person:john chilcot

  • The Chilcot verdict on Iraq: A war crime by British and US imperialism - World Socialist Web Site
    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/07/07/pers-j07.html

    he Chilcot verdict on Iraq: A war crime by British and US imperialism
    7 July 2016

    The report of the Chilcot inquiry into the role of the British government in the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, released Wednesday, provides devastating confirmation of the illegal character of the war and the criminal role of those officials, both British and American, who organized and led it.

    The conclusions of the investigation headed by Sir John Chilcot were issued seven years after the inquiry was first convened. The 2.6 million-word, 13-volume report covers the policy decisions made by the British government, military and intelligence services between 2001 and 2009. The inquiry has no legal powers, and any finding on the legality of the invasion was specifically ruled out by the Labour government of Gordon Brown that established it.

    #irak #chilcot

  • Les regrets de l’homme qui avait attaqué la statue de Saddam - L’Orient-Le Jour
    http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/995108/les-regrets-de-lhomme-qui-avait-attaque-la-statue-de-saddam.html

    L’Irakien filmé en 2003 en train de s’attaquer au marteau à une statue de Saddam Hussein lors de la chute de Bagdad aux mains des troupes américaines estime aujourd’hui que l’Irak allait mieux à l’époque du dictateur et que George W. Bush et Tony Blair devraient être traduits en justice pour avoir ruiné ce pays.

    Kadhim Hassan al-Djabouri a fait ces déclarations mercredi alors qu’en Grande-Bretagne était publié le rapport de la commission présidée par John Chilcot sur la décision du Royaume-Uni et de son Premier ministre d’alors d’entrer en guerre aux côtés des Américains contre l’Irak en 2003.
    « Je regrette d’avoir donné des coups contre la statue », dit Djabouri, chiite qui a perdu plus de dix membres de sa famille sous la dictature de Saddam Hussein, lequel appartenait à la minorité sunnite.

    (...) « J’aimerais que Saddam revienne. Il avait exécuté un bon nombre de membres de ma famille mais malgré cela, il vaut mieux que ces politiciens et dignitaires qui ont plongé l’Irak dans l’état où il se trouve », dit-il en faisant allusion aux partis politiques chiites qui dominent la vie politique du pays depuis le renversement de la dictature.

    (...) Pour Djabouri, Blair et Bush « doivent être traduits devant la justice, car avec leurs mensonges, ils ont acculé l’Irak à la ruine. Il s’est avéré qu’il n’y avait pas d’armes de destruction massive ».

    D’autres Irakiens, qui ont souffert sous Saddam, affichent un point de vue différent et disent leur reconnaissance envers Washington et Londres d’avoir mis fin à la dictature baassiste. « Renverser le régime de Saddam était un rêve qui s’est réalisé grâce aux Etats-Unis et à la Grande-Bretagne, et tous ceux qui sont d’un autre avis sont des menteurs », estime un ancien prisonnier politique, Faris Mohammed, âgé de 46 ans, qui purgeait une peine de réclusion à perpétuité à Bassorah lorsque l’invasion a eu lieu.

    Pourquoi ne peut-on pas s’empêcher de penser à la #syrie ?

  • Outrage as war crimes prosecutors say Tony #Blair will not be investigated over Chilcot’s Iraq war report – but British soldiers could be
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/02/outrage-as-war-crimes-prosecutors-say-tony-blair-will-not-be-inv

    Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court will examine the Chilcot report for evidence of abuse and torture by British soldiers but have already ruled out putting Tony Blair on trial for war crimes, The Telegraph can disclose.

    The decision has outraged families of troops killed in Iraq who blame Mr Blair for engineering the war.

    Sir John Chilcot’s report will finally be published on Wednesday and is expected to strongly criticise Mr Blair’s role in the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

    But in an official statement to the Telegraph, the International Criminal Court (ICC) said its prosecutors would comb through the 2.3 million word report for evidence of war crimes committed by British troops but that decision to go to war remained outside its remit.

    Fatou Bensouda ou pas, c’est pareil,
    http://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/idees/20160602.OBS1810/pourquoi-bush-n-a-t-il-pas-ete-juge-devant-la-cour-penale-intern

    #CPI #parodie #justice #crimes #complicité

  • Tony #Blair hints he could refuse to accept Chilcot’s Iraq war verdict
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/29/tony-blair-hints-he-could-refuse-to-accept-chilcots-iraq-war-verdict

    Sir John Chilcot is due to publish his long-awaited report into the war on 6 July. It is expected to be highly critical of Blair and other political and military figures.
    During the inquiry hearings there was particular focus on evidence suggesting Blair had given a firm commitment to back President George W Bush’s decision to invade while he was publicly saying a final decision had not yet been taken.

  • Tony Blair makes qualified apology for Iraq war ahead of Chilcot report | UK news | The Guardian

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/25/tony-blair-sorry-iraq-war-mistakes-admits-conflict-role-in-rise-of-isis

    Je veux pas spécialement énerver plus @fil mais je référence ce criminel de guerre trop vite poubellisé (sans perspective de procès) pour les archives. Donc Pardon @fil ...

    Tony Blair has moved to prepare the ground for the publication of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war by offering a qualified apology for the use of misleading intelligence and the failure to prepare for the aftermath of the invasion.

    In an interview with Fareed Zakaria on CNN, the former British prime minister declined to apologise for the war itself and defended armed intervention in 2003, pointing to the current civil war in Syria to highlight the dangers of inaction.
    Analysis There is no doubt about it: Tony Blair was on the warpath from early 2002
    Colin Powell’s memo confirms what is broadly known, but will add to pressure on Chilcot inquiry to clear up controversy over PM in run up to invasion of Iraq
    Read more

    Blair, who will be aware of what Sir John Chilcot is planning to say about him in the long-awaited report into the Iraq war, moved to pre-empt its criticisms in an interview with CNN. He told Zakaria: “I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong.

    #tony_blair

  • The #Chilcot Inquiry as Comic Opera » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
    by PATRICK COCKBURN
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/06/02/the-chilquit-inquiry-as-comic-opera

    To give the Chilcot inquiry contemporary relevance, it should extend its brief to cover British military interventions, both small and large scale, conducted subsequent to Iraq but along very much the same lines. Otherwise, the traditional British court of inquiry, so brazenly designed to get the establishment off the hook, will become one more colourful relic of Britain’s past, like Beefeaters or clog dancing.

    The agreement of Sir John Chilcot and Sir Jeremy Heywood to censor the #Bush-#Blair papers comes just as President Obama was spelling out to cadets at West Point his thoughts about America’s role in the world. His speech, at least, had the advantage of looking with attempted realism at contemporary events, such as the civil war in Syria, which David Cameron and William Hague were so willing to join in lock-step with the US last year – until blocked by Parliament which had been soured by past disasters.

    Obama has considered seriously how the world is changing, most especially in Syria, where he said that “as the Syrian civil war spills across borders, the capacity of battle-hardened extremist groups to come after us only increases”. He noted that a new strategy was needed because “today’s principal threat no longer comes from a centralized al-Qa’ida leadership. Instead it comes from decentralised al-Qa’ida affiliates.”

    (...)

    Obama sees the problem, but his prescription of what to do is only going to exacerbate it. He will avoid direct US military action, but will outsource support for the rebels – now too toxic for the US to arm directly – to countries such as Turkey, across whose 510-mile-long border with Syria extreme jihadis pass without hindrance. The situation is not without precedent: after the overthrow in Cambodia of the Khmer Rouge, the murderers of more than a million of their own people, by the Vietnamese army in 1979, the US, China and Britain backed Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge leader, and recognised his government as Cambodia’s true representative at the UN. It was subsequently revealed that the British covertly gave military training to armed groups associated with the Khmer Rouge.

    The jihadi insurgent movements in Syria are the Islamic version of the Khmer Rouge who, like their Cambodian predecessors, dominate the rebel-held enclaves. Moreover, #Isis has seized much of western Iraq right up to the western outskirts of Baghdad. Iraqi security forces are capturing sophisticated weapons from Isis originally supplied by US and British allies to supposed moderate rebels in Syria.

    The potential for disaster in Syria in 2014 is, in many ways, greater than in Iraq in 2003. In this growing crisis, the Chilcot inquiry comic opera is playing a small but ignoble role.

    #Etats-Unis #Turquie #Syrie #Irak