person:moshe feiglin

  • Anti-BDS academics urge ’personal’ sanctions against ’annexationist’ Zionist professors, including renowned political theorist Michael Walzer, say U.S. and EU should restrict visas and freeze assets of Bennett and three others who entrench the occupation.
    By Debra Nussbaum Cohen | Dec. 11, 2014 | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/.premium-1.631336

    NEW YORK –A nascent group of well-known academics is calling on the U.S. government and European Union to impose personal sanctions on four prominent Israelis “who lead efforts to insure permanent Israeli occupation of the West Bank and to annex all or parts of it unilaterally in violation of international law.”

    Scholars for Israel and Palestine (SIP) a group that describes itself as “pro-Israel, pro-Palestine, pro-peace” is asking the U.S. and EU governments to impose visa restrictions and to freeze the foreign assets of Economy Minister and Habayit Hayehudi leader Naftali Bennett, Housing Minister Uri Ariel, Likud MK Moshe Feiglin and Ze’ev “Zambish” Hever, a former Jewish Underground member who heads the Amana organization, which oversees the settlement enterprise, including illegal outposts.

    “We chose four Israeli leaders and public figures to start with because they stand out by working to make the occupation permanent and irreversible,” said Gershon Shafir, a professor of sociology at University of California San Diego, who came up with the concept.

    These four “were particularly dismissive of Secretary of State Kerry’s peace-making efforts, and explicitly call for and work towards the formal annexation of the West Bank or part of it, and thereby push Israel in the direction of violating international law. They are the ones who cross particularly sharp red lines,” Shafir said in an interview initially conducted by email. The approach is being invoked for the first time in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, he said later by telephone.

    The call’s 20 signatories include several well-known academics from UCLA to Boston College and Columbia University, including renowned political theorist Michael Walzer, professor emeritus of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. All the signatories to SIP’s call are Zionists, Walzer said in an interview, and are deeply opposed to academic boycotts.

    The signatories are all members of a group called The Third Narrative established in 2013 by the Labor Zionist group Ameinu as a Zionist-progressive response to far left attacks on Israel – including BDS. One who signed the new call for personal sanctions, Columbia University sociologist Todd Gitlin, published an article last month asserting that broad anti-Israel BDS is a “legal and moral disaster.”

    The new SIP call, which is titled “Israel: A Time for Personal Sanctions,” was also published on the Third Narrative website, though it was not endorsed by the group as a whole.

    Its backers say that it is completely distinct from the BDS resolutions being fought on campuses nationwide, which would effectively ostracize all Israeli academics. This, in contrast, targets some of the individuals most personally responsible for expanding the occupation. It is similar to the approach adopted by President Obama earlier this year when he signed an executive order freezing the assets of seven top Russian officials for their involvement in the annexation of Crimea, they claim.

    “All of us are very engaged in opposing the academic boycott and other boycotts,” said Walzer in an interview. He is author of numerous books, including “In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible,” (Yale University Press) and last year retired as co-editor of Dissent magazine. “But at the same time we always insist we are against the occupation. This seemed to be a usefully dramatic way of focusing attention on where it should be focused and not where some of the BDS people are trying to put it,” Walzer said.

    In their petition, the academics detail their reasons for choosing the four targeted individuals. Bennett is cited for “leading the struggle” against the 2010 settlement freeze during his tenure as director of the Yesha settlements council, for advocating the annexation of Area C, which constitutes 62% of the West Bank, and for “pressing strongly for a policy of creeping annexation” as a cabinet minister. Ariel is blasted for issuing housing tenders across the Green Line and thus undermining Secretary of State John Kerry’s peace efforts and for calling for the establishment of a Third Temple on the Temple Mount. Feiglin is targeted for his “straightforward and undisguised extremism” and anti-Arab statements, while Hever “has been one of the most persistent and influential organizers of settlement construction.”

    Gitlin, a professor of journalism and sociology and longtime participant in protest movements, said that he signed on because “I felt it was time to move the conversation to a different plane.” He first supported a boycott of apartheid South Africa in 1965, he recalled in an interview with Haaretz.

    “The call to condemn right-wing governments is insufficient to get their attention,” he said. “We are holding Israeli figures whose declarations are inimical to a just and peaceful settlement to account,” Gitlin said. “They undermine American policy and security in the Middle East. We think it’s a matter of American policy to say we do not consider these people to be friends of America, but adversaries.”

    Eric Alterman, Distinguished Professor of English at Brooklyn College, is a Third Narrative member who elected not to sign onto the new call for personal sanctions. “I don’t believe in politics that are purely symbolic,” he told Haaretz. “Some people do, and that’s fine. But I only believe in politics when I can see how what I’m supporting might actually happen.”

    Indeed many of The Third Narrative’s Academic Advisory Council’s members did not sign on to the new personal sanctions effort, though Shafir, Gitlin and other signatories to the new call are members of that body as well.

    “This proposal would take us down a route of increasing hostility that can only further isolate Israel from the world community and undermine efforts to build the cooperation necessary to a negotiated settlement,” said Cary Nelson, Jubilee Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. “While I support condemning the views these politicians hold, I cannot support sanctioning them for exercising their free speech rights,” he wrote by email from Israel, which he is visiting.

    The SIP’s call for personal sanctions very specifically opposes wide boycott efforts and its backers are not worried about being lumped together with the BDS proponents who are widely regarded as working toward Israel’s destruction.

    It is “utterly different than anathematizing an entire category of persons like the academic boycott efforts,” Gitlin said. “In this case there is a proper target, people whose activity is toxic and we think they need to be named.”

    “This would provide a way of mobilizing votes against blanket boycotts but equally against the attempts to make the occupation irreversible,” Shafir said. “It would allow us to find a place in the middle and remain distinguished from but remain part of the ongoing dialogue in a productive way that is protective of Israel’s ties with the U.S., the world and liberal intellectuals.”

    “We really are fighting on two fronts,” said Shafir, who was born in Ramat Aviv and began his career at Tel Aviv University, before moving to California in 1987. “That is our identity.”

    Other signatories to the petition include Jeff Weintraub, a political theorist who has taught at the University of Pennsylvania and Israel’s Haifa University; Sam Fleischacker, a philosophy professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago; Alan Wolfe of Boston College; Alan Weisbard of the University of Wisconsin; Rebecca Lesses from Ithaca College; Joe Lockard from Arizona State University; Zachary Braiterman from Syracuse University; Irene Tucker from the University of California, Irvine; Michael Kazin, coeditor of Dissent and professor of history at Georgetown University; Steven Zipperstein from Stanford University; Jeffry Mallow of Loyola University; Rachel Brenner of the University of Wisconsin; Chaim Seidler-Feller of UCLA; Jonathan Malino of Guilford College; Miriam Kastner of UC at San Diego; Barbara Risman from the University of Illinois and Ernst Benjamin, an independent scholar.

  • Le plan effarant de Moshe Feiglin, vice-président de la Knesset

    Avec l’aide de Dieu.

    À l’attention de Monsieur le Premier ministre, Benjamin Netanyahou.

    Monsieur le Premier ministre, nous venons d’apprendre que le Hamas s’est servi du cessez-le-feu pour enlever un officier. Il semble que cette opération ne soit pas prête de se terminer.

    L’échec de cette opération était inévitable depuis ses débuts, car :

    a) Elle n’a aucun objectif clair et précis

    b) il n’y a pas de structure appropriée pour soutenir moralement nos soldats.

    Ce qui est nécessaire, désormais, c’est de comprendre le fait qu’Oslo, c’est terminé ; que c’est notre pays et notre pays exclusivement, y compris Gaza. Il n’y a pas deux États, ni deux peuples ; il n’y a qu’un État pour un peuple.

    Ayant compris celà, ce dont nous avons besoin, c’est d’une révision complète et minutieuse de notre stratégie, en termes de définition de l’ennemi, des tâches opérationnelles, des objectifs stratégiques, et bien entendu, de l’éthique de guerre appropriée.

    1) Définir l’ennemi :

    L’ennemi stratégique est l’Arabe musulman extrémiste sous toutes ses formes, de l’Iran à Gaza, qui cherche à annihiler Israël dans son entièreté. L’ennemi immédiat est le Hamas (pas les tunnels, ni les roquettes ; le Hamas)

    2) Définir les tâches :

    Conquérir la totalité de la bande de Gaza, et annihiler toutes les forces combattantes et leurs soutiens.

    3) Définir un objectif stratégique :

    Transformer Gaza en Jaffa, une ville israélienne florissante comptant un nombre aussi restreint que possible de civils hostiles.

    4) Définir une éthique de guerre :

    « Malheur à celui qui cause le mal, et malheur à son voisin »

    À la lumière de ces quatre points, Israël doit agir de la sorte :

    a) L’IDF [l’armée israélienne] doit désigner certaines zones ouvertes sur la frontière du Sinaï, adjacente à la mer, dans laquelle la population civile serait concentrée, loin des zones urbaines actuellement utilisées pour des tirs de roquettes et où se trouvent des tunnels. Dans ces zones, des campements de tentes seraient établis, jusqu’à ce que des destinations d’émigration adaptées soient déterminées. La distribution d’électricité et d’eau vers la zone autrefois peuplée sera coupée.

    b) La zone autrefois peuplée sera bombardée avec la puissance de feu maximale. L’infrastructure civile et militaire du Hamas dans son intégralité, ses moyens de communication et sa logistique, seront détruites entièrement et rasées.

    c) L’IDF divisera la bande de Gaza latéralement et en travers, étendra de manière significative des corridors, occupera des positions de commandement, et exterminera les poches de résistance, s’il s’avère qu’il en reste.

    d) Israël commencera à chercher des destinations d’émigration et des quotas pour les réfugiés provenant de Gaza. Ceux qui désirent émigrer bénéficieront d’un ensemble de mesures économiques généreuses, et arriveront dans leurs pays d’accueil avec des moyens économiques considérables.

    e) Ceux qui veulent rester, s’il est démontré qu’ils n’ont aucune affiliation avec le Hamas, seront obligés de signer publiquement une déclaration de loyauté à Israël, et recevront une carte d’identité bleue similaire à celle des Arabes de Jérusalem-Est.

    f) Quand les combats seront terminés, la loi israélienne sera étendue afin de couvrir la bande de Gaza toute entière, les gens expulsés de Gush Katif seront invités à retourner dans leurs colonies, et la ville de Gaza et sa périphérie seront reconstruites à l’image de véritables villes touristiques et commerciales israéliennes.

    Monsieur le Premier ministre,

    Nous vivons à un moment-clé de notre destin et de l’histoire de l’État d’Israël. Toutes les métastases que sont nos ennemis, de l’Iran au Hezbollah en passant par l’EIIL et les Frères musulmans, se frottent allègrement les mains et se préparent pour le prochain round. Je vous préviens que toute solution moins ambitieuse que celle que je viens de définir ici signifierait encourager l’offensive constante contre Israël. Il n’y a que lorsque le Hezbollah aura compris comment nous aurons traité le problème du Hamas dans le Sud qu’il cessera de tirer ses 100 000 missiles par le Nord. Je vous exhorte d’appliquer la stratégie proposée ici. Je n’ai aucun doute que l’ensemble de la population israélienne se tiendra à votre droite dans son écrasante majorité, tout comme moi, si seulement vous adoptiez ce plan.

    Avec mes plus hautes considérations, et tout mon respect,

    Moshe Feiglin

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/concentrate-and-exterminate-israel-parliament-deputy-speakers-ga

  • Expel Palestinians, populate Gaza with Jews, says Knesset deputy speaker | The Electronic Intifada

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/expel-palestinians-populate-gaza-jews-says-knesset-deputy-speake

    Un autre député...

    Israel must attack Gaza even more mercilessly, expel the population and resettle the territory with Jews, the deputy speaker of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, has said.

    http://electronicintifada.net/sites/electronicintifada.net/files/styles/large/public/190714_ezz_00_3.jpg?itok=WHs3ALZ7

    Moshe Feiglin, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, makes the call in an article for the Israeli news website Arutz Sheva.

    Feiglin demands that Israel launch attacks “throughout Gaza with the IDF’s [Israeli army’s] maximum force (and not a tiny fraction of it) with all the conventional means at its disposal.”
    Force Gaza population out

    “After the IDF completes the ‘softening’ of the targets with its firepower, the IDF will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations,” Feiglin writes in one of several calls for outright war crimes.

    #gaza #gideon_levy a raison

  • Expel Palestinians, populate Gaza with Jews, says Knesset deputy speaker
    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/expel-palestinians-populate-gaza-jews-says-knesset-deputy-speake

    Israel must attack Gaza even more mercilessly, expel the population and resettle the territory with Jews, the deputy speaker of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, has said.

    Moshe Feiglin, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, makes the call in an article for the Israeli news website Arutz Sheva.

    […]

    “Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever,” Feiglin concludes. “Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel.”

  • Yossi Sarid / Feiglin, his cronies are fascists by any definition
    http://www.haaretz.com/yossi-sarid-feiglin-his-cronies-are-fascists-by-any-definition-1.259197

    Moshe Feiglin has been described as a radical rightist but that’s not his main problem - which has now become the Likud’s problem and our problem. In certain respects, he’s less legitimate than Meir Kahane and far less so than Rehavam Ze’evi, the man who Benny Begin once defined as “a moral infection.” Those were the days in old Jerusalem.

    Sometimes, one wonders how what began as an ignominy deteriorates into abysmal lows. This paper published an interview with Feiglin from 1995, conducted by Ada Oshpiz. “When he reads about Hitler, it is with astonishment,” the reporter wrote.

    In describing Adolf Hitler, Feiglin is quoted to have told her, “Hitler was an unparalleled military genius. Nazism promoted Germany from a low to a fantastic physical and ideological status. The ragged, trashy youth body turned into a neat and orderly part of society and Germany received an exemplary regime, a proper justice system and public order. Hitler savored good music. He would paint. This was no bunch of thugs. They merely used thugs and homosexuals.”

  • Feiglin: Israel misuses Holocaust for political reasons

    GIL HOFFMAN

    | JPost

    http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?ID=309051&R=R1

    Israel must stop using the Holocaust to score political points and should no longer bring foreign leaders and dignitaries to the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Museum, Deputy Knesset Speaker Moshe Feiglin (Likud) told The Jerusalem Post Sunday.

    In comments he originally make at a conference in Shoham Thursday, first revealed by Ma’ariv, Feiglin said that “Israel has wrongly used the Holocaust as a tool to justify our existence and sovereignty here.”

    “They have made it as if we have to have a Jewish state because of the Holocaust,” he told the Post. “When the diplomats are brought to Yad Vashem, they are speechless. But giving only security reasons for being here does not work with new generations in Europe who care about rights. The other side’s incorrect arguments about the land being theirs are more persuasive than the pragmatic arguments about what would happen if there were no Jewish state.”