person:netanyahu

  • There’ll be more Gazas without a two-state solution - Opinion Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.608673
    By Stephen Robert | 00:03 03.08.14

    So much tragedy and insufferable grief now engulfs the Israel-Palestine debate that the past year’s transformation of Israeli politics is easily overlooked. Yet, it is the nutrient for the present catastrophe, and perhaps for even worse in the future.

    In 2009, Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu gave a major speech at Bar Ilan University, which, though highly nuanced, purportedly supported a two state solution. His father, a darling of the right-wing, then gave an interview to Israeli TV in which he stated that his son would never approve a state the Palestinians could possibly accept. The past year has demonstrably proved the father’s prophecy.

    Netanyahu’s pretense to the contrary has been demolished, both by others and himself. Since there is no other sustainable solution, Palestinians have now lost all hope of their God-given right to govern themselves with the dignity humanity demands. History informs us that when that hope is lost, radicalism will ensue. Occupiers lose in the end.

  • This is Netanyahu’s final status solution
    Noam Sheizaf
    http://972mag.com/this-is-netanyahus-final-status-solution/94938

    Netanyahu’s approach is consistent. The conflict is for him a zero-sum game, and therefore one need not move beyond “a modified status quo.” One should use the regional and international system to search for ad-hoc coalitions, rather than rely on long-term relationship and agreements. One should try to avoid using military force, yet still prefer it to concessions; when the moment of decision comes, the choice is clear. One should also continue to colonize land, but at a pace that takes geopolitical circumstances into account.

    These ideas now represent the Israeli mainstream. Save for the issue of settlements, the differences between Labor’s Herzog, Livni, Lapid, Netanyahu and Liberman are minor. You hear the same thinking echoed in Israeli think tanks, op-ed pages and conferences. It is ironic that Israel accused Palestinians of a “unilateral move” when they tried to take their statehood bid to the United Nations (!), when unilateralism is at the heart of Israeli thinking.

  • Les #Etats-Unis « consternés » par le bombardement d’une #école de l’ONU à Gaza - L’Orient-Le Jour
    http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/879148/les-etats-unis-consternes-par-le-bombardement-dune-ecole-de-lonu-a-ga

    #Netanyahu avait du insulté #Obama

    « Les Etats-Unis sont consternés par le bombardement #honteux d’une école de l’#UNRWA (l’agence de l’#ONU pour l’aide aux réfugiés palestiniens, ndlr) à Rafah », a déclaré Jennifer Psaki dans un communiqué. « Nous insistons une nouvelle fois sur le fait qu’#Israël doit faire plus pour respecter ses propres standards et éviter les #victimes_civiles ».

    Et ce n’est pas tout,
    https://twitter.com/APDiploWriter/status/495995464396050435

    Le fait qu’il soit soupçonné que des militants opèrent a proximité [des locaux de l’UNRWA] ne justifie pas des frappes qui mettent en péril la vie de tant de civils #innocents.

    Et encore,
    http://www.boursorama.com/actualites/washington-condamne-l-attaque-contre-une-cole-de-l-onu--gaza-95307b3096c

    La porte-parole du Département d’État américain Jen Psaki a
    également appelé à une enquête concernant les récentes attaques
    menées contre des écoles gérées par l’UNRWA, l’agence de l’Onu
    chargée de l’aide aux réfugiés palestiniens.

    • Réaction à l’espionnage de Kerry ?
      http://seenthis.net/messages/281973

      Sinon, aujourd’hui, le New York Times a un portfolio avec des images très dures des victimes et des destructions à Gaza :
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/04/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-conflict.html
      Ce qui fait penser à ce que raconte Chomsky sur le Vietnam : selon lui, les médias ont commencé à publier des images insoutenables à partir du moment où l’establishment a décidé qu’il fallait mettre fin à l’intervention (alors que le mythe usuel est de prétendre que c’est parce que les médias ont publié des images insoutenables que l’establishment a dû céder à l’opinion publique).

    • Sinon, une possibilité est que, comme en 2006 au Liban, les États-Unis décrètent la fin des hostilités pour sortir Israël de son enlisement. Les rumeurs d’un décision unilatérale d’Israël d’arrêter son action vont bon train depuis 48 heures. Il me semble assez crédible que les États-Unis viennent donner un alibi à Netanyahu.

      (Où est l’article qui évoquait ce scénario il y a quelques temps ?)

    • Top 5 Ways the US is Israel’s Accomplice in War Crimes in Gaza | Informed Comment
      http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/israels-accomplice-crimes.html

      Despite this bold criticism, the State Department and the US government won’t actually do anything about Israel’s lawlessness in Gaza. That is because the US is a full ally of the Likud government in its war on Gaza, which is configured as a fight to destroy or attrite the capabilities of the Hamas party-militia, a Muslim fundamentalist movement that has foresworn any attack on US facilities or interests. As the head of US military intelligence recently testified, however, if Hamas were destroyed something worse would almost certainly take its place. That is because you can’t expect people to live the way Israel makes them live in Gaza without their forming a resistance movement. Since they are kept poor and on the edge of hunger, the resistance movements they throw up are lean and hungry, and as ruthless as the Israeli army.

      Here are the ways that the US is actively helping Israel in its war on Gaza:

      1. The US shares its raw signals intelligence directly with Israeli intelligence, enhancing Israeli eavesdropping and surveillance capabilities, as Glenn Greenwald shows in a new article for Firstlook. Israel somewhat ungratefully repaid the favor by collaborating with Russia to spy on John Kerry during his failed peace negotiations.

      2. The US continually replenishes Israel’s ammunition. If Washington were actually so distressed about the UNRWA school shelling, it could just stop sending the shells for a while. It did this to Egypt after the massacre at Rabi`a al-Adawiya last summer.

      3. The US State Department actively helps Israel to economically blockade the civilians of Gaza. It even pressures Egypt to uphold the blockade (which is why it is silly to say that Egypt is also responsible for the siege of Gaza; Egypt doesn’t have a choice in this policy that is made from Tel Aviv and promulgated from Washington).

      4. Amnesty International shows that “Since 2012, the USA has exported $276 million worth of basic weapons and munitions to Israel, a figure that excludes exports of military transport equipment and high technologies.”

      5. The US actively opposed the granting by the UN to Palestine of the status of nonmember observer state. It is this status that Palestine could use to go to the International Criminal Court and get a judgment against Israel for its illegal squatting on Palestinian land in the West Bank. That the US opposed Palestine having standing to apply to the ICC shows how hand in glove Washington is with Israel.

  • Israel seeks to end Gaza operation unilaterally
    After a five-hour meeting Friday, cabinet decides against further cease-fire negotiations, relying instead on restoring Israel’s deterrence.
    By Barak Ravid | Aug. 2, 2014 | 6:00 PM
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.608462

    The senior officials said that ministers were unanimous in the cabinet meeting in their position that there is no point in pursuing cease-fire negotiations after Hamas violated the previous one by capturing an IDF soldier on Friday. According to the officials, the ministers also agreed that the captured soldier will not change Israel’s overall strategy. In other words, the IDF will continue its operations to destroy the tunnels and the ground operation will not be significantly expanded at this stage.

    The cabinet also decided that instead of efforts to reach a cease-fire through negotiations, Israel will focus on restoring Israel’s deterrence against Hamas. The senior officials said that in light of the failed cease-fire efforts, Israel will consider ending the operation and unilaterally leaving Gaza, relying on deterrence.

    • The senior officials said Israel will also try to reach an understanding with Egypt, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and the international community on the issue of reconstructing the Gaza Strip, preventing Hamas from re-arming itself and monitoring material entering Gaza.

    • Oh Punaise ! ils détruisent et parlent de reconstruction et veulent en plus imposer leur maître d’œuvre. Ils chassent les gens de leurs maisons, bombardent les maisons et leur disent maintenant qu’ils peuvent rentrer chez eux.
      Les mots manquent pour qualifier cette toute-puissance fasciste.

      “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
      Israël pilonne encore Gaza mais épargne certains secteurs
      http://www.romandie.com/news/Israel-pilonne-encore-Gaza-mais-epargne-certains-secteurs_RP/503932.rom

      L’armée israélienne a donné samedi de premiers signes d’une fin de ses opérations dans des secteurs limités de la bande de Gaza. Mais elle a poursuivi ailleurs un pilonnage qui a encore fait des dizaines de tués.

      Pour la première fois depuis le début le 8 juillet de l’opération israélienne, et surtout de sa phase terrestre le 17 juillet, des témoins ont rapporté à un journaliste de l’AFP avoir vu les soldats israéliens se retirer de villages proches de Beit Lahiya (nord) et de Khan Younès (sud).

      Dans le même temps, l’armée israélienne a annoncé que les civils pouvaient « rentrer en toute sécurité à Beit Lahiya et Al-Atatra », a expliqué à l’AFP une porte-parole de l’armée, laissant entendre que l’armée estime avoir terminé ses opérations dans ces secteurs.

      Elle y avait ordonné aux habitants d’évacuer le temps qu’elle mène ses opérations destinées à réduire le danger représenté pour Israël par le Hamas. Le mouvement islamiste contrôle le territoire d’une dizaine de kilomètres de large au maximum.

      Au moins 57 tués
      L’armée israélienne a conseillé aux habitants qui rentreraient « de faire attention aux engins explosifs que le Hamas a disséminés dans la zone ».

      Et le reste de la bande de Gaza était toujours soumis au feu israélien, 24 heures après qu’une illusion de cessez-le-feu eut volé en éclats.

      Samedi, au moins 57 personnes ont été tuées rien que dans les environs de Rafah, selon les secours locaux. Depuis l’échec du cessez-le-feu, au moins 114 personnes ont péri dans le secteur, a dit le porte-parole des secours, Ashraf al-Qodra. Quinze des victimes, dont cinq enfants âgés de 3 à 12 ans, étaient membres de la même famille. Des centaines de maisons ont été détruites.

      La guerre en cours a coûté la vie à 1654 Palestiniens, très majoritairement des civils, selon M. Qodra. Côté israélien, plus de 60 soldats et 3 civils ont été tués.

    • Conclude operation and come home - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews
      http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4553925,00.html

      Netanyahu delayed his appearance by 20 minutes because of the comments made by the family members of kidnapped officer Hadar Goldin. The family demanded defiantly that the IDF avoid leaving the Strip as long as their son was in Hamas’ hands, dead or alive.
       
      Netanyahu and Ya’alon did not accept the demand, but were forced to rewrite their speeches. From an announcement about a unilateral withdrawal of IDF forces from the Strip, Netanyahu moved to vague, unbinding sentences, such as “all options are on the table.” When the Americans say that about Iran, we know there are neither options nor a table, that it’s all talk. I doubt Netanyahu has any options.

    • Israel and Palestinians agree to 72-hour cease-fire - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz
      http://seenthis.net/messages/282451

      11:20 P.M. Israeli cabinet ministers accepted the Egyptian proposal for a 72-hour cease-fire without preconditions, a senior Israeli official says. The unconditional cease-fire will last for 72 hours, with a possibility for extension. During the coming days, an Israeli delegation will set out for Cairo for talks on a more permanent cease-fire agreement.

      The senior official stated, “if the cease-fire lasts, there will not be a need for a continued IDF presence within the Gaza Strip,” meaning that the IDF forces that have remained in Gaza will likely return to Israeli territory a few hours after the cease-fire goes into effect. (Barak Ravid)

  • Poll : More Than 50% Of Jewish Israelis Think Netenyahu Is Being Too Soft On Gaza
    http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/07/30/poll-more-than-50-of-jewish-israelis-think-netenyahu-is-being-too-sof

    Before we move on, it is worth a brief reminder of the devastating results of the attacks on #Gaza. Here are the losses from the UN’s latest report:

    Yet according to Strategist Roni Rimon, who sponsored the poll, Netanyahu would pay a political price at home if he pushed for peace:

    All the compliments Netanyahu has received for running the operation, his restraint, thinking things through, and obtaining international support will be lost and will be replaced with criticism. But this is the test of a leader. If he believes that the greater good of Israel requires a cease-fire because of relations with the United States and the international community, he will put ratings aside and do what he thinks is right. We shall wait and see.

    Another poll released Monday showed similar results. The poll showcased that less than 10% of Israeli Jews supported a ceasefire with Hamas, while 86.5% opposed ceasefire. http://www.jpost.com/Operation-Protective-Edge/Poll-865-percent-of-Israelis-oppose-cease-fire-369064

    Something truly toxic is spreading across #Israel. It’s called #fascism, and it manifests itself in the words and deeds of lawmakers, troops and ordinary citizens.

    In recent weeks, Israel’s Deputy Speaker #Moshe_Feiglin has called for the ‘elimination’ of Palestinian life in Gaza, while fellow Likud party lawmaker #Ayelet_Shaked demanded the murder of Palestinian mothers and children – and got thousands of Facebook likes from doing so. Days later, renowned Israeli academic #Mordechai_Kedar proposed the use of rape against female relatives of Palestinian armed resistance fighters as a ‘preventative’ measure.

    Meanwhile, mobs have taken to the streets of Jerusalem to chant “Death to all Arabs”, and “School’s out in Gaza tomorrow, There are no children left!” in the style of a football cheer.

    A quick glance to the social media activity of young Israelis provides an insight into this growing dehumanisation of Palestinians.

    A Facebook page has been set up this week called “Standing With the IDF”, where women are encouraged to post revealing images of themselves covered in pro-IDF graffiti.

    A Facebook page titled “The People of Israel Demand Vengeance!” set up in the wake of the murder of three Israeli teens is the same bizarre mix of sex and incitement. Teens post sun-drenched selfies, no different to so many others filling instagram…except for the fact they are holding placards calling for ‘Death to All Arabs’, or the one below, which reads: Hating Arabs is Not Racism, It’s Moral Values’.

    And on the same page, this reaction to the kidnap and murder of teenage Palestinian Mohammed Khadir, in a so-called ‘revenge’ attack that saw the boy forced to drink petrol and burned alive.

    #fascisme en #Israël

  • Saudi, Egypt and Israel work together in Gaza attack
    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/13044-saudi-egypt-and-israel-work-together-in-gaza-attack-

    The war on Gaza is planned and orchestrated by Israel, Saudi and Egypt, a report by DEBKA-Net-Weekly said yesterday.

    “Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, Egyptian President Fatah Al-Sisi and Netanyahu... [are] in constant communication on the war’s progress and confers on its next steps. Our sources reveal daily conferences, and sometimes more, between King Abdullah and President Sisi over a secure phone line,” the newsletter said.

    DEBKA, thought to have close ties with Israeli intelligence agencies, said the world leaders go to great lengths to ensure their alliance remains undiscovered “given the political and religious sensitivities of their relationship”. Fearful of having even their secure lines intercepted, they prefer to send secret missions to visit each other and discuss the ongoing conflict.

    “Israel keeps a special plane parked at Cairo’s military airport ready to lift off whenever top-secret messages between Sisi and Netanyahu need to be delivered by hand. The distance between Cairo and Tel Aviv is covered in less than an hour and a half,” DEBKA explained.

    L’article (#paywall) chez Debka:
    http://www.debka.com/article/24125/The-Gaza-War-against-Hamas-Is-Managed-by-a-Troika-Abdullah-Sisi-and-Netanyahu

    À rapprocher de l’article de David Hearst, Attack on Gaza by Saudi Royal Appointment
    http://seenthis.net/messages/279411

    Et celui du Akhbar: Saudi Arabia behind effort to disarm the Palestinian Resistance
    http://seenthis.net/messages/279365

    • Saudi crocodile tears over Gaza | David Hearst
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-hearst/saudi-crocodile-tears-ove_b_5628185.html

      La réponse de David Hearst

      Decide what it is you want the Kingdom to say. You can’t say both. You can’t swear allegiance to the Palestinians and give a nod and a wink to their killers.

      And are the kingdom’s dealings with Israel really “limited to bring about a plan for peace”? You are privy to the cables, Mr Ambassador. Tell us what passed between Prince Bandar and the Mossad director Tamir Pardo at that hotel in Aqaba in November last year. The Jordanians leaked it to an Israeli newspaper in Eilat. Were Bandar and Pardo: 1. soaking up the winter sun 2. talking about the Arab Peace Initiative or 3. plotting how to bomb Iran?

      And why are your new friends the Israelis being so loquacious? Why, to take the latest example, did Dan Gillerman, Israeli ambassador to the UN 2003-08, say at the weekend that “representatives from the Gulf states told us to finish the job in Gaza time and again”. Finish the job? Killing over 1000 Palestinians, most of them civilian. Is that you meant when you said “we will never do anything to harm them”?

      The carnage in Gaza at least gives the world clear sight of the protagonists. The wonder of it is that all are American allies, three have US bases on their soil and a fourth is a member of Nato. America’s problems in the Middle East are more to do with their sworn allies than their sworn enemies.

      On one side, stands Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates and Jordan. They consider themselves the voice of reason and moderation, but their methods are violent - the military coup in Egypt and the attack on Gaza have all happened in the space of 12 months. On the other, stands Turkey, Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood and its affliate Hamas.

      We should ,however, talk of governments rather people, because one reason why the government of Saudi Arabia has such an extreme position on Hamas and the Brotherhood in general, is that it knows full well that its own people don’t share their view.

      Saudi Arabia’s leading pollster Rakeen found that 95% out of a representative sample of 2000 Saudis supported the continuation of the Palestinian resistance factions. Only three per cent did not. 82% supported the firing of rockets into Israel and 14 % opposed it. The kingdom’s hatred of Islamism stems not from the fact that it presents a rival interpretation of Islam. It is that it presents to a believer, a democratic alternative. That is what really scares the monarchy.

      The proof of all those secret Saudi-Israeli meetings is to be seen in the behaviour of Egypt. It is impossible to believe that its new president Abdel Fattah al Sisi could act towards Hamas in Gaza independently of his paymasters in Riyadh. He who pays the piper - $5bn after the coup, $20bn now - calls the tune.

      (...)

      Saudi Arabia is treading a fine line. According to my sources, Netanyahu’s rejection of Kerry’s peace initiative over the weekend was due in part to the full support of its Arab allies. Saudi Arabia’s active support is keeping this brutal war going .

  • Jeremy Bowen’s Gaza notebook: I saw no evidence of Hamas using Palestinians as human shields
    http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2014/07/jeremy-bowens-gaza-notebook-i-saw-no-evidence-hamas-using-palestinians

    I was back in London for my son’s 11th birthday party by the time all those people were killed in Shejaiya. But my impression of Hamas is different from Netanyahu’s. I saw no evidence during my week in Gaza of Israel’s accusation that Hamas uses Palestinians as human shields. I saw men from Hamas on street corners, keeping an eye on what was happening. They were local people and everyone knew them, even the young boys. Raji Sourani, the director of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights in Gaza, told me that Hamas, whatever you think of it, is part of the Palestinian DNA.

    […]

    But it is wrong to suggest that Israeli civilians near Gaza suffer as much as Palestinians. It is much, much worse in Gaza. I defy anyone with an ounce of human feeling not to feel the same after ten minutes in Gaza’s Shifa Hospital with wounded and dying civilians. In the mortuary, it’s so overcrowded that the bodies of two children are crammed on to a single shelf. One day, they had only found enough of the remains of six women and children to fill a single stretcher.

    Before Gaza, I’d spent most of the past two months in Baghdad, Beirut, Jerusalem, Aleppo and Damascus. The Middle East is on fire. I haven’t seen anything like it since my first reporting trip to the region in 1990. I don’t think anyone knows how to put the fire out.

  • Netanyahu’s real goal - Le Monde diplo - English edition

    http://mondediplo.com/blogs/gaza-netanyahu-s-real-goal

    Yet Hamas’ insistence on firing rockets into Israel plays into the hands of the Likud’s longstanding ambitions to permanently alter the ‘facts on the ground’ in Gaza through extreme force. And given the vast military disparity between Hamas and the IDF — illustrated in the casualty figures — this is not a war. Rather, it is a colonial massacre to expunge Palestinians from their ancestral homeland.

    #gaza #colonisation

  • Sans limites: Netanyahu: Hamas wants “telegenically dead Palestinians”
    http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-hamas-wants-telegenically-dead-palestinians

    “They want to pile up as many civilian dead as they can,” the prime minister continued. “They use telegenically dead Palestinians for their cause. They want the more dead, the better.”

    La vidéo:
    http://edition.cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2014/07/20/sotu-blitzer-intv-netanyahu.cnn

  • What’s coming next - Norman G. Finkelstein
    http://normanfinkelstein.com/2014/finkelstein-on-whats-coming-next

    (1) Netanyahu exploited the ceasefire ultimatum (a trap laid by Blair, but of course with Obama’s connivance), and the downing of the Malaysian airliner (which displaced Gaza from the headlines), to launch the ground invasion. However, it is only a limited invasion because of the broad constraints still imposed on Israel by international public opinion. It gives Netanyahu enough time and leeway to clobber Hamas and “mow the grass” in Gaza. 

    (2) But Netanyahu can’t declare victory until the Hamas projectile attacks cease, and without a full-scale invasion he can’t stop them. Here’s where Abbas comes in. Abbas will negotiate an agreement with Egypt whereby the PA will staff Rafah crossing, enabling Abbas to declare that he won an end to the blockade. The quid pro quo, however, is that he will agree to prevent any arms smuggling into Gaza and to disarm Hamas.  

    Because
    (a) Hamas’s key demand was to end the blockade,
    (b) Hamas is isolated politically and neutered militarily, and
    (c) Abbas is technically the head of the Unity government, Hamas will be forced to agree to these terms. 

    If things go according to plan, it will mark the end of Hamas as a resistance movement, to the joy of the Arab states, the US, EU, Israel and, of course, the PA.

  • Gaza: Netanyahu’s real goal, by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
    http://mondediplo.com/blogs/gaza-netanyahu-s-real-goal

    On the pretext that Hamas has rejected Egypt’s proposed ceasefire, Israel is escalating Operation Protective Edge with plans for intensified airstrikes. Now IT has launched its much-vaunted ground invasion, likely designed to collapse Gaza’s civilian infrastructure — on Tuesday, the IDF called on residents of eastern and northern #Gaza — some 100,000 people — to evacuate their homes.

    The only conceivable objective of this total war on Gazan society is the forced displacement and expulsion of the Palestinian people from their homes.

  • Growing Up Privileged in Apartheid, Colonial Israel - Shir Hever on Reality Asserts Itself (1/5) | TRNN 2014-07-09

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1BqNlSpD7g

    La trace écrite via http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12088

    Shir Hever is an economic researcher in the Alternative Information Center, a Palestinian-Israeli organization active in Jerusalem and Beit-Sahour. Hever researches the economic aspect of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territory, some of his research topics include the international aid to the Palestinians and to Israel, the effects of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories on the Israeli economy, and the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns against Israel. His work also includes giving lectures and presentations on the economy of the occupation. He is a graduate student at the Freie Universitat in Berlin, and researches the privatization of security in Israel. His first book: Political Economy of Israel’s Occupation: Repression Beyond Exploitation, was published by Pluto Press.

    [...]

    HEVER: I was born in Jerusalem, and I was born into a lefty household, a critical household. And the most important thing that I think my parents taught me and raised me with is this idea that I have to be aware of my own privileges and to take responsibility for them, because Israeli society is extremely divided and extremely hierarchical, and I am lucky to have been born male, white, Jewish, Ashkenazi, so in all of these categories in which I had an advantage, and my parents told me this is an unfair advantage.

    [...]

    JAY: Now, just because it’s an interesting kind of historical note, there’s kind of two types of Zionist fascists. There are Zionists who are simply very aggressive against Palestinians and people called them fascists, and then there are Zionists who loved Mussolini.

    HEVER: Yeah, I’m talking about the second kind. I’m talking about real—people who really adopt this kind of Zionist—or this kind of fascist ideology that the state is above everything, and that we all have to conform to a certain idea, and that we should find our great leader. So that kind of Zionism is not mainstream, actually, and it’s not in power. In many demonstrations that I had the chance to go to, people tend to shout that fascism will not pass.But, of course, when you look at it from a more academic point of view, there’s a difference between fascism and other kinds of repressive regimes, and I would say Israel is a colonial regime, a colonialist regime, in which there’s apartheid, there’s very deep entrenched repression.

    But in a colonialist system there’s always fear. And you grow up with this fear also. You always know—.

    JAY: Did you?

    HEVER: Yeah, yeah. I mean, when I would go to certain areas or when I took a taxi with a Palestinian driver, then even my closest family would get nervous about it. And then it made me wonder: how come you taught me that everybody’s equal but you’re still afraid of Palestinians?

    [...]

    (M)y close family, my immediate family, they were very supportive of my opinions. And we had many political debates at home—sometimes arguments, but in the end I think for the outsider it doesn’t seem like we’re that much far apart. When you go a little bit further to the extended family, then that’s a whole different story. And most of the family on my mother’s side stopped speaking with me after I decided not to go to the army. And so, yeah, my mother’s parents, who were fighters in the Palmach, they had a completely different worldview and a very Zionist right-wing perspective in which they believe that all of these policies against Palestinians were completely justified.

    JAY: And your grandparents, were any of them—when did they come to Israel? Did you have direct family that were killed during World War II?

    HEVER: Yeah. So this is actually the exact—the interesting intersection of two stories, because my mother’s side of the family came to Palestine before the Holocaust, before the Second World War, and participated in the Nakba against Palestinians. And my father’s family—.

    JAY: So they came during the ’30s or ’20s?

    HEVER: Yeah, over some time, but yeah. And my father’s family came right after the war. They escaped from the Nazis in Poland. And the vast majority of the family in Poland was exterminated by the Nazis. So they escaped to the Soviet Union, where they lived pretty harsh years during the war. And then the family scattered again, and that part of the family that chose to go to Palestine, to Israel, happened to be my side of the family.

    [...]

    HEVER: That is a concept called Hebrew labor, and it was done very openly and without shame because there was at that point of time no concept that such structural and comprehensive racism against a particular group of people is something that Jews should also be worried about. I mean, it wasn’t something that was even in people’s minds so much, because Palestinians were part of the scenery, part of the background, and not treated as the native inhabitants of Palestine. But it has to be said also that during those fights it wasn’t—even though it was a colonial situation, in which Zionists were supported by foreign powers in coming and colonizing Palestine, it wasn’t clear if they were going to succeed or not, and it wasn’t clear until 1948 whether they would succeed or not. So from the personal stories of these people, they saw themselves as heroes or as overcoming a great adversity, and not as people who had all their options and decided that here’s a little piece of land that we want to add to our collection. From their point of view, this was their chance to have their own piece of land, and when looking at the colonial powers, the European colonial powers operating all of the world, they didn’t think that what they were doing was so strange or peculiar.

    [...]

    HEVER: And during the ’90s there was—the Oslo process began. There was a coalition between Yitzhak Rabin from the Labor Party and Meretz, which was the part that they supported. Meretz was the liberal party for human rights, but still a Zionist party. And this coalition started to negotiate with Yasser Arafat and to start the Oslo process. But at the same time, they would implement these policies that were just completely undemocratic and—for example, to take 400 people who were suspected of being members of the Hamas Party without a trial and just deport them. And at that point my parents had a kind of crisis of faith and they decided not to support his party anymore. And I would say this is the moment where Zionism was no longer accepted.

    [...]

    HEVER: I think the moment that I made that choice is actually much later, because it’s possible to have all these opinions but still play the game and go to any regular career path. But after I decided not to go into the army and after I decided to go to university, in the university I experienced something that changed my mind.

    JAY: But back up one moment. You decide not to go into the army. (...) That’s a big decision in Israel.

    HEVER: Well, I was again lucky to be in this very interesting time period where Netanyahu just became prime minister, and he was being very bombastic about his announcements, and a lot of people started doubting the good sense of going into the army. So it was a time where it was relatively easy to get out. At first I thought, I will go into the army, because I went to a very militaristic school. My school was very proud of all the intelligence officers that used to come out of it. So I thought, okay, I don’t want to be an occupier, I don’t want to be a combat soldier in the occupied territory, but if I’ll find some some kind of loophole that I can be a teacher or do some kind of noncombat work for the army, I’ll do that.

    [...]

    And I used to support the Oslo process, because I used to read the Israeli newspapers, and it seemed like Israel is being very generous and willing to negotiate, when in fact—. But my mother, I said that she was working for the government. She would bring me some documents about the Oslo process, and there I would be able to read about the water allocation and about land allocation and say, well, this is certainly not a fair kind of negotiation. But then, when the Second Intifada started, it was repressed with extreme violence by the Israeli military, by the Israeli police. And that was also a moment in which I felt that even living in Israel is becoming unbearable for me. But there’s always kind of the worry, is it going to get to the next step? I think this immediate tendency to compare it with the ’30s in Germany is because it’s a Jewish society.

    [...]

    –-----

    oAnth :

    Palmach

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmach

    The Palmach (Hebrew: פלמ"ח, acronym for Plugot Maḥatz (Hebrew: פלוגות מחץ), lit. “strike forces”) was the elite fighting force of the Haganah, the underground army of the Yishuv (Jewish community) during the period of the British Mandate for Palestine. The Palmach was established on 15 May 1941. By the outbreak of the Israeli War for Independence in 1948 it consisted of over 2,000 men and women in three fighting brigades and auxiliary aerial, naval and intelligence units. With the creation of Israel’s army, the three Palmach Brigades were disbanded. This and political reasons led to many of the senior Palmach officers resigning in 1950.

    Hebrew Labor

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_labor#Terminology

    "Hebrew labor" is often also referred to as “Jewish labor” although the former is the literal translation of “avoda ivrit”. According to Even-Zohar the immigrants of the Second Aliyah preferred to use the word “Hebrew” because they wanted to emphasize the difference between their “new Hebrew” identity and the “old Diaspora Jewish” identity. For them the word “Hebrew” had romantic connotations with the “purity” and “authenticity” of the existence of the “Hebrew nation in its land”, like it had been in the past.

    Related to the concept of “Hebrew labor” was the concept of “alien labor”. Ben-Gurion wrote about the settlers of the First Aliyah: “They introduced the idol of exile to the temple of national rebirth, and the creation of the new homeland was desecrated by avodah zara”. According to Shapira avodah zara means both “alien labor” and, in a religious sense, “idol worship”. Along with bloodshed and incest this is one of the three worst sins in Judaism. Application of this concept to the employment of Arab workers by Jews depicted this as a taboo.

    Meretz

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meretz#Ideology

    Meretz defines itself as a Zionist, left-wing, social-democratic party. The party is a member of the Socialist International and an observer member of the Party of European Socialists. It sees itself as the political representative of the Israeli Peace movement in the Knesset – as well as municipal councils and other local political bodies.
    In the international media it has been described as left-wing, social-democratic, dovish, secular, civil libertarian, and anti-occupation.

    –----------------------------------

    #Palestine #Palästina
    #Israel

    #histoire #Gechichte #history
    #20e_siècle #20th_c

    #Meretz #Palmach #Hebrew_Labor
    #Intifada
    #Apartheid

    • Fear and Loathing in Israel- Shir Hever on Reality Asserts Itself (2/5) | TRNN 2014-07-10
      http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12093

      HEVER: I think there’s something to be said about stereotypes, and there is a kind of stereotype about Jews that—there used to be a stereotype about Jews as being a very weak and frail kind of people who are supporting human rights because they don’t have the strength to defend themselves. And that’s obviously a racist stereotype, just as much as the stereotype that says that Jews are violent brutes that just want to kill Palestinians and are inherently hateful towards Palestinians. And this is something—I mean, I grew up, like anyone in Israel, learning the story of the Holocaust and repeating it year after year. But I learned it in the sense of the Holocaust is a universal story. So the Germans were not particularly evil. They were—these were circumstances that made a certain atrocity come into this world. And it’s unfortunately not unique. This kind of dark side exists in all human beings.

      And so the Zionist movement has attracted some of the worst Jews around the world, those people who wanted to use force to get more property and more land. It also attracted people of completely different ideals; it also attracted very progressive people; but those were, unfortunately, somewhat sidelined, because Israel became this kind of very authoritative country—state in which Palestinians have very little if any rights.

    • [ @Kassem, merci pour avoir continué les extraits! ]

      Israel, World Capital of Homeland Security Industries - Shir Hever on Reality Asserts Itself (3/4) | TRNN 2014-07-10

      "... so the attacks become demos ..."

      http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12101

      [...]

      HEVER: [A]ctually, Israel is now the world capital of homeland security industries. They’re selling security cameras, surveillance equipments, drones, riot gear. That is the sort of technology that governments need in order to control their citizens. And it comes not just with the actual technology; it comes also with an ideology. It comes with the ideology that, look what Israel is doing, how Israel is controlling Palestinians and every aspect of their lives, and decides who can pass and who gets a permit and so on, and uses this technology to leave Palestinians no option to resist, and why don’t we sell that to other governments around the world. For example, Brazil bought a lot of that technology in order to repress the favelas in preparation for the World Cup. We see that in India, not just in the area of Kashmir, but mainly there along the border with Pakistan, and in East Europe. And we also see that with extreme-right governments, like Berlusconi in Italy that was worried about asylum-seekers coming from Africa, and using Israeli drones and Israeli technology to try to block that, but also not just buying the technology, but also buying the legitimacy, saying Israel is a wonderful country. Berlusconi was a big pro-Israeli spokesman. And if Israel is allowed to do it, we can do it too.

      [...]

      Ehud Barak, he has done many political mistakes in the last couple of years, and it seemed that he is not going to be able to get into the government again. So he said, I’m now going to do what I actually like to do best: I am going to the private sector. And then it becomes apparent that he has many friends who own these security companies, and he can open doors for them, and he can get a lot of money from them. So, obviously, these security companies’ business model is built on the occupation. These are companies that their motto when they go to arms trade shows and show their equipment, they say, this has already been tested by the Israeli army on actual people. You can only have that because of the occupation. So every new weapon is first sold to the Israeli army, shot at Palestinians. Then you can sell it.

      JAY: Yeah, and they probably have nice little sales videos showing how this all works.

      HEVER: Of course. Yeah. After this invasion of Gaza that we were talking about, there was a trade show that the Israeli army did where they showed how each and every of these new inventions were used in the attack on Gaza, completely shamelessly.

      JAY: So the attacks become demos.

      HEVER: The attacks become demos, and these companies make a profit out of it, and then these companies are hiring senior Israeli officials. I don’t think that means that they want to end the peace process or sabotage the peace process; it means they want to continue it forever, because as long as it continues, they can continue these periodic attacks and they can continue the occupation.

      JAY: Yeah, ’cause the peace process is a process of never come to an agreement about peace.

      [...]

    • An Occupier’s Peace or a Just Peace - Shir Hever on Reality Asserts Itself (4/4) | TRNN 2014-07-13
      Mr. Hever says the occupiers always want peace - one that strengthens the status quo

      http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12105

      [...]

      HEVER: I think the vast majority of the Israeli public wants peace. But a famous German military thinker, Clausewitz, has once said the occupier always wants peace. Peace means the status quo. That’s why Palestinians don’t call for peace, they call for a just peace. And that’s also why the Israeli peace movement has collapsed, because the peace movement had this kind of idea that if Palestinians would be offered peace, they would just accept that the current situation will continue. And, of course, that’s a completely false premise. But there are, of course, people in Israel who do have an incentive to end the occupation and to end the injustice. A lot of Israelis are suffering because of the massive cost of security that is needed to repress the Palestinians. I would say the majority of Israelis are losing in their standard of living because of this continued repression of Palestinians, because of the continued conflict. So they have a real interest even in a just peace, but their voices are not heard and they cannot be heard within this kind of colonial system, which is dominated by those elites who are actually profiting

      [...]

      Jay: [I]f you were going to try to create a model that would be, one, sellable, not just just. I mean, you can imagine a just model, which is pretty straightforward. It’s a Democratic, single secular state and everybody gets to vote and it’s, you know, a modern country. But right now that’s not a sellable proposition. So some people, like, just as example, some people have talked a possible federated state, where you have a province or a state within a Federation which is primarily Jewish. Hebrew would be the language. You would have another one, another state, which is primarily—Arabic is the primary language, and so on, or some configuration. You must have thought about this. What might be possible?

      HEVER: It’s not only that I’ve thought about it, that this is also almost an obsession, but not just for me, but for political activists, for leftists for years. But I want to answer you in two parts. The first part, I have to say, again I have to be very sensitive to my own position of privilege. Being an Israeli Jew and saying well, this is the solution is not going to work, and it shouldn’t be, it shouldn’t work. Palestinians should not get their solution from some Israeli. They have to come up with their own platform for political change. And therefore I have to be very careful in how I answer that sort of question.Having said that, let me tell you what voices I hear from my Palestinian friends about what they’re saying. And among these voices, you can hear a lot of those ideas of a federation, a confederation, two separate states, three separate states, one democratic state, joining with Egypt. You can hear a lot of interesting ideas. But the voice that comes out the clearest in the last few years is the voice that says, we don’t care about that. All of these ideas are legal demarcations, are some kind of—where you put the border here or there. That’s not important. The important thing is to talk about rights, talk about how we have the right to move wherever we want, to say whatever we want, to have a government that represents us, to organize, to practice our religion, to trade freely. That’s what it means to be free. And then it doesn’t matter so much exactly how many borders you’re going to stretch across this territory. If we’re practical about it, historically Palestine is a country that was divided by the UN, but in fact there has never been a Palestinian state there. There’s always been one powerful force of Israel and some areas that were temporarily held by Egypt and Jordan, and then Israel occupied these parts as well. Now we have a situation in which there’s one state under Israeli domination with a population of 12 million, 49 percent Jews, 49 percent Palestinians, 2 percent others. And it’s an apartheid state.

      [...]

  • Israeli-Palestinian MKs cower to Netanyahu’s calls to end the protests
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/israeli-palestinian-mks-cower-netanyahu%E2%80%99s-calls-end-prote

    A protestor holds a portrait of #Mohammed_Abu_Khudair, a 16-year-old Palestinian from east #jerusalem who was kidnapped and killed in a suspected revenge attack, during a protest in the northern Israeli Arab city of Acre on July 7, 2014. (Photo: AFP-Ahmed Gharabli) A protestor holds a portrait of Mohammed Abu Khudair, a 16-year-old Palestinian from east Jerusalem who was kidnapped and killed in a suspected revenge attack, during a protest in the northern Israeli Arab city of Acre on July 7, 2014. (Photo: AFP-Ahmed Gharabli)

    The sight of protests and burning garbage containers bothered some Israeli-Palestinian MKs in the Israeli Knesset, who made a call to “stop the violence and put an end to the protests.” Along with (...)

    #Palestine #Articles #avigdor_lieberman #benjamin_netanyahu #gaza_strip #Haifa #Israel #Nazareth #west_bank

  • Palestinian detainees vow to keep up hunger strike: ’Death over compromise’
    Prime Minister Netanyahu looks for way to legally force-feed rather than negotiate with the 100-125 hunger-striking detainees.
    By Jack Khoury | Jun. 10, 2014
    Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.597827

    The leadership of the Palestinian administrative detainees announced on Monday morning that the detainees are unwilling to compromise in their struggle and that they will continue their hunger strike even if it costs them their lives.

    Through their attorney, the detainees sent the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club a letter claiming that the medical teams who are treating the 70 hospitalized detainees were collaborating with the Prisons Service, and that some of the detainees had been chained to their hospital beds.

    “The nurses, who are supposed to be angels of mercy, come into our rooms with food to break our spirits, but we will not give up until we accomplish our goal, and we are willing to die for it,” the detainees wrote. “Each one of us has already written his will, and we have sworn that there is no way back.”

    Regarding the claim that some of the hospitalized hunger-strikers are chained to their beds, the detainees wrote, “We hear comments such as ‘Crucify them,’ and then their right arms and left legs are chained to the bed 24 hours a day.” They added that most of them are suffering from side effects, that 13 detainees suffer from bleeding and that some are suffering from low blood sugar. “We ask the world how long they will ignore us. Maybe if we die, the world will wake up.”

    Israel has 189 people in administrative detention. Between 100 and 125 detainees are participating in the hunger strike, which was declared on April 24. They are drinking water with vitamins, salt and sugar. The medical condition of about 70 of these has deteriorated, and they are hospitalized under heavy guard. From time to time, security prisoners begin solidarity hunger strikes with the administrative detainees in one of the prisons, for a limited time.

  • #Netanyahu, Peres congratulate Sisi on electoral win
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/netanyahu-peres-congratulate-sisi-electoral-win

    The prime minister and president of #Israel both spoke with #Abdel_Fattah_al-Sisi on Friday to congratulate him on his victory in Egyptian presidential elections and to stress the importance of bilateral ties. The separate phone calls came two days before Sisi was due to be installed in office following his comprehensive ballot-box win last month. Neither Prime Minister #benjamin_netanyahu nor President #Shimon_Peres spoke with the previous Egyptian head of state, the Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Mursi, who was toppled from power last year by Sisi following street protests. read more

    #Egypt

  • On ’Jerusalem Day,’ Netanyahu vows never to divide the city
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/jerusalem-day-netanyahu-vows-never-divide-city

    Police closed off the Al-Aqsa compound to visitors on Wednesday as Israelis marked #jerusalem Day, with Prime Minister #benjamin_netanyahu pledging to never allow the city to be divided. The annual celebration, which began at sundown on Tuesday, recalls the moment when Israeli forces took over the walled Old City on the third day of the 1967 Six-Day War. #Israel later annexed the entire eastern side of the city in a move never recognized by the international community. read more

    #Palestine

  • Israël et l’Ukraine : une ambiguïté extrême
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article-isra_l_et_l_ukraine_une_ambigu_t_extr_me_12_04_2014.html

    • La position d’Israël vis-à-vis de la crise ukrainienne est d’une ambiguïté exemplaire. • Les liens avec Moscou comptent-ils plus dans ce cas que les liens avec Washington ?

    • U.S. officials angry: Israel doesn’t back stance on Russia
      Amid tension, Netanyahu backs out of event he was invited to personally by Putin.

      http://www.haaretz.com/mobile/.premium-1.585333?v=D97A0B2854A04B94D98D82EF9EBCFBD7
      By Barak Ravid
      Published 02:49 13.04.14

      White House and State Department officials in Washington have built up a great deal of anger over Jerusalem’s “neutrality” regarding Russia’s invasion of the Crimean Peninsula. Senior figures in the Obama administration have expressed great disappointment with the lack of support from Israel for the American position on the Ukraine crisis and with the fact that the Israeli government puts its relations with the United States and with Russia on the same plane.

      One senior U.S. official noted that one of the reasons for the anger in the White House was Israel’s absence from the UN General Assembly vote about two weeks ago on a resolution censuring the Russian invasion and expressing support for the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

      “We have been consulting closely on Ukraine not only with our partners and allies around the world," a senior U.S. official told Haaretz. "Obviously we are looking to the entire international community to condemn Russia’s actions and to support Ukraine, so we were surprised to see that Israel did not join the large majority of countries that voted to support Ukraine’s territorial integrity at the United Nations.”

      A senior Israeli official said that Israel’s absence from the United Nations vote was viewed around the world as an extremely irregular measure, a departure from a long-standing Israeli policy of voting with the United States in the UN. While the Americans viewed Israel’s behavior as ungrateful, in light of Washington’s unshakable support for Jerusalem in the UN, in the Kremlin and in the Russian media Israel’s action was seen as an expression of support for Moscow, or at the very least a lack of opposition to the invasion of Ukraine.

      According to the Israeli official, in response to U.S. inquiries Israel attributed its absence at the vote to the strike by the Foreign Ministry’s employees. The White House and the State Department found the explanation wanting, especially in light of the lack of advanced notice from Jerusalem.

  • U.S. Hawks Take Flight over #Ukraine - Inter Press Service
    http://www.ipsnews.net/2014/03/u-s-hawks-take-flight-ukraine

    #Neocons et #Netanyahou : L’invasion de la #Crimée c’est parce que Obama n’a pas frappé la Syrie et il faut maintenant frapper l’Iran pour que Poutine revienne sur ses pas.

    ... speaking before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), McCain also blamed Obama’s alleged timidity – particularly his failure to carry out his threat to take military action against Syria last September – for the situation. “(T)his is the ultimate result of a feckless foreign policy in which nobody believes in America’s strength anymore,” McCain said to thunderous applause from the hawkish audience whom Netanyahu will address Tuesday.

    Indeed, Israel-centred neo-conservatives, for whom Obama’s “weakness” and “appeasement” in dealing with perceived adversaries have become a mantra over the past five years, have been quick to use the Ukraine crisis to argue for toughening Washington’s position in the Middle East, in particular.

    “In the brutal world of global power politics, Ukraine is in particular a casualty of Mr. Obama’s failure to enforce his ‘red line’ on Syria,” according to the Journal’s editorial writers, who stressed that “(a)dversaries and allies in Asia and the Middle East will be watching President Obama’s response now. …Iran is counting on U.S. weakness in nuclear talks.”

    “Like Putin, the ayatollahs likely see our failure to act in Syria … as a sign that they can drive a hard bargain indeed with us over their nuclear weapons program, giving up nearly nothing and getting sanctions relief,” wrote Abrams on his Council on Foreign Relations blog over the weekend.

    “And now they see us reacting (so far) to Russian aggression in Ukraine, sending troops across the border into the Crimea, with tut-tutting,” he added in a call for Congress – likely to be echoed by Netanyahu here this week — to pass stalled legislation imposing new sanctions against Tehran.

    “That makes about as much sense …as saying that a proper response to a terrorist act by an Afghanistan-based group is to launch a war against Iraq,” replied Paul Pillar, the intelligence community’s top analyst for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, on his nationalinterest.com blog Monday.

  • Palestinians: #Netanyahu speech effectively ends negotiations - Diplomacy and Defense #Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.577941

    Herzog added that he “believes less and less that Netanyahu can or wants to be the one who leads us to a diplomatic solution.”

    He added that he “opposes with all my heart the #boycott movement against Israel, but unfortunately it is turning into a strategic threat and the lack of diplomatic progress can only assist it.”

  • Medics : Palestinian killed in Israel airstrike | Maan News Agency
    http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=678371

    GAZA CITY (Ma’an) — A young Palestinian man was killed and three others were injured Monday in an Israeli airstrike on al-Sikka street in Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip, medics said.

    They told Ma’an that Musab Moussa al-Zaaneen , 21, was pronounced dead on arrival at Kamal Adwan hospital. The others were moderately and seriously injured.

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    En partant pour les Etats-Unis, Netanyahu promet de résister aux pressions
    http://www.romandie.com/news/n/_En_partant_pour_les_Etats_Unis_Netanyahu_promet_de_resister_aux_pressions

    (...) M. Netanyahu estime que l’obstacle principal à la paix est l’absence de volonté des Palestiniens d’accepter un État juif.

    Les commentateurs israéliens faisaient d’ailleurs état dimanche du pessimisme de Washington sur les chances d’un accord prochain, d’autant que la crise ukrainienne risque de rejeter au second plan la visite de M. Netanyahu.

    Contrairement aux informations selon lesquelles le président Obama a l’intention de s’engager directement dans les négociations, il semble être trop occupé avec la crise en Ukraine et ne s’attend pas à ce qu’un tel effort de sa part ait une très grande chance d’aboutir, pronostique le quotidien populaire Yediot Aharonot.

    Mardi, M. Netanyahu doit s’adresser à la conférence annuelle du principal groupe de pression américain pro-israélien AIPAC, où il doit évoquer le dossier nucléaire iranien. (...)

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Obama appelle Netanyahu à prendre des décisions difficiles pour la paix
    http://www.romandie.com/news/n/_Obama_appelle_Netanyahu_a_prendre_des_decisions_difficiles_pour_la_paix_R

    De son côté, le dirigeant de l’Etat hébreu a estimé que contrairement à son pays, les Palestiniens n’avaient pas fait le nécessaire dans ce dossier, a constaté un journaliste de l’AFP dans le Bureau ovale.

    Pour l’instant, Israël a démantelé des colonies et relâché des centaines de terroristes palestiniens, a remarqué M. Netanyahu. Israël a fait ce qu’il devait, et je suis désolé de le dire, mais les Palestiniens n’ont pas fait de même, a-t-il poursuivi.

  • Bibi has turned me into an ’anti-Semite’
    Un article assez drôle sur comment “on devient antisémite”

    Haaretz, By Roy Isacowitz | Feb. 19, 2014
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.575170

    I’ve spent the last couple of days battling to come to terms with the fact that I’m an anti-Semite.

    It’s not an easy thing to accept for someone who has been Jewish since birth, has lived in Israel for over 40 years and who likes to believe that he doesn’t have a racist bone in his body. In fact, it’s a real blow.

    But it must be true because Prime Minister Netanyahu said it was – and we all know that Bibi would never play fast and loose with the truth on matters as sacred as anti-Semitism and the Holocaust.

    To be specific, Netanyahu described supporters of a boycott against Israel, of which I am one, as “classical anti-Semites in modern garb.” In the past, the prime minister said earlier this week, “anti-Semites boycotted Jewish businesses - and today they call for the boycott of the Jewish state.”

    Case closed. Everyone who supports a boycott against Israel as a means of pressuring it to drop its insane and suicidal dominion over the Palestinian people is a classical anti-Semite. Not an ordinary, run-of-the-mill kind of anti-Semite, note, but a classical one – the type who flips through the Protocols of Zion before turning out the light at night and believes that Jews use Christian blood in baking their matzot.

    It’s also worth noting that the government’s boycott law specifically includes any “area under Israel’s control,” which means that even refraining from drinking Golan wine is a sure sign of anti-Semitism. So, the next time you want to check the place of origin of a packet of parsley in the supermarket, think again. Next thing you know, you’ll be spray-painting swastikas on walls.

    It’s like drugs, this anti-Semitism stuff. You start with something small, like avoiding herbs from Gush Etzion, and before you know it you’re foaming at the mouth and mainlining Mein Kampf. Or arguing that disinvestment might prompt Israeli businessmen to pay a little more attention to what’s going on in their back yard.

    Same thing, really; anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism. Only a proto-anti-Semite would look for nuances in the filth and the muck. Luckily, we have our sharp and unerring prime minister to fend off the danger and keep us on the straight and narrow. Only he knows how fiendishly devious the anti-Semites really are.

    It’s going to take me time to get used to being a classical anti-Semite. It’s like discovering in my sixties that my biological father was actually Himmler or that I was mistakenly swapped with another baby at birth. (I wonder if he also turned out to be an anti-Semite.) An entire lifetime of self-discovery needs to be scrapped and the process begun again from scratch.

    Not that it was entirely unexpected, to be honest. I understood relatively early on that the progressive, non-racial Judaism I imbibed with my mother’s milk (what was in that damn milk, for Christ sake?) was very far from the Judaism that drives Israel. So, pretty much from the start, I’ve been a bit of a Jewish sore thumb in Israel; an anachronism among my exclusivist and revanchist fellow Jews.

    But I never thought of myself as an anti-Semite. A non-mainstream Israeli, certainly; a non-Zionist, probably – even, perhaps, a quasi-self-hating Jew. But never an anti-Semite.

    Now, thanks to the prime minister, I have seen the light. I’m too old and too set in my ways to change my politics, so I’m just going to have to get used to being an anti-Semite and make the best of it. Learn to love my anti-Semitic self, as contemporary pop-psychology would have it.

    And I’m pleased to say that there do seem to be some glimmers of illumination, if not exactly hope. For one thing, we anti-Semitic boycotters seem to be souring the mood of the prime minister and his cohorts. There’s no doubt that they’re concerned by all this boycott stuff - very concerned, even - and concerned Jews should make an anti-Semite happy, I guess. I’m still a novice anti-Semite, so I don’t really know. But the signs are good.

    Then there’s the odd, niggling doubt I’ve had on occasion about my political positions – like on Iran, for example. To me, Netanyahu has always seemed to have a Strangelovian obsession with nuking Iran, but I’ll admit to moments during which I’ve questioned whether perhaps he knows more about what’s going on than I do; he is the prime minister, after all.

    Now, I no longer have to worry. As an anti-Semite, I can trash the Jewish prime minister without qualm or conscience. After all, if being pro-Israel means being as intellectually dishonest as the prime minister is, then being an anti-Semite is probably a step up.

    #BDS