person:roger cohen

  • Bret Stephens’s greatest hits
    http://mondoweiss.net/2017/04/bret-stephenss-greatest

    I was shocked last night when I learned that Bret Stephens has been hired as an op-ed columnist by the New York Times. Being an idealist, I’ve always believed that the Times is going to begin to reflect progressive opinion on Israel and Palestine; but this hire told me I’m dreamin. It goes to show, there really is a neoconservative bloc at the Times. That’s why Jodi Rudoren was Jerusalem bureau chief (and told readers about “a sliver of opportunity” in Gaza). It’s why Bill Kristol was a columnist for a while. It’s why editors always let through stupid headlines about Jerusalem. It’s why the op-ed page is all Zionist, from Roger Cohen to David Brooks to waffling Tom Friedman. And why the paper slags the boycott movement against Israel without rejoinder from pro-BDS voices.

    But let’s hear from the temperamental Stephens himself; let’s see why I think this hire is so problematic. What characterizes Stephens’s speech is an irritable callowness that easily flares into prejudice. That prejudice is conventional neoconservative, and Jewish-centric with a boyish gloss. A former editor of the Jerusalem Post— the launching pad for Wolf Blitzer and Jeffrey Goldberg — Stephens is often Islamophobic.

  • US “errors” and the debacle in the Middle East - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/08/28/cohe-a28.html

    More pro-war propaganda from NY Times columnist Roger Cohen
    US “errors” and the debacle in the Middle East
    By Bill Van Auken
    28 August 2014

    With the Obama administration on the brink of launching yet another war in the Middle East, this time extending its resumption of the US intervention in Iraq across the border into Syria, the US media has gone into overdrive in churning out propaganda justifying military action. Exploiting the revulsion over the recent execution of American photojournalist Richard Foley, the attempt is being made to present the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which has overrun large swathes of both countries, as evil incarnate and an imminent terrorist threat.

    #moyen-orient #guerre

  • « La France décapitée » : les Français n’aiment pas la modernité ? - Atelier des médias
    http://atelier.rfi.fr/profiles/blogs/la-france-d-capit-e?xg_source=msg_mes_network

    « La France décapitée ». C’est le titre d’un article d’opinion publié sur le New York Times en cette veille d’anniversaire de la prise de la Bastille. Il a été écrit par Roger Cohen qui suit les affaires européennes depuis Londres et qui connaît bien la région. Le titre est provocateur et le contenu mérite réflexion. Son affirmation principale est que « les Français n’aiment pas la modernité. Ils n’ont pas confiance dans la modernité. C’est le noyau du problème. Ils ne l’aiment pas et n’ont pas confiance en elle pour deux raisons. La modernité a redéfini l’espace et relégué l’Etat. C’est intolérable ».

    Un article au titre provocateur dont le contenu mérite réflexion [l’article].

    Un propos qui n’est pas avare en images chocs (la légende de St Denis décapité, nos têtes « jivarisées » ...) tout ça pour ne pas dire qu’il existe en France et ailleurs une approche critique des technologies de l’information, partie la plus visible d’une soit-disant « post-modernité ».

  • Anonymous Israeli Official Tells Post: You Can’t Trust Persians
    http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/10/01/anonymous-israeli-official-tells-post-you-cant-trust-persians

    Anonymity is, according to the Post’s own rules, something to be granted to sources very rarely, and for good reason. I’m not sure “Persians are liars” meets those standards. The Post’s rationale for granting anonymity here is that the government officials were told not to speak before Netanyahu’s address. But it’s hard to imagine how “Don’t trust Iranians” might be considered an especially risky bit of information to share.

    Or is the Post now ready afford other government officials the permission to make anonymous ethnic smears? The Post’s rules state, “Sources who want to take a shot at someone in our columns should do so in their own names.” I guess, in this case, a “shot” wasn’t taken at “someone”–just all Iranians.

    • En fait c’est la totale : ils sont non seulement perses mais aussi chiites.

      NYT Columnist : You Can’t Trust Shiites
      http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/09/27/nyt-columnist-you-cant-trust-shiites

      Today New York Times columnist Roger Cohen (9/27/13) offered some reasons to be skeptical of what we’re hearing from Iranian president Hassan Rouhani. He is, after all, Muslim:

      As the Iranians say, “Not everything round is a walnut”–and not every form of “heroic flexibility” is an olive branch. Iran always operates on at least two tracks; to do otherwise would be simplistic. Its Shiite religion permits, in some circumstances, the embroidering of the truth for the protection of the faith, a divinely sanctioned dissimulation. This is a land where straight talk and virtue are not widely seen to overlap.

      Now, I prefer a different kind of skepticism, one that is not religiously based; I.F. Stone’s famous pronouncement that “all governments lie” is a better, less bigoted principle for evaluating world leaders.

      ...

      Jewish scholars and some Christians theologians such as Martin Luther have produced similar ethical doctrines about the acceptability of lying to prevent a greater evil. And antisemites have cited these Talmudic discussions to make the argument that Jews can’t be believed.

      ...

      #pitoyable

  • Démission de Salam Fayyad, premier ministre démissionnaire de l’Autorité palestinienne (suite et pas fin)

    Classique malentendu/ manipulation entre la presse et un politique qui va convaincre les convaincus que Salam Fayyad servait davantage les intérêts des Israéliens et des Américains que ceux des Palestiniens. Le premier article est le démenti de ses propos publié par l’agence de presse officielle palestinienne (WAFA), le second article, du New York Times, est l’article incriminé.

    Article 1
    Fayyad denies statements in the New York Times article
    http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=22289

    “RAMALLAH, May 4, 2013 (WAFA) – Outgoing Prime Minister Salam Fayyad’s office Saturday denied statements slamming the Palestinian leadership which were attributed to Fayyad in an interview with the New York Times.

    Fayyad’s office said in a statement, “The statements in the article are just journalist Roger Cohen’s personal impressions, and certainly not the words of Fayyad, who did not make any statements or conduct interviews for the New York Times or any other newspaper or agency since his resignation.”

    The New York Times published on May 3 an article titled “Fayyad Steps Down, Not Out” by Cohen, in which Fayyad allegedly described the Palestinian leadership as “failed”.

    Cohen quoted Fayyad saying “It is incredible that the fate of the Palestinian people has been in the hands of leaders so entirely casual, so guided by spur-of-the-moment decisions, without seriousness. We don’t strategize, we cut deals in a tactical way and we hold ourselves hostage to our own rhetoric.”

    Cohen’s article caused an uproar among Palestinians while Fayyad’s office said that this article must not be published as an interview with Fayyad.”

    Article 2
    Op-Ed Columnist
    Fayyad Steps Down, Not Out
    By Roger Cohen
    Published: May 3, 2013

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/04/opinion/global/Roger-Cohen-Fayyad-Steps-Down-Not-Out.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    « (…) Yet the Fatah old guard with their sweet deals wants Fayyad gone; Hamas hates him as a supposed American stooge, and Abbas has tired of this U.S.-educated “turbulent priest.” So the president hesitates. He mumbles about a “unity government” with Hamas. He does little. And Fayyad is at his desk when he might be eating sweet pastries with his family.

    “Our story is a story of failed leadership, from way early on,” Fayyad tells me. “It is incredible that the fate of the Palestinian people has been in the hands of leaders so entirely casual, so guided by spur-of-the-moment decisions, without seriousness. We don’t strategize, we cut deals in a tactical way and we hold ourselves hostage to our own rhetoric.” (…) “This party, Fatah, is going to break down, there is so much disenchantment,” Fayyad predicts. “Students have lost 35 days this year through strikes. We are broke. The status quo is not sustainable.”

  • http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/21/opinion/sunday/cohen-jews-in-a-whisper.html?_r=2

    Roger Cohen :

    "Jewish identity is an intricate subject and quest. In America, because I’ve criticized Israel and particularly its self-defeating expansion of settlements in the West Bank, I was, to self-styled “real Jews,” not Jewish enough, or even — join the club — a self-hating Jew. In Britain I find myself exasperated by the muted, muffled way of being a Jew. Get some pride, an inner voice says, speak up!

    But it’s complicated. Britain, with its almost 300,000 Jews and more than two million Muslims, is caught in wider currents — of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and political Islam. Traditionally, England’s genteel anti-Semitism has been more of the British establishment than the British working class, whereas anti-Muslim sentiment has been more working-class than establishment.

    Now a ferocious anti-Zionism of the left — the kind that has called for academic boycotts of Israel — has joined the mix, as has some Muslim anti-Semitism. Meanwhile Islamophobia has been fanned by the rightist fabrication of the “Eurabia” specter — the fantasy of a Muslim takeover that sent Anders Breivik on his Norwegian killing spree and feeds far-right European and American bigotry.

    Where then should a Jew in Britain who wants to speak up stand? Not with the Knesset members who have met in Israel with European rightists like Filip Dewinter of Belgium in the grotesque belief that they are Israel’s allies because they hate Muslims. Not with the likes of the Jewish writer Melanie Phillips, whose book “Londonistan” is a reference for the Islamophobes. Nor with those who, ignoring sinister historical echoes, propose ostracizing Israeli academics and embrace an anti-Zionism that flirts with anti-Semitism.

    Perhaps a good starting point is a parallel pointed out to me by Maleiha Malik, a professor of law at King’s College London. A century ago, during the Sidney Street siege of 1911, it was the Jews of London’s East End who, cast as Bolsheviks, were said to be “alien extremists.” Winston Churchill, no less, argued in 1920 that Jews were part of a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development.”

    “The lesson is clear: Jews, with their history, cannot become the systematic oppressors of another people. They must be vociferous in their insistence that continued colonization of Palestinians in the West Bank will increase Israel’s isolation and ultimately its vulnerability.

    That — not fanning Islamophobia — is the task before diaspora Jews.”