person:russ

  • John Berger, la vie du monde | Joshua Sperling
    https://www.revue-ballast.fr/john-berger-la-vie-du-monde

    Il fut peintre, poète, romancier, essayiste, critique d’art et scénariste — peut-être en oublie-t-on. Il donna la moitié de la dotation d’un prix littéraire aux Black Panthers, correspondait avec le sous-commandant insurgé Marcos et comptait parmi les membre du comité de soutien du Tribunal Russell sur la Palestine. John Berger, natif de Londres, a disparu en France en 2017, à l’âge de 90 ans, où il vivait dans un hameau de Haute-Savoie. Lorsqu’on lui demandait s’il était, le temps passant, toujours marxiste, il répondait : « Jamais la dévastation provoquée par la poursuite du profit n’a eu l’ampleur qu’elle a aujourd’hui… » — donc oui. Portrait. Source : (...)

  • Mini cheetah is the first four-legged robot to do a backflip

    Robot’s lightweight, high-power design is the perfect platform to share and play, developers say.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNeZWP5Mx9s

    MIT’s new mini cheetah robot is springy and light on its feet, with a range of motion that rivals a champion gymnast. The four-legged powerpack can bend and swing its legs wide, enabling it to walk either right-side up or upside down. The robot can also trot over uneven terrain about twice as fast as an average person’s walking speed.

    Weighing in at just 20 pounds — lighter than some Thanksgiving turkeys — the limber quadruped is no pushover: When kicked to the ground, the robot can quickly right itself with a swift, kung-fu-like swing of its elbows.

    Perhaps most impressive is its ability to perform a 360-degree backflip from a standing position. Researchers claim the mini cheetah is designed to be “virtually indestructible,” recovering with little damage, even if a backflip ends in a spill.

    MIT’s new mini cheetah robot is the first four-legged robot to do a backflip. At only 20 pounds, the limber quadruped can bend and swing its legs wide, enabling it to walk either right side up or upside down. The robot can also trot over uneven terrain about twice as fast as an average person’s walking speed.

    Video: Melanie Gonick/MIT

    In the event that a limb or motor does break, the mini cheetah is designed with modularity in mind: Each of the robot’s legs is powered by three identical, low-cost electric motors that the researchers engineered using off-the-shelf parts. Each motor can easily be swapped out for a new one.

    “You could put these parts together, almost like Legos,” says lead developer Benjamin Katz, a technical associate in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering.

    The researchers will present the mini cheetah’s design at the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, in May. They are currently building more of the four-legged machines, aiming for a set of 10, each of which they hope to loan out to other labs.

    “A big part of why we built this robot is that it makes it so easy to experiment and just try crazy things, because the robot is super robust and doesn’t break easily, and if it does break, it’s easy and not very expensive to fix,” says Katz, who worked on the robot in the lab of Sangbae Kim, associate professor of mechanical engineering.

    Kim says loaning mini cheetahs out to other research groups gives engineers an opportunity to test out novel algorithms and maneuvers on a highly dynamic robot, that they might not otherwise have access to.

    “Eventually, I’m hoping we could have a robotic dog race through an obstacle course, where each team controls a mini cheetah with different algorithms, and we can see which strategy is more effective,” Kim says. “That’s how you accelerate research.”

    “Dynamic stuff”

    The mini cheetah is more than just a miniature version of its predecessor, Cheetah 3, a large, heavy, formidable robot, which often needs to be stabilized with tethers to protect its expensive, custom-designed parts.

    “In Cheetah 3, everything is super integrated, so if you want to change something, you have to do a ton of redesign,” Katz says. “Whereas with the mini cheetah, if you wanted to add another arm, you could just add three or four more of these modular motors.”

    Katz came up with the electric motor design by reconfiguring the parts to small, commercially available motors normally used in drones and remote-controlled airplanes.

    Each of the robot’s 12 motors is about the size of a Mason jar lid, and consists of: a stator, or set of coils, that generates a rotating magnetic field; a small controller that conveys the amount of current the stator should produce; a rotor, lined with magnets, that rotates with the stator’s field, producing torque to lift or rotate a limb; a gearbox that provides a 6:1 gear reduction, enabling the rotor to provide six times the torque that it normally would; and a position sensor that measures the angle and orientation of the motor and associated limb.

    Each leg is powered by three motors, to give it three degrees of freedom and a huge range of motion. The lightweight, high-torque, low-inertia design enables the robot to execute fast, dynamic maneuvers and make high-force impacts on the ground without breaking gearboxes or limbs.

    “The rate at which it can change forces on the ground is really fast,” Katz says. “When it’s running, its feet are only on the ground for something like 150 milliseconds at a time, during which a computer tells it to increase the force on the foot, then change it to balance, and then decrease that force really fast to lift up. So it can do really dynamic stuff, like jump in the air with every step, or run with two feet on the ground at a time. Most robots aren’t capable of doing this, so move much slower.”

    Flipping out

    The engineers ran the mini cheetah through a number of maneuvers, first testing its running ability through the hallways of MIT’s Pappalardo Lab and along the slightly uneven ground of Killian Court.

    In both environments, the quadruped bound along at about 5 miles per hour. The robot’s joints are capable of spinning three times faster, with twice the amount of torque, and Katz estimates the robot could run about twice as fast with a little tuning.

    The team wrote another computer code to direct the robot to stretch and twist in various, yoga-like configurations, showcasting its range of motion and ability to rotate its limbs and joints while maintaining balance. They also programmed the robot to recover from an unexpected force, such as a kick to the side. When the researchers kicked the robot to the ground, it automatically shut down.

    “It assumes something terrible has gone wrong, so it just turns off, and all the legs fly wherever they go,” Katz says.

    When it receives a signal to restart, the robot first determines its orientation, then performs a preprogrammed crouch or elbow-swing maneuver to right itself on all fours.

    Katz and co-author Jared Di Carlo, an undergraduate in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), wondered whether the robot could take on even higher-impact maneuvers. Inspired by a class they took last year, taught by EECS Professor Russ Tedrake, they set about programming the mini cheetah to perform a backflip.

    “We thought it would be a good test of robot performance, because it takes a lot of power, torque, and there are huge impacts at the end of a flip,” Katz says.

    The team wrote a “giant, nonlinear, offline trajectory optimizations” that incorporated the robot’s dynamics and actuator capabilities, and specified a trajectory in which the robot would start out in a certain, right-side-up orientation, and end up flipped 360 degrees. The program they developed then solved all the torques that needed to be applied to each joint, from each individual motor, and at every time period between start and end, in order to carry out the backflip.

    “The first time we tried it, it miraculously worked,” Katz says.

    “This is super exciting,” Kim adds. “Imagine Cheetah 3 doing a backflip — it would crash and probably destroy the treadmill. We could do this with the mini cheetah on a desktop.”

    The team is building about 10 more mini cheetahs, each of which they plan to loan out to collaborating groups, and Kim intends to form a mini cheetah research consortium of engineers, who can invent, swap, and even compete with new ideas.

    Meanwhile, the MIT team is developing another, even higher-impact maneuver.

    “We’re working now on a landing controller, the idea being that I want to be able to pick up the robot and toss it, and just have it land on its feet,” Katz says. “Say you wanted to throw the robot into the window of a building and have it go explore inside the building. You could do that.”

  • (20+) Jack l’Eventreur, viscéralement misogyne - Libération
    https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2016/08/19/jack-l-eventreur-visceralement-misogyne_1473479

    En 2015, de nombreux habitants de l’East End ont très mal vécu l’érection d’un musée entièrement consacré à l’œuvre de Jack l’Eventreur - en l’occurrence le massacre, à l’automne 1888, de cinq prostituées et le vol de certains de leurs organes. Surtout qu’à l’origine, l’homme derrière le projet, Mark Palmer-Edgecumbe, ancien chef de la diversité chez Google, avait promis qu’on érigerait là « le premier musée dédié aux femmes » du Royaume-Uni - ce qui devait théoriquement inclure l’histoire des premières suffragettes. Cela doit être de l’humour anglais : en lieu et place de cartels sur des militantes féministes, les Londoniens se sont retrouvés avec des mannequins ensanglantés sur le sol, un large couteau, de l’hémoglobine factice, des ambiances brumeuses qui rappellent le fog local, ainsi que des répliques de missives écrites à l’encre rouge sang, alors même que la majorité des lettres attribuées à Jack l’Eventreur sont, rappelons-le, de notoires fumisteries écrites par des rigolos pathologiques en mal d’attention médiatique (déjà). Bref, le tout ressemble à un mauvais épisode de Faites entrer l’accusé, mais sans Christophe Hondelatte qui relève son col de manteau à la fin. Résumons ainsi cette mascarade ironico-sexiste : à un musée célébrant les femmes et leurs combats politiques, on a préféré ouvrir un lieu mettant en scène les forfaits d’un meurtrier en série, qui les tuait précisément parce qu’elles étaient des femmes.
    Un « folklore » macabre et navrant

    Cette grotesque histoire démontre une fois de plus que Jack l’Eventreur est, depuis son apparition sur les registres de Scotland Yard, l’objet d’une inépuisable fascination macabre en Angleterre - en témoignent les objets qu’on peut acquérir à la boutique de souvenirs du « musée » : tee-shirt blanc avec silhouette en haut-de-forme et traces de sang, sifflet estampillé « Jack the Ripper » (pour prévenir la police ?). Imaginerait-on, en France, l’ouverture d’un musée « Emile Louis », avec une réplique grandeur nature de son car de ramassage scolaire ?

    Les crimes de Jack l’Eventreur étaient-ils misogynes ? Indéniablement. C’est même l’une des seules choses dont on soit à peu près sûr. Les cinq victimes canoniques sont des femmes, toutes des prostituées ; certains de leurs organes sexuels, comme l’utérus ou le vagin, ont été prélevés par le tueur. C’est pourtant l’élément qui est le moins mis en avant dans la foultitude de publications qu’experts en criminologie et autre « ripperologues » autoproclamés publient chaque année dans toutes les maisons d’édition de la planète. On préfère se concentrer sur « l’enquête », pourtant lacunaire, mais surtout sur les théories autour de l’identité du meurtrier, alimentant ainsi la machine à fantasmes. Ne serait-il pas un barbier juif de Whitechapel (suspect idéal : Aaron Kosminski, qu’un Anglais richissime du nom de Russell Edwards a cru récemment confondre à l’aide de son ADN, ayant acheté pour une somme faramineuse un châle censément attribué à l’une de ses victimes) ? Le prince Albert Victor de Galles, petit-fils de la reine Victoria ? Le chef du département d’enquêtes criminelles de Scotland Yard ? Ou, mieux, le peintre impressionniste Walter Sickert, qui - attention, preuve à l’horizon - peignait des prostituées dans leur chambre, qui tiraient la gueule ? La polardeuse Patricia Cornwell a passé des années à zigzaguer sur cette piste, déboursant 6 millions de dollars (soit 5,3 millions d’euros) en achats de toiles et analyses ADN, et en a tiré en 2002 un pavé de 800 pages aussi indigeste qu’une tourte à la viande (tant qu’on y est, pourquoi ne pas accuser Egon Schiele ou Otto Dix ?). Lewis Carroll a été, lui aussi, suspecté un temps, par deux ou trois zozos pressés de pouvoir clamer « J’ai trouvé ».

    Les femmes semblent être les grandes absentes de cette histoire, qui les concerne pourtant au premier chef. Sophie Herfort est une « ripperologue » française. Elle a publié un ouvrage sur le sujet, Jack l’Eventreur démasqué, où elle dévoile « son » suspect : un policier de Scotland Yard du nom de Melville Macnaghten. Elle explique avoir peu abordé la question de la misogynie du tueur dans son livre, notamment parce que l’éditeur « préférait que je me concentre sur l’enquête ». Elle reconnaît pourtant que le contexte, dans cette affaire, est loin d’être une simple toile de fond : en 1888, les mutilations féminines étaient courantes à Londres. Les hystérectomies étaient un moyen de contrôler les naissances. Et on pratiquait volontiers l’excision, pour prévenir les femmes de cette maladie censément féminine qu’était l’hystérie ou pour les « soulager » de règles douloureuses. Dépression ? Langueur ? Appétit sexuel jugé démesuré ? Une seule réponse : l’ablation du clitoris.
    L’effrayante sexualité des femmes

    Sophie Herfort évoque le cas du docteur Isaac Baker Brown. Cofondateur du prestigieux Saint Mary’s Hospital (où les journalistes ont récemment fait le pied de grue lors des naissances de George et de Charlotte de Cambridge), ce chirurgien opérait à tour de bras les femmes de la haute bourgeoisie dans sa clinique privée, la London Surgical Home. Il y pratiquait avec enthousiasme l’ablation des ovaires, ainsi que l’hystérectomie. En 1866, il publie un livre où il prône la pratique de l’excision « préventive », afin de lutter contre les dangers de la masturbation. Il y explique avoir excisé une femme « malade » (en vérité, elle avait demandé le divorce à son mari, la loi l’y autorisant depuis 1857). Il décrit : « Il y avait la preuve d’une excitation périphérique [entendre masturbation, ndlr]. J’ai pratiqué mon opération comme à l’accoutumée et ma patiente s’est bien remise. Elle est devenue ensuite à tous égards une bonne épouse. » Il a également pratiqué l’ablation du clitoris sur une jeune femme de 20 ans car « elle ne répondait pas aux aspirations de sa mère, envoyait des cartes de visite à des hommes, et passait beaucoup de temps à lire ». Notons qu’en France, en 1882, le docteur Démétrius Zambaco, chef de clinique à la faculté de médecine de Paris, venait de décrire avec force détails, dans la revue scientifique l’Encéphale, comment il avait brûlé au fer rouge le clitoris de deux petites filles de 6 et 10 ans pour leur passer l’envie de se masturber.

    La sexualité des femmes terrorisait l’Albion de la reine Victoria, où l’on conseillait aux jeunes épouses effrayées par les futurs assauts du mari de « fermer les yeux et penser à l’Angleterre ». Les héroïnes de fiction du XIXe siècle avec un passé sexuel, celles des romans de Dickens par exemple, comme Nancy la prostituée d’Oliver Twist, mouraient immanquablement dans d’atroces souffrances. Tout cela n’empêchait pas (au contraire) Londres d’être un lupanar géant, propice aux trafics en tout genre : en 1885, un journaliste de la Pall Mall Gazette dévoila, dans un impressionnant reportage, un monumental trafic d’enfants, dans lequel les élites victoriennes étaient impliquées, ce qui poussa le législateur à relever l’âge de la majorité sexuelle à 16 ans (elle était fixée auparavant à 13). Londres était surnommé « the whoreshop of the world » (« le bordel du monde ») : en 1888, dans le simple quartier de Whitechapel, qui ne compte que quelques rues, Scotland Yard avait évalué le nombre de prostituées à 1 200. Les victimes furent faciles à trouver pour le tueur : elles étaient pauvres, alcooliques, sans famille, sans toit, à la merci des hommes qui sollicitaient leurs faveurs pour quelques shillings, vivant la nuit dans des quartiers mal famés et sans éclairage public.
    Un retour de bâton patriarcal

    Et pourtant, aussi, à l’époque de Jack l’Eventreur, l’on réforme - timidement - le divorce (en 1857) ; le médecin anglais Joseph Mortimer Granville invente le vibromasseur (en 1883) ; l’on pose enfin la question de l’égalité entre garçons et filles dans l’accès à l’éducation (en 1870) ; et puis celle de leur droit de vote (en 1867, avec John Stuart Mill). Dans son livre The Age of Sexcrime, l’historienne Jane Caputi interprète les meurtres de l’Eventreur comme une sorte de « backlash » misogyne, un retour de bâton anti-femmes, une résurgence de l’ordre patriarcal face à une condition féminine qui, très lentement, avance vers le chemin de l’émancipation. Les victimes massacrées sont les boucs émissaires, dit-elle, d’une société en train de changer, inéluctablement. D’où l’intense médiatisation des crimes, aussi atroces que spectaculaires. Le corps de la prostituée, considéré de son vivant comme un simple bien de consommation et désormais réduit en charpie, est, à sa mort, exposé au regard forcément horrifié du public. D’abord le cadavre est trouvé dans la rue. Puis il est photographié, et ces images sont abondamment diffusées par la presse - qui se délecte d’informer ses lecteurs de certains détails insoutenables, comme les intestins de Mary Jane Kelly, la cinquième victime de l’Eventreur, déposés par le tueur sur sa table de nuit. On peut encore contempler aujourd’hui, en un simple clic sur Wikipédia, les clichés mortuaires de Mary Jane Kelly, Annie Chapman, Catherine Eddowes, Elizabeth Stride, Mary Ann Nichols. On frissonne, on s’inquiète, on s’affole, et puis les crimes s’arrêtent, la vie reprend.

    Dans leur ouvrage Sex Crimes in History (1963), les historiens Robert E. L. Masters et Eduard Lea avaient évoqué une « infestation », entre 1885 et 1895, de ce type de criminels s’attaquant à des femmes dans le monde entier, avec sensiblement le même mode opératoire. L’Encyclopédie des serial killers, de Michael Newton (1999), en recense plusieurs : l’Eventreur de Moscou (1885), une affaire jamais élucidée, où plusieurs prostituées ont été éventrées ; l’Eventreur du Texas (1885, lire ci-contre) qui, lui, tuait des prostituées noires ; l’Eventreur du Nicaragua (1889) ; « Jack the Strangler » qui tuait des prostituées à Denver, dans le Colorado, en 1894 ; et en France, Joseph Vacher (« l’Eventreur du Sud-Est ») qui a sévi de 1894 à 1897, au gré de ses mortels vagabondages, non pas sur des prostituées, mais sur des jeunes femmes et des bergers isolés.

    Jack l’Eventreur est peut-être le premier serial killer « moderne », utilisant la presse à grand tirage pour médiatiser ses actes, se riant de la population effrayée, jouant à cache-cache avec Scotland Yard ; mais, avant tout, et c’est l’irréfutable point commun qu’on peut lui trouver avec la liste des tueurs énoncée plus haut : il haïssait les femmes, dont l’émancipation était pourtant, bien malgré lui, en marche.

    Bibliographie :

    The Age of Sexcrime, de Jane Caputi, UW Press (2000).

    Jack l’Eventreur démasqué, l’enquête définitive, de Sophie Herfort, éd. Points (2008), 320 pp., 7 €.

    Jack l’Eventreur démasqué, de Russell Edwards, éd. de l’Archipel (2016), 21 €.

    A Comparison of 19th Century and Current Attitudes to Female Sexuality, de John Studd, paru dans la revue Gynecological Endocrinology (2007).

    Pucelles à vendre, Londres 1885, de William Thomas Stead, éd. Alma (2013), 292 pp., 16 €.

    Vacher l’Eventreur , de Régis Descott, Grasset (2016), 288 pp., 19 €.

    #historicisation #excision #violence_masculine #misogynie #backlash #féminicide #violence_médicale #hystérie

    • @simplicissimus super désespérant, quand à la photo d’illustration d’une femme à terre la jupe relevée, ça permet à libé un double racolage de raclures de journalistes : montrer l’entrejambe d’une femme et se #divertir avec les crimes de ce tueur mysogine.

    • L’article est interessant pour l’histoire d’un certain nombre de violences faites aux femmes à cette époque en citant quelques noms de #grand_homme et sur le fait qu’il pointe la misogynie des crimes. Pour l’illustration je ne l’ai pas remise, je suis d’accord avec toi @touti et c’est vrai que le titre est un peu macabre mais je trouve que la mention de la misogynie est pertinente car c’est plutot de ca que parle le texte. Vicéralement misogyne ca me choque pas mais j’ai un gout prononcé pour le morbide.

  • Cheap Words | The New Yorker
    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/17/cheap-words

    Amazon is a global superstore, like Walmart. It’s also a hardware manufacturer, like Apple, and a utility, like Con Edison, and a video distributor, like Netflix, and a book publisher, like Random House, and a production studio, like Paramount, and a literary magazine, like The Paris Review, and a grocery deliverer, like FreshDirect, and someday it might be a package service, like U.P.S. Its founder and chief executive, Jeff Bezos, also owns a major newspaper, the Washington Post. All these streams and tributaries make Amazon something radically new in the history of American business.

    Recently, Amazon even started creating its own “content”—publishing books. The results have been decidedly mixed. A monopoly is dangerous because it concentrates so much economic power, but in the book business the prospect of a single owner of both the means of production and the modes of distribution is especially worrisome: it would give Amazon more control over the exchange of ideas than any company in U.S. history. Even in the iPhone age, books remain central to American intellectual life, and perhaps to democracy. And so the big question is not just whether Amazon is bad for the book industry; it’s whether Amazon is bad for books.

    According to Marcus, Amazon executives considered publishing people “antediluvian losers with rotary phones and inventory systems designed in 1968 and warehouses full of crap.” Publishers kept no data on customers, making their bets on books a matter of instinct rather than metrics. They were full of inefficiences, starting with overpriced Manhattan offices. There was “a general feeling that the New York publishing business was just this cloistered, Gilded Age antique just barely getting by in a sort of Colonial Williamsburg of commerce, but when Amazon waded into this they would show publishing how it was done.”

    During the 1999 holiday season, Amazon tried publishing books, leasing the rights to a defunct imprint called Weathervane and putting out a few titles. “These were not incipient best-sellers,” Marcus writes. “They were creatures from the black lagoon of the remainder table”—Christmas recipes and the like, selected with no apparent thought. Employees with publishing experience, like Fried, were not consulted. Weathervane fell into an oblivion so complete that there’s no trace of it on the Internet. (Representatives at the company today claim never to have heard of it.) Nobody at Amazon seemed to absorb any lessons from the failure. A decade later, the company would try again.

    Around this time, a group called the “personalization team,” or P13N, started to replace editorial suggestions for readers with algorithms that used customers’ history to make recommendations for future purchases. At Amazon, “personalization” meant data analytics and statistical probability. Author interviews became less frequent, and in-house essays were subsumed by customer reviews, which cost the company nothing. Tim Appelo, the entertainment editor at the time, said, “You could be the Platonic ideal of the reviewer, and you would not beat even those rather crude early algorithms.” Amazon’s departments competed with one another almost as fiercely as they did with other companies. According to Brad Stone, a trash-talking sign was hung on a wall in the P13N office: “people forget that john henry died in the end.” Machines defeated human beings.

    In December, 1999, at the height of the dot-com mania, Time named Bezos its Person of the Year. “Amazon isn’t about technology or even commerce,” the breathless cover article announced. “Amazon is, like every other site on the Web, a content play.” Yet this was the moment, Marcus said, when “content” people were “on the way out.” Although the writers and the editors made the site more interesting, and easier to navigate, they didn’t bring more customers.

    The fact that Amazon once devoted significant space on its site to editorial judgments—to thinking and writing—would be an obscure footnote if not for certain turns in the company’s more recent history. According to one insider, around 2008—when the company was selling far more than books, and was making twenty billion dollars a year in revenue, more than the combined sales of all other American bookstores—Amazon began thinking of content as central to its business. Authors started to be considered among the company’s most important customers. By then, Amazon had lost much of the market in selling music and videos to Apple and Netflix, and its relations with publishers were deteriorating. These difficulties offended Bezos’s ideal of “seamless” commerce. “The company despises friction in the marketplace,” the Amazon insider said. “It’s easier for us to sell books and make books happen if we do it our way and not deal with others. It’s a tech-industry thing: ‘We think we can do it better.’ ” If you could control the content, you controlled everything.

    Many publishers had come to regard Amazon as a heavy in khakis and oxford shirts. In its drive for profitability, Amazon did not raise retail prices; it simply squeezed its suppliers harder, much as Walmart had done with manufacturers. Amazon demanded ever-larger co-op fees and better shipping terms; publishers knew that they would stop being favored by the site’s recommendation algorithms if they didn’t comply. Eventually, they all did. (Few customers realize that the results generated by Amazon’s search engine are partly determined by promotional fees.)

    In late 2007, at a press conference in New York, Bezos unveiled the Kindle, a simple, lightweight device that—in a crucial improvement over previous e-readers—could store as many as two hundred books, downloaded from Amazon’s 3G network. Bezos announced that the price of best-sellers and new titles would be nine-ninety-nine, regardless of length or quality—a figure that Bezos, inspired by Apple’s sale of songs on iTunes for ninety-nine cents, basically pulled out of thin air. Amazon had carefully concealed the number from publishers. “We didn’t want to let that cat out of the bag,” Steele said.

    The price was below wholesale in some cases, and so low that it represented a serious threat to the market in twenty-six-dollar hardcovers. Bookstores that depended on hardcover sales—from Barnes & Noble and Borders (which liquidated its business in 2011) to Rainy Day Books in Kansas City—glimpsed their possible doom. If reading went entirely digital, what purpose would they serve? The next year, 2008, which brought the financial crisis, was disastrous for bookstores and publishers alike, with widespread layoffs.

    By 2010, Amazon controlled ninety per cent of the market in digital books—a dominance that almost no company, in any industry, could claim. Its prohibitively low prices warded off competition.

    Publishers looked around for a competitor to Amazon, and they found one in Apple, which was getting ready to introduce the iPad, and the iBooks Store. Apple wanted a deal with each of the Big Six houses (Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin, Random House, and Simon & Schuster) that would allow the publishers to set the retail price of titles on iBooks, with Apple taking a thirty-per-cent commission on each sale. This was known as the “agency model,” and, in some ways, it offered the publishers a worse deal than selling wholesale to Amazon. But it gave publishers control over pricing and a way to challenge Amazon’s grip on the market. Apple’s terms included the provision that it could match the price of any rival, which induced the publishers to impose the agency model on all digital retailers, including Amazon.

    Five of the Big Six went along with Apple. (Random House was the holdout.) Most of the executives let Amazon know of the change by phone or e-mail, but John Sargent flew out to Seattle to meet with four Amazon executives, including Russ Grandinetti, the vice-president of Kindle content. In an e-mail to a friend, Sargent wrote, “Am on my way out to Seattle to get my ass kicked by Amazon.”

    Sargent’s gesture didn’t seem to matter much to the Amazon executives, who were used to imposing their own terms. Seated at a table in a small conference room, Sargent said that Macmillan wanted to switch to the agency model for e-books, and that if Amazon refused Macmillan would withhold digital editions until seven months after print publication. The discussion was angry and brief. After twenty minutes, Grandinetti escorted Sargent out of the building. The next day, Amazon removed the buy buttons from Macmillan’s print and digital titles on its site, only to restore them a week later, under heavy criticism. Amazon unwillingly accepted the agency model, and within a couple of months e-books were selling for as much as fourteen dollars and ninety-nine cents.

    Amazon filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. In April, 2012, the Justice Department sued Apple and the five publishers for conspiring to raise prices and restrain competition. Eventually, all the publishers settled with the government. (Macmillan was the last, after Sargent learned that potential damages could far exceed the equity value of the company.) Macmillan was obliged to pay twenty million dollars, and Penguin seventy-five million—enormous sums in a business that has always struggled to maintain respectable profit margins.

    Apple fought the charges, and the case went to trial last June. Grandinetti, Sargent, and others testified in the federal courthouse in lower Manhattan. As proof of collusion, the government presented evidence of e-mails, phone calls, and dinners among the Big Six publishers during their negotiations with Apple. Sargent and other executives acknowledged that they wanted higher prices for e-books, but they argued that the evidence showed them only to be competitors in an incestuous business, not conspirators. On July 10th, Judge Denise Cote ruled in the government’s favor.

    Apple, facing up to eight hundred and forty million dollars in damages, has appealed. As Apple and the publishers see it, the ruling ignored the context of the case: when the key events occurred, Amazon effectively had a monopoly in digital books and was selling them so cheaply that it resembled predatory pricing—a barrier to entry for potential competitors. Since then, Amazon’s share of the e-book market has dropped, levelling off at about sixty-five per cent, with the rest going largely to Apple and to Barnes & Noble, which sells the Nook e-reader. In other words, before the feds stepped in, the agency model introduced competition to the market. But the court’s decision reflected a trend in legal thinking among liberals and conservatives alike, going back to the seventies, that looks at antitrust cases from the perspective of consumers, not producers: what matters is lowering prices, even if that goal comes at the expense of competition.

    With Amazon’s patented 1-Click shopping, which already knows your address and credit-card information, there’s just you and the buy button; transactions are as quick and thoughtless as scratching an itch. “It’s sort of a masturbatory culture,” the marketing executive said. If you pay seventy-nine dollars annually to become an Amazon Prime member, a box with the Amazon smile appears at your door two days after you click, with free shipping. Amazon’s next frontier is same-day delivery: first in certain American cities, then throughout the U.S., then the world. In December, the company patented “anticipatory shipping,” which will use your shopping data to put items that you don’t yet know you want to buy, but will soon enough, on a truck or in a warehouse near you.

    Amazon employs or subcontracts tens of thousands of warehouse workers, with seasonal variation, often building its fulfillment centers in areas with high unemployment and low wages. Accounts from inside the centers describe the work of picking, boxing, and shipping books and dog food and beard trimmers as a high-tech version of the dehumanized factory floor satirized in Chaplin’s “Modern Times.” Pickers holding computerized handsets are perpetually timed and measured as they fast-walk up to eleven miles per shift around a million-square-foot warehouse, expected to collect orders in as little as thirty-three seconds. After watching footage taken by an undercover BBC reporter, a stress expert said, “The evidence shows increased risk of mental illness and physical illness.” The company says that its warehouse jobs are “similar to jobs in many other industries.”

    When I spoke with Grandinetti, he expressed sympathy for publishers faced with upheaval. “The move to people reading digitally and buying books digitally is the single biggest change that any of us in the book business will experience in our time,” he said. “Because the change is particularly big in size, and because we happen to be a leader in making it, a lot of that fear gets projected onto us.” Bezos also argues that Amazon’s role is simply to usher in inevitable change. After giving “60 Minutes” a first glimpse of Amazon drone delivery, Bezos told Charlie Rose, “Amazon is not happening to bookselling. The future is happening to bookselling.”

    In Grandinetti’s view, the Kindle “has helped the book business make a more orderly transition to a mixed print and digital world than perhaps any other medium.” Compared with people who work in music, movies, and newspapers, he said, authors are well positioned to thrive. The old print world of scarcity—with a limited number of publishers and editors selecting which manuscripts to publish, and a limited number of bookstores selecting which titles to carry—is yielding to a world of digital abundance. Grandinetti told me that, in these new circumstances, a publisher’s job “is to build a megaphone.”

    After the Kindle came out, the company established Amazon Publishing, which is now a profitable empire of digital works: in addition to Kindle Singles, it has mystery, thriller, romance, and Christian lines; it publishes translations and reprints; it has a self-service fan-fiction platform; and it offers an extremely popular self-publishing platform. Authors become Amazon partners, earning up to seventy per cent in royalties, as opposed to the fifteen per cent that authors typically make on hardcovers. Bezos touts the biggest successes, such as Theresa Ragan, whose self-published thrillers and romances have been downloaded hundreds of thousands of times. But one survey found that half of all self-published authors make less than five hundred dollars a year.

    Every year, Fine distributes grants of twenty-five thousand dollars, on average, to dozens of hard-up literary organizations. Beneficiaries include the pen American Center, the Loft Literary Center, in Minneapolis, and the magazine Poets & Writers. “For Amazon, it’s the cost of doing business, like criminal penalties for banks,” the arts manager said, suggesting that the money keeps potential critics quiet. Like liberal Democrats taking Wall Street campaign contributions, the nonprofits don’t advertise the grants. When the Best Translated Book Award received money from Amazon, Dennis Johnson, of Melville House, which had received the prize that year, announced that his firm would no longer compete for it. “Every translator in America wrote me saying I was a son of a bitch,” Johnson said. A few nonprofit heads privately told him, “I wanted to speak out, but I might have taken four thousand dollars from them, too.” A year later, at the Associated Writing Programs conference, Fine shook Johnson’s hand, saying, “I just wanted to thank you—that was the best publicity we could have had.” (Fine denies this.)

    By producing its own original work, Amazon can sell more devices and sign up more Prime members—a major source of revenue. While the company was building the Kindle, it started a digital store for streaming music and videos, and, around the same time it launched Amazon Publishing, it created Amazon Studios.

    The division pursued an unusual way of producing television series, using its strength in data collection. Amazon invited writers to submit scripts on its Web site—“an open platform for content creators,” as Bill Carr, the vice-president for digital music and video, put it. Five thousand scripts poured in, and Amazon chose to develop fourteen into pilots. Last spring, Amazon put the pilots on its site, where customers could review them and answer a detailed questionnaire. (“Please rate the following aspects of this show: The humor, the characters . . . ”) More than a million customers watched. Engineers also developed software, called Amazon Storyteller, which scriptwriters can use to create a “storyboard animatic”—a cartoon rendition of a script’s plot—allowing pilots to be visualized without the expense of filming. The difficulty, according to Carr, is to “get the right feedback and the right data, and, of the many, many data points that I can collect from customers, which ones can tell you, ‘This is the one’?”

    Bezos applying his “take no prisoners” pragmatism to the Post: “There are conflicts of interest with Amazon’s many contracts with the government, and he’s got so many policy issues going, like sales tax.” One ex-employee who worked closely with Bezos warned, “At Amazon, drawing a distinction between content people and business people is a foreign concept.”

    Perhaps buying the Post was meant to be a good civic deed. Bezos has a family foundation, but he has hardly involved himself in philanthropy. In 2010, Charlie Rose asked him what he thought of Bill Gates’s challenge to other billionaires to give away most of their wealth. Bezos didn’t answer. Instead, he launched into a monologue on the virtue of markets in solving social problems, and somehow ended up touting the Kindle.

    Bezos bought a newspaper for much the same reason that he has invested money in a project for commercial space travel: the intellectual challenge. With the Post, the challenge is to turn around a money-losing enterprise in a damaged industry, and perhaps to show a way for newspapers to thrive again.

    Lately, digital titles have levelled off at about thirty per cent of book sales. Whatever the temporary fluctuations in publishers’ profits, the long-term outlook is discouraging. This is partly because Americans don’t read as many books as they used to—they are too busy doing other things with their devices—but also because of the relentless downward pressure on prices that Amazon enforces. The digital market is awash with millions of barely edited titles, most of it dreck, while readers are being conditioned to think that books are worth as little as a sandwich. “Amazon has successfully fostered the idea that a book is a thing of minimal value,” Johnson said. “It’s a widget.”

    There are two ways to think about this. Amazon believes that its approach encourages ever more people to tell their stories to ever more people, and turns writers into entrepreneurs; the price per unit might be cheap, but the higher number of units sold, and the accompanying royalties, will make authors wealthier. Jane Friedman, of Open Road, is unfazed by the prospect that Amazon might destroy the old model of publishing. “They are practicing the American Dream—competition is good!” she told me. Publishers, meanwhile, “have been banks for authors. Advances have been very high.” In Friedman’s view, selling digital books at low prices will democratize reading: “What do you want as an author—to sell books to as few people as possible for as much as possible, or for as little as possible to as many readers as possible?”

    The answer seems self-evident, but there is a more skeptical view. Several editors, agents, and authors told me that the money for serious fiction and nonfiction has eroded dramatically in recent years; advances on mid-list titles—books that are expected to sell modestly but whose quality gives them a strong chance of enduring—have declined by a quarter.

    #Amazon

  • Media Lens - The Filter Bubble - Owen Jones And Con Coughlin
    http://medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2018/886-the-filter-bubble.html

    It stands to reason that anyone seeking employment within this bubble will have to accept an unwritten agreement not to challenge the integrity of the bubble by which they are granted wealth and fame. Any ingrate deciding to renege is attacked, reviled and cast out; treated almost as sub-human, not entirely real. Politicians like George Galloway challenging the bubble can be beaten up in broad daylight and it is of no concern. Idealistic hippies like Russell Brand preaching love can be torn to shreds and silenced by the press pack – it doesn’t matter. Whistleblowing activists like Julian Assange can be trapped, threatened with life imprisonment and death, and it is a laughing matter. Whole countries can be destroyed – it doesn’t matter. The climate can be destroyed – it doesn’t matter. The filter bubble has its own dream logic, follows its own cosmic laws as if the real world was none of its concern.

    Quant aux noms invoqués dans le titre, ils font référence à la différence abyssale existant entre un fil twitter (franc et incisif) du journaliste du « Guardian » Owen Jones concernant la flagornerie sans vergogne dont fait preuve le journaliste du « Telegraph » Con Coughlin vis-à-vis de l’Arabie saoudite, et un article (aussi peu critique du flagorneur que possible) du même Jones dans le Guardian :

    Why are defence editors, defence correspondents, diplomatic editors and the like so often biased in favour of the Western defence and diplomatic establishment they are covering? And why are they allowed to demonstrate this bias without anyone so much as commenting?

    The filter bubble ensures that these questions can never be asked, much less answered.

    #filtre #bulle #MSM

    • Iraq was destroyed in a nakedly illegal oil grab, more than one million human beings were killed, and the ’mainstream’ continued to treat the criminals responsible as respectable statespeople, and to take seriously their subsequent calls for ’humanitarian intervention’ in oil-rich Libya. With Libya reduced to ruins, the same journalists dreamed on, treating the same criminals with the same respect as they sought yet one more regime change in Syria.

  • The Economic Crisis Is Over. Populism Is Forever. – Foreign Policy
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/31/the-economic-crisis-is-over-populism-is-forever

    This is the phenomenon we face today in the United States, where the economy has rebounded more quickly than it has elsewhere in the West yet the forces of nationalism have not abated a whit. Donald Trump has not even campaigned on the economy or the stock market, an utterly bewildering choice by classical political standards. At first the president focused on his nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, which drew attention to his crusade against abortion, the great values issue of the last generation. But recently he has switched to immigration, turning the caravan of mothers and children seeking refuge from the violence and poverty of Central America into a threat to national security and identity.

    Steve Bannon has claimed that the American electorate is dividing between “nationalists” and “cosmopolitans.” Trump plainly agrees, and he knows his base. A 2017 survey found that “fears about immigrants and cultural displacement were more powerful factors than economic concerns in predicting support for Trump among white working-class voters.” Almost half of such voters agreed with the statement, “things have changed so much that I often feel like a stranger in my own country”—an echo of the title of Arlie Russell Hochschild’s study of working-class Louisiana whites, Strangers in Their Own Land. Hochschild observes that the stoical, self-reliant code of her Cajun subjects cannot be wholly reduced to racism and xenophobia, even if it contains elements of both.

    What this means for liberals is that a program of economic justice will not be enough to reach alienated whites. It means as well that a politics of identity that emphasizes the particularity of every group and subgroup, the right of each to stand apart from the straight white male default, will only further inflame the yearning for an atavistic whites-only identity. Liberals must find a national language that speaks to a national, inclusive identity. French President Emmanuel Macron has very consciously sought to position himself in the tradition of Charles de Gaulle as a patriot and the incarnation of an idea of France, though a far more up-to-date idea than de Gaulle’s 19th-century grandeur. (So far, it must be said, Macron has gained a reputation more for grandeur than for patriotism.) Perhaps the gap between the Democrats’ old New Deal base and the new race- and gender-conscious one is simply too large to be bridged.

    Liberals are inclined to regard their own values as universal and self-evident, unlike the so-called subjective ones that arise from religion or custom. The cosmopolitan cherishing of diversity is an intrinsic good, while the yen for the familiar constitutes a repudiation of reality. In fact, both are preferences, though very deep ones that sharply divide those who hold them. The globalization of people, goods, jobs, and ideas has brought out that difference in sharp relief and thus redefined the politics of the West. Liberals can’t abandon their own values, but they must acknowledge them. And they must take seriously the views of those who do not share those values.

  • Amazon’s Russell Grandinetti: Kindle champ takes on the books trade | Observer profile | From the Observer | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2014/aug/17/russell-grandinetti-amazon-kindle-hachette-book-war-profile

    Grandinetti believes the publishing industry has failed to recognise fundamental shifts in its business. Part of Amazon’s mission, then, has been to jolt an often sleepy industry with revolutionary, customer-focused retailing zeal. The real competition, he believes, is not rival publications or publishers but the entire array of information and entertainment, free or otherwise, available to consumers. “Books compete against mobile games, television, movies, Facebook, blogs, free news sites and more,” he says.

    Amazon claims its power in the market is exaggerated and publishers, ever on the lookout for a good storyline, are in love with a plot that ends with their own demise. “It’s always the end of the world,” Grandinetti says. “You could set your watch on it arriving.” But, he adds, the publishing industry is going through a dramatic shift. “_The only really necessary people in the publishing process now are the writer and reader. Everyone who stands between those two has both risk and opportunit y._”

    #Edition #Amazon

    • New figures reveal at least 449 homeless deaths in UK in the last year

      On the streets, in a hospital, a hostel or a B&B: across the UK the deaths of people without a home have gone unnoticed.

      Tonight we’re attempting to shed new light on a hidden tragedy.

      Research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism suggests at least 449 homeless people have died in the UK in the last year – at least 65 of them on the streets.

      The homeless charity Crisis says the figures are “deeply shocking”. They want such deaths to be better investigated and recorded.

      https://www.channel4.com/news/new-figures-reveal-at-least-449-homeless-deaths-in-uk-in-the-last-year

      #statistiques #chiffres

    • “A national scandal”: 449 people died homeless in the last year

      A grandmother who made potted plant gardens in shop doorways, found dead in a car park. A 51-year-old man who killed himself the day before his temporary accommodation ran out. A man who was tipped into a bin lorry while he slept.

      These tragic stories represent just a few of at least 449 people who the Bureau can today reveal have died while homeless in the UK in the last 12 months - more than one person per day.

      After learning that no official body counted the number of homeless people who have died, we set out to record all such deaths over the course of one year. Working with local journalists, charities and grassroots outreach groups to gather as much information as possible, the Bureau has compiled a first-of-its-kind database which lists the names of the dead and more importantly, tells their stories.

      The findings have sparked outrage amongst homeless charities, with one expert calling the work a “wake-up call to see homelessness as a national emergency”.

      Our investigation has prompted the Office for National Statistics to start producing its own figure on homeless deaths.

      We found out about the deaths of hundreds of people, some as young as 18 and some as old as 94. They included a former soldier, a quantum physicist, a travelling musician, a father of two who volunteered in his community, and a chatty Big Issue seller. The true figure is likely to be much higher.

      Some were found in shop doorways in the height of summer, others in tents hidden in winter woodland. Some were sent, terminally ill, to dingy hostels, while others died in temporary accommodation or hospital beds. Some lay dead for hours, weeks or months before anyone found them. Three men’s bodies were so badly decomposed by the time they were discovered that forensic testing was needed to identify them.

      They died from violence, drug overdoses, illnesses, suicide and murder, among other reasons. One man’s body showed signs of prolonged starvation.

      “A national disgrace”

      Charities and experts responded with shock at the Bureau’s findings. Howard Sinclair, St Mungo’s chief executive, said: “These figures are nothing short of a national scandal. These deaths are premature and entirely preventable.”

      “This important investigation lays bare the true brutality of our housing crisis,” said Polly Neate, CEO of Shelter. “Rising levels of homelessness are a national disgrace, but it is utterly unforgivable that so many homeless people are dying unnoticed and unaccounted for.”
      “This important investigation lays bare the true brutality of our housing crisis"

      Our data shows homeless people are dying decades younger than the general population. The average age of the people whose deaths we recorded was 49 for men and 53 for women.

      “We know that sleeping rough is dangerous, but this investigation reminds us it’s deadly,” said Jon Sparkes, chief executive of Crisis. “Those sleeping on our streets are exposed to everything from sub-zero temperatures, to violence and abuse, and fatal illnesses. They are 17 times more likely to be a victim of violence, twice as likely to die from infections, and nine times more likely to commit suicide.”

      The Bureau’s Dying Homeless project has sparked widespread debate about the lack of data on homeless deaths.

      Responding to our work, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has now confirmed that it will start compiling and releasing its own official estimate - a huge step forward.

      For months the ONS has been analysing and cross-checking the Bureau’s database to create its own methodology for estimating homeless deaths, and plans to produce first-of-their-kind statistics in December this year.

      A spokesperson said the information provided by the Bureau “helps us develop the most accurate method of identifying all the deaths that should be counted.”
      Naming the dead

      Tracking homeless deaths is a complex task. Homeless people die in many different circumstances in many different places, and the fact they don’t have a home is not recorded on death certificates, even if it is a contributing factor.

      Click here to explore the full project

      There are also different definitions of homelessness. We used the same definition as that used by homeless charity Crisis; it defines someone as homeless if they are sleeping rough, or in emergency or temporary accommodation such as hostels and B&Bs, or sofa-surfing. In Northern Ireland, we were only able to count the deaths of people registered as officially homeless by the Housing Executive, most of whom were in temporary accommodation while they waited to be housed.

      For the past nine months we have attended funerals, interviewed family members, collected coroners’ reports, spoken to doctors, shadowed homeless outreach teams, contacted soup kitchens and hostels and compiled scores of Freedom of Information requests. We have scoured local press reports and collaborated with our Bureau Local network of regional journalists across the country. In Northern Ireland we worked with The Detail’s independent journalism team to find deaths there.

      Of the 449 deaths in our database, we are able to publicly identify 138 people (we withheld the identity of dozens more at the request of those that knew them).

      Of the cases in which we were able to find out where people died, more than half of the deaths happened on the streets.

      These included mother-of-five Jayne Simpson, who died in the doorway of a highstreet bank in Stafford during the heatwave of early July. In the wake of her death the local charity that had been working with her, House of Bread, started a campaign called “Everyone knows a Jayne”, to try to raise awareness of how easy it is to fall into homelessness.

      Forty-one-year-old Jean Louis Du Plessis also died on the streets in Bristol. He was found in his sleeping bag during the freezing weather conditions of Storm Eleanor. At his inquest the coroner found he had been in a state of “prolonged starvation”.

      Russell Lane was sleeping in an industrial bin wrapped in an old carpet when it was tipped into a rubbish truck in Rochester in January. He suffered serious leg and hip injuries and died nine days later in hospital. He was 48 years old.

      In other cases people died while in temporary accommodation, waiting for a permanent place to call home. Those included 30-year-old John Smith who was found dead on Christmas Day, in a hostel in Chester.

      Or James Abbott who killed himself in a hotel in Croydon in October, the day before his stay in temporary accommodation was due to run out. A report from Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group said: “He [Mr Abbott] said his primary need was accommodation and if this was provided he would not have an inclination to end his life.” We logged two other suicides amongst the deaths in the database.

      Many more homeless people were likely to have died unrecorded in hospitals, according to Alex Bax, CEO of Pathways, a homeless charity that works inside several hospitals across England. “Deaths on the street are only one part of the picture,” he said. “Many homeless people also die in hospital and with the right broad response these deaths could be prevented.”
      Donate to the Bureau

      Investigative journalism is vital for democracy. Help us to tell the stories that matter.
      Click here to support us
      Rising levels of homelessness

      The number of people sleeping rough has doubled in England and Wales in the last five years, according to the latest figures, while the number of people classed as officially homeless has risen by 8%.

      In Scotland the number of people applying to be classed as homeless rose last year for the first time in nine years. In Northern Ireland the number of homeless people rose by a third between 2012 and 2017.

      Analysis of government figures also shows the number of people housed in bed and breakfast hotels in England and Wales increased by a third between 2012 and 2018, with the number of children and pregnant women in B&Bs and hostels rising by more than half.

      “Unstable and expensive private renting, crippling welfare cuts and a severe lack of social housing have created this crisis,” said Shelter’s Neate. “To prevent more people from having to experience the trauma of homelessness, the government must ensure housing benefit is enough to cover the cost of rents, and urgently ramp up its efforts to build many more social homes.”

      The sheer scale of people dying due to poverty and homelessness was horrifying, said Crisis chief executive Sparkes.“This is a wake-up call to see homelessness as a national emergency,” he said.

      Breaking down the data

      Across our dataset, 69% of those that died were men and 21% were women (for the remaining 10% we did not have their gender).

      For those we could identify, their ages ranged between 18 and 94.

      At least nine of the deaths we recorded over the year were due to violence, including several deaths which were later confirmed to be murders.

      Over 250 were in England and Wales, in part because systems to count in London are better developed than elsewhere in the UK.

      London was the location of at least 109 deaths. The capital has the highest recorded rough sleeper count in England, according to official statistics, and information on the well-being of those living homeless is held in a centralised system called CHAIN. This allowed us to easily record many of the deaths in the capital although we heard of many others deaths in London that weren’t part of the CHAIN data.

      In Scotland, we found details of 42 people who died in Scotland in the last year, but this is likely a big underestimate. Many of the deaths we registered happened in Edinburgh, while others were logged from Glasgow, the Shetland Islands and the Outer Hebrides.
      “We know that sleeping rough is dangerous, but this investigation reminds us it’s deadly”

      Working with The Detail in Northern Ireland, we found details of 149 people who died in the country. Most died while waiting to be housed by the country’s Housing Executive - some may have been in leased accommodation while they waited, but they were officially classed as homeless.

      “Not only will 449 families or significant others have to cope with their loss, they will have to face the injustice that their loved one was forced to live the last days of their life without the dignity of a decent roof over their head, and a basic safety net that might have prevented their death,” Sparkes from Crisis. No one deserves this.”

      A spokesperson from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said:

      “Every death of someone sleeping rough on our streets is one too many and we take this matter extremely seriously.

      “We are investing £1.2bn to tackle all forms of homelessness, and have set out bold plans backed by £100m in funding to halve rough sleeping by 2022 and end it by 2027."


      https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2018-10-08/homelessness-a-national-scandal?token=ssTw9Mg2I2QU4AYduMjt3Ny
      #noms #donner_un_nom #sortir_de_l'anonymat

    • Homelessness kills: Study finds third of homeless people die from treatable conditions

      Nearly a third of homeless people die from treatable conditions, meaning hundreds of deaths could potentially have been prevented, a major new study shows.

      The research by University College London (UCL), which was exclusively shared with the Bureau, also shows that homeless people are much more likely to die from certain conditions than even the poorest people who have a place to live.

      The findings come as the final count from our Dying Homeless project shows an average of 11 homeless people a week have died in the UK in the last 18 months. We have been collecting data dating back to October 2017 and telling the stories of those who have died on the streets or in temporary accommodation; our tally now stands at 796 people. Of those people we know the age of, more than a quarter were under 40 when then they died.

      While many might assume hypothermia or drug and alcohol overdoses kill the majority of homeless people, this latest research by UCL shows that in fact most homeless people die from illnesses. Nearly a third of the deaths explored by UCL were from treatable illnesses like tuberculosis, pneumonia or gastric ulcers which could potentially have improved with the right medical care.

      In February 2018, 48-year old Marcus Adams died in hospital after suffering from tuberculosis. The same year, 21 year old Faiza died in London, reportedly of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Just before Christmas in 2017, 48-year-old former soldier Darren Greenfield died from an infection and a stroke in hospital. He had slept rough for years after leaving the army.

      “To know that so many vulnerable people have died of conditions that were entirely treatable is heartbreaking,” said Matthew Downie, Director of Policy and External Affairs at Crisis. The government should make sure all homeless deaths were investigated to see if lessons could be learned, he said.

      “But ultimately, 800 people dying homeless is unacceptable - we have the solutions to ensure no one has to spend their last days without a safe, stable roof over their head.
      “To know that so many vulnerable people have died of conditions that were entirely treatable is heartbreaking”

      “By tackling the root causes of homelessness, like building the number of social homes we need and making sure our welfare system is there to support people when they fall on hard times, governments in England, Scotland and Wales can build on the positive steps they’ve already taken to reduce and ultimately end homelessness.”
      Twice as likely to die of strokes

      Academics at UCL explored nearly 4,000 in-depth medical records for 600 people that died in English hospitals between 2013 and 2016 who were homeless when they were admitted. They compared them to the deaths of a similar group of people (in terms of age and sex) who had somewhere to live but were in the lowest socio-economic bracket.

      The research gives unprecedented insight into the range of medical causes of homeless deaths, and provides yet another reminder of how deadly homelessness is.

      The homeless group was disproportionately affected by cardiovascular disease, which includes strokes and heart disease. The researchers found homeless people were twice as likely to die of strokes as the poorest people who had proper accommodation.

      A fifth of the 600 deaths explored by UCL were caused by cancer. Another fifth died from digestive diseases such as intestinal obstruction or pancreatitis.

      Our database shows homeless people dying young from cancers, such as Istvan Kakas who died aged 52 in a hospice after battling leukaemia.

      Istvan, who sold The Big Issue, had received a heroism award from the local mayor after he helped save a man and his daughter from drowning. Originally from Hungary, he had previously worked as a chef under both Gordon Ramsay and Michael Caines.

      Rob Aldridge, lead academic on the UCL team, told the Bureau: “Our research highlights a failure of the health system to care for this vulnerable group in a timely and appropriate manner.”

      “We need to identify homeless individuals at risk earlier and develop models of care that enable them to engage with interventions proven to either prevent or improve outcomes for early onset chronic disease.”

      Of the deaths we have logged in the UK 78% were men, while 22% were female (of those where the gender was known). The average age of death for men was 49 years old and 53 years old for women.

      “It is easy for them to get lost in the system and forgotten about”
      The spread of tuberculosis

      In Luton, Paul Prosser from the NOAH welfare centre has seen a worrying prevalence of tuberculosis, particularly amongst the rough sleeping migrant community. A service visits the centre three times a year, screening for TB. “Last time they came they found eight people with signs of the illness, that’s really concerning,” said Prosser.

      “There are a lot of empty commercial properties in Luton and you find large groups of desperate homeless people, often migrants, squatting in them. It is easy for them to get lost in the system and forgotten about and then, living in such close quarters, that is when the infection can spread.”

      “When people dip in and out of treatment that is when they build a resistance to the drugs,” Prosser added. “Some of these people are leading chaotic lives and if they are not engaging that well with the treatment due to having nowhere to live then potentially that is when they become infectious.”

      One man NOAH was helping, Robert, died in mid-2017 after moving from Luton to London. The man, originally from Romania, had been suffering from TB for a long time but would only access treatment sporadically. He was living and working at a car-wash, as well as rough sleeping at the local airport.

      Making them count

      For the last year the Bureau has been logging the names and details of people that have died homeless since October 1, 2017. We started our count after discovering that no single body or organisation was recording if and when people were dying while homeless.

      More than 80 local news stories have been written about the work and our online form asking for details of deaths has been filled in more than 140 times.

      Our work and #MakeThemCount hashtag called for an official body to start collecting this vital data, and we were delighted to announce last October that the Office for National Statistics is now collating these figures. We opened up our database to ONS statisticians to help them develop their methodology.

      We also revealed that local authority reviews into homeless deaths, which are supposed to take place, were rarely happening. Several councils, including Brighton & Hove, Oxford, Malvern and Leeds have now said they will undertake their own reviews into deaths in their area, while others, such as Haringey, have put in place new measures to log how and when people die homeless.

      Councillor Emina Ibrahim, Haringey Council’s Cabinet Member for Housing, told the Bureau: “The deaths of homeless people are frequently missed in formal reviews, with their lives unremembered. Our new procedure looks to change that and will play an important part in helping us to reduce these devastating and avoidable deaths.”

      Members of the public have also come together to remember those that passed away. In the last year there have been protests in Belfast, Birmingham and Manchester, memorial services in Brighton, Luton and London, and physical markers erected in Long Eaton and Northampton. Last week concerned citizens met in Oxford to discuss a spate of homeless deaths in the city.

      In a response to the scale of the deaths, homeless grassroots organisation Streets Kitchen are now helping to organise a protest and vigil which will take place later this week, in London and Manchester.

      After a year of reporting on this issue, the Bureau is now happy to announce we are handing over the counting project to the Museum of Homelessness, an organisation which archives, researches and presents information and stories on homelessness.
      “The sheer number of people who are dying whilst homeless, often avoidably, is a national scandal”

      The organisation’s co-founder Jess Turtle said they were honoured to be taking on this “massively important” work.

      “The sheer number of people who are dying whilst homeless, often avoidably, is a national scandal,” she said. “Museum of Homelessness will continue to honour these lives and we will work with our community to campaign for change as long as is necessary.”

      Matt Downie from Crisis said the Bureau’s work on the issue had achieved major impact. “As it comes to an end, it is difficult to overstate the importance of the Dying Homeless Project, which has shed new light on a subject that was ignored for too long,” he said. “It is an encouraging step that the ONS has begun to count these deaths and that the stories of those who have so tragically lost their lives will live on through the Museum of Homelessness.”

      The government has pledged to end rough sleeping by 2027, and has pledged £100m to try to achieve that goal, as part of an overall £1.2bn investment into tackling homelessness.

      “No one is meant to spend their lives on the streets, or without a home to call their own,” said Communities Secretary James Brokenshire. “Every death on our streets is too many and it is simply unacceptable to see lives cut short this way.”

      “I am also committed to ensuring independent reviews into the deaths of rough sleepers are conducted, where appropriate – and I will be holding local authorities to account in doing just that.”

      https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-03-11/homelessness-kills

      #statistiques #chiffres #mortalité

    • Homeless Link responds to Channel 4 report on homeless deaths

      Today, The Bureau Investigative of Journalism released figures that revealed almost 800 people who are homeless have died over the last 18 months, which is an average of 11 every week. The report also shows that a third (30%) of the homeless deaths were from treatable conditions that could have improved with the right medical care.
      Many other deaths in the study, beyond that third, were from causes like suicide and homicide.

      Responding Rick Henderson, Chief Executive of Homeless Link, said: “These figures bring to light the shocking inequalities that people who experience homelessness face. People are dying on our streets and a significant number of them are dying from treatable or preventable health conditions.

      “We must address the fact that homelessness is a key health inequality and one of the causes of premature death. People who are experiencing homelessness struggle to access our health services. Core services are often too exclusionary or inflexible for people who are homeless with multiple and complex needs. This means people aren’t able to access help when they need it, instead being forced to use A&E to “patch up” their conditions before being discharged back to the streets. Services need to be accessible, for example by expanding walk-in primary care clinics or offering longer GP appointment times to deal with people experiencing multiple needs. We also need to expand specialist health services for people who are homeless to stop people falling through the gaps.

      “This research also highlights the other causes of death that people who are homeless are more likely to experience. Research shows that people who are homeless are over nine times more likely to take their own life than the general population and 17 times more likely to be the victims of violence.

      “Homeless Link is calling on the Government in its upcoming Prevention Green Paper to focus on addressing these inequalities, start to tackle the structural causes of homelessness, and make sure everyone has an affordable, healthy and safe place to call home and the support they need to keep it.”

      https://www.homeless.org.uk/connect/news/2019/mar/11/homeless-link-responds-to-channel-4-report-on-homeless-deaths

  • If you’re Chinese, then being a ‘shameless’ savvy saver is likely to be in your DNA | South China Morning Post
    http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/community/article/2138956/if-youre-chinese-then-being-shameless-savvy-saver-likely-be

    Chinese people, like most others, love money. But to be more precise, we take great joy in scrupulously balancing between saving money and spending within our means.

    This attitude has been extolled as a virtue. In fact, it’s become so ingrained in our psyche that no matter where or how we are brought up or how we are educated, when it comes to handling money, being sensible and frugal is second nature to us.

    We often do it without thinking and feel no shame in doing so, even if we might appear penny-pinching to others.

    So there was little surprise when a recent Citibank study revealed Hong Kong is packed with a million millionaires, 68,000 of whom have at least HK$10 million (US$1.27 million) squirrelled away.

    Another report by Wealth-X, a firm that conducts research and valuations on ultra-high net worth individuals, also found that Hong Kong is a magnet for the ultra-wealthy. It was the city with the second-highest number of such residents, after New York.

    Any Chinese would tell you that accumulating wealth may be hard work, but keeping it is even harder.

    As a popular Chinese saying goes, “The first generation makes the money, the second one holds onto the inheritance, but the third one spends it.” This Chinese proverb serves as a warning and a reminder that sensible budgeting and frugality is not only a virtue but a survival mantra that needs to be etched on the mind.

    Therefore, our attitudes towards money are shaped early in life by our elders as an integral part of Chinese culture and upbringing. We are told at a very young age that to be a responsible person, we must work hard and save up a nest egg to secure our future and consequently, our family’s future.

    All Chinese are also familiar with the saying, “To store up grains in case of a famine”. This obviously is the basic principle that illustrates we may be money-oriented but it’s all for good reason.

    We are driven by a sense of responsibility to provide for our families and the fear that something might go wrong also prompts us to work hard to save up for rainy days.

    There’s no shame in being a savvy saver – even in times of prosperity
    Many of my old relatives have said that their life savings are hidden away in tin boxes stashed under their beds, cupboards or even their floorboards. I once came across a biscuit tin that contained a big wad of HK$1,000 bills, a bank book, some old photographs and some identification documents; I later found out the items belonged to one of my aunts.

    When I asked her why she stored all these valuables in a tin box, she said the items were like her life – the photographs were her past and the money was to support her now and in the future. She thought keeping “her life” in a tin box was the best way to keep it safe, as in the event of a misfortune like a fire, she would be able to quickly grab all of her valuables.

    Last week, I was having dinner with my girlfriend and when she ordered hot lemon water, I immediately asked the waiter to give her a mug of hot water instead, but with two pieces of lemon for me. The waiter took the order but gave me a funny look. I didn’t even have to explain to my girlfriend, Patty, who is an overseas Chinese, the reasoning behind my order – I wanted to save money.

    By ordering the hot water and lemon separately, the restaurant wouldn’t know how to charge us – so it would be free. We burst out laughing and both agreed that being thrifty is in our DNA. We may come from very different backgrounds but we are undeniably Chinese when it comes to our views of money.

    Famed Canadian comedian Russell Peters was spot on in one of his shows when he described a shopping experience he had when trying to get a discount from a Chinese shop owner who only gave him a reduction of 50 cents.

    He said “Chinese won’t give you a bargain … instead they will try to get every penny from you.”

    Many years ago, I heard that for every $10 a Chinese makes, they would save $9. It might sound far-fetched but it’s true that an average Chinese person saves a lot more than many of his overseas counterparts.

    According to the International Monetary Fund, from 1995 to 2005, the average urban household savings rate in China stood at 25 per cent of disposable income, with some other analysts even putting it as high as 30 per cent.

    When we have our minds set on earning that first barrel of gold, every penny counts, and we always look for a bargain. Others may laugh at our frugality or supposed stinginess, but at the end of the day, there’s no shame in being a savvy saver – even in times of prosperity.

    With that in mind, let’s finish off today with another Chinese adage and some food for thought: “When rich, think of poverty, but do not think of riches when you are poor”. In other words, there is never a bad time to save. Even when you have deep pockets, you must always be prepared for leaner times.

    Luisa Tam is a senior editor at the Post

    This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Savvy saving is a way of life for Chinese

    #économie #affaires #Chine

  • Permis de tuer ? Masculinité, culture d’agression et armée
    https://entreleslignesentrelesmots.wordpress.com/2018/03/19/introduction-demilie-beauchesne-a-son-ouvrage-

    Selon l’Organisation mondiale de la santé, 35% des femmes dans le monde indiquent avoir subi des violences physiques ou sexuelles au cours de leur vie1. Une femme sur trois. Les Québécoises adultes comptent pour 92,8 % des victimes d’agression sexuelle, selon le Conseil du statut de la femme2. En matière de violences contre les femmes, les statistiques parlent d’elles-mêmes : nous vivons dans une société profondément inégale caractérisée par une vaste succession de violences à l’égard des femmes.

    De temps à autre, un cas de violence extrême fait la une des médias, tel un cas d’exception occultant tous les autres, lesquels sont désormais banals, ravalés au rang de faits divers. Ces événements retiennent momentanément l’attention du public puis s’estompent, pour finalement disparaître. Pendant ce temps sont négligées les violences systémiques à l’encontre des femmes.

    Pourtant, l’actualité amène son lot d’événements pour nous les rappeler. Pensons à certains élus provinciaux (tels que Gerry Sklavounos, député de Laurier-Dorion, ou Pierre Paradis, ex-ministre de l’Agriculture) qui se voient publiquement accusés de harcèlement ou de viol et sont aussitôt blanchis, faute de preuve ou en l’absence d’une « victime parfaite ». Ou à ce juge qui innocente un chauffeur de taxi d’Halifax ayant violé une cliente ivre et inconsciente, sous prétexte que la femme était peut-être consentante. Ou bien au maire de l’arrondissement de Montréal-Nord – et ancien policier du Service de police de la Ville de Montréal –, reconnu coupable d’attouchements sexuels sur une mineure. Ou encore au meurtre de Daphné Boudreault par son ex-conjoint, quelques heures à peine après qu’elle a alerté la police de Richelieu-Saint- Laurent, car elle se sentait menacée…

    La majorité des analyses de ces cas dits d’exception associent la violence à un individu seul ou encore mettent en cause la victime et, par le fait même, déresponsabilisent l’ensemble de la société. Or, il existe une trame commune à toutes ces violences. L’État est non seule- ment incapable de les prévenir, mais de plus il participe en quelque sorte à ces crimes, à ce silencieux féminicide.

    #virilité #masculinité #feminicide

    • Je soutiendrai la thèse selon laquelle Russell Williams n’est pas en contradiction avec les valeurs militaires canadiennes, mais est plutôt l’effet programmé et brutal d’une construction sociale de la domination à travers sa formation de militaire, laquelle reflète la socialisation à l’œuvre dans la société patriarcale.

  • Conference : Italian Genre Cinema
    http://www.nova-cinema.org/prog/2018/165-offscreen/enzo-g-castellari-sergio-martino/article/symposium-italian-genre-cinema

    Dans les années 60 et 70, l’industrie cinématographique italienne s’est lancée dans les films d’exploitation, faisant primer la ressemblance à des block busters américains sur la qualité du scénario, ce qui leur donna la réputation de plagiats de piètre qualité. Ceux-ci ont toutefois acquis, au fil du temps, un statut de films cultes. Leur charme réside dans leur caractère extravagant et absurde, mais aussi dans leur photographie d’une étonnante beauté, leur inventivité, et ce malgré de médiocres budgets. Leur nombre est également considérable, avec une productivité record de plus de 250 films par an. Russ Hunter (“Italian Horror Cinema”) présentera un aperçu du cinéma de genre italien et de sa diversité. Alexia Kannas (“Deep Red”) examinera quant à elle les principales caractéristiques du giallo. Ensuite, (...)

  • J’ai un problème avec « Black Panther » | Russell Rickford
    http://www.etatdexception.net/jai-un-probleme-avec-black-panther

    De mémoire récente, Black Panther est devenu un phénomène culturel comparable avec aucun autre. Un public enthousiaste a presque divinisé cette grosse production, remake d’une bande dessinée sur un super-héros de la mythique nation africaine de Wakanda. Prévenez-moi de tous les nouveaux commentaires par e-mail. Prévenez-moi de tous les nouveaux articles par email. Source : Etat d’Exception

  • Mulhouse, l’usine dont PSA veut faire un modèle
    http://lemonde.fr/economie/article/2017/10/26/a-mulhouse-dans-l-usine-dont-psa-veut-faire-un-modele_5206277_3234.html
    Le site bénéficie du plus lourd investissement du groupe : 300 millions d’euros entre 2014 et 2020

    300 : C’est, en millions d’euros, l’investissement 2014-2020 prévu par PSA dans son site de Mulhouse, principal effort financier consenti par le groupe pour moderniser ses usines en France (790 millions au total).

    400 000 : C’est, en nombre de véhicules,la capacité de production que devrait atteindre le site de Mulhouse en 2020 (270 000 actuellement).

    529 : C’est, en euros, la réduction des coûts de production par véhicule depuis 2015 que devrait atteindre le groupe PSA en 2017. -Objectif : 700 euros en 2018.

    Dans les salles de formation attenantes à l’atelier de ferrage, le catéchisme de « l’usine excellente » façon PSA s’étale sur les murs. « En 2016, le coût des retouches s’élève à 2 millions d’euros », dit une affiche. Plus loin, un calicot destiné aux futurs ouvriers de la chaîne résume le credo : « Je m’implique pour garantir la qualité du véhicule. Je suis premium. »

    En ce mardi 24 octobre ensoleillé, c’est bien une usine étiquetée « premium », celle de Mulhouse-Sausheim, que PSA fait visiter à une vingtaine de journalistes cornaqués par Corinne Spilios, la directrice du centre de production. La seule femme (avec Thérèse Joder, à Rennes) à diriger une usine de PSA était pour l’occasion accompagnée de Yann Vincent, patron de la stratégie industrielle du groupe.

    Le lieu n’est pas choisi par hasard : Mulhouse est un site-clé dans l’ensemble industriel de PSA. C’est ici que vient de démarrer la production du véhicule le plus élégant du groupe : la DS7 Crossback, un SUV qu’Emmanuel Macron a sélectionné pour en faire sa voiture présidentielle officielle et qui sera commercialisé début 2018. Mais là n’est pas le plus important. Avant tout, l’usine – et en particulier sa nouvelle ligne d’assemblage – devient une vitrine des meilleures pratiques industrielles de PSA telles que celles voulues par Carlos Tavares, son président : polyvalente, efficace, économe.

    Voici de quoi intéresser le nouvel entrant dans la famille PSA, Opel-Vauxhall, acquis par le groupe français cette année. Les sites de production européens d’Opel ont un niveau de rentabilité médiocre, en particulier, si l’on en croit les experts de PSA, l’usine mère de Rüsselsheim, en Allemagne, et, dans une moindre mesure, l’usine Vauxhall d’Ellesmere Port, au Royaume-Uni.

    Au sein du groupe de journalistes visiteurs, le correspondant en France du Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, l’un des grands quotidiens de référence allemands, n’était pas le moins attentif. Il est à Mulhouse pour faire découvrir à ses compatriotes un modèle français industriel qui a permis à PSA de réduire en moyenne ses coûts de plus de 500 euros par véhicule depuis 2015.

    En quoi consiste la recette de l’usine idéale façon PSA ? Première étape : réduire les frais fixes. Et pour cela, il existe un mot magique : le compactage. Il s’agit de diminuer la surface utilisée pour la production, afin de réduire les dépenses de maintenance, de chauffage et les coûts fiscaux.

    Ce type d’action est loin d’avoir des effets homéopathiques. « Dans notre usine de Sevelnord - Nord - , explique M. Vincent, l’opération va nous faire économiser 100 euros par modèle produit. » A Mulhouse, c’est environ un tiers des 300 hectares de l’usine qui sont soit cédés, soit transformés pour accueillir des fournisseurs et le magasin de pièces détachées au plus près des lignes.

    Le maître mot est flexibilité
    Direction justement cette nouvelle ligne d’assemblage où sont produits les petits SUV Peugeot 2008 et les nouvelles DS7 Crossback. L’endroit est un condensé de pratiques vertueuses. Ici, un fournisseur prépare des tableaux de bord pour la zone logistique. Là, des ouvriers – l’usage est de dire opérateurs – préparent les pièces selon la technique du full kitting (l’ensemble des pièces d’une voiture avancent avec le modèle en cours de montage au lieu d’être placées le long de la ligne). Partout, des robots autoguidés transportent les kits de pièces.

    Mulhouse est l’usine qui bénéficie du plus lourd investissement de tous les sites français du groupe : 300 millions d’euros entre 2014 et 2020 (sur un total de près de 800 millions). Mais pas question de dépenser à tort et à travers. Une partie des robots qui assemblent la carrosserie de la DS7 sont des engins d’occasion trouvés sur la Bourse interne au groupe qui rassemble les actifs dont certains sites n’ont plus l’usage. La débrouille est aussi une vertu.

    Ici, en plus de sobriété, le maître mot est flexibilité. La ligne, qui tourne à une vitesse de 60 véhicules à l’heure, sera capable de produire six modèles différents. Au détriment des conditions de travail, affirment des -représentants du personnel. « Samedis travaillés, soirées rallongées… En matière de flexibilité, on a une longueur d’avance, affirme Jean-Pierre Mercier, délégué central CGT du groupe. Mais les salariés le paient cash. Et la précarité s’ajoute à cette pression : il y a 7 000 intérimaires aujourd’hui dans les usines françaises, autant qu’en 2010, alors que le nombre de CDI est passé de 69 000 à 57 000. »

    « Nous considérons les intérimaires comme des collaborateurs à part entière, répond M. Vincent. Une partie d’entre eux a d’ailleurs signé un CDI avec la société d’intérim. » De toute façon, à Mulhouse, pour les 6 500 salariés (dont 1 000 intérimaires), pas question de réduire les cadences. On parle même d’ajouter une quatrième équipe le week-end en plus de -celles qui font les trois-huit. Mulhouse n’a pas fini de produire des voitures.

    Éric Béziat

    #travail #usine #quatre_équipes #intérimaires

  • Sperm counts of Western men are plummeting, analysis finds - CNN.com
    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/25/health/sperm-counts-declining-study/index.html

    Sperm counts of men in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand are plunging, according to a new analysis published Tuesday.

    Among these men there has been a 52% decline in sperm concentration and a 59% decline in total sperm count over a nearly 40-year period ending in 2011, the analysis, published in the journal Human Reproduction Update, said.
    […]
    Though Levine emphasized that his analysis did not study the cause of declines, he speculated the reason may be “°we are exposed to many chemicals we’ve never been exposed to before.°”

    Previous studies, including his own, show that exposure in utero to endocrine disrupting chemicals can harm male reproductive system development and fertility potential. Commonly used chemicals, including pesticides, lead and fire retardants, can increase or decrease production of certain hormones within our bodies and so are said to disrupt our endocrine, or hormone-making, system.
    Sonya Lunder, a senior analyst at the nonprofit advocacy group Environmental Working Group, noted that sperm is manufactured daily by men’s bodies. Recent exposures to environmental chemicals would have an effect on sperm, which serves as a good indicator of contamination, while also serving as a good biomarker of men’s health.

    Lunder cites the work of Russ Hauser, a professor of reproductive physiology at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who suggests that exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may be associated with poorer sperm quality among men and worse reproductive outcomes among women.

    #perturbateur_endocrinien

    • Résumé de l’étude (accessible intégralement)

      Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis | Human Reproduction Update | Oxford Academic
      https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/doi/10.1093/humupd/dmx022/4035689/Temporal-trends-in-sperm-count-a-systematic-review

      Abstract

      BACKGROUND
      Reported declines in sperm counts remain controversial today and recent trends are unknown. A definitive meta-analysis is critical given the predictive value of sperm count for fertility, morbidity and mortality.

      OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
      To provide a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of recent trends in sperm counts as measured by sperm concentration (SC) and total sperm count (TSC), and their modification by fertility and geographic group.

      SEARCH METHODS
      PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for English language studies of human SC published in 1981–2013. Following a predefined protocol 7518 abstracts were screened and 2510 full articles reporting primary data on SC were reviewed. A total of 244 estimates of SC and TSC from 185 studies of 42 935 men who provided semen samples in 1973–2011 were extracted for meta-regression analysis, as well as information on years of sample collection and covariates [fertility group (‘Unselected by fertility’ versus ‘Fertile’), geographic group (‘Western’, including North America, Europe Australia and New Zealand versus ‘Other’, including South America, Asia and Africa), age, ejaculation abstinence time, semen collection method, method of measuring SC and semen volume, exclusion criteria and indicators of completeness of covariate data]. The slopes of SC and TSC were estimated as functions of sample collection year using both simple linear regression and weighted meta-regression models and the latter were adjusted for pre-determined covariates and modification by fertility and geographic group. Assumptions were examined using multiple sensitivity analyses and nonlinear models.

      OUTCOMES
      SC declined significantly between 1973 and 2011 (slope in unadjusted simple regression models −0.70 million/ml/year; 95% CI: −0.72 to −0.69; P < 0.001; slope in adjusted meta-regression models = −0.64; −1.06 to −0.22; P = 0.003). The slopes in the meta-regression model were modified by fertility (P for interaction = 0.064) and geographic group (P for interaction = 0.027). There was a significant decline in SC between 1973 and 2011 among Unselected Western (−1.38; −2.02 to −0.74; P < 0.001) and among Fertile Western (−0.68; −1.31 to −0.05; P = 0.033), while no significant trends were seen among Unselected Other and Fertile Other. Among Unselected Western studies, the mean SC declined, on average, 1.4% per year with an overall decline of 52.4% between 1973 and 2011. Trends for TSC and SC were similar, with a steep decline among Unselected Western (−5.33 million/year, −7.56 to −3.11; P < 0.001), corresponding to an average decline in mean TSC of 1.6% per year and overall decline of 59.3%. Results changed minimally in multiple sensitivity analyses, and there was no statistical support for the use of a nonlinear model. In a model restricted to data post-1995, the slope both for SC and TSC among Unselected Western was similar to that for the entire period (−2.06 million/ml, −3.38 to −0.74; P = 0.004 and −8.12 million, −13.73 to −2.51, P = 0.006, respectively).

      WIDER IMPLICATIONS
      This comprehensive meta-regression analysis reports a significant decline in sperm counts (as measured by SC and TSC) between 1973 and 2011, driven by a 50–60% decline among men unselected by fertility from North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Because of the significant public health implications of these results, research on the causes of this continuing decline is urgently needed.

    • ... his analysis did not study the cause of declines, he speculated ...

      Well, that moved quickly from evidence to speculation as to cause. So this is not a scientific journal but a space for speculation?