person:uri avnery

  • Amos Oz n’était pas une colombe | Haidar Eid
    http://www.agencemediapalestine.fr/blog/2018/12/31/amos-oz-netait-pas-une-colombe

    Une fois encore, je me retrouve dans l’étrange situation de devoir écrire une nécrologie critique d’un autre membre de la soi-disant “gauche” israélienne, ou plutôt du “camp de la paix”. Il y a quatre mois il s’agissait d’Uri Avnery, fondateur du mouvement pacifiste Gush. Aujourd’hui c’est le prestigieux écrivain israélien Amos Oz, mort à l’âge de 79 ans. Bien que mon domaine de prédilection soit la littérature, ce sont les idées politiques de l’homme qui m’ont d’avantage intéressées. Source : Agence Media Palestine

    • Non, non, tu n’as pas le « devoir » de faire ça, si tu veux, tu n’écris rien.
      Cette victimisation serait drôle si ce n’était une attitude récurrente, ici de manière hallucinante.
      Avec faute d’orthographe pour le même prix.

  • Israel is building another 1,000 homes on Palestinian land. Where’s the outrage? | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/israel-settlement-expansion-1000-new-homes-palestinian-land-robert-fi

    n the week that Uri Avnery, the scourge of colonialism, died in Tel Aviv, the Israeli government announced a further enlargement of its massive colonial project in the occupied West Bank. Plans were now advanced, it said on Wednesday, for a further 1,000 “homes” in Jewish “settlements” – still the word we must use for such acts of land theft – and final approval had been given for another 382. Today, 600,000 Jewish Israelis live in about 140 colonies constructed on land belonging to another people, the Palestinians, either in the West Bank or east Jerusalem.

    #israël #destruction #colonisation #violence_d_état

  • Le militant pacifiste israélien Avnery, intervieweur d’Arafat, est décédé
    AFP, publié le lundi 20 août 2018 à 09h37
    https://actu.orange.fr/societe/culture/le-militant-pacifiste-israelien-avnery-intervieweur-d-arafat-est-decede-
    http://media2.woopic.com/api/v1/images/661%2Fafp-news%2F84b%2F8f7%2Fe1476d6af82ee6f330654680d9%2Fle-militant

    Le journaliste et militant pacifiste israélien Uri Avnery, durement attaqué dans son pays dans les années 1980 pour avoir rencontré le leader palestinien Yasser Arafat, est décédé dans la nuit à Tel-Aviv à 94 ans, a-t-on appris lundi de source hospitalière.

    Figure centrale du mouvement pacifiste israélien, Uri Avnery avait causé une tempête en recueillant en juillet 1982 ce qui est présenté comme la première interview de M. Arafat avec un journal israélien, Haolam Haze, qu’il dirigeait.

    Il était l’un des premiers Israéliens à rencontrer M. Arafat, alors considéré comme l’ennemi numéro un d’Israël.

    L’entretien avait eu lieu à Beyrouth, assiégée par l’armée israélienne.

    Avocat de la création d’un Etat palestinien, Uri Avnery avait été soldat et avait même appartenu à une milice de droite avant de devenir une voix éminente de la paix, en laquelle il a cru jusqu’au bout.

    De son vrai nom Helmut Ostermann, Uri Avnery est né en Allemagne en 1923, d’où il émigre vers la Palestine mandataire en 1933 après l’accession au pouvoir d’Adolf Hitler.

    Brièvement membre de l’Irgoun, le groupe clandestin armé de droite qui combat le mandat britannique, il s’engage dans l’armée israélienne après la création de l’Etat d’Israël en 1948. Il est blessé lors de la guerre israélo-arabe.

    En 1950, après sa démobilisation, il fonde Haolam Haze (Ce monde), hebdomadaire critique des institutions israéliennes. Il est la cible de la censure et d’attaques personnelles. Une bombe est placée au siège du journal en 1955, le seul de l’époque à ne pas être sous la coupe d’un parti.

    Il restera pendant 40 ans à la tête de Haolam Haze, publiant des enquêtes et des faits divers souvent sensationnels dans un style inconnu alors en Israël, tout en militant pour la coexistence avec la population arabe et en faveur de la création d’un Etat palestinien. Haolam Haze exercera une influence considérable sur la presse israélienne.

    Engagé tout à la gauche de l’échiquier politique israélien, il est élu au Parlement en 1965. Il y passera 10 ans en tout.

    En 1994, il fonde une ONG pacifiste, Gush Shalom (Bloc de la paix), en marge des autres mouvements pacifistes car plaidant pour le droit au retour des Palestiniens et de leurs descendants sur les terres dont ils ont été chassés ou qu’ils ont fuies à la création d’Israël en 1948.

    Ecrivain prolifique, il écrit une dizaine de livres, dont, en 2014, son autobiographie intitulée « optimiste ».

    Il a reçu de nombreux prix internationaux, dont le Prix de la paix Erich-Maria Remarque en 1995.

    Il avait été admis il y a plusieurs jours à l’hôpital Ichilov de Tel-Aviv à la suite d’un accident vasculaire cérébral.

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Uri Avnery, Veteran Peace Activist and Among First Israelis to Meet Arafat, Dies at 94
    Ofer Aderet - Aug 20, 2018 7:21 AM
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-uri-avenry-veteran-peace-activist-dies-at-94-1.6364250

    The Gush Shalom founder was one of the first Israelis to actively seek a Palestinian state as a peaceful solution to the conflict: ‘The difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist depends on your perspective’

  • The late Inas and Bayan Khammash
    Haaretz.com - Gideon Levy - Aug 12, 2018 2:50 AM
    Imagine the reaction if Hamas had killed a pregnant Israeli woman and her baby daughter. But Inas and Bayan were Palestinians from Dir al-Balah

    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-the-late-inas-and-bayan-khammash-1.6365468

    For Uri Avnery

    While the thirst for blood overtook social media; while commentator Shimon Riklin tweeted, “We want you to kill terrorists, and as many as possible, until the cries of their families overcome their sick murderousness”; while Minister Yoav Galant, a man whose hands are stained with a great deal of Gazan blood, declared with Biblical lyricism, “I’ll pursue my enemies and catch them, I won’t come back until they’re finished”; while Yair Lapid was writing, “The IDF must hit them with all its force, without hesitating, without thinking” – while all this was happening, Inas and Bayan Khammash were killed.

    They were mother and daughter. Inas was 23, in her ninth month of pregnancy; Bayan was an 18-month-old baby. They were killed when a missile hit their home, a rented apartment in a one-story building in Dir al-Balah in the Gaza Strip. The father of the family, Mohammed, was seriously wounded.

    Their killing didn’t slake the thirst for blood on social media in the slightest. It barely earned a mention in the mainstream Israeli media, which were far more concerned by the cancellation of a wedding in Sderot. That’s always Israel’s order of priorities.

    It’s not that the suffering of residents of Israeli communities near Gaza shouldn’t be given abundant coverage, but the complete disregard for the victims on the other side, even the killing of a pregnant mother and her daughter, is an act of collaboration with wartime propaganda. The complete public indifference to every killing, coupled with the thirst for blood that has become politically correct, is also evidence of an unparalleled nadir.

    It’s not hard to imagine what would have happened, both in Israel and abroad, if Hamas had killed a pregnant Israeli woman and her baby daughter. But Inas and Bayan were Palestinians from Dir al-Balah.

    Are there still any Israelis who glanced for a moment at their own loved ones and imagined the atrocity of killing a pregnant mother with her baby in her arms? Does the thought still pass through anyone’s mind here that Inas and Bayan were a pregnant mother and her baby daughter, like the neighbors across the way? Like your daughter and granddaughter. Like your wife and daughter.

    Can thoughts like these still arise even for a moment, given the onslaught of dehumanization, propaganda and brainwashing, which justifies any killing and blames the entire world, with the sole exception of those who committed it? Given the media, most of which just wants to see more and more blood being spilled in Gaza, and even does everything in its power so that blood will actually be spilled? Given the usual excuses that the Israel Defense Forces never intend to hit a pregnant woman and her daughter, they merely happen to do so, again and again and again and again?

    Given all this, is there still any chance that the killing of a mother and daughter will shock anyone here? That it will touch anyone?

    For almost 12 years, Gaza has been closed to Israeli journalists on Israel’s orders, and Israel’s fighting media accepts this submissively, even gladly. How badly I wish I could go to Inas and Bayan’s house right now, to tell their story and, above all, to remind the reader that they were human beings, people – a very difficult thing to do in the atmosphere of today’s Israel.

    On one of our last trips to Gaza, in September 2006, photographer Miki Kratsman and I went to the Hammad family’s house in the Brazil refugee camp in Rafah. A huge crater had opened up a few hundred meters from the miserable tin shack we entered. In the dim room, we saw nothing but a crushed wheelchair and a crippled woman lying on the sofa.

    A few nights earlier, the family heard airplanes overhead. Basma, then 42 and completely paralyzed, was lying in her iron bed. She quickly told her only daughter, 14-year-old Dam al-Iz, to rush to her so she could protect the girl with her own body. A concrete roof crashed down on them and killed Dam, her only daughter, who was lying curled up in her mother’s arms.

    Ever since Inas and Bayan were killed, I’ve been thinking about Dam al-Iz and her mother again.

  • Left-wing peace activist Uri Avnery hospitalized in critical condition Haaretz.com - Aug 09, 2018 10:37 AM
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/left-wing-peace-activist-uri-avnery-in-critical-condition-in-hospital-1.636

    Uri Avnery at a Tel Aviv rally in memory of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Nov. 4, 2017. Credit Meged Gozani

    Left-wing peace activist Uri Avnery has been hospitalized in very serious condition after suffering a stroke on Saturday and is said to be unconscious.

    Avnery, 94, has written opinion pieces on a regular basis for Haaretz. He is a former Knesset member and a founder of the Gush Shalom peace movement who worked as editor-in-chief of the Haolam Hazeh weekly. He has been an advocate for the past 70 years for the creation of a Palestinian state.

    Anat Saragusti, a journalist and human rights activist, who is close to the 94-year-old Avnery, posed a wry comment on Facebook late Wednesday in which she wrote of in part: “It can be assumed that he won’t write his weekly column this week He once told me half-kiddingly and half-seriously: ’If you don’t receive my column on Friday, you should know that I died.’ So he hasn’t died, but he’s not conscious. In exactly another month, on September 10, he’ll be celebrating his 95 birthday, and an event is already being prepared in his honor at the Tzavta [Theater in Tel Aviv]. I was there today, hoping for the best, fingers crossed.”

    Avnery was the first Israeli to meet with PLO leader Yasser Arafat, in Lebanon in 1982.

    In the last article that Avnery wrote for Haaretz, which appeared in Hebrew on Tuesday, he was highly critical of the controversial nation-state law that the Knesset passed last month, and argued that the Israeli nation and not the Jewish nation has its home in Israel. He also mentioned that he had once been among the petitioners in an unsuccessful effort before the High Court of Justice to change the nationality notation in his identity card from “Jewish” to “Israeli.”

  • Eyeless in Gaza
    by Uri Avnery | April 16, 2018
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/16/eyeless-in-gaza-4

    Write down: I, Uri Avnery, soldier number 44410 of the Israel army, hereby dissociate myself from the army sharpshooters who murder unarmed demonstrators along the Gaza Strip, and from their commanders, who give them the orders, up to the commander in chief.

    We don’t belong to the same army, or to the same state. We hardly belong to the same human race.

    Is my government committing “war crimes” along the border of the Gaza Strip?

    I don’t know. I am not a jurist.

    It seems that officials of the International Criminal Court believe that the acts of our soldiers do constitute war crimes. They demand an international investigation.

    To prevent that, our army command proposes an Israeli military investigation. That is manifestly ridiculous – an army investigating itself about acts committed on direct orders of the Chief of Staff. (...)

  • BDS is our only lever against Israeli occupation and apartheid
    Thinking that Israel can fix a colonial, apartheid regime without outside help is a dangerous illusion based on Israeli macho pride
    By Dr. Ruchama Marton | Sep. 26, 2017 | 4:31 AM
    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.814203

    In his article in Haaretz, Uri Avnery responds to what I said at my 80th birthday party. “Some of my friends believe the fight is lost, that it’s no longer possible to change Israel ‘from within,’ that only outside pressure can help and that the external pressure that is capable of doing this is the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. One of these friends is Dr. Ruchama Marton,” he writes.

    “First of all, I profoundly reject the argument that there is nothing we can do to save the state, and that we must trust foreigners to do our job for us. Israel is our state. We are responsible for it,” says Avnery.

    Here is my response to him.

    I never said at any time or in any place that I, or we, the non-Zionist left that’s called radical, want or expect that someone in the world will do our work for us. Not only isn’t it moral, it’s also stupid and impractical. From the civil war in Spain, a war that failed, to South Africa, a war that succeeded, and all the other struggles – the locals always fought and were killed together with their supporters around the world, never separately. In this respect, the radical left in Israel is in very good company. Avnery has no right to say about me/us that we expect someone from outside Israel to fight the fight for us. This is truly wrong.

    The correct struggle, in my opinion, is the anti-colonial and anti-apartheid struggle. Whoever deludes themselves that they can win this battle without help from the outside holds a mistaken, dangerous illusion, based on Zionist-Israeli macho pride. Me and only me.

    The question of peace is not relevant today. It is a rather convenient question, too pretty and impractical at the present. The support for peace is not a political position but lip service. Does Avnery know someone on the right or left who opposes peace? The present question is the question of occupation and apartheid.

    The anti-colonial struggle has a respected tradition, and the fight against apartheid has a strategy that proved itself. It is true that those who fight for real political change, and not just saving the country, need to give up the privileges granted to them by the apartheid regime.

    The right to political life is the most important right. Without the right to political life, it is like “Let the animals live.” To fight for the right to a clinic in the occupied territories is like fighting for a trough for a horse. The totalitarian regime reduces the citizen to “having rights” – the right to food, housing, education and health. When the right to political life is denied, the person is reduced to the state of an animal. Whoever is not willing to fight for political rights for everyone fights only for their own beauty. It is worth asking ourselves – are we just aspirin for the occupier? A band-aid for apartheid?

    I want to give the young people willing to fight the tools to think critically. In other words – not to play on the government’s playing field and by its agenda. We must learn to declare that we do not accept the government’s rules any longer. It means taking risks and giving up our privileges, which lie within the boundaries set by the regime. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said: “Good men must not obey the laws too well.”

    As long as Jewish Israelis who do not support BDS think it is possible to change from within, they are like the parable of the rabbit who wanted to change the lion from within. So the lion ate him. The rabbit did enter the lion but there his story ended. To change from within today is an illusion, the radical left cannot think and act in such a way.

    The Zionist left is afraid of radicalism because it is afraid of remaining alone, without a tribe. The problem is that there is another, larger tribe – and that tribe is on the outside. For example, the growing international BDS tribe. It is our ally because we have no allies within our local tribe. We have to know that from within, we are too few and too weak. We cannot do much without our allies on the outside. Today’s traitors are tomorrow’s heroes.

    Avnery says: “I believe that boycotting Israel itself would be a mistake. It would drive the entire Israeli public into the arms of the settlers, while our job is to isolate the settlers in the occupied territories and to separate them from the Israeli public. Our job here is to regroup, reorganize and redouble our efforts to overturn the current government and bring the peace camp to power.”

    I say to him: You are dealing with a baseless assumption about the future, based only on the fear of remaining alone, because the entire Israeli public will join with the settlers. Most already have. BDS is the only nonviolent lever that can cause Jewish-Israeli society to feel the yoke and pain of the occupation when it is forced to pay the price.

    If the occupation and apartheid lead to economic, cultural and diplomatic suffering because of an international boycott, it is very possible that a change will occur in Israel’s worldview, which is based on one hand on the enormous benefit to the country and its Jewish citizens from the occupation and separation, and on the other hand the cowardice of what is called the Israeli left, or peace camp.

    Dr. Ruchama Marton is the founder and president of Physicians for Human Rights – Israel. Her views here do not represent the views of the organization.

    This article was first published on the Haokets website.

  • Assad, Hersh & Sherlock Holmes
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article/assad-hersh-sherlock-holmes

    Assad, Hersh & Sherlock Holmes

    Uri Avnery est un journaliste, auteur et ancien membre de la Knesset. C’est aussi, espèce fort rare, un activiste pacifiste qui s’oppose avec constance à la politiqueSystème maximaliste de la direction israélienne ; ce n’est certainement pas, à proprement parler, un ami du Premier ministre Netanyahou

    Ce n’est pas non plus un ami du Syrien Assad, qu’il considère comme un dictateur. Il lui reconnaît pourtant, dans le tourbillon qu’est le désordre sanglant de Syrie et alentour, un rôle de stabilisateur et de rassembleur qui le fait s’opposer, lui Avnery, à la politique extrémiste aveugle de soutien au terrorisme islamiste anti-Assad de la direction israélienne.

    Dans ce texte repris le 30 juin 2017 par Antiwar.com, dont il est un collaborateur régulier (« Read other (...)

  • Syrie : A qui profite le crime ? | Chronique de Palestine
    http://chroniquepalestine.com/syrie-a-qui-profite-crime

    Et donc, quelques minutes (littéralement) après l’attaque, le New York Times et beaucoup d’excellents journaux occidentaux ont proclamé sans hésiter : C’est Assad, le coupable !

    Pas besoin de preuve. Ni d’enquête. C’était tout simplement évident. Ce ne pouvait être qu’Assad. En quelques minutes, tout le monde était au courant.

    Une tempête d’indignation a balayé le monde occidental. Il faut le punir ! Le pauvre Donald Trump, qui ne comprend rien à rien, a cédé à la pression et a lancé une attaque de missiles absolument insensée sur un aérodrome syrien, après avoir prêché pendant des années que les États-Unis ne devaient en aucun cas s’impliquer en Syrie. Soudain, il a changé d’avis. Juste pour donner une bonne leçon à ce salaud. Et pour montrer au monde que, lui, Trump, est un homme, un vrai de vrai.

    L’opération a eu un immense succès. En une nuit, Trump, qui était universellement méprisé, est devenu un héros national. Même les libéraux lui ont embrassé les pieds.

    Mais la question a continué à me tarauder Pourquoi Assad a-t-il fait cela ? Qu’avait-il à y gagner ?

    La réponse simple est : Rien. Absolument rien.

    Rien de particulièrement intéressant dans cet article, qui reprend des choses assez connues, sauf que la signature est en principe adorée par une bonne moitié des progressistes français qui ont applaudi aux bombardements étasuniens en #syrie.

  • The no-shows at Arafat’s funeral - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz.com
    All those who don’t understand why it was so difficult for the Palestinian-Israelis’ political representatives to show their final respects to Shimon Peres, should recall Arafat’s funeral and the ’respect’ shown him by the Israelis.

    Shlomo Sand Oct 14, 2016
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.747364

    On November 11, 2004, Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat died under mysterious circumstances. The next day his body was brought to Cairo, where a official state funeral was held. Representatives of 50 countries participated in the event, both admirers and rivals.
    Behind his coffin marched Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, Syrian President Bashar Assad, King Abdullah of Jordan, King Mohammed VI of Morocco, the presidents of Tunisia and Sudan, the leaders of Sweden, Brazil, Turkey, Malaysia and Pakistan, the deputy prime minister of China, the vice presidents of Austria, Bulgaria, Tanzania, Iraq and Afghanistan, the foreign ministers of Great Britain, France, Spain, Germany, Holland, Belgium, Ireland, Portugal, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Greece, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovakia, Canada, Indian and Slovenia, the parliamentary leaders of Italy, Russia, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates. It was an official farewell that was less impressive that Shimon Peres’ funeral, but still quite respectable for a president without a country.
    The United States, the well known neutral intermediary between Israel and Palestine, sent a low-ranking representative: William Burns, assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs. Israel, on the other hand, gave it the finger.
    No Israeli representative, either high- or low-ranking, or even very low-ranking, attended. None of the leaders of the opposition dreamed of showing his final respects to the leader of the Palestinian people, the first who recognized the State of Israel, and signed the Oslo Accords. Not Shimon Peres, not Ehud Barak, not Shlomo Ben-Ami and not even Uzi Baram bothered to participate in the Palestinians’ mourning.
    Some of them had courageously shaken his hand in the past, other had embraced him enthusiastically several years earlier. But with the outbreak of the second intifada he was once again categorized as a satanic terrorist. The pundits of the sane, moderate left repeatedly claimed in innumerable learned articles that he was not a partner and there was nobody to talk to. When the body of the rais was transferred to Ramallah, the funeral was attended by several “extremist,” marginal Israelis, the likes of Uri Avnery and Mohammed Barakeh.
    All the other peaceniks had to wait for the screening of the film “The Gatekeepers” in 2012; in other words, for the videos of all the chiefs of the Shin Bet security services, who declared that in real time they knew that Arafat did not encourage, organize or initiate the mass uprising in the second intifada, nor the acts of terror that accompanied it. For lack of choice the leader was forced to join the wave, otherwise he would have lost his prestige and his status. The disappointment at Barak’s unprepared and totally bizarre diplomatic step, and Ariel Sharon’s ascent to the Temple Mount, were among the main reasons for the eruption of the Palestinians’ unbridled opposition.

  • Le criminel de guerre Shimon Peres échappe à la justice humaine -
    par Ben White –
    28 septembre 2016 – Middle East Monitor – Traduction : Chronique de Palestine – Lotfallah
    http://chroniquepalestine.com/criminel-de-guerre-shimon-peres-echappe-a-justice-humaine

    Shimon Peres, décédé mercredi à l’age de 93 ans après avoir subi un accident vasculaire cérébral le 13 septembre, incarne la disparité entre l’image d’Israël en Occident et la réalité de ses sanglantes politiques coloniales en Palestine et dans la région.

  • Avec les Palestiniens, contre l’occupation | NPA
    http://www.npa2009.org/actualite/avec-les-palestiniens-contre-loccupation
    excellent article de Julien Salingue

    Sois colonisé et tais-toi !

    Comme le faisait en effet remarquer la journaliste israélienne Amira Hass dans une tribune parue le 6 octobre dernier dans Haaretz, « Les Palestiniens se battent pour leurs vies, [alors qu’]Israël se bat pour l’occupation ». Et de poursuivre : « Les jeunes Palestiniens ne se mettent pas à assassiner des juifs parce qu’ils sont juifs, mais parce que nous sommes leurs occupants, leurs tortionnaires, leurs geôliers, les voleurs de leur terre et de leur eau, les démolisseurs de leurs maisons, ceux qui les ont exilés, qui bloquent leur horizon. Les jeunes Palestiniens, vengeurs et désespérés, sont prêts à donner leur vie et à causer à leur famille une énorme douleur, parce que l’ennemi auquel ils font face leur prouve chaque jour que sa cruauté n’a pas de limites. »

    Quelles sont les perspectives offertes aux Palestiniens par ceux qui aujourd’hui critiquent leurs actions et exigent un « retour au calme » ? Aucune, sinon la perpétuation d’un système de domination et d’oppression contre lequel ils n’auraient pas le droit de s’insurger, et face auquel ils n’auraient qu’une seule attitude : la soumission et le silence, en attendant que les choses s’améliorent dans un avenir plus ou moins lointain. En d’autres termes : sois colonisé et tais-toi !

    • Excellent point de vue auquel je m’y retrouve. Toute colonisation est par essence abjecte. J’ai vécu la colonisation étant adolescent dans mon pays Djibouti, occupé par la France de 1882 á 1977. Je suis particulièrement sensible à la cause palestinienne et faisait parti durant 10 ans de la commission djiboutienne de soutien de la Palestine. Elle a été fondée et présidée par notre actuel président de la république Ismaël Omar. Et c’est pour dire que les malheurs les cris et les pleurs les ressentiments du peuple palestinien dans l’indifférence des nations occidentales, nous accablent nuit et jour. Ceux se disant être les rescapés de la shoa et leurs descendants, ont perpétré les mêmes méthodes avec les mêmes moyens mais plus sophistiqués contre le peuple palestinien. Et ceux-là sont ceux venus des pays de l’Est et l’ex URSS. Enfin je voudrais á travers ce site lancer un appel au peuple juif de par le monde á contrecarrer le complot des sionistes qui veulent détruire á la longue Israël et exterminer les palestiniens. Il faut pour les juifs d’Israël un Mandela juif. Et je suis fort persuader qu’un tel homme qui abattra l’apartheid sioniste surgira un jour ou l’autre. Vive le peuple juif. A bas les sionistes génocidaires. Je manifeste ici min respect et mon admiration á un grand homme. Il s’agit de Uri Avnery, une sorte de Mandela israélien. Salut à toute l’équipe. Aboubaker.

  • Corbyn and the Middle East : where does he really stand ?
    http://www.al-bab.com/blog/2015/september/corbyn-middle-east.htm#sthash.Xdy8DQJN.QHuxqeLE.dpbs

    Asked in the interview if there is anyone he regards as “the man or woman of the Middle East”, he names Uri Avnery, the 92-year-old Israeli peace campaigner, and Mustapha Barghouti, a veteran activist on the Palestinian side. This says a lot about Corbyn’s focus. Although the Israel-Palestinian conflict continues to be a running sore and terrible things happen which should not be ignored, events elsewhere over the last few years have made it increasingly marginal.

    Corbyn’s apparent preoccupation with Israel-Palestine, though praiseworthy up to a point, raises questions about whether he fully appreciates the magnitude of other issues, such as the scale of the threat posed by religious authoritarianism or the historic proportions of the social and political upheaval now sweeping across the region. His interview offers little reassurance on that score.

    Le second paragraphe donne le ton : cet excellent tour d’horizon des positions de #Corbyn sur le #Moyen-Orient est tout sauf complaisant.

    #palestine

  • L’apprenti sorcier - Association France Palestine Solidarité
    Uri Avnery - « The Magician’s Apprentice » - 22/08/15 - traduction FL/SW
    http://www.france-palestine.org/L-apprenti-sorcier

    (...) Je pense que les Iraniens ne voulaient pas beaucoup la bombe de toute façon. D’après tout ce que l’on peut constater, l’accord a provoqué la joie dans les rues de Téhéran. Le sentiment qui semble l’emporter est : « Grâce à Allah, nous avons fini par nous débarrasser de toutes ces absurdités ! »

    MAIS LA bombe qui n’existe pas a déjà causé d’immenses dommages à Israël. Bien pires que si elle existait dans quelque sombre caverne.

    Tous les Israéliens sont d’accord sur le fait que le principal capital dont dispose Israël est sa relation particulière, sans équivalent, avec les États-Unis. C’est unique.

    Unique et sans prix. En matière militaire, Israël obtient les systèmes d’armes dernier cri, pratiquement pour rien. Non moins important, Israël ne peut mener aucune guerre pendant plus de quelques jours sans un pont aérien d’alimentation en munitions et en pièces de rechange depuis les États-Unis.

    Mais cela ne représente qu’un petit élément de notre sécurité nationale. Encore plus importante est la conscience que vous ne pouvez menacer Israël sans affronter toute la puissance des États-Unis. C’est une protection formidable, que le monde envie.

    De plus, chaque pays du monde sait que si vous voulez obtenir quelque chose de Washington DC, et en particulier du Congrès des États-Unis, vous avez intérêt à passer par Jérusalem et à payer le prix. Combien cela vaut-il ?

    Et puis il y a le véto. Pas le petit véto qu’utilisera Obama pour neutraliser un vote du Congrès contre l’accord, mais le Grand Véto, celui qui bloque la moindre résolution du Conseil de Sécurité des Nations unies pour censurer Israël, même pour des actions qui en appellent à la justice céleste. Une occupation de 49 ans. Des centaines de milliers de colons qui violent le droit international. Des meurtres presque quotidiens.

    Condamner Israël ? N’y pensez pas. Des sanctions contre Israël ? Vous voulez rire. Tant qu’Israël est protégé par la puissance des États-Unis, il peut faire ce qu’il veut.

    C’est tout cela qui est maintenant mis en question. Peut-être le mal est-il déjà fait, comme des fissures invisibles dans les fondations d’un immeuble. L’étendue du mal pourrait n’apparaître que dans les prochaines années. (...)

  • The War of Fools by Uri Avnery — Antiwar.com
    http://original.antiwar.com/avnery/2015/05/19/the-war-of-fools

    Since then until now the Lebanon-Israel border has been comparatively quiet. If there had been any discernible war aim at all, it was to terrorize the Lebanese civilian population by widespread destruction and killing. This was indeed achieved. Hassan Nasrallah, the outstanding Hezbollah leader (who was appointed after his much less able predecessor was “eliminated” by the Israeli army in a “targeted killing”) publicly admitted with unusual candor that he would not have ordered the prisoner-taking action if he had foreseen that it would result in a war.

    However, listening to the three Israeli leaders in the TV stories, one is struck by the glaring incompetence of all three. They started a war in which hundreds of Israelis and Lebanese were killed and houses destroyed without a valid reason, conducted a war without a clear plan, took decisions without the necessary knowledge. Speaking on TV, they showed very little respect for each other.

  • Waving in the first Row : Reflections on the recent Paris Massacre and Zionism
    Uri Avnery, 17 January 2015
    https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/reflections-on-the-recent-paris-massacre-and-zionism

    THE THREE Islamic terrorists could have been very proud of themselves, if they had lived to see it.

    By committing two attacks (quite ordinary ones by Israeli standards) they spread panic throughout France, brought millions of people onto the streets, gathered more than 40 heads of states in Paris. They changed the landscape of the French capital and other French cities by mobilizing thousands of soldiers and police officers to guard Jewish and other potential targets. For several days they dominated the news throughout the world.

    Three terrorists, probably acting alone. Three!!!

    FOR OTHER potential Islamic terrorists throughout Europe and America, this must look like a huge achievement. It is an invitation for individuals and tiny groups to do the same again, everywhere.

    Terrorism means striking fear. The three in Paris certainly succeeded in doing that. They terrorized the French population. And if three youngsters without any qualifications can do that, imagine what 30 could do, or 300!

    Frankly, I did not like the huge demonstration. I have been in many demonstrations in my time, maybe more than 500, but always against the powers that be. I have never participated in a demonstration called by the government, even when the purpose was good. They remind me too much of the late Soviet Union, Fascist Italy and worse. Not for me, thank you.

    But this particular demonstration was also counterproductive. Not only did it prove that terrorism is effective, not only did it invite copycat attacks, but it also hurt the real fight against the fanatics.

    To conduct an effective fight, one has to put oneself first into the shoes of the fanatics and try to understand the dynamic that pushes young local-born Muslims to commit such acts. Who are they? What do they think? What are their feelings? In what circumstances did they grow up? What can be done to change them?

    After decades of neglect, that is hard work. It takes time and effort, with results uncertain. Much easier for politicians to march in the street in front of the cameras.

    AND WHO marched in the first row, beaming like a victor?

    Our own and only Bibi.

    How did he get there? The facts came out within record time. Seems he was not invited at all. On the contrary, President Francois Hollande sent explicit messages: please, please don’t come. It would turn the demo into a show of solidarity with the Jews, instead of a public outcry for the freedom of the press and other “republican values”. Netanyahu came nevertheless, with two extreme rightist ministers in tow.

    Placed in the second row, he did what Israelis do: he shoved aside a black African president in front of him and placed himself in the front row.

    Once there, he began waving to the people on the balconies along the way. He was beaming, like a Roman general in his triumphal parade. One can only guess the feelings of Hollande and the other heads of state – who tried to look appropriately solemn and mournful – at this display of Chutzpah.

    Netanyahu went to Paris as part of his election campaign. As a veteran campaigner, he knew that three days in Paris, visiting synagogues and making proud Jewish speeches, were worth more than three weeks at home, slinging mud..

    THE BLOOD of the four Jews murdered in the kosher supermarket was not yet dry, when Israeli leaders called upon the Jews in France to pack up and come to Israel. Israel, as everybody knows, is the safest place on earth.

    This was an almost automatic Zionist gut reaction. Jews are in danger. Their only safe haven is Israel. Make haste and come. The next day Israeli papers reported joyfully that in 2015 more than 10,000 French Jews were about to come to live here, driven by growing anti-Semitism.

    Apparently, there is a lot of anti-Semitism in France and other European countries, though probably far less than Islamophobia. But the fight between Jews and Arabs on French soil has little to do with anti-Semitism. It is a struggle imported from North Africa.

    When the Algerian war of liberation broke out in 1954, the Jews there had to choose sides. Almost all decided to support the colonial power, France, against the Algerian people.

    That had a historical background. In 1870, the French minister of justice, Adolphe Cremieux, who happened to be a Jew, conferred French citizenship on all Algerian Jews, separating them from their Muslim neighbors.

    The Algerian Liberation Front (FLN) tried very hard to draw the local Jews to their side. I know because I was somewhat involved. Their underground organization in France asked me to set up an Israeli support group, in order to convince our Algerian co-religionists. I founded the “Israeli Committee For A Free Algeria” and published material which was used by the FLN in their effort to win over the Jews.

    In vain. The local Jews, proud of their French citizenship, staunchly supported the colonists. In the end, the Jews were prominent in the OAS, the extreme French underground which conducted a bloody struggle against the freedom fighters. The result was that practically all the Jews fled Algeria together with the French when the day of reckoning arrived. They did not go to Israel. Almost all of them went to France. (Unlike the Moroccan and Tunisian Jews, many of whom came to Israel. Generally, the poorer and less educated chose Israel, while the French-educated elite went to France and Canada.)

    What we see now is the continuation of this war between Algerian Muslims and Jews on French soil. All the four “French” Jews killed in the attack had North African names and were buried in Israel.

    Not without trouble. The Israeli government put great pressure on the four families to bury their sons here. They wanted to bury them in France, near their homes. After a lot of haggling about the price of the graves, the families finally agreed.

    It has been said that Israelis love immigration and don’t love the immigrants. That certainly applies to the new “French” immigrants. In recent years, “French” tourists have been coming here in large numbers. They were often disliked. Especially when they started to buy up apartments on the Tel Aviv sea front and left them empty, as a kind of insurance, while young local people could neither find nor afford apartments in the metropolitan area. Practically all these “French” tourists and immigrants are of North African origin.

    WHEN ASKED what drives them to Israel, their unanimous answer is: anti-Semitism. That is not a new phenomenon. As a matter of fact, the vast majority of Israelis, they or their parents or grandparents, were driven here by anti-Semitism.

    The two terms – anti-Semitism and Zionism – were born at almost the same time, towards the end of the 19 th century. Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement, conceived his idea when he was working in France as a foreign correspondence of a Viennese newspaper during the Dreyfus affair, when virulent anti-Semitism in France reached new heights. (Anti-Semitism is, of course, a misnomer. Arabs are Semites, too. But the term is generally used to mean only Jew-haters.)

    Later, Herzl wooed outspoken anti-Semitic leaders in Russia and elsewhere, asking for their help and promising to take the Jews off their hands. So did his successors. In 1939, the Irgun underground planned an armed invasion of Palestine with the help of the profoundly anti-Semitic generals of the Polish army. One may wonder if the State of Israel would have come into being in 1948 if there had not been the Holocaust. Recently, a million and a half Russian Jews were driven to Israel by anti-Semitism.

    ZIONISM WAS born at the end of the 19 th century as a direct answer to the challenge of anti-Semitism. After the French revolution, the new national idea took hold of all European nations, big and small, and all of the national movements were more or less anti-Semitic.

    The basic belief of Zionism is that Jews cannot live anywhere except in the Jewish State, because the victory of anti-Semitism is inevitable everywhere. Let the Jews of America rejoice in their freedom and prosperity – sooner or later that will come to an end. They are doomed like Jews everywhere outside Israel.

    The new outrage in Paris only confirms this basic belief. There was very little real commiseration in Israel. Rather, a secret sense of triumph. The gut reaction of ordinary Israelis is: “We told you so!” and also: “Come quickly, before it is too late!”

    I HAVE often tried to explain to my Arab friends: the anti-Semites are the greatest enemy of the Palestinian people. The anti-Semites have helped drive the Jews to Palestine, and now they are doing so again. And some of the new immigrants will certainly settle beyond the Green Line in the occupied Palestinian territories on stolen Arab land.

    The fact that Israel benefits from the Paris attack has led some Arab media to believe that the whole affair is really a “false flag” operation. Ergo, in this case, the Arab perpetrators were really manipulated by the Israeli Mossad.

    After a crime, the first question is “cui bono”, who benefits? Obviously, the only winner from this outrage is Israel. But to draw the conclusion that Israel is hiding behind the Jihadists is utter nonsense.

    The simple fact is that all Islamic Jihadism on European soil hurts only the Muslims. Fanatics of all stripes generally help their worst enemies. The three Muslim men who committed the outrages in Paris certainly did Binyamin Netanyahu a great favor.

    #Charlie_Hebdo #Palestine #Uri_Avnery #Algerie #Netanyahu #Je_ne_suis_pas_Charlie #Sionisme

  • La ville impie -
    Uri Avnery, dimanche 23 novembre 2014
    http://www.france-palestine.org/La-ville-impie

    (...) KOLLEK [ maire de Jérusalem élu en 1965 ] AVAIT le soutien efficace de Moshe Dayan, alors ministre de la Défense. Dayan pensait tenir les Pales­ti­niens tran­quilles en leur accordant tous les avan­tages pos­sibles, sauf la liberté.

    Quelques jours après l’occupation de Jéru­salem Est, il fit enlever le drapeau israélien que des soldats avaient planté devant le Dôme du Rocher sur le Mont du Temple. Dayan transmit aussi l’autorité de fait sur le Mont aux auto­rités reli­gieuses musulmanes.

    Les juifs furent auto­risés à se rendre sur l’esplanade du Temple en petit nombre et seulement en visi­teurs dis­crets. Il leur était interdit d’y prier, et ils se fai­saient expulser éner­gi­quement s’ils remuaient les lèvres. Ils avaient, après tout, la pos­si­bilité de prier autant qu’il le vou­laient au Mur occi­dental voisin (qui est une partie de l’ancien mur exté­rieur de l’esplanade).

    Le gou­ver­nement avait pu imposer ce décret en raison d’une fait reli­gieux bizarre : les juifs ortho­doxes ont l’interdiction des rabbins d’entrer sur le Mont du Temple. Selon une règle biblique, les juifs ordi­naires n’ont pas accès au Saint des Saints, seul le Grand Prêtre en avait le droit. Du fait que per­sonne ne sait aujourd’hui où il se situait exac­tement, les juifs pieux ne peuvent pas avoir accès à l’ensemble de l’esplanade.

    Le résultat, c’est que les pre­mières années de l’occupation furent un temps de bonheur pour Jéru­salem Est. Juifs et Arabes se mêlaient librement. Il était de bon ton pour les Juifs de faire leurs courses au marché arabe coloré et de dîner dans les res­tau­rants “orientaux”. J’ai moi-​​même souvent fré­quenté des hôtels arabes et me suis fait un bon nombre d’amis arabes.

    Cette ambiance a changé gra­duel­lement. Le gou­ver­nement et la muni­ci­palité ont dépensé beaucoup d’argent pour embour­geoiser Jéru­salem Ouest, mais les quar­tiers arabes de Jéru­salem Est ont été négligés, et sont devenus misé­rables. Les infra­struc­tures et les ser­vices locaux se sont dégradés. Les Arabes n’obtenaient presque pas de permis de construire, afin d’obliger les jeunes géné­ra­tions à aller habiter hors des limites de la ville. C’est alors que le mur de “sépa­ration” a été construit, empê­chant les gens de l’extérieur d’entrer dans la ville, les coupant de leurs écoles et de leurs emplois. Pourtant, en dépit de tout cela, la popu­lation arabe a aug­menté pour atteindre 40% du total.

    L’oppression poli­tique a aug­menté. Dans le cadre des accords d’Oslo, les Arabes de Jéru­salem avaient le droit de voter pour l’Autorité Pales­ti­nienne. Mais ensuite ils en furent empêchés, leurs repré­sen­tants furent arrêtés et expulsés de la ville. Toutes les ins­ti­tu­tions pales­ti­niennes furent fermées par la force, y compris la célèbre Maison de l’Orient, où le très admiré et aimé leader des Arabes de Jéru­salem, feu Faisal al-​​Husseini, avait son bureau.

    KOLLEK fut rem­placé par Ehoud Olmert et un maire orthodoxe qui n’avait rien à faire de Jéru­salem Est, mis à part le Mont du Temple.

    Et c’est alors qu’un désastre sup­plé­men­taire s’est produit. Les Israé­liens laïques quittent Jéru­salem qui devient rapi­dement un bastion orthodoxe. En désespoir de cause, ils ont décidé de virer le maire orthodoxe et d’élire un homme d’affaires laïque. Mal­heu­reu­sement c’est un ultra-​​nationaliste enragé.

    Nir Barkat se com­porte en maire de Jéru­salem Ouest et en gou­verneur mili­taire de Jéru­salem Est. Il traite ses sujets pales­ti­niens en ennemis, que l’on peut tolérer s’ils obéissent pai­si­blement, que l’on réprime bru­ta­lement dans le cas contraire. L’abandon dans lequel ont été laissés les quar­tiers arabes pendant des décennies, le rythme accéléré de construction de nou­veaux quar­tiers juifs, la bru­talité excessive de la police (encou­ragée ouver­tement par le maire), tout cela crée une situation explosive.

    La sépa­ration com­plète de Jéru­salem de la Cis­jor­danie, son arrière-​​pays naturel, aggrave encore davantage la situation.

    À cela on peut ajouter l’interruption du soi-​​disant pro­cessus de paix, puisque tous les Pales­ti­niens sont convaincus que Jéru­salem Est doit être la capitale du futur État de Palestine.

    À CETTE SITUATION il ne manque qu’une étin­celle pour mettre le feu à la ville. Elle a été fournie comme il se doit par les déma­gogues de droite de la Knesset. Riva­lisant pour attirer l’attention et soigner leur popu­larité, ils ont entrepris de visiter le Mont du Temple, l’un après l’autre, déclen­chant à chaque fois une tempête. Ajouté au désir évident de cer­tains reli­gieux et de fana­tiques de droite de construire le Troi­sième Temple à l’emplacement de la mosquée sainte al-​​Aqsa et du Dôme doré du Rocher, cela a suffi pour faire naître le sen­timent que les sanc­tuaires sacrés étaient vraiment en danger.

    C’est alors qu’est survenu l’horrible meurtre de ven­geance d’un garçon arabe enlevé par des Juifs et brûlé vif avec de l’essence versé dans sa bouche.

    Les habi­tants musulmans de la ville se sont mis à réagir indi­vi­duel­lement. Sans se pré­oc­cuper des orga­ni­sa­tions, presque sans armes, ils se sont livrés à une série d’attaques que l’on qua­lifie main­tenant de “l’intifada des indi­vidus”. Agissant seul, ou avec un frère ou un cousin en qui il a confiance, un Arabe prend un couteau, ou un pis­tolet (s’il peut s’en pro­curer un), ou sa voiture, ou un tracteur et tue les Israé­liens les plus proches. Il sait qu’il va mourir.(...)

  • Vous avez sans doute entendu dire qu’un Palestinien, Khair al-Din Hamdan, avait été abattu par la police lors d’une arrestation qui avait mal tourné, Hamdan ayant attaqué un policier qui s’était défendu. Version de la police relayée par l’AFP alors que les Palestiniens affirmaient que Hamdan avait été abattu de sang froid et dans le dos et que la police mentait. Plusieurs jours après les faits, la presse israélienne commence à relayer la version palestinienne et à faire des reproches à la police.
    https://www.facebook.com/notes/sol-salbe/risk-of-a-conflagration-the-policeman-who-shot-hamdan-killed-him-in-cold-blood/10152487185011662

    Peut-être à cause de la vidéo tournée par un Palestinien ? Mais cette vidéo était déjà disponible lorsque le Figaro, par exemple, reprenait la version israélienne :
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UNlXJ7QQGM

    #Palestine #Assassinats #Police #Mensonges #vidéo

    • Eau, sang et essence
      Uri Avnery, mardi 18 novembre 2014
      http://www.france-palestine.org/Eau-sang-et-essence

      (...) Il s’est avéré qu’avant que les caméras n’aient enre­gistré la scène, la police avait arrêté le cousin de Hamdan et l’avait poussé dans la voiture. Mani­fes­tement, Kheir a-​​Din voulait libérer son cousin et c’est pour cela qu’il tapa sur la voiture. Le cousin l’a vu ciblé par les tirs et jeté sur le plancher de la voiture dans laquelle il était assis.

      La pre­mière réaction du com­man­dement de la police fut de jus­tifier le com­por­tement des poli­ciers dont les noms et les photos ne furent pas révélés. Ils furent mutés subrep­ti­cement dans une autre unité de la police

      JE RELATE l’incident en détail, non parce qu’il est unique mais au contraire – parce qu’il est tel­lement typique. Ce qui était par­ti­culier c’est sim­plement la pré­sence inaperçue de la caméra.

      Plu­sieurs ministres avaient loué le com­por­tement exem­plaire de la police dans cet incident. On peut imputer cela à des déma­gogues d’extrême droite en quête de publicité, qui pensent que leurs élec­teurs approuvent sans dis­cer­nement toutes les exé­cu­tions d’Arabes. Il faut leur apprendre.

      Cependant, il y a une décla­ration qu’on ne peut ignorer : celle du ministre de la Sécurité intérieure.

      Quelques jours avant l’incident, le ministre Yitzhak Aha­ro­nowitz, un protégé d’Avigdor Lie­berman et lui-​​même ancien officier de police, avait déclaré publi­quement qu’il ne voulait pas qu’un seul ter­ro­riste survive à une attaque. C’est une décla­ration mani­fes­tement illégale. En fait c’est un appel au crime. Selon la loi, les poli­ciers n’ont pas le droit tirer sur des “ter­ro­ristes”, ni sur per­sonne d’autre, après qu’ils aient été faits pri­son­niers, en par­ti­culier lorsqu’ils sont blessés et qu’ils ne pré­sentent aucun“danger mortel”.(...)

  • 5月11日のツイート
    http://twilog.org/ChikuwaQ/date-140511

    My Tweeted Times tweetedtimes.com/ChikuwaQ - top stories by IsabRegnier, FabienTrecourt, Val_Do posted at 12:00:08

    RT @polarcityman: TIME magazine ’’cli fi goes to hollywood’’ behind paywall but for limited time only pcillu101.blogspot.tw/2014/05/time-m… #clifi posted at 11:45:54

    ▶ Little Feat Google Hangout with Bill Payne - YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKEj6n… posted at 10:47:57

    RT @GreeGreece: A National Hero The Israeli Army Rebellion by URI AVNERY bit.ly/1iDvUfO posted at 10:38:07

    “@seansaunders1: www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ6Mzv… Arvo Part - Spiegel en Spiegel.” via @ArvoPartProject

    posted at 10:11:37

    Top story: Pour Philippe Val, Snowden est un « traître à la démocratie » - Le n… rue89.nouvelobs.com/2014/05/10/phi…, see more tweetedtimes.com/ChikuwaQ posted at 09:49:42

    Papier is out! (...)

  • South Africa FM : Struggle of Palestinians is ’our struggle’ | Maan News Agency
    http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=643956

    BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — South Africa’s foreign minister strongly criticized the Israeli occupation of Palestine and compared the situation in the occupied territories to apartheid in South Africa on Friday.

    “The struggle of the people of Palestine is our struggle,” South Africa’s The Times quoted her as saying.

    “The last time I saw a map of Palestine, I couldn’t go to sleep. It is just dots, smaller than those of the homelands, and that broke my heart,” she added, referring to apartheid-era Bantustans on which black residents of South Africa were forced to live as part of a system of racial separation engineered by the formerly ruling white minority.

    “Ministers of South Africa do not visit Israel currently,” she added. “We have agreed to slow down and curtail senior leadership contact with that regime until things begin to look better.”

    “Our Palestinian friends have never asked us to disengage with Israel. They had asked us in formal meetings to not engage with the regime,” Nkoana-Mashabane was quoted as saying.

    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Taking Apartheid Apart par Uri Avnery
    26/10/13
    http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1382707541

    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““

    Comment se fait-il qu’Uri Avnery en sache si peu sur Israël, ou sur l’apartheid ?

    dimanche 3 novembre 2013 - Jonathan Cook - The Palestine Chronicle
    http://www.info-palestine.net/spip.php?article14148

    (...) Il y a beaucoup à critiquer dans son papier faiblement étayé, où il se base sur une conversation récente avec un « expert » dont il ne divulgue pas le nom. Avnery, comme beaucoup avant lui, commet l’erreur de croire que, en mettant en avant les différences entre Israël et l’Afrique du Sud de l’apartheid, il apporte la preuve qu’Israël n’est pas un État d’apartheid. Mais ce n’est là que l’ultime argument d’un homme de paille. Personne ne prétend qu’Israël est identique à l’Afrique du Sud. Vous n’avez quand même pas besoin d’un expert pour vous en rendre compte.

    Quand on dit qu’Israël est un État d’apartheid, on se réfère au crime d’apartheid tel que défini par le droit international. Selon le Statut de Rome de 2002 de la Cour pénale internationale, l’apartheid comprend les actes inhumains « commis dans le cadre d’un régime institutionnalisé d’oppression systématique et de domination par un groupe racial sur un autre ou plusieurs autres groupes raciaux et commis avec l’intention de maintenir ce régime. »

    Aussi, de savoir de quelle couleur sont les victimes de l’apartheid, la part de population qu’elles représentent, si l’économie dépend de leur travail productif, que les premiers sionistes étaient socialistes, où que les Palestiniens ont un Nelson Mandela, et cætera, tout cela n’a absolument aucun intérêt pour déterminer si Israël est un État d’apartheid.

    La distinction essentielle pour Avnery se situe entre « Israël proprement dit » et les territoires occupés. Dans les territoires, Avnery admet qu’il existe certains parallèles avec l’Afrique du Sud de l’apartheid. Mais à l’intérieur d’Israël, il pense que la comparaison est outrancièrement injuste. Laissons de côté la question, qui n’est pas sans importance, qu’Israël refuse de reconnaître ses frontières telles qu’internationalement définies ; ou que l’une de ses principales stratégies est une politique de diviser pour régner, dans un style colonial, qui compte sur l’instauration de différences concernant les droits des Palestiniens sous sa domination, comme d’un moyen pour mieux les opprimer.

    Les motifs qui poussent Avnery à mettre l’accent sur une distinction territoriale doivent être clairs. Il croit que l’occupation est un crime, et qu’elle doit cesser. Mais il croit aussi qu’Israël, en tant qu’État juif, doit subsister après la fin de cette occupation. En réalité, pour lui, les deux questions sont inextricablement liées. Selon lui, pour qu’à long terme Israël puisse survivre en tant qu’État juif, il lui faut se séparer des territoires occupés.

    Cela concorde avec une idéologie sioniste libérale assez classique : la ségrégation est considérée comme offrant une protection contre les menaces démographiques posées par les non juifs pour la future réussite de l’État juif, et elle est arrivée à son apothéose avec la construction du mur en Cisjordanie et le désengagement de Gaza. Avnery se place simplement parmi les partisans les plus humains de cette logique.(...)

    #apartheid #israel

  • “Ich bin ein Bil’iner!” Uri Avnery
    – Gush Shalom - Israeli Peace Bloc
    http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1362763452

    One may wonder how two films like these made it to the top of the Academy awards in the first place. My own (completely unproven) conjecture is that the Jewish academy members voted for their selection without actually seeing them, assuming that an Israeli film could not be un-kosher. But when the pro-Israeli lobby started a ruckus, the members actually viewed the films, shuddered, and gave the top award to Searching for Sugar Man.

    #Palestine

  • The Riddle of the Israel Lobby

    Uri Avnery

    Le long débat, au cours des années, entre deux militants de la paix, Uri Avnery et Nahum Goldmann

    Ceux qui sont intéressés à Nahum Goldmann pourront lire dans le livre d’Eric Rouleau, Dans les coulisses du Proche-Orient, ses tentatives infructueuses d’ouvrir un dialogue entre Nasser et les Israéliens (infructueuses du fait de l’intransigeance israélienne) http://blog.mondediplo.net/2012-10-31-Dans-les-coulisses-du-Proche-Orient-un-temoignage

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/22/the-riddle-of-the-israel-lobby

    One of the most interesting and prolonged private debates I have had in my life was with the brilliant Dr. Nahum Goldmann. The subject: American peace initiatives.

    It was an unequal debate, of course. Goldmann was my elder by 28 years. While I was a mere editor of an Israeli news magazine, he was an international figure, President of the World Zionist Organization and the World Jewish Congress.

    In the mid ’50s, when I was looking for a personality who could possibly contest David Ben-Gurion’s stranglehold on the prime minister’s office, I thought of Goldmann. He had the necessary stature and was liked by moderate Zionists. No less important, he had a clear set of opinions. From the first day of the State of Israel, he had proposed that Israel become a “Middle Eastern Switzerland”, neutral between the US and the Soviet Union. For him, peace with the Arabs was absolutely essential for the future of Israel.

  • The Riddle of the Israel Lobby » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/22/the-riddle-of-the-israel-lobby

    URI AVNERY

    The two professors, Mearsheimer and Walt, dared to say it: the pro-Israeli lobby controls American policy.

    But this theory is not completely satisfying. What about the spying affair around Jonathan Pollard, who stays in prison for life in spite of immense Israeli pressure to release him?

    Can a world power really be induced by a small foreign country and a powerful domestic lobby to act for decades against its basic national interest?

    Another factor often mentioned is the power of the arms industry.

    When I was young, no one was more despised than the Merchants of Death. These days are long past. Countries – including Israel – pride themselves on selling arms to the most despicable regimes.

    The US supplies us with huge quantities of the most sophisticated weapons. True, a lot of these come to us as a gift – but that doesn’t change the picture. The arms producers are paid by the US government as a kind of New Deal public works project supported enthusiastically even (and especially) by the Republicans. After the arms are supplied to Israel, some Arab countries see themselves compelled to order huge quantities for themselves, for which they pay through the nose. See: Saudi Arabia.

    This theory, which was once very popular, does not really satisfy either. No single industry is powerful enough to compel a nation to act against its own general interests for half a century.

    ....