person:zahran alloush

  • ‘Saudi, UAE assisted Assad in detecting, killing Syrian opposition leaders’
    https://www.yenisafak.com/en/world/saudi-uae-assisted-assad-in-detecting-killing-syrian-opposition-leaders-3

    Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which has recently reopened its embassy in Damascus, cooperated with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, leading to the detection and killing of close to 80 leaders of the Syrian opposition.

    The locations of Jaysh al-Islam’s leader Zahran Alloush, Ahrar al-Sham leaders Hassan Aboud and Khalid al-Suri, leader of Liwa al-Tawhid Abdulkadir Salih, who all fell martyrs to the bombings of the Syrian regime, were shared by Saudi Arabia and the UAE with Assad, according to a Syrian opposition commander.

    In an exclusive interview with Yeni Şafak daily, Mahmoud Sulayman, a commander of the Mohammad Al-Fateh brigade, revealed that between the years 2012 and 2014, the Abu Dhabi and Riyadh brought hundreds of satellite phones to the front.

    “The passwords of the UAE-made ‘Thuraya’ and the British-made ‘Inmarsat’ satellite phones, which were given to group commanders by the UAE and Saudi Arabia, were shared with Damascus, thus this information led to the killings of dozens of opposition commanders,” he said.

    La source est... turque.

    Toujours se méfier des cadeaux qu’on vous fait (message valable pour les Kurdes aussi !)

    #syrie #grand_jeu #tic_arabes

  • Le « Y » syrien : Damas-Alep, Homs-Lattaquié par Juan Cole.
    Un résumé à ma sauce : pour assurer sa viabilité, l’Etat syrien ne doit pas perdre le contrôle de la dorsale : Damas-Homs-Hama-Alep et de la côte. Sans quoi, les jeux sont faits. L’intervention russe a permis, en partie, à l’armée syrienne de reprendre le contrôle de ce Y.
    Top 5 Ways Putin has won big in Syria and why Europe is embracing him
    http://www.juancole.com/2016/01/top-5-ways-putin-has-won-big-in-syria-and-is-being-embraced-by-europe.html

    So what has the Russian air force accomplished?
    1. It allowed the reopening of the road from Hama to West Aleppo, ending the siege of that regime-held part of the city and pushing back the rebels from it.
    2. It retook most of Latakia Province, safeguarding the port. Yesterday came the news that the major northern al-Qaeda-held town of Rabia had fallen to the government forces, meaning that Latakia is nearly 100% in government control. These advances into northern Latakia involved hitting Turkmen proxies of Turkey, which is why Turkey shot down a Russian plane last fall. Likely the next step will be to take back cities in Idlib like Jisr al-Shughour, which fell last spring to an al-Qaeda-led coalition, and which could be used as a launching pad for the taking of Latakia port.
    3. It strengthened regime control of Hama and Homs, ensuring the supply routes south to Damascus.
    4. It hit the Army of Islam as well as al-Qaeda and Daesh around Damascus, forcing the latter two to withdraw from part of the capital and killing Zahran Alloush, leader of the Army of Islam.
    5. It hit al-Qaeda and FSA forces in Deraa Province and yesterday the key town of al-Sheikh Miskin fell to the Syrian Arab Army. This is a Deraa crossroads and its loss affects the rebels ability to maneuver in this province.

  • Syria Comment - Syrian politics, history, and religion
    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog

    C’est juste le résumé de ses 10 points, très bien développés. En plus, Joshua Landis devait être en forme, il y a un certain nombre de formules assez drôles, sur un sujet uqi ne l’est pas vraiment, on est d’accord...

    10. The Death of Zahran Alloush.
    9. The Failure of the Southern Storm Offensive.
    8. Operation Decisive Quagmire.
    7. Europe’s Syria Fatigue vs. Assad’s Viability
    6. The Vienna Meeting, the ISSG, and Geneva III.
    5. The Donald.
    4. The Iran Deal.
    3. The Continuing Structural Decay of the Syrian Government. 

    2. The American-Kurdish Alliance.
    1. The Russian Intervention.❞

    #syrie

  • L’expression avec laquelle tu dois te familiariser au plus vite : « Riyadh-based Syrian opposition group ». Et arrête de ricaner s’il te plaît.

    Riyadh-based Syrians must decide on peace delegation : Saudi
    http://news.yahoo.com/riyadh-based-syrians-must-decide-peace-delegation-saudi-185114009.html

    A Riyadh-based Syrian opposition group must control delegates to planned peace talks with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister said on Tuesday.

    […]

    The High Committee formed after an unprecedented meeting last December in the Saudi capital “is the concerned body, and nobody else can impose on them who should represent them” in negotiations with Assad’s regime, Jubeir said at a joint news conference with his French counterpart Laurent Fabius.

    (Tiens donc, durant une conférence de presse avec Fabius…)

  • Le chef des rebelles syriens Zahran Aloush aurait été tué dans des frappes aériennes en Syrie —
    25 déc. 2015
    https://francais.rt.com/international/12725-chef-rebelles-syriens-zahran-aloush-tue

    Zahran Alloush, chef du groupe djihadiste Jaish al-Islam, opérant dans la banlieue de Damas, aurait été tué dans un raid aérien, selon des sources locales a déclaré à Reuters vendredi.

    Le raid aérien a visé le siège de Jaish al-Islam (’Brigade de l’islam’), une coalition formée de différents groupes extrémistes de lutte contre les forces du gouvernement syrien .

    Deux sources rebelles ont confirmé à Reuters que le raid aérien avait tué Alloush. Bien que selon leurs allégations, l’attaque aurait été menée par « des avions russes », l’information n’a pas été confirmée.

    Jaish al-Islam est une coalition d’unités islamistes et salafistes dont le siège principalement se situe dans les quartiers de Damas de Ghouta.

    Bien qu’il ne fasse pas partie de l’Armée syrienne libre, un grand groupe de coordination d’unités de lutte contre les forces fidèles au président Bachar el-Assad, la coalition a pris part à la conférence organisée par l’Arabie saoudite au début du mois de décembre pour essayer de convenir d’une position commune pour négocier avec le gouvernement syrien actuel.

    Certains critiques ont accusé Jaish al-Islam d’utiliser les mêmes méthodes que les combattants de l’Etat islamique, y compris des exécutions publiques de prisonniers.

    Zahran Alloush avait quant à lui appelé sur Youtube à l’extermination des chiites et des alaouites, le groupe religieux dont fait partie le président Assad.

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Zahran Alloush : His Ideology and Beliefs
    Posted by Joshua on Sunday, December 15th, 2013
    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/zahran-alloush

    #Zahran_Alloush #Syrie

    • Syrie : le régime élimine Zahrane Allouche, chef islamiste rebelle
      Par RFI Publié le 26-12-2015 | Paul Khalifeh
      http://www.rfi.fr/moyen-orient/20151226-syrie-armee-regime-elimine-allouche-chef-islamiste-rebelle

      En plus de Zahrane Allouche, âgé de 44 ans, Abdel Nasser Chmeir, un capitaine dissident de l’armée, chef de Faylaq al-Rahman, et une quinzaine d’autres commandants ont trouvé la mort.

      L’Armée de l’islam a annoncé, vendredi soir, la nomination d’Abou Hammam Bouyadani pour succéder à son fondateur. Mais les analystes prévoient l’éclatement de ce groupe composé à l’origine d’une soixantaine de brigades islamistes, et dont la cohésion tenait beaucoup à la personnalité fédératrice de Zahrane Allouche.

  • En Turquie, 2 journalistes poursuivis pour des révélations sur des livraisons d’armes aux rebelles syriens
    http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2015/11/27/turquie-deux-journalistes-poursuivis-pour-leurs-revelations-sur-des-livraiso

    Deux journalistes du quotidien Cumhuriyet, Can Dündar et Erdem Gül, ont été mis en examen et écroués à la prison Silivri d’Istanbul, jeudi 26 novembre, pour avoir diffusé une vidéo, des photographies et des articles montrant des livraisons d’armes convoyées par le gouvernement aux rebelles syriens.

    Tout a commencé le 29 mai 2015 lorsque Cumhuriyet, un journal très respecté de l’opposition laïque, a publié des documents fort embarrassants pour le gouvernement. A deux reprises, le 1er et le 19 janvier 2014, la gendarmerie turque avait intercepté, non loin de la frontière syrienne, des camions chargés d’armes destinées à des groupes rebelles syriens. Les convois étaient escortés à chaque fois par des représentants des services de renseignement (MIT).

    Gendarmes et agents du MIT faillirent en venir aux mains dès lors qu’il fut question d’inspecter le contenu des camions. Après bien des péripéties, dix-neuf gendarmes se retrouvèrent inculpés pour « espionnage » et cinq procureurs trop zélés furent arrêtés. Accusés d’avoir révélé des « secrets d’Etat » et d’avoir terni l’image du gouvernement en faisant croire à sa complicité avec les terroristes, tous encourent de dix à vingt ans de prison.

    Quelques mois plus tard, Cumhuriyet se résolut à tout révéler au grand jour. Les photos et les vidéos amateurs prises par des témoins sur place au moment de la fouille des camions apparurent sur son site et dans les pages du journal. Selon l’enquête publiée alors, un millier d’obus de mortier, 80 000 munitions pour des armes de petit et gros calibre et des centaines de lance-grenades se trouvaient dans le convoi. De fabrication russe, ces armes provenaient de pays de l’ancien bloc soviétique, assurait le journal. Le gouvernement, qui affirmait à l’envi que les camions convoyaient de l’aide humanitaire, dut reconnaître qu’il n’en était rien.

    • Peut-être faut-il également prendre en compte ce qu’exprime plutôt bien ce commentaire :

      If Turkey does not support Syria’s fight for freedom then it will need to endlessly host 3 million Syrian refugees that fled the dictator and ISIS. If they do support the fight then they will get attacked by the Iranian Russian block. So they decided to do it secretly and they got stabbed in the back by one of their own. Turkey should take the long term view and continue to stand firm with the Syrians despite all the attacks from the media and foreign powers.

      en dessous de cet article :

      http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/weapons-syria-journalists-prison-story-behind-turkey-s-great-espionag

    • @stephane_m : Ce serait donc pour des raisons humanitaires que la Turquie armerait des organisations jihadistes et/ou salafistes dont certaines prônent ouvertement l’élimination physique de tout ou partie des minorités religieuses syriennes ? Vous êtes sérieux ?
      Que se passerrait-il à votre avis si la sympathique coalition de Jaysh al-Fateh (al-Nusra + Front islamique salafiste) prenait une ville comme Lattaquieh - dont la population a doublé au cours de la guerre civile dûs à l’afflux de déplacés (7 millions en Syrie) ? Ou même Damas ? Si vous voulez en avoir une petite idée demandez-vous ce qu’il s’est passé lorsque les mêmes avec l’appui turc ont pris le village arménien de Kessab, vous saurez si une telle éventualité accroîtrait ou diminuerait le flot des réfugiés vers l’extérieur !

    • Je ne prends pas Erdogan pour un humaniste.

      Mais je cherche à comprendre ce qui se passe en essayant de me défendre d’avoir des biais trop pro-occidentaux ou trop pro-russes (les deux grandes sources de propagande qui nous abreuvent).

      Je n’aime pas trop qu’on s’offusque que la Turquie défende ses intérêts géopolitiques en Syrie alors que c’est logique qu’elle le fasse et que c’est ce que font absolument tous les acteurs en Syrie.

      La population turque comprend un très grand nombre d’ethnies variées (les kurdes sont la minorité ethnique la plus importante), conserver la stabilité de cet ensemble est essentiel, et je comprends qu’un gouvernement turc ne reste pas inerte face à ce qui se passe chez son très très proche voisin. Le refus des différents gouvernements turcs de l’idée même d’un état kurde dans leur voisinage immédiat, me parait, par exemple, compréhensible, alors que la plupart des commentaires occidentaux sont très favorables à un tel état (qui sera probablement pro-occidental et ne déstabilisera pas nos pays ...)

      Je préférais la politique antérieure du gouvernement turc de négociation et de gestes d’apaisement envers les Kurdes turcs. Mais tous les mouvements kurdes ne sont pas non plus des gentils pacifistes, il y a une variété d’orientations politiques parmi eux : des démocrates convaincus et dépourvus de racisme, et d’autres qui ne le sont pas.

      La Turquie subi déjà des conséquences trop importantes de sa proximité avec la Syrie pour rester inerte et, par exemple, l’afflux de réfugiés est considérable :

      http://www.amnesty.fr/Nos-campagnes/Refugies-et-migrants/Actualites/Turquie-la-protection-des-refugies-de-Syrie-atteint-ses-limites-13281

      Si vous avez des sources ayant des arguments étayés indiquant quels groupes le gouvernement d’Erdogan soutient en Syrie, cela m’intéresse.

    • Je crois que comme beaucoup de ceux qui ont choisi l’option de la guerre clandestine contre le régime d’Assad, le tandem Erdogan/Davutoglu a fait l’erreur de croire que la chute d’Assad était imminente, et qu’ensuite la prééminence des FM lui assurerait une influence sans partage sur la Syrie. La question des réfugiés (et son instrumentalisation) n’était au départ que secondaire par rapport aux enjeux politiques.
      Calcul dangereux, parce qu’il y avait beaucoup à perdre pour la Turquie quand on sait que la politique d’Assad (je parle de Bachar) était jusqu’en 2011 de contrebalancer l’influence iranienne par une intensification de la coopération économique avec la Turquie (assurant à celle-ci une ouverture au sein du marché en constitution de la GAFTA). Les échanges entre les deux pays (tourisme, investissements, commerce, …) étaient intenses. A cette époque Erdogan appelait Bachar al-Assad son "bon ami" et Davutoglu prônait une politique de "zéro problème avec nos voisins".
      Mais la Turquie, après des réticences initiales, a finalement décidé de se joindre aux opérations militaires de l’OTAN en Libye et donc à la première opération violente de regime-change sous couverture des « révoltes arabes ». Le tournant de sa politique étrangère est exactement là (courant 2011) donc bien avant que le problème des réfugiés syriens ne prenne l’ampleur dramatique qu’il a aujourd’hui. Elle a ensuite continué à suivre cette nouvelle ligne et a choisi de rejoindre la seconde opération de regime-change, en Syrie, organisée par les mêmes : USA, alliance Qatar-F.M., France et GB. Elle a donc préféré rejoindre l’option de la guerre clandestine de ce bloc plutôt que de profiter de sa proximité avec Assad, de l’amélioration de ses rapports avec la Russie et l’Iran (médiation dans le dossier nucléaire), et de ses rapports avec les FM pour essayer par la voie diplomatique et de la médiation de peser en faveur d’une désescalade de la guerre civile naissante. Ce n’est donc pas par humanitarisme que l’équipe Erdogan a fait ce choix risqué (et de mon point de vue désastreux pour la Syrie comme pour la Turquie), mais par opportunisme et intérêt à courte vue. Nul doute que de tous les acteurs extérieurs qui ont joué à ce sale jeu (dont les Syriens payent avant tous les autres les conséquences), la Turquie est celle qui avait le plus à perdre, et c’est probablement celle qui perdra le plus.

      Quant à l’affirmation selon laquelle la Turquie aurait le droit de s’ingérer dans les affaires syriennes pour y défendre ses intérêts - comme tout un chacun en Occident, en somme – elle me paraît inacceptable. L’annexionnisme turc a déjà sévi une première fois en Syrie, quand la France mandataire a cru pouvoir disposer du territoire syrien comme sa propriété en achetant la neutralité turque contre le Sanjak d’Alexandrette syrien en 1938 (à la suite d’un référendum bidonné). De par l’histoire récente, la Turquie, comme les anciennes puissances mandataires (R.U. et France), les Etats-Unis et Israël, ont moins que tout autre pays du monde la légitimité historique pour défendre la population syrienne et ainsi s’autoriser, sous ce prétexte, à y alimenter la guerre civile de l’extérieur en vue d’un changement de régime. Au risque d’une destruction de l’Etat. Evidemment une notion aussi floue et aussi morale que « légitimité historique » est peu opératoire pour l’analyse, mais elle devrait servir de système d’alerte sommaire. Ainsi quand après les deux bombardements français de Damas et la répression de la révolution de 1925, le Seyfo turc, l’épuration ethnique israélienne en slow-motion du Golan ou les coups d’Etats à répétition des Etats-Unis, tout ce petit monde additionné des deux monarchies absolues wahhabites (Saoud-Qatar), prétend maintenant défendre la population syrienne et favoriser la démocratisation en armant, finançant et offrant une couverture politique à des groupes armés qui vont de l’islamisme dit modéré tendance FM au salafisme jihadiste, ça devrait un peu interloquer et inciter au recul !

    • Le principe d’une guerre clandestine est justement qu’elle ne se fait pas publiquement. Il n’existe pas à ma connaissance de liste de groupes soutenus par la Turquie qui aurait fuité des archives de leurs services. Le but de l’enfermement de journalistes, de procureurs ou d’officiers de gendarmerie en Turquie qui ont mis le nez là où il ne le fallait pas, c’est évidemment de maintenir secrets certains aspects peu reluisants de cette guerre et le nom de certains groupes soutenus. Néanmoins certains signes et indices peuvent nous renseigner.

      La Turquie n’a pas fait mystère d’avoir contribué à créer puis soutenu l’ASL dès 2011. Je passe donc sur cette évidence, illustrée par le fait que son premier commandant en chef Ryad al-Asaad résidait en Turquie et que plusieurs des groupes de l’ASL sont notoirement liés aux FM dont le parti d’Erdogan est issu (et dont lui-même a été membre).

      Pour ce qui est du jeu très ambigu vis-à-vis de Da’ich : le lien donné par @rastapopoulos

      Pour ce qui est du groupe salafiste Jaysh al-Islam (faction du Front islamique), son leader Zahran Alloush a pu paraître publiquement à deux reprises à Istanbul cette année : en avril 2015 : http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/politics/2015/4/21/syrian-rebel-groups-await-formation-of-a-saudi-turkish-alliance
      et en mai 2015 : https://twitter.com/joshua_landis/status/601321202695557120
      Son principal soutien est certainement, malgré tout, l’Arabie saoudite.

      Pour ce qui est de la coalition Jaysh al-Fateh, le fait qu’elle contrôle le poste-frontière syro-turc de Bab al-Hawa qui reste ouvert est une indication claire que cette coalition, comprenant notamment Ahrar al-Sham et al-Nusra, est soutenue par Ankara. Il est d’ailleurs de notoriété publique que quand cette coalition s’est montée début 2015, c’est grâce à une joint-venture Saoud/Qatar/Turquie pour lui apporter un soutien massif qu’elle a pu conquérir Idlib et Jisr al-Shoughour durant la première moitié de l’année 2015 (jusqu’à l’arrivée des Russes et des Iraniens).
      Sur le soutien turc à Jaysh al-Fatah et notamment au groupe salafiste Ahrar al-Sham, on trouve quantité d’articles dans la presse mainstream. Par exemple :
      – une dépêche AP qui parle de confirmation d’officiels turcs sur le rôle d’Ankara et cite l’universitaire Joshua Landis : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/07/turkey-saudi-arabia-syria-rebels-pact_n_7232750.html
      – une autre dépêche AP : http://uk.businessinsider.com/ahrar-al-sham-in-syria-and-turkey-2015-10?r=US&IR=T
      – Libération et Hala Kodmani herself : http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2015/07/30/l-armee-de-la-conquete-prete-pour-la-releve_1356480
      – The Independent : http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-crisis-turkey-and-saudi-arabia-shock-western-countries-by-suppo
      – dépêche Reuters : http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/22/us-mideast-syria-crisis-ahrar-insight-idUSKCN0RM0EZ20150922#vUU8VwHisjGDevA

      Sur les brigades turkmènes qu’Ankara aimerait voir unifiées sous un même commandement turkmène (et anti-kurde) : http://seenthis.net/messages/387949

      Et probablement le Parti islamique du Turkestan (mouvement panturkiste/jihadiste), dont une brigade composée de turcophones d’Asie centrale a été responsable avec al-Nusra de l’exécution d’une cinquantaine de soldats syriens après la prise de la base aérienne d’al-Duhur : http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2015/09/turkistan-islamic-party-releases-photos-from-captured-syrian-regime-

      Et pour l’implantation documentée dès 2011 d’une filière du jihad partant de Libye et allant en Syrie via la Turquie et organisée par Belahj (ancien chef d’al-Qaïda en Libye) et al-Harati, voir + commentaires : http://seenthis.net/messages/381028

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Take Two : How New York Times justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages to be used as human shields
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/11/take-two-how-new-york-times-justified.html

    Take Two: How New York Times justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages to be used as human shields
    1) Typical of the New York Times: Alawite sect is always referred to as “Bashshar Al-Asad’s sect”, as if he is its prophet or as if he owns it. This is bigotry in the extreme and has provided justification and jubilation for war crimes by Syrian rebels. It would be disgusting anti-Semitism if one were to refer to Judaism as “the religion of Ariel Sharon” or to refer to Islam as “the religion of ISIS”.
    2) Like the HRW statement (see below) the article immediately gives readers justification of the cage war crime: “Two days after Syrian government forces shelled a rebel-held suburb of the capital, Damascus, killing at least 40 people in a market”. That is it: the reader is immediately persuaded to sympathize with the war crimes of the rebel by telling them that the Syrian regime started this. Notice that New York Times has been doing this constantly and it is a propaganda service that the New York Times has never rendered except to Israeli occupation forces. You will look in vain to find any reference to a war crime by the regime in which a sentence is inserted to remind readers of a war crime by Syrian rebels.
    3) Instead of condemning the act, the article in fact makes an effort to blatantly justifiies it and does not even refer to its practice as human shields: “apparently to shield the area from further bombardment”.
    4) Wait: how were they able to capture “army officers” with their families? The officers were on the battle fields with their families? “the prisoners were captured army officers from President Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite sect and their families.” Another desperate attempt to provide justifications.
    5) Joshua Landis is wrong: it is not uncommon for Syrian rebels to impose Sunni-style veiling on Alawite women: “Joshua Landis, a Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma, suggested that some of the women appeared to be Sunni Muslims.”
    6) The NYT even tries to present the leader of the group which committed those war crimes in a positive light: “The Army of Islam, a group with financial backing from Saudi Arabia, is led by Zahran Alloush, a Sunni commander who seemed to back away from sectarian anti-Alawite statements in an interview with an American journalist, Roy Gutman, in May.” That is all what it takes for NYT to be convinced that he is no more anti-Alawite? I am sure that Times would have been impressed with Ribbentrop statements in Nuremberg as well.
    7) Obama’s administration is in contact with this war criminal: “Mr. Alloush, who said his faction had been in direct contact with Daniel Rubinstein, the Obama administration’s special envoy for Syria”.
    8) Another attempt by Alewives to justify indiscriminate war crimes against all Alawites: “Alawites from the Assad family have ruled Syria for decades, even though most Syrians are Sunnis.” Imagine how the NYT would be outraged if an Arab were to insert a statement about the murder of Jews by Palestinians to the effect that: “Jews have ruled Palestine since 1948”: such a reference would be categorized as anti-Semitism in a sentence about violence.
    9) Another justification in the same article for the cage war crime: “The rebel stronghold of Eastern Ghouta has been under intense bombardment since the insurgents managed to block the main northern entrance to Damascus”.
    10) They managed to even Skyped with someone to give them another justification: ““It’s to protect the civilians,” Bilal Abu Salah, a media activist from Douma, said in a Skype interview on Sunday.” And by referring to this supporter of war crimes as “media activists” they only lend his voice credibility.
    11) Then a medication justification for the cage war crime: “A paramedic from Douma who asked to be identified only by his first name, Ahmad, said the casualties of the recent strikes there “were women and kids mostly.””
    12) Another justification: “said the Sunni Islamist group had copied the strategy of using “kidnapped people — including whole families — as human shields,” seen earlier in Alawite-majority towns seeking to deter shelling by insurgents.” Where did the Times correspondent see that in Alawite-majority towns? Why not name them and provide readers with pictures?

    Excellente analyse de texte, en en l’occurrence un article du NYT, par Angry Arab. Pas suffisant malheureusement pour convaincre ceux qui s’obstinent encore à applaudir à la révolution syrienne.

    #syrie

  • A lire sur al-monitor, une très intéressante tentative de prospective sur l’avenir de la politique turque vis à vis de la Syrie à l’aune des changements des rapports de force politiques suite aux résultats des récentes élections législatives :
    The future of Turkey’s Syria policy
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/06/turkey-qatar-syria-saudi-arabia-remain-alone-in-syria.html#
    Selon l’analyse de l’auteur la plupart des partis autres que l’AKP sont sceptiques voire très critiques vis à vis de la politique choisie par l’ex-tandem Erdogan-Davutoglu et donc susceptible de profondes révisions. Les doutes se feraient sentir au sein même de l’AKP. Selon l’auteur, quelle que soit la coalition qui formera le nouveau gouvernement turc, Jaysh al-Fatah au Nord (coalition groupant al-Nusra Ahrar al-Cham et les débris de l’ASL) devrait voir l’appui turco-qataro-saoudien s’amoindrir - même si au sud les opérations dirigées depuis une chambre d’opérations à Amman (groupant Qatar, AS, Turquie et pays occidentaux [et aussi très probablement Israël]) et s’appuyant sur le Front Révolutionnaire du Sud ne devraient pas être affectées :

    As Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan agreed with Saudi King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud in their Riyadh meeting, the new addresses for weapons assistance were al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch of Jabhat al-Nusra and the Army of Conquest (Jaish al-Fateh), led by Ahrar al-Sham, set up by former al-Qaeda affiliates.
    After the shipment of weapons via Turkey, the Army of Conquest captured Idlib, Jisr al-Shughour, Ariha and Mastume. The Syrian army also lost some locations in the south. In the latest development, the 52nd Brigade, which was 100 kilometers (62 miles) south of Damascus, had to abandon its base.
    On the northern front, the objective of the Army of Conquest is to capture Aleppo and Latakia after Idlib and then move toward Damascus. Before Turkey’s elections, there were reports that Turkey was about to send troops to Syria along with Saudi Arabia to set up a buffer zone. The second prong of the strategy developed by the Turkey-Saudi-Qatari alliance is to devise a new approach in the south. The south front, commanded from an operations room in Amman, Jordan, in the presence of Western intelligence officials, will hopefully be reorganized under the leadership of Zahran Alloush, commander of the Army of Conquest.
    Reports say that Alloush was in Istanbul last month to meet with opposition representatives and then in Amman to meet with Gulf and Western intelligence services.
    The scenarios for government change in Turkey will not affect support for the opposition from Amman, but the future of the northern front will depend mostly on Ankara’s new attitude. If the new government in Ankara does not agree to continue with the Turkey-Qatar-Saudi Arabia partnership, then the flow of weapons via Turkey will cease. In such a case, it won’t be easy for the Army of Conquest to hold on to the territory it has captured in Idlib and the vicinity.
    The Syrian army is now massing around Idlib and preparing for a major offensive. According to journalist Mehmet Serim, who is reporting from Damascus, Assad’s regime was waiting for the Turkish elections for its major offensive.

  • Yarmouk: the victim of IS-Nusra power struggles
    http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/comment/2015/4/22/yarmouk-the-victim-of-is-nusra-power-struggles

    However, after IS was expelled from Eastern and Western Ghouta and weakened in southern Damascus, the council has became the governing body that various factions competed to dominate.

    Yarmouk fell victim to a power struggle between armed factions over an area that had been pounded into rubble by the regime’s barrel bombs.
    Zahran Alloush, the leader of Jaish al-Islam, succeeded in controlling the council and began taking decisions that favoured his group and Ajnad al-Sham against Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham.

    Skirmishes occurred in Beit Sahm between a number of groups in the council, and tensions rose after Nusra withdrew and Ahrar al-Sham resisted a council order to arrest its military commander.

    Ahrar al-Sham was leaning toward a peaceful resolution to the conflict, however it seems that Nusra had other ways of curbing the influence of Jaish al-Islam, the IS’ arch rival.

    Nusra facilitated and coordinated the IS attack on Yarmouk to draw the IS and other armed factions into a battle that would weaken both sides.

    Nusra would remain neutral and reap the rewards of the settlement between the IS and other factions.
    – See more at: http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/comment/2015/4/22/yarmouk-the-victim-of-is-nusra-power-struggles#sthash.EDMtEkvq.dpuf

  • Are Saudi Arabia and Turkey About to Intervene in Syria? - Syria in Crisis - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    http://carnegieendowment.org/syriaincrisis/?fa=59904

    ... without U.S. backing and approval, a large-scale Arab and Turkish military intervention in Syria isn’t likely to happen, because it would change too little and the participants would get stuck too fast and too hard.

    But there are many other ways that these governments could cooperate to increase pressure on Assad. They could increase funding and training. They could lift restrictions on the rebel groups they fund and allow them to move in new directions, as seems to have happened with the Nasib crossing. They could provide greater quantities and more advanced weapons (bearing in mind that the United States draws a line at antiaircraft missiles). They could send special forces into Syria to aggressively assist rebels of their choosing. They could also attempt a more limited direct intervention, restricted in terms of geographic scope and/or time frame. With Jordan now proposing a “safe zone” in the south of Syria, it’s worth watching what comes out of Ankara on this topic.

    Most of all, they could coordinate their own diplomatic and military efforts to limit the fragmentation among rebel groups on the ground and dissidents in exile.

    Something of that sort may already be going on. In the exile opposition, rumors abound about an upcoming conference, perhaps in Riyadh, that would set up a new political body. Meanwhile, Aleppo’s largest insurgent coalition, known as the Levant Front, has suddenly announced its own dissolution, and rebel commanders are also busily holding meetings in Turkey and elsewhere. Islam Army head Zahran Alloush recently slipped out of his stronghold east of Damascus to appear at a meeting of Syrian Islamic scholars in Turkey. The real purpose of his visit seems to have been other, secret meetings. According to the well-connected Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, “the visit of Zahran Alloush to Turkey removes the last obstacle for Saudi-Turkish-Qatar cooperation in Syria,” while Alloush’s cousin Mohammed Alloush (head of the Political Office of the Revolutionary Command Council, a large rebel coalition that includes the Islam Army) has said that the Turkey trip “aims to unite the efforts of revolutionaries on the ground in all of Syria, not just in the Damascus countryside.”

    How much of the movement among the rebels is coordinated is open to question. Commanders are probably in many cases positioning themselves, jockeying for influence, and trying to show off their military strength and ability to work with others, in the hope of being selected for a role in the new order they believe will emerge from the Saudi-Turkish talks. As ever, so much remains unclear. But with both rebels and regime now deeply dependent on foreign support, any shift in regional alignments is sure to produce some form of change on the ground in Syria. Something is being cooked up in all these meetings, and we’re about to find out what.

    #syrie

  • Syria: Nation-wide clashes continue between regime and rebels | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/syria-nation-wide-clashes-continue-between-regime-and-rebels

    NewsPoliticsCulture & SocietyEconomyOpinionPortraitsIn FocusBlogsGI FilesSyria FilesArabic Edition
    Follow Al-Akhbar on Twitter Like Al-Akhbar on Facebook Subscribe to our RSS Feed
    Syria: Nation-wide clashes continue between regime and rebels

    Rebel fighters from the Islamic Front, Syria’s largest rebel coalition, hold a position on July 13, 2014 during clashes with militants of the Islamic State (IS), formerly known as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), for the control a village on the outskirts of Aleppo. (Photo: AFP-Ahmed Deeb)
    Published Monday, August 11, 2014
    The Syrian governorate of Deir Ezzor has been witnessing a growing escalation in fighting, with fierce battles taking place between the Islamic State (IS) and the tribes there, resulting in mass executions and large-scale displacement. In the meantime, a Syrian military source speaking to Al-Akhbar denied reports of clashes and shelling in the areas surrounding the Damascus International Airport, describing the battle to encircle the airport declared by the Army of Islam organization as “illusory.”

    In Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria, developments are taking an increasingly bloody turn. Violent clashes broke out between IS and the tribesmen in the areas of al-Shaaitat, Abu Hamam, Kiskhiyeh, and Gharanij, prompting large numbers of civilians to flee those areas. According to activists, nearly 100,000 people, mostly women, children, and elderly people, have fled in the direction of Baqaan, Hujayn, al-Bahr, and al-Shaafa.

    Meanwhile, sources said that the IS has been bombing the villages indiscriminately using T-72 tanks. In turn, the IS posted images purporting to show mass executions it carried out including by firing squad, beheading, and crucifixion. The IS claimed the victims were prisoners it had captured from the ranks of al-Shaaitat tribal fighters.

    A source from the IS said, “The mujahidin, by God’s grace, have been able to capture a large number of traitors.” “Some were executed pursuant to God’s law on those who betray their oaths, and the rest will meet the same fate, and no one will escape punishment,” the source added.

    “The operation is part of a failed psychological war following the successive losses suffered by Alloush and his organization.” – Syrian military sourceHowever, a source from the Shaaitat clan said that the IS’ victims were actually laborers from the oil fields in the area. The same source told Al-Akhbar, “The IS is holding dozens of prisoners from Shaaitat, mostly laborers from the oil fields now controlled by the IS.”
    Many of these prisoners were not aware of recent developments, while others were kidnapped at checkpoints just for belonging to the Shaaitat clan, the source explains. “The crimes being committed by the IS against our people are meant to terrorize us, but they have backfired, and the criminals will not escape from the rebels who will avenge their brothers,” the source adds.

    In the same vein, activists on social media sites said that the IS is trying to convince the Gharanij Brigades to stop fighting alongside Shaaitat, and allow the IS’ convoys to pass through their territory in return for safety for their lives and properties. However, according to the activists, the Brigades have refused the offer.

    Sources also said the IS tried to end the fighting against Shaaitat’s fighters, as it sensed the battles were not proceeding in its favor. However, IS seems to have made humiliating demands, including for Shaaitat to hand over 170 people it wants and lay down arms including their personal pistols, which the Shaaitat clan has refused. In the meantime, locals said that Syrian warplanes dropped flyers “saluting the courage of the tribesmen, and confirming support for them against the IS’ terrorism.”

    In Raqqa, reports indicated that the IS continues to build up its forces to attack the Tabaqa military airbase, now the last remaining major Syrian military outpost in the governorate, after the IS overran the headquarters of both the 17th Division and Brigade 93 in the past several days. The IS fighters attacked the Tabaqa airbase on Friday, but the army managed to repel the attack.

    On the other hand, Syrian warplanes conducted airstrikes against IS bases in the city of Tabaqa, also on Friday.

    No fighting in the vicinity of Damascus airport

    On Thursday, Zahran Alloush, leader of the Army of Islam, announced the start of a battle to encircle Damascus airport, which aims to seize the airport and surrounding areas. Then on Friday, opposition Local Coordination Committees were spreading reports about violent clashes in the towns of Hteita al-Turukman and al-Ghazlaniya, which are close to the airport.

    However, a Syrian military source denied the reports, describing this battle as “illusory.” “There are no battles,” he said, adding that “the Syrian army has been in full control of the area since October.” The same source stressed that it would be “impossible” to make any breach in the vicinity of the Damascus International Airport and adjacent areas, and said, “The operation is part of a failed psychological war following the successive losses suffered by Alloush and his organization.”

    In Qalamoun in the northern Damascus countryside, fierce fighting broke out in the hills near Rankous and al-Jubbah, with Syrian warplanes targeting dozens of militants. Clashes also continued in the Joubar district south of the capital. Mortar shells fired by opposition groups landed in several neighborhoods of Damascus, killing and injuring several civilians.

  • Zahran Alloush: His Ideology and Beliefs
    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/zahran-alloush

    Zahran `Alloush: His Ideology and Beliefs
    By Joshua Landis
    December 15, 2013

    Zahran Alloush is the military chief of the Islamic Front (‏الجبهة الإسلامية‎, al-Jabhat al-Islāmiyyah), the newly founded super militia that reportedly represents 45,000 fighters. As such, he could turn out to be the most powerful man in rebel held Syria.

    Hassan Hassan argues in his article, “Why Syria’s Islamic Front is bad news for radical groups,” that the Jihadist and radical Islamist rhetoric of the Front can be discounted as a positioning ploy, but that the new group is really bad news for al-Qaida groups in Syria because it will stem the slide toward radicalism in Syria and be able to face down militias on their right.

    It is too early to know if the Islamic Front will take on the formidable al-Qaida groups in Syria. Despite frequent tensions, the main groups that came together to form the Islamic Front have worked hand in glove with al-Qaida linked forces, particularly al-Nusra, on most battle fronts and recent offensives against the regime.

    Zahran Alloush’s rhetoric and propaganda videos provide much insight into his world view, attitude toward Syria’s religious minorities, and vision for Syria’s future. The difference between his ideology and that of al-Qaida groups is not profound. Rather, it is one of shades of grey.
    Perhaps the most important video Alloush has produced is this one:
    كلمة الشيخ المجاهد زهران علوش للامة وتحدية للرافضة Speech of the Mujahid Zahran Alloush to the Umma on the challange of the “Raafida,” (rejectionists or Shiites).

    ...

    Is Alloush the most powerful leader in rebel-held Syria?

    He holds the title of military commander of the most powerful militia in Syria, but that is only if we assume that the IF is actually one militia, as it claims. In reality, it is made up of a number of powerful militias. Hassan Aboud, the head of Ahrar al-Sham, may actually be more powerful than Alloush, although he is listed only as the “Chief of the Political Office.” This reminds me of the secret military committee that drove forward the Baathist coups of the 1960s. It was formed by minority officers who found themselves exiled in Egypt by Nasser during the UAR. The leaders were Lieutenant-Colonel Muhammad Umran, Major Salah Jadid and Captain Hafez al-Assad. Like the present Islamic Front, they were supposed to be acting as one. But as they came to power and ceased working behind the scenes, they turned against each other. Assad ended up on the top after using his superior political skills and military base to outmaneuver the others and arrest them. Alloush may look like the strongest member of the IF on paper, but others may have superior force on the ground. Only time will tell.

    ...

    In the meantime, Ambassador Ford has met with Alloush to discuss the possibility of his going to Geneva.

    ...

  • Syria crisis: Saudi Arabia to spend millions to train new rebel force
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/07/syria-crisis-saudi-arabia-spend-millions-new-rebel-force

    The force excludes al-Qaida affiliates such as the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham and Jabhat al-Nusra, but embraces more non-jihadi Islamist and Salafi units.

    (...)

    “There are two wars in Syria,” said Mustafa Alani, an analyst for the Saudi-backed Gulf Research Centre. “One against the Syrian regime and one against al-Qaida. Saudi Arabia is fighting both.”

    • Nos nouveaux meilleurs amis en Syrie :

      Saudi Arabia is preparing to spend millions of dollars to arm and train thousands of Syrian fighters in a new national rebel force to help defeat Bashar al-Assad and act as a counterweight to increasingly powerful jihadi organisations.

      Syrian, Arab and western sources say the intensifying Saudi effort is focused on Jaysh al-Islam (the Army of Islam or JAI), created in late September by a union of 43 Syrian groups. It is being billed as a significant new player on the fragmented rebel scene.

      […]

      The JAI is led by Zahran Alloush, a Salafi and formerly head of Liwa al-Islam, one of the most effective rebel fighting forces in the Damascus area. Alloush recently held talks with Bandar along with Saudi businessmen who are financing individual rebel brigades under the JAI’s banner. Other discreet coordinating meetings in Turkey have involved the Qatari foreign minister, Khaled al-Attiyeh, and the US envoy to Syria, Robert Ford.

      In one indication of its growing confidence – and resources – the JAI this week advertised online for experienced media professionals to promote its cause.

      Oui, si tu maîtrises la Creative Suite® d’Adobe™, tu peux postuler auprès de « jobs@islam-army.com » :

      L’effort médiatique est visible : le champ lexical livré aux médias internationaux est très visible : il s’agirait, de la part de l’Arabie séoudite et des bailleurs privés, de « lutter contre l’extrémisme ».

      Saudi Arabia’s Shadow War - David Kenner
      http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/11/06/saudi_arabias_shadow_war

      Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, along with the CIA, also supported the Afghan rebels against the Soviet-backed government during the 1980s. That collaboration contains a cautionary note for the current day: The fractured Afghan rebels were unable to govern after the old regime fell, paving the way for chaos and the rise of the Taliban. Some of the insurgents, meanwhile, transformed into al Qaeda and eventually turned their weapons against their former patrons.

      While the risk of blowback has been discussed in Riyadh, Saudis with knowledge of the training program describe it as an antidote to extremism, not a potential cause of it. They have described the kingdom’s effort as having two goals — toppling the Assad regime, and weakening al Qaeda-linked groups in the country. Prince Turki, the former Saudi intelligence chief and envoy to Washington, said in a recent interview that the mainstream opposition must be strengthened so that it could protect itself “these extremists who are coming from all over the place” to impose their own ideologies on Syria.

    • Syria: Ahrar Al-Sham leader threatens to form Islamist rebel command
      http://www.aawsat.net/2013/11/article55321549

      The Islamist factions are led by four rebel commanders in charge of operations in Damascus, Aleppo, Idlib, and Raqqa. They are: Zahran Alloush, commander of Islam Brigade in Rif Dimashq, Haj Mara’a (Abdelkader Saleh), commander of Al-Tawhid Brigade, Isa Al-Sheikh, commander of Suqour Al-Sham, and Abu Talha, commander of Ahrar Al-Sham.

      Asharq Al-Awsat spoke with Abu Talha, commander of Ahar Al-Sham, the largest armed Islamist faction in Syria. It includes military, rescue, and engineering units and is responsible for delivering the salaries of workers in the town of Raqqa, according to its leaders.

      Speaking exclusively to Asharq Al-Awsat, Abu Talha said: “The FSA leadership was established under circumstances which were neither natural, nor healthy, resulting in a body which does not meet our aspirations.”

      Although differences have always existed between the Islamist factions and the FSA leadership, the Islamist factions have lately announced their intention to completely withdraw from both the FSA and the Syrian National Coalition.

  • Syria: Battle for Qalamoun May Be Felt in Lebanon http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/security/2013/10/syria-opposition-qalamun-battle-qusair.html

    The Qalamoun battle may have repercussions on the Lebanese interior because Liwa al-Islam, which is led by Zahran Alloush, has become the main opposition force on Lebanon’s eastern slopes in Arsal al-Ward, the Rankous Plain, and Hawsh al-Arab. That threat is serious because Alloush, who has set up his base of operations in the area, has returned from a visit to Saudi Arabia last week, where he met his financial and military authority, the director of Saudi intelligence Prince Bandar bin Sultan.

    Bandar holds a strong military card with which to pressure the Lebanese interior: the deployment on the outskirts of the Bekaa of 3,000 to 5,000 Liwa al-Islam fighters and an armed battalion having 23 T-72 tanks.

  • Syrie : d’importants groupes rebelles prônent la charia et rejettent la Coalition nationale
    http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2013/09/25/syrie-d-importants-groupes-rebelles-pronent-la-loi-islamique_3483973_3218.ht

    D’importants groupes rebelles islamistes combattant en Syrie ont affirmé mardi 24 septembre au soir qu’aucune organisation basée à l’étranger, y compris la Coalition nationale, ne saurait les représenter.

    […]

    Le groupe radical mais non djihadiste Ahrar Al-Sham a également signé le texte, tout comme la 19e Division, une formation importante mais relativement récente du courant principal Armée syrienne libre. Ces groupes affirment que la loi islamique doit être la seule source de la législation.

    • Pour élaborer une « narrative » cohérente bons salafistes versus mauvais salafistes (AQ) en Syrie il suffit de faire comme Reuters : ne parler que de « Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), » autrement dit faire comme si al Nosra n’existait plus.

      Insight : Saudi Arabia boosts Salafist rivals to al Qaeda in Syria
      http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/01/us-syria-crisis-jihadists-insight-idUSBRE9900RO20131001

      Rebel and diplomatic sources said it was Saudi Arabia which nudged rebel brigades operating in and around Damascus to announce this week that they have united under a single command comprising 50 groups and numbering some thousands of fighters.

      The formation of the Army of Islam in the capital’s eastern fringe under Zahran Alloush, leader of the group Liwa al-Islam, strengthens Salafist jihadis owing allegiance to Riyadh against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), an al Qaeda branch which has in recent weeks taken control of territory from other Islamist forces in parts of northern and eastern Syria.

      The establishment of the Army of Islam follows last week’s joint declaration by groups, mainly in the northeast but also including Liwa al-Islam, who agreed to fight for Islamic rule and also rejected the authority of the Western- and Saudi-backed opposition in exile, the Syrian National Coalition (SNC).

      That accord was notably not signed by ISIL.

      D’après Hassan Hassan (partisan des Saoud) al-Nusra aurait été éliminé du nouveau groupe,
      http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/10/01/the_army_of_islam_is_winning_in_syria?print=yes&hidecomments=yes&page

      Saudi Arabia appears to be central to the merger of rebel groups
      around Damascus. Liwa al-Islam chief Zahran Alloush is backed by Riyadh, while both Ahrar al-Sham, which is supported by Qatar, and Jabhat al-Nusra have been excluded from the new grouping. Although Liwa al-Islam had been part of the Saudi-backed FSA, the spokesman of the new grouping told an Arabic television channel that the Army of Islam is not part of the FSA. This is likely because the FSA has lost the trust of many rebel groups, and adopting a religious language will be more effective in countering the appeal of radical groups — which is what happened after the announcement of the merger, as various Islamists and moderate groups welcomed the move.