position:behavioral scientist

  • Believing the future will be favorable may prevent action — ScienceDaily
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170803145643.htm
    /images/2017/08/170803145643_1_540x360.jpg

    ... partisans believe they are so correct that others will eventually come to see the obviousness of their correctness," says behavioral scientist Todd Rogers of the Harvard Kennedy School, lead author on the research. "Ironically, our findings indicate that this belief in a favorable future may diminish the likelihood that people will take action to ensure that the favorable future becomes reality

    #ideas #truth #belief #reality

  • News Feature: Can animal culture drive evolution?
    http://www.pnas.org/content/114/30/7734.full

    Killer whales, also known as orcas (Orcinus orca), have a geographic range stretching from the Antarctic to the Arctic. As a species, their diet includes birds, fish, mammals, and reptiles. But as individuals, they typically fall into groups with highly specialized diets and hunting traditions passed down over generations. Increasingly, scientists refer to these learned feeding strategies as #culture, roughly defined as information that affects behavior and is passed among individuals and across generations through social learning, such as teaching or imitation.

    Scientists once placed culture squarely in the human domain. But discoveries in recent decades suggest that a wide range of cultural practices—from foraging tactics and vocal displays to habitat use and play—may influence the lives of other animals as well. Studies attribute additional orca behaviors, such as migration routes and song repertoires, to culture. Other research suggests that a finch’s song, a chimpanzee’s nut cracking, and a guppy’s foraging route are all manifestations of culture. Between 2012 and 2014, over 100 research groups published work on animal culture covering 66 species, according to a recent review.

    Now, scientists are exploring whether culture may shape not only the lives of nonhuman animals but the evolution of a species. “Culture affects animals’ lives and their survival and their fitness,” says the review’s coauthor, behavioral scientist Andrew Whiten of the University of St Andrews in Scotland. “We’ve learned that’s the case to an extent that could hardly have been appreciated half a century ago.” Based on work in whales, dolphins, and birds, some researchers contend that animal culture is likely a common mechanism underlying animal evolution. But testing this hypothesis remains a monumental challenge.

  • Ingenious: Nicholas Epley - Issue 27: Dark Matter
    http://nautil.us/issue/27/dark-matter/ingenious-nicholas-epley

    As a behavioral scientist, Nicholas Epley is a bold explorer. For years he has plumbed the murky river of misunderstanding that runs between people. “There’s more blackness in the mind of another person than we think there is,” Epley says. In his 2014 book Mindwise, Epley demonstrates why our window into others is limited. “You can’t overcome your own experiences, beliefs, attitudes, emotions, knowledge, and visual perspective to recognize that others may view the world differently,” Epley writes in a Mindwise chapter, featured in Nautilus. I caught up with the outgoing Epley in his office at the University of Chicago, where he is the John Templeton Keller Professor of Behavioral Science. I was anxious to hear what his research can teach us about our obtuse ways. Epley mentions Lance (...)

  • Hurricanes with girl names are deadlier; researchers defend study
    http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-deadliest-hurricanes-have-female-names-study-20140602-story.html

    “The femininity of the name influences the degree to which people feel the storm is dangerous, and that affects how they respond to it,” said Sharon Shavitt, a behavioral scientist at the university and a coauthor of the paper. “We had a hunch that there would be some gender biases, but we were quite stunned by the degree of this effect.”

    #sexisme #communication

    • #selon_une_étude_récente

      L’étude est publiée ici Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes
      http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/05/29/1402786111.abstract

      Malheureusement elle est derrière #paywall et l’abstract dit beaucoup moins de choses que l’article pointé par @lyco

      Dans les trucs bizarres, il y a quand même ceci :

      Their study looks not just at whether a hurricane has a female name or a male name, but at how feminine or masculine the name is. For example, the name Bertha sounds less feminine than Laura.

      Je ne sais pas aux États-Unis, mais de ce côté-ci de l’Atlantique Bertha est un peu connoté…

      Sinon, quelques classiques,

      A big sticking point for critics is that all hurricanes were given female names from 1953 through 1978 because they were considered to be “unpredictable,” a trait that at the time was considered to be female.

      It wasn’t until 1979 that hurricane names started to alternate between female names and male names.

      … ou moins classique, mais « rassurant »

      In one experiment, volunteers were given the names of 10 hurricanes and asked to predict their intensity based on nothing but the name. “Omar” was predicted to be the most intense. “Dolly” was expected to be the least intense.

    • #merci !

      Ils mettent les liens vers où ils ont trouvé leurs données, mais il y a pas mal de boulot (of course) pour préparer tout ça. En fait, je suis toujours très frustré quand ce genre d’étude sort, à grand fort de modèles, d’ANOVAs et de p-value sans AUCUN graphique, ne serait-ce que la chronologie…

      Ainsi, ce genre d’affirmations

      Another point that has been raised by some critics is that more people died on average in hurricanes before they were given male names. The researchers say that is simply not accurate, according to their data set.

      et même pas UN graphique ! #grrr !

      Ah, et des « détails » comme celui-ci (j’ai juste parcouru)

      Deaths outside the continental United States were excluded.