position:prosecutor

  • Brazilian prosecutor targets senior ruling party leaders: report | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-politics-idUSKCN0YT1H6

    Brazil’s top prosecutor is seeking the arrests of the Senate leader and other senior ruling party politicians for allegedly trying to obstruct a corruption probe, threatening to undermine President Michel Temer’s interim government, O Globo reported on Tuesday.

    Those targeted are Senate President Renan Calheiros, Senator Romero Jucá, the president of the ruling PMDB, former Brazilian President José Sarney and the suspended speaker of the lower house of Congress, Eduardo Cunha, the newspaper said.

    Prosecutor General Rodrigo Janot accuses them of seeking to block a sprawling two-year-old investigation into political kickbacks on contracts with state-run oil company Petrobras, according to the report.

    The four men, powerful members of Brazil’s political establishment and the centrist PMDB, the country’s largest party, have denied the accusations.

    The Supreme Court must authorize their arrests.

  • Biden : Ukraine should appoint reformist prosecutor general : UNIAN news
    http://www.unian.info/politics/1320042-biden-ukraine-should-appoint-reformist-prosecutor-general.html


    Biden (left) with Groysman (right) / Photo from UNIAN

    In order to maintain international support for Ukraine, the new team should move forward quickly on Ukraine’s reform program, including fulfilling its IMF commitments, as well as on Minsk implementation and the confirmation of a new, reformist Prosecutor General,” Biden told Ukraine’s newly-elected Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman over the phone on Thursday evening.

    (la photo a été prise le 8/12/2015, lors de la visite du vice-président au Parlement ukrainien dont Groysman était le président, au vu des figures réjouies, on peut considérer que c’est à ce moment-là que Groysman a obtenu son nihil obstat…)
    http://tsn.ua/politika/bayden-poperediv-scho-isnuyuchiy-istorichniy-shans-ukrayini-mozhe-buti-ostannim-

  • Pour faire patienter en attendant l’annonce du prochain gouvernement en #Ukraine (si, si, attendez, ça vient !…)

    Ukraine’s parliament elects new government amid political crisis - The Washington Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ukraines-parliament-elects-new-government-amid-political-crisis/2016/04/14/ffdd2919-0312-4ced-89d8-402317002762_story.html

    On Wednesday, the Ukrainian Prosecutor General confirmed to the Interfax news service that it was investigating an alleged $3 million bribe given to Yatsenyuk to appoint the head of the country’s broadcasting agency.

  • (Attention, assieds-toi avant de lire ça.) Russian air strikes in Syria ’good thing’ : Del Ponte
    http://www.france24.com/en/20160208-russian-air-strikes-syria-good-thing-del-ponte

    Former war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, who is currently probing rights abuses in Syria, on Monday backed Russia’s air strikes on “terrorist groups” in the war-torn country.

    “Overall, I think the Russian intervention is a good thing, because finally someone is attacking these terrorist groups,” Del Ponte told Swiss public broadcaster RTS, listing the Islamic State group and Al-Nusra among the groups targeted.

    But Del Ponte, a member of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria, quickly added that the Russians apparently “are not distinguishing enough between the terrorists and others, and that is not as good.”

  • Najib Razak Got $681 Million Personal Donation From Saudi Royals, Malaysia Says - WSJ
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/malaysias-attorney-general-najib-razak-received-681-million-personal-donation-f

    Insondable générosité d’Abdallah ben Abdelaziz, feu le roi d’Arabie saoudite. 681 millions de dollarsen « donation personnelle » à Najib Razak, le PM indonésien un peu gêné dans une affaire de corruption. De quoi rendre Hariri jaloux !

    Pareilles sommes laissent imaginer ce qui circule dans les rangs de la « révolution » syrienne...

    #syrie #arabie_saoudite

    • Note amusante : pour vérifier l’orthographe de l’ex roi d’Arabie saoudite, j’ai tapé « roi arabie saoudite » dans Google et je tombe sur Mohammed Ben Salmane Ben Abdelaziz al Saoud, le jeune prince dont, de fait, tout le monde « prédit » le coup d’Etat de velours prochain. Orwell enfoncé !

    • Malaysia prosecutor clears PM Najib Razak of corruption - BBC News
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35407017

      The attorney-general’s office said the $681m (£479m) that Mr Najib received in his bank account was a personal donation from the Saudi royal family.
      Critics had alleged the money came from state-owned investment fund 1MDB.
      Mr Najib has consistently denied these accusations, but has faced pressure to resign over them.
      Anti-corruption officials have previously said he received money as a gift from a foreign funder.
      Attorney-General Mohamed Apandi Ali said in a press statement on Tuesday that the amount was a “personal donation” from the royal family in Saudi Arabia, transferred between the end of March and early April 2013.
      He added that anti-corruption officials had met witnesses including the person they identified as the donor to confirm it.
      I am satisfied that there is no evidence to show that the donation was a form of gratification given corruptly,” he said, adding that evidence did not show the donation was used as an “inducement or reward” for Mr Najib to do anything in his capacity as prime minister.

  • La justice turque vient de condamner par contumace un syrien, un certain Haytham Qassab, à 12 ans d’emprisonnement pour « appartenance à une organisation terroriste » (en l’occurrence al-Qaïda) et « tentative d’acquérir des armes pour une organisation terroriste » (en l’occurrence du gaz sarin). Celui-ci, arrêté, avait ensuite été relâché durant le procès et est désormais en fuite.
    Tous les suspects turcs, arrêtés en mai 2013 (soit un peu avant l’attaque chimique dans la Ghouta orientale), pour avoir tenter d’aider à cette opération, ont été acquittés au motif que leur tentative n’en était qu’au stade préliminaire...
    http://www.todayszaman.com/national_court-sentences-syrian-in-sarin-gas-case-to-12-years-acquits-t

    A Turkish court on Tuesday sentenced in absentia a Syrian national accused of attempting to obtain chemicals used in the production of sarin gas to 12 years in jail and acquitted five Turkish suspects, bringing a two-and-a-half-year case that has stirred political controversy to a close.
    The Adana 9th High Criminal Court convicted the Syrian man, Haytham Qassab, of “membership in a terrorist organization” and “attempting to obtain weapons for an armed terrorist organization.” The court ruled to acquit the Turkish suspects who were accused of helping Qassab to acquire the materials sought, saying their attempts to acquire the materials were in the preparatory stages and had not been completed.
    The suspects were initially detained in an Adana police operation in May 2013 on suspicion of seeking to obtain materials used in the production of chemical weapons, reportedly for Syrian rebels linked to al-Qaeda. In July 2013, the suspects were released pending trial but when the court later established that the materials they were trying to obtain could in fact be used to produce sarin, a warrant for the arrest of Qassab, who is the main suspect in the case, was issued. But Qassab could not be arrested and he has remained at large since then.

    Le jugement fait suite aux accusations récentes du député turc du CHP Eren Erdem à l’encontre d’Erdogan et du gouvernement turc d’avoir fait pression sur le magistrat pour enterrer l’affaire :

    Eren Erdem has been accused of “treason” by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu and pro-government media, and the lawmaker is also under legal investigation, again on treason charges.
    Erdem has also accused the Turkish authorities of complicity, claiming that the government pressured the prosecutor of the case into toning down the accusations and ending the trial swiftly.

    Pour mémoire le député Erdem, allait même plus loin, en accusant sur Russia Today le gouvernement turc d’avoir permis l’acquisition d’armes chimiques à Da’ich, à partir de pièces de ce procès qu’il aurait obtenues.
    Voir ici : http://seenthis.net/messages/439692

    #sarin #attaques_chimiques #Turquie #Syrie #al-Nusra #Daech #ISIS

  • I revealed the truth about President Erdogan and Syria. For that, he had me jailed – Can Dündar
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/28/truth-president-erdogan-jailed-turkey-regime-state-security-crime?CMP=s

    In May 2015, however, Cumhuriyet Daily, the newspaper I serve as the editor-in-chief, acquired the footage of this incident. It was clearly visible that the truck was loaded with arms. It was thus documented that the intelligence service was illegally carrying arms into the civil war raging in a neighbouring country. This was big news. We published details of the operation with photos, and uploaded the video to our website.

    Erdoğan was in a fix. He couldn’t refute the story, so instead chose to censor the publication and threaten the journalist responsible, who was me. In a live broadcast on a state TV channel, he said: “The person who wrote this story will pay a heavy price for it; I won’t let him go unpunished.” He added that the footage was a “state secret”, and that publishing it was an act of “espionage”. Furthermore, as if to confirm that this was not the state’s secret but his secret, he filed a personal complaint to the prosecutor’s office.

    The punishment he demanded for me was two life sentences – for “treason” and for “acquiring and publishing classified information for the purpose of espionage”.

  • 12月29日のツイート
    http://twilog.org/ChikuwaQ/date-151229

    Top story: Meet Wish, the $3 Billion Shopping App That Sells $15 Smartwatches |… recode.net/2015/12/28/mee…, see more tweetedtimes.com/ChikuwaQ?s=tnp posted at 10:59:42

    Papier is out! paper.li/ChikuwaQ/13277… Stories via @cyrildruesne @mckenziewark @SilvioAlvarez posted at 09:16:08

    RT @Sabear3: ▼前ツイ< 大晦日コミケで頒布の【obosaブックレット】は夏からコツコツ時間かけて編集した冊子。このブックレット自体がワタシの久々の新作です。一人でも多くの方にご購入頂きたくてコミケに参加します。よろしくお願いします〜(’∀`)丿 pic.twitter.com/UoM44whj2N posted at 08:35:06

    Top story: Kate Aronoff on Twitter: "Prosecutor McGinty says Rice should have k… twitter.com/KateAronoff/st…, see more tweetedtimes.com/ChikuwaQ?s=tnp posted at 07:08:10

    Top story: $250,000 a Year Is Not Middle Class www.nytimes.com/2015/12/28/opi…, see more tweetedtimes.com/ChikuwaQ?s=tnp posted at 05:16:06

    Top story: Meadowlark Lemon, Harlem Globetrotter Who Played Basketball and Pran… (...)

  • Why It’s Impossible to Indict a Cop
    http://www.thenation.com/article/why-its-impossible-indict-cop

    Chapter 563 of the Missouri Revised Statutes grants a lot of discretion to officers of the law to wield deadly force, to the horror of many observers swooping in to the Ferguson story. The statute authorizes deadly force “in effecting an arrest or in preventing an escape from custody” if the officer “reasonably believes” it is necessary in order to “to effect the arrest and also reasonably believes that the person to be arrested has committed or attempted to commit a felony…or may otherwise endanger life or inflict serious physical injury unless arrested without delay.”

    But this law is not an outlier, and is fully in sync with Supreme Court #jurisprudence. The legal standard authorizing deadly force is something called “objective reasonableness.”

    This standard originates in the 1985 case of Tennessee v. Garner, which appeared at first to tighten restrictions on the police use of deadly force. The case involved a Memphis cop, Elton Hymon, who shot dead one Edward Garner: 15 years old, black and unarmed. Garner had just burgled a house, grabbing a ring and ten bucks. The US Supreme Court ruled that a police officer, henceforth, could use deadly force only if he “has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.” The ruling required that the use of force be “objectively reasonable.” How this reasonableness should be determined was established in a 1989 case, Graham v. Connor: severity of the crime, whether the suspect is resisting or trying to escape and above all, whether the suspect posed an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others. All this appeared to restrict police violence—even if, in the end, Officer Hymon was never criminally charged for fatally shooting Edward Garner.

    “Objectively reasonable”—what could be wrong with that? But in actual courtroom practice, “objective reasonableness” has become nearly impossible to tell apart from the subjective snap judgments of panic-fueled police officers. American courts universally defer to the law enforcement officer’s own personal assessment of the threat at the time.

    The Graham analysis essentially prohibits any second-guessing of the officer’s decision to use deadly force: no hindsight is permitted, and wide latitude is granted to the officer’s account of the situation, even if scientific evidence proves it to be mistaken. Such was the case of Berkeley, Missouri, police officers Robert Piekutowski and Keith Kierzkowski, who in 2000 fatally shot Earl Murray and Ronald Beasley out of fear that the victims’ car was rolling towards them. Forensic investigations established that the car had not in fact lurched towards the officers at the time of the shooting—but this was still not enough for the St. Louis County grand jury to indict the two cops of anything.

    Not surprisingly then, legal experts find that “there is built-in leeway for police, and the very breadth of this leeway is why criminal charges against police are so rare,” says Walter Katz, a police oversight lawyer who served on the Los Angeles County Office of Independent Review until it disbanded in July of this year. According to Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine Law School, recent Supreme Court decisions are not a path towards justice but rather a series of obstacles to holding police accountable for civil rights violations.

    • https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/12/28/tamir-rice-grand-jury-announcement-expected-monday

      The boy’s mother, in a statement released early Monday night said the decision not to charge the officers involved in the death of her son left her family without any faith in the justice system.

      “Prosecutor McGinty deliberately sabotaged the case, never advocating for my son, and acting instead like the police officers’ defense attorney,” Samaria Rice said, adding that she believes race was a factor in her son’s death and extended solidarity to the families of other black men and women killed by the police. “I don’t want my child to have died for nothing and I refuse to let his legacy or his name be ignored. We will continue to fight for justice for him, and for all families who must live with the pain that we live with.”

  • Cleveland officer who fatally shot Tamir Rice will not face criminal charges | US news | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/28/tamir-rice-shooting-no-charges-cleveland-officer-timothy-loehmann?CMP=t

    The white police officer who fatally shot Tamir Rice, an African American 12-year-old, will not face criminal charges, it was announced on Monday – more than a year after the shooting in Cleveland.

    A grand jury declined to indict officer Timothy Loehmann, who opened fire on Rice less than two seconds after arriving at a park where the 12-year-old was playing with a toy gun on 22 November 2014. Loehmann’s partner, Frank Garmback, will also face no charges, Cuyahoga county prosecutor Timothy McGinty announced at a press conference.

    #crime #violences_policières #impunité #racisme

    • Police fatally shoot nearly 1,000 people in 2016 | The Washington Post
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000

      Nearly a thousand times this year, an American police officer has shot and killed a civilian.

      When the people hired to protect their communities end up killing someone, they can be called heroes or criminals — a judgment that has never come more quickly or searingly than in this era of viral video, body cameras and dash cams. A single bullet fired at the adrenaline-charged apex of a chase can end a life, wreck a career, spark a riot, spike racial tensions and alter the politics of the nation.

      About this story: The killing of an unarmed black man by a white police officer last year in Ferguson, Mo., ignited a national debate and exposed the federal government’s failure to track the use of deadly force by police. The Washington Post launched a comprehensive project to log every on-duty fatal shooting by police in 2015. The resulting database chronicled shootings nationwide in real time, using news reports and other public sources. The Post compiled data about each death, including the race of those killed, whether they were armed and descriptions of the events. The project revealed that police nationwide were killing more than twice as many people as the FBI had previously reported. In October, the agency’s director, James B. Comey, said it was “unacceptable” that journalists had become the leading source of information on the subject. In December, an FBI official told The Post the agency is overhauling how it tracks violent police encounters, calling it “the highest priority.” The Post will continue tracking fatal shootings by police in 2016.

      In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. Meanwhile, The Post found that the great majority of people who died at the hands of the police fit at least one of three categories: they were wielding weapons, they were suicidal or mentally troubled, or they ran when officers told them to halt.

      The Post sought to compile a record of every fatal police shooting in the nation in 2015, something no government agency had done. The project began after a police officer shot and killed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., in August 2014, provoking several nights of fiery riots, weeks of protests and a national reckoning with the nexus of race, crime and police use of force.

  • The IAEA’s ‘Final Assessment’
    by Gareth Porter, December 18, 2015
    http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2015/12/17/iaeas-final-assessment

    Sur le rôle de #supplétif des #Etats-Unis de l’#AIEA

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assessment has cleared the way for the board of governors to end the Agency’s extraordinary investigation into accusations of Iran’s past nuclear weapons work. But a closer examination of the document reveals much more about the political role that the Agency has played in managing the Iran file.

    Contrary to the supposed neutral and technical role that Director General Yukiya Amano has constantly invoked and the news media has long accepted without question, the Agency has actually been serving as prosecutor for the United States in making a case that #Iran has had a nuclear weapons program.

    [...]

    Now that the Obama administration has settled on a nuclear agreement with Iran, the IAEA will no longer have to find contorted language to discuss Iran’s past and present nuclear program. Nevertheless, the Agency remains a highly political actor, and its role in monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the agreement may bring more occasions for official assessments that reflect the political interest of the U.S.-led dominant coalition in the IAEA board of governors rather than the objective reality of the issue under review.

  • Israël : une députée palestinienne condamnée à 15 mois de prison - Moyen-Orient - RFI - Publié le 07-12-2015
    http://www.rfi.fr/moyen-orient/20151207-israel-une-deputee-palestinienne-condamnee-15-mois-prison

    La députée palestinienne Khalida Jarrar, accusée d’incitation à la violence et au terrorisme, a été condamnée ce lundi à 15 mois de prison par un tribunal militaire israélien. Les Palestiniens, qui se sont beaucoup mobilisés pour cette personnalité connue, dénoncent un jugement purement politique.

    Avec notre correspondante à Jérusalem, Murielle Paradon

    Khalida Jarrar avait été arrêtée chez elle, en Cisjordanie occupée le 2 avril dernier, dans un raid de l’armée israélienne. Cette députée palestinienne était accusée d’incitation à la violence et d’appartenance au Front populaire de libération de la Palestine, un mouvement d’extrême gauche considéré comme une organisation terroriste par Israël.

    Le sort de Khalida Jarrar a beaucoup mobilisé. Féministe, militante des droits de l’homme et en particulier des droits des prisonniers, c’est une personnalité connue. Les Palestiniens ont aussitôt vu dans son arrestation par Israël un geste politique.

    Le jugement rendu ce lundi, 15 mois de prison fermes et 2 500 euros d’amende, est dénoncé comme totalement arbitraire, venant d’un tribunal militaire israélien. Khalida Jarrar a déjà passé huit mois en détention, elle devrait donc sortir de prison l’été prochain. Selon une association de détenus, cinq députés palestiniens sont actuellement emprisonnés dans les geôles israéliennes.

    #Khalida_Jarrar

    • Even a Political Trial Can’t Budge Israel’s Silence of the Ewes

      Palestinian parliamentarian Khalida Jarrar was jailed because of her political beliefs, but few Israelis seem to care.
      Gideon Levy Dec 10, 2015 2:32 AM
      http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.690967


      Palestinian Legislative Council member Khalida Jarrar in Ofer military court, May 2015.Alex Levac

      What is left of concepts like solidarity, sympathy or protest here? And who is left to express them? What could remain of those words when a military court sentences a Palestinian parliamentarian to a prison term for her political activity – and Jewish-Israeli society looks on with complete disinterest?

      It’s unlikely that the Israeli public even heard of it. No man cried out, no woman either. There is not a righteous man in Sodom, nor a righteous woman.

      The banishment, arrest and trial of Khalida Jarrar, not to mention the verdict against her, are among the abominations of the occupation. There have been greater abominations, but this one should have raised some kind of storm in Israel – as it did in the rest of the world – because it concerns an elected official, a fighter for human rights and social justice, a feminist and, of course, an opponent to the occupation.

      She was sentenced to prison solely due to her political activity. That, surely, should have awakened someone here? But we’re only shocked by the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma, where there’s a military dictatorship.

      Here’s a brief history of the abomination. A banishment order from the city she lives in; imprisonment without trial; a fabricated indictment, produced in response to the international criticism of her arrest and incarceration, consisting of grotesque charges that even the military prosecution never dared to concoct; the prosecutor’s threat before the court that she would be locked up without trial if it dared release her; and a verdict of 15 months in prison.

      The occupation’s clerks, disguised as prosecutors and military judges – imposters to all intents and purposes - did their job well. This is exactly what is required of obedient bureaucrats in uniform, some of them in skullcaps too.

      The mission was accomplished and Jarrar was neutralized. She will remain in prison for at least seven more months. Her husband, Ghassan, manufactures fur toys. Israel has arrested him 14 times and the furthest he has been allowed to travel in his 55 years is the Ketziot prison in the Negev. He and their daughters, Yaffa and Suha, doctoral students in Canada, will continue to weep, as they did in several court sessions.

      The only person who tried to stop this abomination was IDF Judge Major Haim Balilti, who ordered Jarrar’s release from prison. But Chief Military Advocate Lt. Col. Morris Hirsch threatened that Jarrar would be imprisoned in any case, regardless of the court’s ruling. That had the desired effect on judge Lt. Col. Ronen Atzmon of the appeals court, who did his duty.

      That is how Israel teaches the subjects of its occupation the only lesson it wants them to learn – you must not resist the occupation in any way, on any account, neither with violence nor politics, nor guns nor words. Bow your heads obediently under the boot, raise your hands in subservience and surrender. If you don’t, you will be punished.

      The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, one of the most sophisticated and impressive political movements, is seen by Israeli despotism as a “prohibited organization.” It also has a military wing, with which Jarrar had no contact. Even Jarrar’s visit to a Palestinian book fair was registered as an offense for which there can only be one verdict.

      A lawmaker is banished, arrested, imprisoned without really doing anything wrong or committing a crime – and Israel is silent. Her parliamentary peers – male and female members of the Knesset who grandstand about the “only democracy,” are silent. Apart from MK Aida Touma-Sliman, who visited Jarrar in prison, there was no display of protest or solidarity.

      Where are the MKs, especially the female ones? Hello, Merav Michaeli? Stav Shafir? Meretz? The silence of the lambs, mainly of the ewes. The women’s organizations are silent, the feminists are silent and the legal experts are silent. And, of course, the media, which didn’t even bother to report the verdict, except for Haaretz. Why? What happened? A “terrorist” was sentenced to prison? What’s the story?

      But this is a big story and it should trouble many Israelis, even those who aren’t concerned with the fate of the Palestinians. It won’t stop with Jarrar; it never does.

  • How influential are Orthodox radicals in Georgian society?

    By Silvia Serrano, lecturer in Political Science at the Auvergne University, Research fellow at CERCEC and CASCADE coordinator of Working Package 6 on ‘Religion and Politics’.

    Source : CASCADE. This initiative is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 613354 - CASCADE Project.

    www.cascade-caucasus.eu

    On 22 October 2015, the Tbilisi City Court cleared an Orthodox cleric and three followers of the charges of impeding an anti-homophobia rally held in Tbilisi to celebrate the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia, on 17 May 2013. This decision brought the issue of Orthodox radicalism in Georgia, and more broadly, of religious radicalism in the Caucasus, back to the forefront.

    The events of 17 May 2013 were widely covered in the Georgian and international media. TV broadcasts showed a small group of militants physically threatened by dozens of Orthodox activists under the gaze of indifferent police officers. The image of father Iotam, the superior of Ioane-Tornike Eristavi Monastery, chasing the militants with a stool as he was about to smash the window of a bus where the besieged had found refuge, went viral on social networks. A few days later, a petition initiated by intellectuals against the ‘threat of theocracy’ gathered several thousand signatures. The rally and counter-rally illustrated the divisions in Georgian society, and exemplified the polarization between ‘liberals’ in favour of individual freedoms, including sexual orientation, and ‘traditionalists’. The counter-rally was viewed by the former as evidence that groups led by uneducated priests, some of them with criminal records, were ready to resort to anything, including violence, to impose their obscurantist views. Although this interpretation is relevant, it ignores important developments which have to be taken into account in order to understand the role of public religion in post-Soviet Georgia.

    This episode highlights the role of institutional actors, namely the State and the Church, in shaping social attitudes towards minorities. Orthodox radicals obviously enjoy – explicit or implicit – support from the patriarchate. After the arrest of Father Basil Mkalavishvili in March 2004 – one of the main instigators of numerous assaults against Jehovah’s Witnesses, Baptists and others – the attacks against confessional minorities had dramatically decreased. Indeed, the behaviour of radical groups is largely determined by the messages sent by the authorities: passivity on the part of the government is interpreted as an authorisation of violence, while sanctions or court rulings draw red lines that are not to be crossed. The months following the coming to power of the ‘Georgian Dream’ coalition government in 2012 can be regarded as a test; the multiplication of conflicts over religious issues in the first two years of its rule can be correlated with the ambiguity and lack of direction of the new government. From this point of view, dropping the charge against undoubtedly aggressive individuals may be interpreted as a signal that violence against minorities’ rights advocates is tolerated by the state. At the time of writing, the prosecutor had not appealed.

    The assertiveness and high visibility of radical groups is often analysed as evidence of the growing influence of the Orthodox Church over Georgian society. However, being active does not mean representing majorities in society. ‘Traditional values’ often referred to in public debate, although seldom defined, are certainly cherished by many Georgians. But it does not mean that they support violence against minorities’ rights advocates nor that they share the hate speeches delivered by some priests in their sermon. A few days after 17 May 2013, when radical associations called for a second rally, no more than a few dozen people gathered and it went unnoticed.

    Indeed, the most remarkable development stemming from the rally two years ago was the fact that discrimination according to sexual orientation became a public issue. It illustrates the transnational dimension of social questions now debated in post-Soviet societies. It also sheds light on the role of NGOs in defining the topics to be discussed, while the Church finds it difficult to set the agenda on a broader range of social issues. Focussing on social issues such as homosexuality is hence viewed as a means to strengthen the ties between the Church and the ‘people’. In other words, it may be better analysed as an alternative survival strategy to compensate for its lack of an audience on religious issues. Hence, the rise of Orthodox activism should not be considered as evidence of desecularisation, but rather as a politicisation of religion to counterbalance a still weak religiosity.

    The process of reshaping the relation between the religious and the political in Georgia and across the Caucasus lies at the heart of Work Package 6 in the Cascade project. This Work Package looks into the complex and often contradictory dynamics that the dominant paradigm of secularisation / desecularisation cannot alone explain. In order to avoid the trap of simplification, this CASCADE research Work Package seeks to develop theoretical tools to address two mirroring processes: secularisation from below and desecularisation from above, a notion more explicitly expressed by the French ‘délaïcisation’. Facing indifference from large segments of the population towards its teachings, the Church, seeks to respond by challenging the secularity of the state; dynamics that are unfolding in other parts of the Caucasus and have their impact on shaping social developments in the region.

    #géorgie #caucase #caucase_sud

  • Le lauréat du Prix RSF 2015 va-t-il être incarcéré ce soir à Istanbul ?
    http://fr.rsf.org/turquie-le-laureat-du-prix-rsf-2015-va-t-26-11-2015,48584.html

    Reporters sans frontières (RSF) est abasourdie par les lourdes réquisitions du parquet d’Istanbul à l’encontre de Can Dündar et Erdem Gül. Le rédacteur en chef du quotidien Cumhuriyet et son représentant à Ankara sont poursuivis pour avoir publié, fin mai, un article sur de possibles livraisons d’armes par les services secrets turcs (MIT) en Syrie. À l’appui de son enquête, le journal avait produit une vidéo et des photos.

    • Cumhuriyet daily’s Dündar, Gül arrested over report on Syria arms transfer
      http://www.todayszaman.com/national_cumhuriyet-dailys-dundar-gul-arrested-over-report-on-syria-arm

      The editor-in-chief of the Cumhuriyet daily, Can Dündar, and the paper’s Ankara representative Erdem Gül have been arrested on charges of being members of a terror organization, espionage and revealing confidential documents — charges that could see them spend life in prison.
      “We have been arrested!” Dündar tweeted after the 7th Penal Court of Peace ruled to arrest the two men pending trial, complying with prosecutor İrfan Fidan’s request. Dündar and Gül will be taken to the Metris Prison after the court’s decision.

  • Case of Gaza family killed in their sleep taken to International Criminal Court | The Electronic Intifada
    https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/case-gaza-family-killed-their-sleep-taken-international-criminal
    https://electronicintifada.net/sites/electronicintifada.net/files/styles/original_800w/public/200814_ash_00_11.jpg?itok=fqiamay3&timestamp=1448299603

    Killed in their sleep

    “On 20 August 2014 at 4:45 AM, Israel attacked our home in Deir al-Balah whilst my family was fast asleep. My son and two stepsons were killed in the attack, as well as my nine-months pregnant daughter-in-law and her three children,” al-Louh says in a statement from Al-Haq, whose director Shawan Jabarin handed the file to Bensouda in The Hague.

    The evidence addresses specific attacks on Palestinian homes, hospitals, schools and high-rise buildings.

    It was submitted by Al-Haq, Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights, Aldameer and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights under a provision of the court’s founding Rome Statute that permits the prosecutor to launch investigations on her own initiative on the basis of information she receives.

    This can include evidence submitted by states, human rights organizations and international bodies.

    Monday’s submission is the first of its kind, according to the Center for Constitutional Rights, whose attorney Katherine Gallagher accompanied the Palestinian delegation to the ICC.

    If Bensouda’s preliminary analysis finds there is a “reasonable basis to proceed,” the prosecutor must seek permission from a panel of judges, known as a pre-trial chamber, to open a formal investigation.

    Israel’s 51-day assault on Gaza beginning in early July 2014, left more than 2,200 Palestinians dead, including 551 children, according to the report of an independent UN inquiry published in June.

    Israel injured thousands more, displaced hundreds of thousands of people and devastated large areas of Gaza.

    That inquiry concluded that the death and destruction was the consequence of a “policy, approved at least tacitly by decision-makers at the highest levels of the Government of Israel.”

  • Palestinian Center for Human Rights
    http://www.pchrgaza.org/portal/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11379:palestinian-human-right

    23 November 2015
    Today, in a historic moment in Palestinian pursuit of accountability, four Palestinian human rights organisations delivered a confidential communication to Madam Prosecutor Bensouda of the International Criminal Court on behalf of themselves and Palestinian victims of Israel’s “Operation Protective Edge”. The communication, which was submitted by Al-Haq, Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights, Aldameer and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute, contains information on crimes jointly documented during Israel’s 2014 offensive against the Gaza Strip.

    “We have become used to Israel killing and injuring Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The 2014 offensive is the third war on our people in about six years. But nothing could have fully prepared me for the devastating loss of my sons, grandsons and granddaughters in an attack against our family home.” said Bouthaineh Al Louh, a Palestinian 57-year old grieving mother. “On 20 August 2014 at 04.45am, Israel attacked our home in Deir al Balah whilst my family was fast asleep. My son and two stepsons were killed in the attack, as well as my nine months pregnant daughter-in-law and her three children. Our family will never again be complete, and our house is in ruins. I hope that the ICC can acknowledge the crimes that we endured and punish those that deprived us of our loved ones”.

    Speaking from The Hague, Mr. Shawan Jabarin (Al-Haq Director) said that, “We have provided the Office of the Prosecutor with enough information for it to determine that there is a reasonable basis to believe that senior Israeli military and civilian officials committed crimes against humanity and war crimes during the offensive against Gaza. We are confident that the information now at the disposal of the Office of the Prosecutor is sufficient to open an investigation, and urge her to act quickly to begin a formal investigation.”

    #Palestine #CPI

  • ICC issues first report on war crimes in Palestinian- Israeli conflict - Arab-Israeli Conflict - Jerusalem Post
    http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/ICC-issues-first-report-on-war-crimes-in-Palestinian-Israeli-conflict-432875

    This preliminary report comes after months of investigation and the ICC is expected to continue its evaluation, a process which could take from months to several years to complete. Then it will determine based on the analysis whether to move to the next stage and bring the case to a full criminal investigation.

    The annual report, the institution’s fifth, also covers a wide array of other countries it is reviewing.

    Previous ICC prosecutor reports from 2009-2012 made occasional mentions of the 2008-2009 Gaza war (Operation Cast Lead), but since the ICC prosecutor did not recognize “Palestine” until January 2015, none of those statements ever reached the stage of even the preliminary examination that is currently under way.

  • French NGO Survie files a complaint against French officials for complicity in the genocide of Tutsis in Rwanda
    http://survie.org/genocide/nos-actions-en-justice/article/french-ngo-survie-files-a-5042

    Tuesday, November 3rd, 2015 On November 2nd, 2015 the association Survie lodged a complaint against unknown persons ("plainte contre X") with the Prosecutor of the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris, for complicity in genocide and complicity in crimes against humanity. This complaint targets French political and military officials who were responsible, in the early 1990s, for providing assistance to the regime that prepared and then committed genocide against Rwandans designated as (...)

    #Nos_actions_en_justice

    / #Complicité_de_la_France_dans_le_génocide_des_Tutsi_au_Rwanda, #Communiqués_de_presse, (...)

    #Justice

  • The New Yorker Doesn’t Factcheck What ‘Everyone Knows’ Is True
    By Gareth Porter
    http://fair.org/home/the-new-yorker-doesnt-factcheck-what-everyone-knows-is-true

    #Dexter_Filkins has been one of the top journalists covering America’s wars since 9/11—first for the New York Times, and since 2011 for the New Yorker—often uncovering stories that were not welcomed by the US national security structure. But when Filkins, in a long-form New Yorker article last summer (7/20/15), took on the subject of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman’s untimely death and its relation to his role in indicting senior Iranian officials for a 1994 Buenos Aires terror bombing, it tested how far Filkins would go in questioning conventional wisdom.

    #Tout_le_monde_sait#Iran #Hezbollah (absence de) #rigueur #éthique

  • The International Advisory Panel says Ukraine’s investigations into May 2014 violence in Odesa are inefficient
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/the-international-advisory-panel-says-ukraines-investigations-into-may-201

    The International Advisory Panel overseeing the investigations into the tragic events in Odesa on May 2, 2014 has said that the investigations being carried out by the Ukrainian authorities have so far been insufficient.

    Pour ne pas changer, hélas !

    • Le rapport du Groupe consultatif du Conseil de l’Europe était présenté aujourd’hui à Kiev à 10h et le sera demain (5/11) à Odessa.

      International Advisory Panel to present its review of the Odesa violence investigations on Wednesday in Kyiv, on Thursday in Odesa - Council of Europe Office in Ukraine - Council of Europe
      http://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/home/-/asset_publisher/Pur4r4szNjUn/content/international-advisory-panel-to-present-its-review-of-the-odesa-violence-invest

      The report of the International Advisory Panel on its review of the investigations into the violent incidents in Odesa in May 2014 will be presented at press conferences in Kyiv on Wednesday, 4 November 2015, and in Odesa on Thursday, 5 November 2015.

      The report will be presented by Sir Nicolas Bratza, Chair of the International Advisory Panel (IAP), former President of the European Court of Human Rights; Volodymyr Butkevych, IAP Member, former Judge of the European Court of Human Rights, and Oleg Anpilogov, IAP Member, a former prosecutor of Ukraine.

      The Special Advisor of the Council of Europe Secretary General for Ukraine, Christos Giakoumopoulos, will also take part in the press conference in Kyiv.

      The press conference in Kyiv will take place at 10:00 local time on Wednesday, 4 November, at the Ukrinform Press Centre (8/16 Bohdana Khmelnytskoho Street, Kyiv).

      The press conference in Odesa will take place the next day, on Thursday, 5 November, at 10:00 local time, at the Londonskaya Hotel (11 Prymorskyi Blvd, Odesa).

    • Ukraine Failing to Probe Pro-Russia Protester Deaths, Panel Says - Bloomberg Business
      http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-04/ukraine-failing-to-probe-pro-russia-protester-deaths-panel-says

      Ukrainian authorities are failing to adequately investigate 48 deaths, including of 42 pro-Russian protesters, in the Black Sea port of Odessa in May 2014, according to an international panel set up by the Council of Europe.
      The demonstrators clashed with football fans and participants in a pro-government rally as the military conflict in Ukraine’s easternmost regions erupted following Russia’s annexation of nearby Crimea. Most of the deaths occurred after a building in which the protesters had barricaded themselves was set on fire.
      Despite the lapse of some 18 months after the events, not a single charge has been brought in respect of the deaths,” the panel said Wednesday in an e-mailed report. The body is tracking the investigation to check it meets the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.

  • Head of UKROP party detained on kidnapping suspicions; his allies outraged (UPDATED)
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/ukrop-party-claims-its-head-korban-detained-by-sbu-401057.html

    Gennady Korban, Dnipropetrovsk businessman and head of the recently founded UKROP party, was detained in Dnipropetrovsk by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) on the morning of Oct. 31. The offices and homes of his associates were searched.

    SBU and Prosecutor General’s Office confirmed they were conducting a large-scale joint operation against an organized crime group in Dnipropetrovsk.

    There is no political component in this case,” SBU prosecutor Vladyslav Kutsenko said at a briefing in Kyiv on Oct. 31. “We don’t care which political party the suspects represent.

    UKROP has called the arrest and the searches an act of “political repression.

    Korban is suspected of kidnapping several people during his time as deputy governor of Dnipropetrovsk in 2014-2015 and is facing eight to 15 years of prison. One of them, according to the investigators, was Oleksandr Velychko, a director of the law department in Dnipropetrovsk City Council, allegedly kidnapped to force a change of the city’s mayor back in 2014.
    […]
    Korban, a Dnipropetrovsk businessman and a renowned self-admitted corporate raider, launched UKROP party in 2015 with a financial support of his friend, Ukraine’s second richest oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.

    • Scènes de dépouillement à Dnipropetrovsk…

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yZE_Hlr1yU

      On the eve of his detention, Korban was involved in an argument at the Babushkinskiy District Election Commission in central Dnipropetrovsk. The district had not yet filed its results for the Oct. 25 local election to the City Election Commission.

      UKROP wanted the final count for the district to take place at the City Election Commission, while representatives of Petro Poroshenko Bloc and Opposition Bloc wanted the head of the commission to be replaced.

      The argument reportedly continued for hours during which armed men entered the building and an armored personnel carrier marked Dnipro-1 Battalion - a division allegedly sponsored by oligarch Kolomoisky - showed up outside and left without explanation. Denys Davydov, a representative of the election monitors OPORA, reported on Facebook that the commission, under armed guard, handed over their count to the City Election Commission.

      In the heat of the argument, Korban threw a book across the table at the election commission members. The video of the incident was published by his opponent Vilkul’s people.

  • Palestinians Urge Speedy ICC Probe Into Alleged Israeli Crimes
    Haaretz Israeli News Source
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.683358

    Palestinian leaders on Friday handed what they called evidence of Israeli crimes committed in the recent outburst of violence to prosecutors at the International Criminal Court.
    Foreign Minister Riad Malki said the Palestinians submitted details to Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda of what they described as extra-judicial killings of Palestinians as well as home demolitions and other forms of collective punishment.

  • Turkish journalist detained for tweets critical of president
    http://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2015/10/09/turkish-journalist-detained-for-tweets-critical-of-president

    Police in Turkey have detained the chief editor of an opposition English-language newspaper for posting tweets critical of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    Bulent Kenes, editor-in-chief of Today’s Zaman, was taken away from the newspaper’s headquarters in Istanbul on Friday as supporters chanted: “Free media cannot be silenced!” The detention was televised live.

    A court issued a warrant for his arrest for tweets that a Turkish prosecutor says insult Erdogan. Kenes, who received a suspended sentence earlier this year for insulting the president, denies the accusation, insisting he is exercising his right to free speech.

  • Yatsenyuk and allies of Poroshenko, Avakov targeted by corruption investigations
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv-post-plus/yatsenyuk-allies-of-poroshenko-avakov-targeted-by-corruption-investigation

    Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, President Petro Poroshenko’s chief of staff Borys Lozhkin and an ally of Interior Minister Arsen Avakov have been targeted by investigators and whistleblowers in Ukraine and abroad this week.

    The reports come as Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk and Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin are accused of failing to investigate corruption among incumbent and former top officials and applying selective justice.

    Geoffrey Pyatt, the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, went so far on Sept. 24 as to say that “corrupt actors within the Prosecutor General’s Office are making things worse by openly and aggressively undermining reform.

    Kyiv’s Pechersky District Court has ordered the Prosecutor General’s Office to start an investigation against Yatsenyuk on suspicion of getting a $3 million bribe for appointing Volodymyr Ishchuk as chief executive of state-owned Radio Broadcasting, Radio Communications and Television Company, Serhiy Kaplin, a member of the Verkhovna Rada, wrote on Sept. 26.

  • Le TSL acquitte al-Jadeed, Karma Khayat reconnue coupable
    http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/944981/le-tsl-acquitte-al-jadeed-karma-khayat-reconnue-coupable.html

    La chaîne de télévision libanaise al-Jadeed, accusée d’avoir diffusé des informations sur des témoins protégés dans l’enquête sur l’assassinat de l’ancien Premier ministre Rafic Hariri, a été acquittée d’outrage et entrave à la justice par le juge compétent en matière d’outrage du Tribunal spécial pour le Liban (TSL), Nicola Lettieri.

    Le tribunal a certes estimé que trois témoins présumés, sur un total de onze concernés par cette affaire, pouvaient être identifiés grâce aux informations publiées par Al-Jadeed-TV. Mais, a soutenu le juge Lettieri, rien ne montre que « les individus concernés ait souffert de quoi que ce soit à cause de ces divulgations ».

    L’accusation n’a « pas prouvé au-delà de tout doute raisonnable que la divulgation (...) pouvait objectivement miner la confiance du public dans la capacité du tribunal à protéger la confidentialité de certaines informations », a-t-il ajouté lors d’une audience publique dans la banlieue de La Haye, où siège le TSL.

    La rédactrice en chef adjointe et la vice-présidente du conseil d’administration de la chaîne al-Jadeed, Karma Mohammad Tahsine Khayat, a elle aussi été acquittée pour la diffusion des reportages, mais a été reconnue coupable de ne pas les avoir retirés du site Internet de la chaîne lorsque le tribunal le lui avait demandé.

    • Lebanon Tribunal Gives Mixed Verdict in Confidential Witnesses Case
      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/19/world/middleeast/lebanon-hariri-tribunal-karma-khayat-al-jadeed-tv-trial.html

      An international court on Friday found Karma Al-Khayat, an executive with Al Jadeed TV in Lebanon, guilty of contempt of court for ignoring its order to remove broadcasts about confidential witnesses from the station’s website. She was acquitted, however, of the more serious charge of obstruction of justice.

      The station’s parent company, New TV, based in Beirut, was tried on similar charges before the same Italian judge, Nicola Lettieri, but on Friday he cleared the company on all counts.

      The case against Ms. Khayat and Al Jadeed drew criticism from news organizations in Lebanon and abroad, raising questions about whether the trials amounted to an attack on the freedom of the press. Diplomats and lawyers also followed it because the charges against the company, rather than an individual, appeared to develop a novel notion of corporate liability in international criminal law.

      “I’m delighted the judge unequivocally rejected the charges against the company, because they lacked a legal base in international law,” said Karim Khan, the British lawyer representing Ms. Khayat and New TV. He said he was satisfied that Ms. Khayat had been acquitted of the most serious charge she faced, obstruction of justice. He also said that Ms. Khayat would almost certainly appeal the contempt of court conviction.

      Ms. Khayat, 32, whose family is the main owner of Al Jadeed TV, could face a prison term or fine. The prosecutor asked for a 12-month sentence or a fine of 100,000 euros, about $130,000. Ms. Khayat was scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 28.

    • Chez la BBC, on titre carrément sur le fait que Karma Khayat a été innocentée par « la Hague »… la condamnation pour outrage n’est mentionnée qu’après trois paragraphes : Hague court clears Lebanese journalist
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34288461

      A Lebanese TV journalist and her station have been cleared of obstructing justice by a UN-backed tribunal investigating the 2005 killing of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

      Karma Khayat and Al Jadeed had been accused of having revealed details about key protected witnesses.

      But Ms Khayat was convicted of contempt of court for failing to remove broadcasts about the case online.

    • Why the judgement against Karma Khayyat is disappointing: Another case of STL “selective #justice
      https://mideastwire.wordpress.com/2015/09/18/why-the-judgement-against-karma-khayyat-is-disappointing-anot

      As for the Khayyat judgement, it is disappointing not because of her case in itself – I cant evaluate that…. but rather because of all the many many many destructive leaks etc by many new orgs and journos over the last 10 years – NONE of which have been brought before the court.

      Strange, right, that the only two cases involve vociferous critics of the STL!

      Strange and another sad mark on a process that could have been and should have been far better.

      #mascarade