position:secretary of state

  • FBI criminal investigation emails: Clinton approved CIA drone assassinations with her cellphone, report says - Salon.com
    https://www.salon.com/2016/06/10/fbi_criminal_investigation_emails_clinton_approved_cia_drone_assassinations_w

    The FBI has been conducting a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information for months.

    An explosive new report reveals just what it is that the FBI is looking to: emails in which then-Secretary of State Clinton approved CIA drone assassinations in Pakistan with her cellphone.

    From 2011 on, the State Department had a secret arrangement with the CIA, giving it a degree of say over whether or not a drone killing would take place.

    The U.S. drone program has killed hundreds of civilians in Pakistan and other countries.

    Under Sec. Clinton, State Department officials approved almost every single proposed CIA drone assassination. They only objected to one or two attacks.

    The emails that are at the heart of the FBI’s criminal investigation are 2011 and 2012 messages between U.S. diplomats in Pakistan and their State Department superiors in D.C., in which the officials approved drone strikes.

    Clinton’s aides forwarded some of these emails to her personal email account, on a private server in her home in suburban New York.

    These are the revelations of a report by The Wall Street Journal, based on information provided by anonymous congressional and law-enforcement officials who were briefed on the FBI’s probe.

  • International treaty targeting illegal fishing takes effect
    https://news.mongabay.com/2016/06/international-treaty-targeting-illegal-fishing-takes-effect

    United Nations treaty aimed at preventing illegal fishing will enter into force this Sunday, June 5, with 29 countries and the European Union as parties to it.

    Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing puts the world’s already-strained fish stocks at risk, each year capturing as much as 26 million metric tons of fish valued at up to $23 billion.

    “Illegal fishing steals billions of dollars’ worth of resources from our ocean each year, hurting those who play by the rules,” U.S. secretary of state John Kerry said in a press release about the treaty.

    Officially titled the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, the treaty represents an international effort to shore up the global seafood supply by preventing vessels from landing illegal catches. Significantly, it commits countries hosting ports of entry to deter IUU fishing vessels, rather than relying on the vessels’ flag states to police their fleets.

    #pêche #pêche_illégale (#surpêche) #traités #Europe

  • Sunday, May 29, 2016
    ISIS and Israel
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2016/05/isis-and-israel.html

    There is a strange relationship between Israel and a small sect of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) based next to the Golan Heights. The very presence of a group like ISIS so close to Israel poses many questions. Firstly why has ISIS not attacked Israel – a country they have sworn to destroy – from said base? Similarly why has the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) not attacked this small and weak group of extremists on their border? The answers to such questions show the truth behind the rhetoric all actors use in this conflict...Israel is focused not on ISIS and Sunni groups, but on the Shia groups in Syria. Israel’s airstrikes have hit Assad’s Shia-backed regime and Hezbollah, not ISIS or al-Nusra. Correspondence between the then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and political advisor Jacob Sullivan about Israel’s aims in the region tried to rationalise why Israel ignores ISIS." (thanks Helena)
    Posted by As’ad AbuKhalil at 2:22 PM

    Correspondence : http://graphics.wsj.com/hillary-clinton-email-documents/pdfs/C05791550.pdf

  • Significantly, but without much fanfare, an expanded definition of anti-Semitism entered the UK’s policy arena this April.

    An article by Eric Pickles, former secretary of state for communities and local government, chair of the Conservative Friends of Israel and, since September 2015, UK special envoy for post-Holocaust issues, entitled ‘A definition of antisemitism’ introduced the government’s ‘Combating Anti-Semitism: a British best practice guide’ just before the announcement of a short Home Affairs Committee inquiry into anti-Semitism. And in it, anti-Semitism, traditionally defined simply as ‘hostility to or discrimination against Jews’ (Concise Oxford Dictionary) was replaced by an enormously long definition which not only includes attacks (physical or verbal) on Jewish people and community institutions but also ‘manifestations … target[ing] the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity’, such as: ‘denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, eg, by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour; applying double standards by requiring behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation … drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis …’

    http://www.irr.org.uk/news/anti-semitism-thought-or-deed/?platform=hootsuite

    #anti-sémitisme

  • Le dernier Rapport d’Oxfam décrit pire que les Panama Papers

    But what is new in this report is the aspect of lobbying, and the implications that can be drawn from these corporation’s relationships with politicians.

    The total lobbying amount detailed in the report is around $2.6bn – or, as Oxfam themselves explained it: “For every $1 spent on lobbying, these 50 companies collectively received $130 in tax breaks and more than $4,000 in federal loans, loan guarantees and bailouts”.

    A case in point would be Morgan Stanley. Named the 21st most powerful company in the world in a 2011 study by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, they (according to Oxfam) have held over $7bn offshore, received more than $2tn in state handouts – all while paying an effective domestic tax rate of 7.9 per cent.

    When you compare these figures to the (relatively) paltry $23m they spent on lobbying, it would mean that for every $1 dollar they spent pushing the US Government on laws and regulations important to them, they got back an eye watering $92,000. Money extremely well spent, you could say. Neither is their lobbying particularly discreet, as paying $225k to Hillary Clinton for just one speech could be seen as questionable - when she had just stepped down as Secretary of State after pushing through free trade agreements which were touted as being platforms for easier tax avoidance and offshore accounting.

    https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/3847/beyond-panama-why-oxfam-s-latest-tax-haven-report-matters

    #lobbying #lobby #fraude-fiscale #paradis-fiscaux #Etats-Unis #occident #Multinationales

  • #PanamaPapers : le rôle méconnu d’accords de « #libre-échange » made in USA dans l’#évasion_fiscale | Jean Gadrey
    http://alternatives-economiques.fr/blogs/gadrey/2016/04/10/evasions-panameennes-le-role-meconnu-d%E2%80%99accords-de-%

    Le premier est l’accord #CAFTA, qui, contrairement à l’#ALENA, n’est jamais cité dans les débats actuels autour du traité transatlantique ou #TAFTA, de son cousin avec le Canada le CETA, ou encore celui sur la libéralisation des services ou #TISA. Le second, encore plus inconnu, est justement un accord signé avec… le #Panama.

    Le CAFTA, ou pour l’écrire en entier le DR-CAFTA, est un accord signé entre les Etats-Unis et cinq « petits » pays d’Amérique centrale (Costa-Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua), plus la République dominicaine. Il est effectif depuis 2009. Son nom officiel est le « Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement ». J’en reparlerai.

    (…)

    Ajout, quelques heures après la mise en ligne : il n’est pas sans intérêt de savoir que Bernie Sanders s’était très vivement opposé à l’accord de « libre-échange » avec le Panama, comme en témoignent des vidéos de ses interventions de l’époque, et bien entendu son vote au Congrès en octobre 2011, où il avait pu rallier 21 sénateurs démocrates. Il vient de le rappeler, le 5 avril dernier, en déclarant notamment ceci :

    “I was opposed to the Panama Free Trade Agreement from day one. I predicted that the passage of this disastrous trade deal would make it easier, not harder, for the wealthy and large corporations to evade taxes by sheltering billions of dollars offshore. I wish I had been proven wrong about this, but it has now come to light that the extent of Panama’s tax avoidance scams is even worse than I had feared.

    “My opponent [Hillary Clinton], on the other hand, opposed this trade agreement when she was running against Barack Obama for president in 2008. But when it really mattered she quickly reversed course and helped push the Panama Free Trade Agreement through Congress as Secretary of State. The results have been a disaster.”

  • US congressmen seek investigation of Israel’s ’extrajudicial killings’
    March 30, 2016 1:18 P.M. (Updated: March 30, 2016 2:16 P.M.)
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=770905

    BETHLEHEM — US Senator Patrick Leahy along with 10 other Democratic congressmen have called on the US to investigate the possibility of “gross violations of human rights” by Israel’s and Egypt’s security forces, including “extrajudicial killings.”

    Leahy, who has in the past sought a greater role for human rights in US foreign policy, made the request in a joint letter sent to US Secretary of State John Kerry on Feb. 17, suggesting that if the reports of rights violations should be proven, US military assistance should be cut off.

    “There have been a disturbing number of reports of possible gross violations of human rights by security forces in Israel and Egypt — incidents that may have involved recipients, or potential recipients, of US military assistance,” the congressmen said in the letter published on Tuesday by Politico.

    The letter cited findings by Amnesty International and other human rights organizations of “extrajudicial killings by the Israeli military and police of Fadi Alloun, Saad al-Atrash, Hadeel Hashlamoun, and Mutaz Ewisa,” as well as several cases of torture.

    “We urge you to determine if these reports are credible and to inform us of your findings,” the congressmen said.

    • USA : un sénateur réclame une enquête sur Israël et l’Egypte
      by Claire Dana-Picard | mars 30, 2016
      http://lphinfo.com/2016/03/30/usa-un-senateur-reclame-une-enquete-sur-israel-et-legypte

      Le sénateur démocrate du Vermont Patrick Leahy et dix autres membres du Congrès appartenant à la même formation politique ont adressé une lettre à l’administration Obama pour réclamer des investigations sur les forces de sécurité d’Israël et de l’Egypte, accusées d’avoir commis ‘d’importantes violations des droits de l’Homme qui pourraient affecter l’aide militaire US accordée à ces pays’.

  • The NSA denied Hillary a Secure BlackBerry like Obama has

    Since he became president, Barack Obama has carried a special “secure” BlackBerry, altered by the NSA to make it as difficult as possible for hackers to turn it into a remote spying device.

    Now it’s been revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked in 2009 for one of those uncrackable BlackBerries, too, and the NSA denied her request and keeps secret the reasons why.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone

    Standard smartphones are not allowed into areas designated as approved for the handling of classified information, such as the block of offices used by senior State Department officials, known by the nickname “Mahogany Row” for the quality of their paneling.

  • Hillary Clinton Email: Overthrow Assad, Destroy Syria For Israel
    http://www.inquisitr.com/2922838/hillary-clinton-email-overthrow-assad-destroy-syria-for-israel-2

    Clinton specifically mentions Iran’s nuclear program as threatening Israel’s atomic monopoly in the Middle East, and that other “adversaries” in the region could be encouraged to go nuclear as well and threaten the interests of the U.S. and Israel. In true realpolitik Machiavellian logic, this means that Syria must be destroyed.

    Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

    She goes on to detail the relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria through Iran’s alleged proxies and proposes toppling Assad will solve this problem.

    It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

    Chillingly, she also mentions that bringing down the Syrian government by force may open the doors to military action against Iran.

    Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran’s strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran’s nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington.

    Détail important:

    It should be noted that the Wikileaks transcript of the email is incorrectly dated to December 31, 2000, which is an obvious error due to references in the text to the Syrian Civil War, which began in March 2011, as well as references to the May 2012 negotiations in Istanbul between Iran and the west over its nuclear program. Most likely the actual date of the email is December 31, 2012. At the time, Clinton was Secretary of State for President Barack Obama.

    Le mail d’origine chez Wikileaks:
    https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18328

  • Europe’s refugee crisis: a taste of things to come? — Medium
    https://medium.com/@UNEnvironment/europe-s-refugee-crisis-a-taste-of-things-to-come-72a5d4079cb4

    When you look to the root causes of migration, more often than not environmental change or mismanagement is in there somewhere. The Syrian civil war, while clearly not directly triggered by environmental factors, may have been made more likely by the severe drought that struck the country between 2006 and 2009. This drought, which some suggest may be the worst to hit the region in 900 years, forced thousands of rural farmers to abandon their villages and move to urban centres, thus swelling the country’s cities and putting pressure on jobs and resources. As US Secretary of State John Kerry said in 2015: “I’m not telling you that the crisis in Syria was created by climate change. But the devastating drought clearly made a bad situation a lot worse.”

    Meanwhile, since 2008 an average of 26.4 million people have been displaced from their homes each year by disasters brought on by natural hazards. This is the equivalent to one person every second.

    #migrations #climat #sécheresse #agriculture

  • Reporting (or Not) the Ties Between US-Armed Syrian Rebels and Al Qaeda’s Affiliate
    http://fair.org/home/reporting-or-not-the-ties-between-us-armed-syrian-rebels-and-al-qaedas-affilia

    À la fois étiqueter groupe terroriste #al_nusra, et en fait compter sur lui et l’appuyer,

    The Obama administration has long portrayed the opposition groups it has been arming with anti-tank weapons as independent of Nusra Front. In reality, the administration has been relying on the close cooperation of these “moderate” groups with Nusra Front to put pressure on the Syrian government. The United States and its allies–especially Saudi Arabia and Turkey–want the civil war to end with the dissolution of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who is backed by US rivals like Russia and Iran.

    Reflecting the fact that Nusra Front was created by #Al_Qaeda and has confirmed its loyalty to it, the administration designated Nusra as a terrorist organization in 2013. But the US has carried out very few airstrikes against it since then, in contrast to the other offspring of Al Qaeda, the Islamic State or ISIS (Daesh), which has been the subject of intense air attacks from the US and its European allies. The US has remained silent about Nusra Front’s leading role in the military effort against Assad, concealing the fact that Nusra’s success in northwest Syria has been a key element in Secretary of State John Kerry’s diplomatic strategy for Syria.

    When Russian intervention in support of the Syrian government began last September, targeting not only ISIS but also the Nusra Front and US-supported groups allied with them against the Assad regime, the Obama administration immediately argued that Russian airstrikes were targeting “moderate” groups rather than ISIS, and insisted that those strikes had to stop.

    #délétère #Etats-Unis #Syrie

  • J’apprends en lisant un article du 8 mars dernier (donc avant l’annonce du retrait russe) de Paul Pillar que l’#Iran a retiré la plus grande partie de ses troupes de la #Syrie,
    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/the-latest-non-nefarious-iranian-behavior-15439

    Je cherche des liens en Francais sur Google : je n’en ai trouvé que 3 :

    L’Iran commence à retirer ses troupes de Syrie (rapport)
    http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/moyen-orient/95340-151211-l-iran-commence-a-retirer-ses-troupes-de-la-syrie-rapport

    Les Gardiens iraniens de la révolution se retirent de Syrie, annonce John Kerry
    http://www.45enord.ca/2016/02/les-gardiens-iraniens-de-la-revolution-se-retirent-de-syrie-annonce-john-ker

    Et http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/972365/les-gardiens-iraniens-de-la-revolution-se-retirent-de-syrie-kerry.htm

    Comme l’explique Paul Pillar la discrétion des MSM sur ce sujet se justifie par la nécessité absolue de taire tout ce qui ne colle pas avec la narration (sionisto-saoudo-néocon) d’un Iran qui profite des concessions qui lui sont faites pour se montrer, je cite, « encore plus #néfaste »,

    Now the nuclear agreement is in force, and we can look for any evidence of changes in Iranian regional activity. What certainly should count as significant evidence is the recent report that Iran is withdrawing from Syria a significant portion of the Revolutionary Guard Corps forces that it had deployed there. That’s right: this is Iranian regional activity—violent activity, involving combat—that is going down, not up. Surely those observers who can be expected to be watching like a hawk whatever Iran is doing in the region would have noticed. It’s not as if the report was confined to inconspicuous places. The report first appeared on Israeli television and was replayed in other Israeli news outlets. The Israeli report, according to which Iran is withdrawing all of a 2,500-strong fighting force while leaving 700 military advisers in Syria, is consistent with a brief comment by Secretary of State Kerry in a Congressional hearing less than two weeks ago that Iran had withdrawn a “significant number” of its Revolutionary Guard Corps troops from Syria. But from the people who have said so much about financial windfalls from sanctions relief and how that would lead to Iran doing more destabilizing things in the region, we get no comment. Radio #silence.

    #MSM #silence_radio

  • Kerry Sought Missile Strikes To Force Syria’s Assad To Step Down
    http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2016/03/14/kerry-sought-missile-strikes-to-force-syrias-assad-to-step-down

    That revelation shows that Kerry’s strategy in promoting the Syrian peace negotiations in recent months was based on much heavier pressure on the Assad regime to agree that President Bashar al-Assad must step down than was apparent. It also completes a larger story of Kerry as the primary advocate in the administration of war in Syria ever since he became Secretary of State in early 2013.

    Incidemment, ce monsieur a gagné jusqu’à un passé récent entre $28,872,067 et $38,209,020 grâce à ses investissements en actions dans des compagnies liées à la guerre https://blog.mondediplo.net/2008-04-05-Nicolas-Sarkozy-l-Afghanistan-et-l-universalisme

  • « Before Her Assassination, Berta Cáceres Singled Out Hillary Clinton for Backing Honduran Coup »

    http://www.democracynow.org/2016/3/11/before_her_assassination_berta_caceres_singled

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is facing a new round of questions about her handling of the 2009 coup in Honduras that ousted democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. Since the coup, Honduras has become one of the most violent places in the world. Last week, indigenous environmental activist Berta Cáceres was assassinated in her home. In an interview two years ago, Cáceres singled out Clinton for her role supporting the coup. “We’re coming out of a coup that we can’t put behind us. We can’t reverse it,” Cáceres said. “It just kept going. And after, there was the issue of the elections. The same Hillary Clinton, in her book, ’Hard Choices,’ practically said what was going to happen in Honduras. This demonstrates the meddling of North Americans in our country. The return of the president, Mel Zelaya, became a secondary issue. There were going to be elections in Honduras. And here she [Clinton] recognized that they didn’t permit Mel Zelaya’s return to the presidency.” We play this rarely seen clip of Cáceres and speak to historian Greg Grandin.

    #Berta_Cáceres #Honduras #Hillary_Clinton #US #coup_d'Etat

  • Time to Say Good-Bye? Storm Clouds Gathering on Erdogan’s Horizon - AWD News
    http://www.awdnews.com/top-news/time-to-say-good-bye-storm-clouds-gathering-on-erdogan-s-horizon

    He calls attention to the fact that Erdogan had long been engaged in personal diplomacy with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

    However, when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed that “Assad must go,” the Turkish leader immediately changed his stance and ganged up with the Saudis against the Syrian President.

    Given the fact that the “Assad must go policy” has ultimately failed, it is time to retreat. But since the West took part in stirring Syria up, the Western political establishment is especially interested in retreating quietly so that its glaring misdeeds have never come to light.

    “By failing to cooperate and making a spectacle of defying Obama, Turkey raises the risk of a more detailed examination of this entire sordid affair — the real cause of the loss of 250,000 lives in Syria; the real cause of the refugee crisis (there was none prior to the attack on Syria); the strong support, direct or indirect, by all parties of jihadist extremists who gloried in the killing of Christians, Druze, and other minorities in Syria,” Collins notes.

  • Turkey thanks Merkel for support of #safe_zones in Syria

    Turkey’s foreign minister has thanked German Chancellor Angela Merkel for her support of the Turkish government’s demand to establish safe zones inside Syria, while U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry expressed wariness over a safe zone in Syria, saying that up to 30,000 troops would be needed to maintain the area.

    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-thanks-merkel-for-support-of-safe-zones-in-syria.aspx?page

    Commentaire reçu via la mailing-list Migreurop :

    - De facto, since Aleppo bombing by Russian army, Syrians cannot enter any more Turkey. They are stopped at the border. This decision was taken by Turkey without any existence of “safe zone” yet. This means that protection of the population is not the main goal behind this decision of “safe zone” in Syria: stemming the “inflow” of refugees is the main objective.

    – Again, militarization of refugee “problems”: refugees will be surrounded by army to “protect” them. According to John Kerry, the deployment of up to 30,000 troops is needed and nobody agreed clearly on such deployment. Merkel agrees on safe zone but it is not sure that such protection can be granted to refugees. And what does protection mean when such troops can be the proper target of armed groups in Syria?

    – Merkel still raises her voice to welcome refugees in Europe and faces all other European countries, stuck in the closure of borders. But meanwhile, Merkel agrees de facto on the closure of all Turkish borders: Germany controls NATO operations at sea and support Turkish desire of establishing a “safe zone”.

    – Hypocrisy: "This proposal of Turkey was not seriously discussed when we first brought it to the agenda. But even with delay, Turkey’s proposal is now understood”. NO: the idea of safe zones had been rejected by the international community as an irrelevant “solution” that went against refugees safety. It had been seriously discussed and rejected with arguments. “Given the huge refugee problem threatening the EU’s unity”, Germany (and certainly the European Union will follow Merkel) changes her mind. For European ’safety’ and ’peace’, not for refugees’ protection.

    #Allemagne #Turquie #réfugiés #asile #migrations #safe_zone #Syrie #safe_zones #zone_sure #zones_sures

  • Un long et intéressant article de Robert F. Kennedy Jr - oui, oui, c’est bien le fils de Bob... - fait une rétrospective des opérations de changement de régime au Moyen-Orient en lien avec la question de la géopolitique de l’énergie, afin d’éclairer la guerre en Syrie. C’est aussi, bien sûr, un réquisitoire contre ces opérations.
    Certains faits évoqués sur l’actuel conflit syrien ont été déjà largement évoqués par plusieurs seen thissiens. Mais certains faits plus anciens sont cependant moins connus :
    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/02/rfk-jr-why-arabs-dont-trust-america-213601?o=0
    Why the Arabs Don’t Want Us in Syria
    They don’t hate ‘our freedoms.’ They hate that we’ve betrayed our ideals in their own countries—for oil. / R.F. Kennedy Jr ; 22.02.16

    A titre d’exemple cet extrait sur le choix dès l’époque Eisenhower de jouer le fondamentalisme islamique (aussi bien des Saudiens que des Frères musulmans) contre le nationalisme arabe, ou bien la question des routes de l’énergie dans le choix américain de renverser le chef d’Etat syrien Quwatli par un coup d’Etat militaire en 1949 :

    For Americans to really understand what’s going on, it’s important to review some details about this sordid but little-remembered history. During the 1950s, President Eisenhower and the Dulles brothers—CIA Director Allen Dulles and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles—rebuffed Soviet treaty proposals to leave the Middle East a neutral zone in the Cold War and let Arabs rule Arabia. Instead, they mounted a clandestine war against Arab nationalism—which Allen Dulles equated with communism—particularly when Arab self-rule threatened oil concessions. They pumped secret American military aid to tyrants in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon favoring puppets with conservative Jihadist ideologies thath they regarded as a reliable antidote to Soviet Marxism. At a White House meeting between the CIA’s director of plans, Frank Wisner, and John Foster Dulles, in September 1957, Eisenhower advised the agency, “We should do everything possible to stress the ‘holy war’ aspect,” according to a memo recorded by his staff secretary, Gen. Andrew J. Goodpaster.
    The CIA began its active meddling in Syria in 1949—barely a year after the agency’s creation. Syrian patriots had declared war on the Nazis, expelled their Vichy French colonial rulers and crafted a fragile secularist democracy based on the American model. But in March 1949, Syria’s democratically elected president, Shukri-al-Quwatli, hesitated to approve the Trans-Arabian Pipeline, an American project intended to connect the oil fields of Saudi Arabia to the ports of Lebanon via Syria. In his book, Legacy of Ashes, CIA historian Tim Weiner recounts that in retaliation for Al-Quwatli’s lack of enthusiasm for the U.S. pipeline, the CIA engineered a coup replacing al-Quwatli with the CIA’s handpicked dictator, a convicted swindler named Husni al-Za’im. Al-Za’im barely had time to dissolve parliament and approve the American pipeline before his countrymen deposed him, four and a half months into his regime.

    #gaz #pipelineistan #échapper_à_Ormuz #Syrie #regime_change

  • ’Call Me a Terrorist, but I’m No Different From Israeli Troops Defending Their Homeland’ - Israel News - Haaretz
    Some thoughts on the true source of incitement against and hatred of Israelis from a Palestinian who spent 23 years in jail for killing one.
    Gideon Levy and Alex Levac Feb 19, 2016 1:10 PM
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.704179

    Najah Mohammed Muqbel, a Fatah activist who served 23 years in prison for the murder of an Israeli, Yaakov Shalom. Alex Levac

    As we make our way down a narrow, dark alley barely wide enough to walk through, on the way to the house of mourning, Najah Mohammed Muqbel bends over to pick up a few spent cartridges. “You see, this is the material that incites our children,” he says.

    In 1990, Muqbel was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of Yaakov Shalom in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Ein Karem. Released after 23 years, he is now a key activist in Fatah, talking on the movement’s behalf in West Bank schools.

    “We do not want to die and we do not send our children to die,” he says, before we enter the small, cramped home of Omar Madi, a teenager who was killed last week by Israeli soldiers in the Al-Arroub refugee camp. “No father wants his child to die. But sometimes our children make decisions that are bigger than their age.”

    Al-Arroub, on the main road between Bethlehem and Hebron, is one of the most squalid of refugee camps, and one of the most militant. We are also joined accompanied by Thomas Huelse, an Israeli automotive engineer of German origin who has “adopted” a family living in the camp. The mother of the family is from Deir al-Assad, in the Galilee; the father is from Al-Arroub. Their house overlooks the cemetery, where Omar, the young shahid (martyr for the cause), was killed. Omar’s home is situated at the other end of the camp, next to the approach road that the Israel Defense Forces has sealed off with large concrete blocks, not far from the army guard tower that dominates the landscape.

    The bereaved parents, Naama and Yusuf Madi, and their 10 remaining children huddle in the house. Anguish is etched on the face of the father, a hardscrabble laborer of 52, employed by the Bethlehem Municipality.

    The event occurred last Wednesday, February 10. A few youths threw stones at soldiers who, as usual, had infiltrated deep into the camp. One bullet struck Omar. He wasn’t yet 16; he died 10 days before his birthday, his mother tells us. The last time she saw him was on the roof of their house, when he asked her to wash his sports shoes, which were muddy. She told him she’d wash them with the rainwater collected in the tank on the roof, and that he should clean up afterward. Omar then went to pray in the mosque. And afterward “the story ended,” in Naama’s words.

    Omar Madi’s parents.Alex Levac

    Shots were heard in the camp. Her heart told her it was her son, and at Al-Mizan Hospital in Hebron a short time later she saw his body. The bullet had entered Omar by way of his right hip and exited through the left one; he was declared dead shortly afterward by the hospital staff.

    Many young people in the camp are wearing black T-shirts with Omar’s photo emblazoned on them.

    “They [the soldiers] murdered him in cold blood,” one of the teen’s brothers says. “They have no pity for the old or for the young,” their mother adds. “What reason do the soldiers have to walk around the camp every day,” the dead boy’s father asks, and then answers himself: “They come so the children will throw stones at them and then they can kill them.”

    This is now a house of rage. It’s not hard to guess what will take root here. On the day after the killing, when the family had just begun to mourn, soldiers arrived at the house to arrest one of the other children, claiming he had thrown stones. The family resisted and the soldiers left.

    “It is our right to throw stones at soldiers and we will insist on it,” one of the brothers says.

    The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit stated this week, in reply to a query from Haaretz: “This incident is being investigated by the Military Police. Upon completion of the investigation, the findings will be conveyed to the military advocate general for examination.”

    “No child here can differentiate between Israeli, Jew, Zionist, soldier or civilian. For our children, every Israeli is a Jew and every Jew is a soldier and every soldier is hostile,” Muqbel tells us in his excellent Hebrew, acquired during almost a quarter-century in prison.

    “I was ‘born’ on Oct. 30, 2013. I am a boy with a mustache, I am 2 years old,” he says, referring to the date of his release from prison, as part of Israel’s goodwill gestures to the Palestinians during negotiations led by Secretary of State John Kerry.

    A native of the camp, Muqbel now wears a tie and has a Jeep at his disposal thanks to his work for Fatah. He described his approach to the present situation at length, and it’s worth listening to.

    “We used to think that the killing of children was a ‘mistake.’ Now,” he explained, “we believe that there is an IDF policy to kill children, to execute our children. After all, a child’s body shows that he is a child. The soldier knows he is a child. If you think that this is a message that will help you, you are wrong. These children are a new generation of hatred. Not incitement, not Abu Mazen [i.e., Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas], not Hamas – the true source of incitement is the behavior of the Israeli soldier and whoever gives him his orders.

    “Once,” Muqbel continued, “your way of thinking was that our old people would die and the young ones would forget. I am telling you in all seriousness: We, the old ones, will die, but the next generation believes [in the cause] more than we do. It’s a generation that does not listen to any leader. Believe me or don’t believe me: The parents have no hand in the matter. The real lesson the child learns is this refugee camp. Did you see the entrance to Al-Arroub? It’s open for one hour and closed for two. And what are the soldiers doing inside the camp? Would you stop a child from throwing stones at them? It is you who are making them throw stones and afterward be killed.

    “What did the person who jumped from the 80th floor of the Twin Towers think to himself? What pushed him to jump and die? The hope that maybe he would live, despite everything. If you understand that, you will not ask what makes the children try to assassinate Israelis. Our weapons are dirty, because we don’t have smart ones. A stone, a knife ... If we had smart weapons like you, we would aim them at your army bases. It’s not easy for a person to kill or murder a human being. I know, it supposedly happens only in the jungle, between animals.

    “Maybe you were a soldier in the past. Maybe you killed. Why don’t you see me as a soldier, in exactly the same way you see your soldier as a hero who is guarding the homeland? Look at me. Say ‘terrorist,’ ‘murderer,’ ‘criminal’ – it’s of no interest to me. We are the soldiers of our people. When I got married, I was asked what I would say to the mother of the person I had killed, with me celebrating and him underground. I allowed myself to say that there is no difference between a bereaved Palestinian mother and a bereaved Israeli mother, and it is their right to be angry. But every war has a price and it is paid by the ordinary people. Not by the leaders. Pain has no answer and pain has no price. I paid 23 years of my life. How can you put a value on that?

    “The feeling that allows me to accept myself is that I did something for my people. But what will you say to the mother of one of our children who was killed? Why do you always ask us about our killing? I am the one who killed Yaakov Shalom. By my act, I cried out that I exist. I was 24, and that was my response to Ami Popper, who murdered seven Palestinian workers. I knew it would not bring about the liberation of the homeland, but I believed that I had to take action. To make the Israelis and the world look at me. Maybe it was a mistake, maybe we didn’t gain anything. I’ve seen children who were killed for hoisting a [Palestinian] flag. Today those flags are sold in stores and their importer is an Israeli, a Zionist, maybe even a demobilized soldier. You have to understand, there’s no going back.

    “Even though we are now weak, our strength lies in our weakness, and your strength in your Dimona [i.e., nuclear] project. But we will come back to life. We know that the way is long and the war will continue. But neither a fence nor a tank nor a plane, neither the Arrow nor Iron Dome will be able to withstand the will of a people to live with dignity. I give talks as a volunteer in schools and I teach our children love of the homeland and how it can be realized. I teach them that an uprising is not only with weapons, it is also with the pen, with a poem, with music, with a play – a weapon is the last thing.

    “The only resource the Palestinians have is people. We have no other resources. Accordingly, we have to forge a people who will have values, who will know how to love the homeland and preserve it, who will understand that weapons are only a small part of this. This morning, on the way to taking my daughter to my mother, I saw cartridges all over the road. That is the instrument of incitement, and it is everywhere. Your children are not familiar with this. All you have is the pepper spray that mothers carry in their purses, and the knives that young people take to clubs.

    “Netanyahu wants to put cardboard over the eyes of Israelis, so you will see reality only through the holes he makes in it. In war there are victims, but what is happening now is executions. There is a famous photograph from the second intifada of an Israeli soldier confronting a child with a stone and not shooting him. There was a time when you took pride in that picture.”

    #Palestine

  • The World Has Discovered a $1 Trillion Ocean - Bloomberg Business
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-21/the-world-has-discovered-a-1-trillion-ocean

    As chairman of investments at Guggenheim Partners, Scott Minerd thought he had a realistic view on how big an economic challenge climate change poses.

    Then, at a Hoover Institution conference almost three years ago, he met former U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz. Minerd recalled him saying: “Scott, imagine that you woke up tomorrow morning, and the headline on the newspapers was, ’The World Has Discovered a New Ocean.’” The opening of the Arctic, Shultz told him, may be one of the most important events since the end of the ice age, some 12,000 years ago.

    #arctique #économie #développement

  • Giving Peace Very Little Chance | Consortiumnews
    https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/05/giving-peace-very-little-chance

    By Robert Parry

    After nearly 15 years of Mideast war – with those conflicts growing ever grimmer – you might expect that peace would be a major topic of the 2016 presidential race. Instead, there has been a mix of warmongering bluster from most candidates and some confused mutterings against endless war from a few.

    No one, it seems, wants to risk offending Official Washington’s neocon-dominated foreign policy establishment that is ready to castigate any candidate who suggests that there are other strategies – besides more and more “regime changes” – that might extricate the United States from the Middle East quicksand.

    Late in Thursday’s Democratic debate – when the topic of war finally came up – former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continued toeing the neocon line, calling Iran the chief sponsor of terrorism in the world, when that title might objectively go to U.S. “allies,” such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, all of whom have been aiding Sunni jihadists fighting to overthrow Syria’s secular regime.

  • Le chef de la délégation de l’opposition-syrienne-de-Riyad s’est dit que c’était une bonne idée de s’en prendre à John Kerry là maintenant tout de suite en adoptant un ton vaguement menaçant : Syrian opposition says Kerry applies pressure over peace talks
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-opposition-idUSKCN0V20TW

    The lead negotiator in the Syrian opposition said on Sunday it was coming under pressure from U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to attend peace talks in Geneva this week in order to negotiate over steps including a halt to air strikes.

    The opposition’s High Negotiation Committee, which groups political and armed opponents of President Bashar al-Assad, has said it will not attend negotiations until the government halts bombardments, lifts blockades, and releases detainees - steps mentioned in a United Nations Security Council resolution passed last month.

    Negotiator Mohamad Alloush said Kerry, who met HNC officials on Saturday, had “come to pressure us to forgo our humanitarian rights... and to go to negotiate for them”.

    “There will be a big response to these pressures,” he told Reuters, without giving further details. Asked if the peace talks would go ahead this week, he said “we leave this to the coming hours”.

    Comme dit @souriyam, #ça_commence_à_en_faire_des_conditions

  • Central America’s Gangs Are All Grown Up. And more dangerous than ever.

    The possible arrival of a few thousand Syrian refugees in the United States has caused a political firestorm, but there is a much more serious humanitarian crisis brewing on America’s southern border. The growing wave of unaccompanied children flowing from the northern tier of Central America across the U.S.-Mexico border could very well turn into a long-lasting tsunami due to the horrific violence and gang warfare wracking the region.
    Despite the announcement by Secretary of State John Kerry last week that the United States will increase the number of Central American refugees admitted and work with the United Nations to help those at risk, the number of unaccompanied minors fleeing the Northern Triangle of #El_Salvador, #Honduras, and #Guatemala will likely soon surpass the 2014 surge. Nor are recent efforts by the Obama administration to round up and deport those already in the United States illegally likely to blunt the dynamics driving people to leave.


    http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/19/central-americas-gangs-are-all-grown-up

    #Amérique_centrale #gang #criminalité #bandes #violence #renvoi #expulsion #migrations #mineurs_non_accompagnés

  • Éamon de Valera: A Will to Power review – the man who made modern Ireland | Books | The Guardian

    http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/dec/14/eamon-de-valera-will-to-power-review

    When Winston Churchill attacked Irish taoiseach Éamon de Valera 60 years ago at the end of the second world war for what he regarded as southern Ireland’s shameful neutrality, De Valera responded in a dignified and firm way. Irish neutrality was the logical culmination of De Valera’s mission to achieve Irish sovereignty, and as far as he was concerned the capacity to implement an independent foreign policy was the ultimate measure of that sovereignty. That he had managed to guide southern Ireland to that point was testament to his political success, nearly 20 years after Churchill, as secretary of state for the colonies, had suggested De Valera “may gradually come to personify not a cause but a catastrophe”.

    Référencé pour le boulot pour http://www.eva.ie/still-the-barbarians

    #irlande #eva_2016

  • Kerry at Saban Forum: Current Trends Are Leading to a One-state Reality - Haaretz - Barak Ravid Dec 05, 2015
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.690205

    Secretary of State John Kerry addresses the Saban Forum in Washington D.C., December 5, 2015.Courtesy of Saban Forum

    U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking at the Saban Forum in Washington D.C. Saturday, warned that current trends in the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts are leading to a one-state reality. Kerry also said that if the situation continues, it is unclear how long the Palestinian Authority can survive.

    “If there is a risk the Palestinian Authority might collapse and Israel wants it to survive, shouldn’t Israel do more to help sustain it?” Kerry said.

    “Without the Palestinian Authority, Israel will be responsible for civil administration of the West Bank - it costs billions,” Kerry said. “Without the Palestinian Authority’s security forces, the IDF would be forced to deploy tens of thousands of soldiers to the West Bank indefinitely.”

    Kerry said that the distrust between the two sides has never been more profound. “President Abbas feels great despair - more than I have ever heard him,” he added.

    “I believe that many people in the security establishment in Israel want to see steps for strengthening the Palestinian Authority,” the secretary of state said.

    Kerry added that the two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict mustn’t become a “slogan,” but warned that “current trends are leading for a one-state reality.”

    “We have to be honest about what a one-state solution looks like,” Kerry said, warning that in such a case Israel couldn’t maintain its character as Jewish and democratic, asking rhetorically what the international reaction would be to such a scenario, and saying that true peace with its neighbors will not be possible under such conditions.

    “The one-state solution is no solution at all for a Jewish, democratic Israel living in peace,” he warned.

    Kerry criticized Israeli settlement construction, saying that it raises questions about Israel’s long term intentions. Kerry noted that Palestinians didn’t receive any construction permits in Area C in 2015. He also noted that several Israeli cabinet ministers declared their opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

    Saying that peace is the best way to achieve security, Kerry stated that first of all, the violence must stop. “There’s no justification for violence against civilians. Israel has the right and the obligation to defend itself.”

    “We need people to act in restraint. The Palestinian leadership should stop the incitement and condemn terror attacks,” he said.

    On Friday, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon addressed the Forum and said that he opposed the one-state solution, stating that Israel did not want to govern the Palestinians. “We are happy they already have their political independence,” he said, adding that Israel wants to strengthen Palestinian competence to govern themselves.

    Earlier on Saturday, Yesh Atid chairman Yair Lapid addressed the Forum, saying that solving the conflict “is not the number one priority of Israel - it is the only priority.” Saying that Israel must move toward solving the conflict as soon as possible, Lapid said: “We have been waiting for 40 years for the right timing to have peace with the Palestinians. Enough is enough - we need to do it.”

    Regarding the fight against Islamic State, Kerry seemed to be rebutting statements made by Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon the day before about a lack in U.S. leadership, and laid out U.S. actions and policy against ISIS and in Syria.

    “We want a transition to a unified non-sectarian Syria,” Kerry said, adding that the U.S. isn’t naïve about the diplomatic effort in Syria. “It’s difficult,” he admitted. However, he added that the Vienna talks were “the most promising diplomatic effort regarding Syria in the last years.”

    Regarding the nuclear deal with Iran, Kerry addressed Israel directly, saying that he knows Israel still has concerns, but that the U.S. is “convinced that we will know what Iran is doing.”

    “Under the nuclear deal all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb are blocked,” he said, adding that it was the deal was the right thing to do, “regardless of whether they will change their behavior or not.”

    On Friday, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon addressed the Forum and said that he opposed the one-state solution, stating that Israel did not want to govern the Palestinians. “We are happy they already have their political independence,” he said, adding that Israel wants to strengthen Palestinian competence to govern themselves.