position:western diplomat

  • Saudi Arabia frustrated in its campaign to counter Hizbollah
    https://www.ft.com/content/343a8c46-cabf-11e7-ab18-7a9fb7d6163e

    Riyadh may [...] be forced to backpedal on its threats or push for drastic economic measures that would bring the country to its knees — similar to the regional embargo it has led since June against Qatar, banning flights and cutting trade routes in an attempt to choke its rival Gulf state into submission.

    [...]

    Such harsh tactics may become harder to impose, with western governments pushing back against Riyadh. They have no desire to see further chaos in the war-torn region, fearing radicalisation and more refugees. On Wednesday, France said it would invite Mr Hariri to Paris in an effort to ease tensions and facilitate the premier’s eventual return to Beirut.

    “[We] have been pretty clear that destabilising Lebanon any further is not in anyone’s interest,” said one western diplomat. “I think the Saudis realise that they cannot push much harder or they will shoot themselves in the foot.”

    #arabie_saoudite

  • Outside help behind rebel advances in Aleppo
    https://www.ft.com/content/da076830-5d77-11e6-a72a-bd4bf1198c63

    Apparemment le rapprochement turco-russe est une fiction,

    ... the offensive against President Bashar al-Assad’s troops may have had more foreign help than it appears: activists and rebels say opposition forces were replenished with new weapons, cash and other supplies before and during the fighting.

    “At the border yesterday we counted tens of trucks bringing in weapons,” said one Syrian activist, who crosses between Syria and neighbouring Turkey. “It’s been happening daily, for weeks … weapons, artillery — we’re not just talking about some bullets or guns.”

    Two other rebels, who, like all those interviewed, asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject, described cash and supplies being ferried in for weeks. They and others believe the money and supplies came from regional backers, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and were sent in trucks across Turkey’s border with Syria.

    This was in spite of the fact that the rebel offensive — dubbed “the great Aleppo battle” — has been led and organised by Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, a jihadi group formerly known as Jabhat al-Nusra.

    Some rebels claim that US officials supporting moderate rebel forces intentionally turned a blind eye to Fatah al-Sham’s participation in the offensive to ensure the opposition maintains a foothold in Aleppo.

    “The Americans, of course, knew what was going on. They ignored it to put some pressure back on Russia and Iran,” said a western diplomat in contact with the opposition.

    #Syrie #al-Qaïda #Etats-Unis

  • Il est certainement très important de ne pas laisser dire que l’État islamique aurait pu dézinguer l’avion jordanien avec un missile, parce que dans le cas contraire, on serait amené à se demander s’il ne s’agit pas d’un de ces jolis « mobile antiaircraft missiles » que les Séoudiens s’engageaient à livrer aux rebelles en février dernier, par l’intermédiaire de la… Jordanie. (Et ce serait drôlement ballot.)

    Février 2014 : Saudis Agree to Provide Syrian Rebels With Mobile Antiaircraft Missiles
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304703804579382974196840680

    But if the Manpads are supplied in the quantities needed, rebels said it could tip the balance in the stalemated war in favor of the opposition. The antiaircraft and Russian Konkurs antitank weapons would help them chip away at the regime’s two big advantages on the battlefield—air power and heavy armor.

    “New stuff is arriving imminently,” said a Western diplomat with knowledge of the weapons deliveries.

    Rebel commanders and leaders of the Syrian political opposition said they don’t know yet how many of the Manpads and antiaircraft missiles they will get. But they have been told it is a significant amount. The weapons are already waiting in warehouses in Jordan and Turkey.

    Earlier in the conflict, rebels managed to seize a limited number of Manpads from regime forces. But they quickly ran out of the missiles to arm them, the Western diplomat said.

    Rebel leaders say they met with U.S. and Saudi intelligence agents, among others, in Jordan on Jan. 30 as the first round of Syrian peace talks in Geneva came to a close. That is when wealthy Gulf States offered the more sophisticated weapons.

  • Ukraine war crimes trials a step closer after Red Cross assessment | Reuters
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/07/22/uk-ukraine-crisis-warcrimes-idUKKBN0FR0UV20140722

    The Red Cross has made a confidential legal assessment that Ukraine is officially in a war, Western diplomats and officials say, opening the door to possible war crimes prosecutions, including over the downing of Malaysia Airlines MH-17.

    Clearly it’s an international conflict and therefore this is most probably a war crime,” one Western diplomat in Geneva told Reuters.

    The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is the guardian of the Geneva Conventions setting down the rules of war, and as such is considered a reference in the United Nations deciding when violence has evolved into an armed conflict.

    Within the U.N. system, it’s the ICRC that makes that determination. They are the gate keepers of international humanitarian law,” said one U.N. source.

    The ICRC has not made any public statement - seeking not to offend either Ukraine or Russia by calling it a civil war or a case of foreign aggression - but it has done so privately and informed the parties to the conflict, sources told Reuters.

    The qualification has been shared bilaterally and confidentially,” ICRC spokeswoman Anastasia Isyuk told Reuters on Friday. “We do not discuss it publicly.

    The designation as a war - either international or civil - changes the game legally, because it turns both sides into combatants with equal liability for war crimes, which have no statute of limitations and cannot be absolved by an amnesty.

    Suspects may also be arrested abroad, since some countries apply “universal jurisdiction” to war crimes.

    Without the designation, Ukrainian government forces would be responsible for protecting civilians and infrastructure under international human rights law, while separatists would only be liable under Ukraine’s criminal laws.

    It changes their accountability on the international stage,” said Andrew Clapham, director of the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. “This makes individuals more likely to be prosecuted for war crimes.

    Le CICR (et en conséquence, l’ONU) a précisé le statut juridique des événements d’Ukraine, guerre ou guerre civile, mais ne le rend pas public.

  • Sudanese “apostate” sentenced to death gives birth in jail
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/sudanese-apostate-sentenced-death-gives-birth-jail

    A Christian Sudanese woman sentenced to hang for #apostasy has given birth in jail, a Western diplomat said on Tuesday. “She gave birth to a girl today,” said the diplomat, who is familiar with the case of Meriam Yahia Ibrahim Ishag, 27. “The mother and the baby seem to be doing OK,” said the diplomat who asked for anonymity. But he said: “It’s a cruel treatment to be in such a situation.” The case of Ishag has sparked global outrage since a Khartoum-area court sentenced her to death on May 15. read more

    #Sudan

  • #Iran #nuclear talks with Western powers “useful,” #EU says
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/iran-nuclear-talks-western-powers-useful-eu-says

    Iran and six world powers held more “useful” talks on Tehran’s nuclear program, the European Union announced on Wednesday, as a Western diplomat said they are still struggling to overcome deep disagreements on the future of Iranian atomic capabilities. The remarks came after two days of expert-level talks in New York between Iran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia on a long-term accord that would end a decade-old dispute over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions by a self-imposed July 20 deadline. read more

    #IAEA #Top_News

  • Israel must be included in Western nations’ group on UN human rights council, allies say
    Haaretz, By Barak Ravid | Nov. 18, 2013

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.558730

    Six of Israel’s allies in the West have demanded an upgrade of its status on the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

    A Western diplomat said the demand by these six countries, members of the Western European and Others Group in the UN, was made in the wake of Israel’s agreement to resume ties with the UNHRC and appear two weeks ago at the council’s Universal Periodic Review on human rights issues.

    On November 6, the ambassadors of the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Germany, France and the United States sent a letter to the UN’s institutions in Geneva and to the ambassador of Spain, who heads the group of Western countries on the HRC. In the letter, a copy of which was sent to Haaretz, the six ambassadors wrote that the time had come to bring Israel into the WEOG.

    “We, the undersigned, would like by this letter to recall Israel’s longstanding request to join the WEOG regional group in Geneva. We are strongly supportive of Israel’s membership at the earliest opportunity. We request that you kindly include this issue on the agenda of the next WEOG meeting in Geneva, to be held as soon as possible,” the letter read in part.

    If the bid to bring Israel into the WEOG succeeds, it will be more difficult to isolate and condemn Israel. It will also be easier for Israel to propose diplomatic initiatives of its own in the HRC.

    A Western diplomat told Haaretz that the effort is likely to succeed because most of the WEOG’s countries do not oppose Israel’s inclusion. Only two countries, Iceland and Liechtenstein, had reservations about it, while two others, Ireland and Turkey, expressed neither opposition nor support. “We will persuade the undecided countries too,” the Western diplomat said.

    On October 29, Israel attended the Universal Periodic Review in the UNHRC in Geneva. This was after Israel boycotted the UNHRC for more than a year and a half because of its decision to establish an international investigative committee about the settlements.

    In recent months, negotiations took place between Israel and the WEOG for Israel’s return to the HRC. Allies such as the U.S., Australia, Germany and the U.K. put heavy pressure on Israel to attend the hearing. In exchange, the Western countries promised to restrict the use of Agenda Item 7, which stipulates that a separate discussion on human rights in Israel and in the West Bank take place at every session of the HRC. Israel is the only country in the world regarding which such a rule exists.

    The Western European countries promised to make no statements or speeches during sessions that would come under Agenda Item 7, and to render any such statements empty of content. This promise will apply to the HRC’s next two sessions, which will take place over the next two years. A unanimous decision of all the group’s members will be required to lift the restrictions on Agenda Item 7 — and unanimous decisions are difficult to obtain.

    The Western countries also promised to bring Israel’s inclusion in the WEOG as a full member up for a vote in November. Israel is not a member of any regional group, which results in its isolation and makes it very difficult for Israel to garner support for diplomatic positions or actions.

  • Arabie saoudite – France : Divergences politiques et business : une première victime : EDF ? | Middle East Strategic Perspectives
    http://www.mestrategicperspectives.com/2013/11/05/arabie-saoudite-france-divergences-politiques-et-business-u

    la chaîne du Hezbollah fait deux révélations importantes :
    [...]
    – la deuxième concerne une décision qu’auraient prise les dirigeants saoudiens de réduire les contrats français sur le marché saoudien, après l’apparition de ces divergences avec Paris sur l’Iran et le Liban. Al-Manar va jusqu’à donner des exemples, en estimant qu’EDF aurait perdu le contrat des deux centrales nucléaires (au profit de la concurrence britannique), et en faisant référence, pour rendre plus crédibles les propos avancés, aux partenaires commerciaux traditionnels de sociétés françaises dans le royaume dont Baqer Benladen et Mazen al-Sawwaf du Groupe Benladen, Soroof International (www.soroof.com), propriété du prince Bandar Ben Abdullah Ben Abdulaziz et “sponsor” d’EDF. Cela ne peut que déstabiliser les intérêts économiques et commerciaux français en Arabie saoudite.

    #énergie
    #nucléaire

    • After Reportedly Being Offered Saudi Weapons Sales, France Tries to Blow Up Iran Deal
      http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/11/09/after-reportedly-being-offered-saudi-weapons-sales-france-blows-up-iran-

      Intéressant papier de Emptywheel sur l’actuelle position française dans les négociations avec l’Iran : les dirigeants saoudiens auraient promis aux dirigeants français d’acheter des armes françaises s’ils arrivaient à bloquer un accord avec l’Iran.

      Several weeks after this WSJ article describing a staged Bandar bin Sultan tantrum about US actions, it was revealed the “Western diplomat” involved was a representative of France.

      Diplomats here said Prince Bandar, who is leading the kingdom’s efforts to fund, train and arm rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, invited a Western diplomat to the Saudi Red Sea city of Jeddah over the weekend to voice Riyadh’s frustration with the Obama administration and its regional policies, including the decision not to bomb Syria in response to its alleged use of chemical weapons in August.

      “This was a message for the U.S., not the U.N.,” Prince Bandar was quoted by diplomats as specifying of Saudi Arabia’s decision to walk away from the Security Council membership.

      [snip]

      However, the diplomats said, Prince Bandar told them he intends to roll back a partnership with the U.S. in which the Central Intelligence Agency and other nations’ security bodies have covertly helped train Syrian rebels to fight Mr. Assad, Prince Bandar said, according to the diplomats. Saudi Arabia would work with other allies instead in that effort, including Jordan and France, the prince was quoted as saying.

      [snip]

      In the run-up to the expected U.S. strikes, Saudi leaders asked for detailed U.S. plans for posting Navy ships to guard the Saudi oil center, the Eastern Province, during any strike on Syria, an official familiar with that discussion said. The Saudis were surprised when the Americans told them U.S. ships wouldn’t be able to fully protect the oil region, the official said.

      Disappointed, the Saudis told the U.S. that they were open to alternatives to their long-standing defense partnership, emphasizing that they would look for good weapons at good prices, whatever the source, the official said.

      In the second episode, one Western diplomat described Saudi Arabia as eager to be a military partner in what was to have been the U.S.-led military strikes on Syria. As part of that, the Saudis asked to be given the list of military targets for the proposed strikes. The Saudis indicated they never got the information, the diplomat said.

      The subtext here is clear: Bandar invited the French representative to Riyadh not just to whine about the US, but also to discuss weapons sales.