Pourquoi le “SuprĂ©matisme Blanc” nâest pas un phĂ©nomĂšne marginal : un livre dâAlexander L. Hinton â Outside Dana Hilliot
âșhttps://outsiderland.com/danahilliot/suprematisme-blanc
LâarrivĂ©e au pouvoir de Donald Trump et la radicalisation de nombreux membres du Parti RĂ©publicain, le succĂšs rencontrĂ© par lâ « alt-right » aux Ătats-Unis et lâactivisme des militants dâextrĂȘme droite (et notamment le trauma causĂ© par le dĂ©filĂ© des suprĂ©matistes blancs dans les rues de Charlottesville en aoĂ»t 2017) ont suscitĂ© selon lâauteur des analyses trĂšs insuffisantes dans la littĂ©rature politique. PlutĂŽt que dây voir lâactivisme de groupes marginaux, voire dâindividus isolĂ©s et dĂ©rangĂ©s mentalement, ou aux biographies dramatiques, A.L. Hinton explique comment les politiques erratiques, le racisme structurel, la promotion de lâexceptionnalisme amĂ©ricain et la conviction que les Ătats-Unis sont parvenus Ă une sociĂ©tĂ© sans distinction de couleur ont dĂ©tournĂ© lâattention des racines profondes de la violence suprĂ©matiste blanche dans le passĂ© brutal des Ătats-Unis, et ce depuis la colonisation et lâesclavage. Nos institutions (et ça vaut Ă©videmment pour lâEurope, lâAustralie, la Nouvelle-ZĂ©lande, etc.) sont structurĂ©es par le racisme â il faut ĂȘtre aveugle et sourd (ou raciste) pour ne pas en ĂȘtre persuadĂ© : les politiques migratoires honteuses en Europe suffiraient Ă le dĂ©montrer, et lâexploitation coloniale (et son cortĂšge de massacres, de viols, de camps dâinternement et de gĂ©nocides) ne sâest pas achevĂ©e avec la « dĂ©colonisation ». Le choc et la dĂ©nonciation de lâhorreur nazie nâa absolument pas mis un terme Ă lâantisĂ©mitisme, et la dĂ©claration universelle des droits de lâhomme de 1948, ou lâinscription du gĂ©nocide aux Nations Unis la mĂȘme annĂ©e nâont pas changĂ© grand-chose aux structurations racistes des rapports Nord-Sud (et de la considĂ©ration au sein mĂȘme des sociĂ©tĂ©s dĂ©mocratiques occidentales des « racisĂ©s de lâintĂ©rieur »).
Le terreau qui voit pousser ces excroissances radicales partout dans les pays occidentaux est encore on ne peut plus prĂ©sent. Dans lâextrait du livre de A.L. Hinton que je traduis ici, il est rappelĂ© que ces mouvements, aussi groupusculaires soient-ils, peuvent rapidement, si les circonstances sây prĂȘtent, sâamplifier et donner lieu au pire.
]]>LâidĂ©ologie de Zemmour
â»https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsnJFCpcSyI
#zemmour #politique #grandremplacement #manosphÚre #masculinisme #racisme #sexisme #suprématisme_blanc #suprématisme_masculin
âA system of #global_apartheidâ : author #Harsha_Walia on why the border crisis is a myth
The Canadian organizer says the actual crises are capitalism, war and the climate emergency, which drive mass migration.
The rising number of migrant children and families seeking to cross the US border with Mexico is emerging as one of the most serious political challenges for Joe Bidenâs new administration.
Thatâs exactly what Donald Trump wants: he and other Republicans believe that Americansâ concerns about a supposed âborder crisisâ will help Republicans win back political power.
But Harsha Walia, the author of two books about border politics, argues that there is no âborder crisis,â in the United States or anywhere else. Instead, there are the âactual crisesâ that drive mass migration â such as capitalism, war and the climate emergency â and âimagined crisesâ at political borders, which are used to justify further border securitization and violence.
Walia, a Canadian organizer who helped found No One Is Illegal, which advocates for migrants, refugees and undocumented people, talked to the Guardian about Border and Rule, her new book on global migration, border politics and the rise of what she calls âracist nationalism.â The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Last month, a young white gunman was charged with murdering eight people, most of them Asian women, at several spas around Atlanta, Georgia. Around the same time, there was increasing political attention to the higher numbers of migrants and refugees showing up at the US-Mexico border. Do you see any connection between these different events?
I think they are deeply connected. The newest invocation of a âborder surgeâ and a âborder crisisâ is again creating the spectre of immigrants and refugees âtaking over.â This seemingly race neutral language â we are told thereâs nothing inherently racist about saying âborder surgeââ is actually deeply racially coded. It invokes a flood of black and brown people taking over a so-called white manâs country. That is the basis of historic immigrant exclusion, both anti-Asian exclusion in the 19th century, which very explicitly excluded Chinese laborers and especially Chinese women presumed to be sex workers, and anti-Latinx exclusion. If we were to think about one situation as anti-Asian racism and one as anti-Latinx racism, they might seem disconnected. But both forms of racism are fundamentally anti-immigrant. Racial violence is connected to the idea of who belongs and who doesnât. Whose humanity is questioned in a moment of crisis. Who is scapegoated in a moment of crisis.
How do you understand the rise of white supremacist violence, particularly anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim violence, that we are seeing around the world?
The rise in white supremacy is a feedback loop between individual rightwing vigilantes and state rhetoric and state policy. When it comes to the Georgia shootings, we canât ignore the fact that the criminalization of sex work makes sex workers targets. Itâs not sex work itself, itâs the social condition of criminalization that creates that vulnerability. Itâs similar to the ways in which border vigilantes have targeted immigrants: the Minutemen who show up at the border and harass migrants, or the kidnapping of migrants by the United Constitutional Patriots at gunpoint. We canât dissociate that kind of violence from state policies that vilify migrants and refugees, or newspapers that continue to use the word âillegal alienâ.
National borders are often described as protecting citizens, or as protecting workers at home from lower-paid workers in other countries. You argue that borders actually serve a very different purpose.
Borders maintain a massive system of global apartheid. They are preventing, on a scale weâve never seen before, the free movement of people who are trying to search for a better life.
Thereâs been a lot of emphasis on the ways in which Donald Trump was enacting very exclusionary immigration policies. But border securitization and border controls have been bipartisan practices in the United States. We saw the first policies of militarization at the border with Mexico under Bill Clinton in the late 90s.
In the European context, the death of [three-year-old Syrian toddler] Alan Kurdi, all of these images of migrants drowning in the Mediterranean, didnât actually lead to an immigration policy that was more welcoming. Billions of euros are going to drones in the Mediterranean, war ships in the Mediterranean. Weâre seeing the EU making trade and aid agreements it has with countries in the Sahel region of Africa and the Middle East contingent on migration control. They are relying on countries in the global south as the frontiers of border militarization. All of this is really a crisis of immobility. The whole world is increasingly becoming fortified.
What are the root causes of these âmigration crisesâ? Why is this happening?
What we need to understand is that migration is a form of reparations. Migration is an accounting for global violence. Itâs not a coincidence that the vast number of people who are migrants and refugees in the world today are black and brown people from poor countries that have been made poor because of centuries of imperialism, of empire, of exploitation and deliberate underdevelopment. Itâs those same fault lines of plunder around the world that are the fault lines of migration. More and more people are being forced out of their land because of trade agreements, mining extraction, deforestation, climate change. Iraq and Afghanistan have been for decades on the top of the UN list for displaced people and that has been linked to the US and Natoâs occupations of those countries.
Why would governments have any interest in violence at borders? Why spend so much money on security and militarization?
The border does not only serve to exclude immigrants and refugees, but also to create conditions of hyper exploitation, where some immigrants and refugees do enter, but in a situation of extreme precarity. If youâre undocumented, you will work for less than minimum wage. If you attempt to unionize, you will face the threat of deportation. You will not feel you can access public services, or in some cases you will be denied public services. Borders maintain racial citizenship and create a pool of hyper-exploitable cheapened labor. People who are never a full part of the community, always living in fear, constantly on guard.
Why do you choose to put your focus on governments and their policies, rather than narratives of migrants themselves?
Border deaths are presented as passive occurrences, as if people just happen to die, as if thereâs something inherently dangerous about being on the move, which we know is not the case. Many people move with immense privilege, even luxury. Itâs more accurate to call what is happening to migrants and refugees around the world as border killings. People are being killed by policies that are intended to kill. Literally, governments are hoping people will die, are deliberating creating conditions of death, in order to create deterrence.
It is very important to hold the states accountable, instead of narratives where migrants are blamed for their own deaths: âThey knew it was going to be dangerous, why did they move?â Which to me mimics the very horrible tropes of survivors in rape culture.
You live in Canada. Especially in the United States, many people think of Canada as this inherently nice place. Less racist, less violent, more supportive of refugees and immigrants. Is that the reality?
Itâs totally false. Part of the incentive of writing this second book was being on a book tour in the US and constantly hearing, âAt least in Canada it canât be as bad as in the US.â âYour prime minister says refugees are welcome.â That masks the violence of how unfree the conditions of migration are, with the temporary foreign worker program, which is a form of indentureship. Workers are forced to live in the home of their employer, if youâre a domestic worker, or forced to live in a labor camp, crammed with hundreds of people. When your labor is no longer needed, youâre deported, often with your wages unpaid. There is nothing nice about it. It just means Canada has perfected a model of exploitation. The US and other countries in Europe are increasingly looking to this model, because it works perfectly to serve both the state and capital interests. Capital wants cheapened labor and the state doesnât want people with full citizenship rights.
You wrote recently that âEscalating white supremacy cannot be dealt with through anti-terror or hate crime laws.â Why?
Terrorism is not a colorblind phenomena. The global war on terror for the past 20 years was predicated around deeply Islamophobic rhetoric that has had devastating impact on Black and Brown Muslims and Muslim-majority countries around the world. I think it is implausible and naive to assume that the national security infrastructure, or the criminal legal system, which is also built on racialized logics, especially anti-black racism â that we can somehow subvert these systems to protect racialized communities. Itâs not going to work.
One of the things that happened when the Proud Boys were designated as a terrorist organization in Canada is that it provided cover to expand this terror list that communities have been fighting against for decades. On the day the Proud Boys were listed, a number of other organizations were added which were part of the Muslim community. That was the concern that many of us had: will this just become an excuse to expand the terrorist list rather than dismantle it? In the long run, whatâs going to happen? Even if in some miraculous world the Proud Boys and its members are dismantled, whatâs going to happen to all the other organizations on the list? Theyâre still being criminalized, theyâre still being terrorized, theyâre still being surveilled.
So if you donât think the logics of national security or criminal justice will work, what do you think should be done about escalating white supremacist violence?
I think thatâs the question: what do we need to be doing? Itâs not about one arm of the state, itâs about all of us. Whatâs happening in our neighborhoods, in our school systems, in the media? Thereâs not one simple fix. We need to keep each other safe. We need to make sure weâre intervening whenever we see racial violence, everything from not letting racist jokes off the hook to fighting for systemic change. Anti-war work is racial justice work. Anti-capitalist work is racial justice work.
You advocate for ending border imperialism, and ending racial capitalism. Those are big goals. How do you break that down into things that one person can actually do?
I actually found it harder before, because I would try things that I thought were simple and would change the world, and they wouldnât. For me, understanding how violences are connected, and really understanding the immensity of the problem, was less overwhelming. It motivated me to think in bigger ways, to organize with other people. To understand this is fundamentally about radical, massive collective action. It canât rely on one person or even one place.
â»https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/07/us-border-immigration-harsha-walia
#apartheid #inégalités #monde #migrations #frontiÚres #réfugiés #capitalisme #guerres #conflits #climat #changement_climatique #crises #crise #fermeture_des_frontiÚres #crises_frontaliÚres #violence #racisme #discriminations #exclusion #anti-migrants #violence_raciale #suprématisme_blanc #prostitution #criminalisation #vulnérabilité #minutemen #militarisation_des_frontiÚres #USA #Mexique #Etats-Unis #politique_migratoire #politiques_migratoires #Kurdi #Aylan_Kurdi #Alan_Kurdi #impérialisme #colonialisme #colonisation #mourir_aux_frontiÚres #décÚs #morts
The Danger of Anti-Immigrant Extremism Posing as Environmentalism—and Who Funds It
With President Joe Biden in the White House and Vice President Kamala Harris providing the deciding vote in the Senate, a range of long-sought Democratic policy goals are back in play, albeit just barely. That includes ambitious agendas on immigration and the environment.
Could this be the administration that pushes through comprehensive immigration reform after decades of failed attempts? Will youth activists and the burgeoning movement for a Green New Deal provide a pathway to major climate legislation? If so, advocates and their funders alike face a tough road ahead, including an obstructionist congressional minority and opponents on both fronts that will look to appeal to the publicâs darkest impulses to build opposition.
At this inflection point, a report this month from the Center for American Progress, âThe Extremist Campaign to Blame Immigrants for U.S. Environmental Problems,â offers a timely overview of the history of how opponents of immigration falsely portray it as a threat to the natural worldâa strategy weâre likely to see more of in the months ahead. The report offers a valuable review of these efforts, ranging from the past anti-immigrant stances of some of the nationâs best-known environmental groups to the funders that have bankrolled the nationâs largest anti-immigration groups.
Four years of an administration defined by its opposition to immigration, plus growing attention to climate change, breathed new life into the toxic and racist narrative of immigrants as a cause of environmental degradation. As the report lays out, this argumentâoften part of a right-wing, white supremacist ideology known as ecofascism, though CAPâs report does not use the termâfound allies in the top echelons of government and media, including a former head of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and conservative commentators like Ann Coulter and Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
In contemporary politics, this strategy is mainly seen as a right-wing phenomenon or an artifact of the racist and Eurocentric early history of conservation. Yet the fact that anti-immigrant sentiment found a home within top environmental groups, including Earthfirst! and the Sierra Club, which had a major faction in support of these ideas as late as 2004, is a reminder that it has found fertile soil in a variety of political camps. That makes the narrative all the more dangerous, and one against which funders working in both immigration and the environment ought to take a firm and vocal stance.
Whoâs funding anti-immigration work in the name of the environment?
Although not comprehensive, the report highlights three funders as key backers of anti-immigration groups: Colcom Foundation, Weeden Foundation and Foundation for the Carolinas. The first two are, in their branding and language, environmental fundersâand make those grants in the name of preventing further damage to the natural world.
Colcom, founded by Mellon Bank heir Cordelia Scaife May, is far and away the largest funder. With a roughly $500 million endowment, it has provided a large share of the support for a network of groups founded by John Tanton, a Sierra Club official in the 1980s, whom the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) calls âthe racist architect of the modern anti-immigrant movement.â
Recipients include NumbersUSA, Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and the Center for Immigration Studies, which we once called âTrumpâs favorite immigration think tank.â The latter two are classified as hate groups by the SPLC, a designation the organizations reject.
In keeping with the bending of reflexive political categories, itâs worth noting that Mayâwho died in 2005âwas also a substantial funder of Planned Parenthood due to her prioritization of âpopulation controlâ as a means of achieving conservation. In 2019, the New York Times documented Mayâs dark journey to becoming a leading funder of the modern anti-immigrant movement, and the millions her foundation continued to move, long after her death, in support of ideas that gained a receptive audience in a nativist Trump administration. Mayâs wealth came from the Mellon-Scaife family fortune, which yielded several philanthropists, including another prominent conservative donor, Richard Mellon Scaife.
Weeden, led by Don Weeden, has funded a similar whoâs who of top anti-immigration groups, as well as lower-profile or regional groups like Californians for Population Stabilization, Progressives for Immigration Reformâwhich CAP calls the âmost central organization in the anti-immigrant greenwashing universeââand the Rewilding Institute.
Both Weeden and Colcom, as well as the groups they fund, generally say they are neither anti-immigrant nor anti-immigration. Aside from restrictionist policy positions and racist comments by former leaders, it is revealing that the groups they fund are the favored information sources for some of the most virulently anti-immigrant politicians, both historically and among those who rose prominence during the Trump administration. For a deeper dive on Weeden and Colcom, see my colleague Philip Rojcâs excellent 2019 piece on these grantmakers.
Finally, there is the Foundation for the Carolinas, which in many ways is a typical community foundation, with initiatives on topics from COVID-19 relief to local arts. But it also hosts a donor-advised fund that has supported several anti-immigration groups, including Center for Immigration Studies, FAIR and NumbersUSA. That fund channeled nearly $21 million to nine such groups between 2006 and 2018, according to the report.
Thereâs a connection here to a larger problem of private foundations and DAFs, some of which are housed at community foundations, supporting 501(c)(3) nonprofits identified as hate groups, according to a recent analysis from the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Foundation for the Carolinas also made its list of top donors to these groups.
An ideology funders must fight against
As the debates over both immigration and climate policies move forward under this new administration, and the opposition marshals efforts to defeat them, this report offers a helpful guide to this enduring and noxious myth. Itâs also an important reminder that if these ideas are not called actively combated, they can take root within well-intentioned efforts. Though it seems only a small number of foundations directly fund groups advancing these ideas, anti-immigrant sentiment is insidious.
For example, while some commentators are suggesting that acceding to Trump-fueled demands for a border wall is how Congress could reach bipartisan action on immigration reform, the report notes how the existing sections of wall are ineffective against furtive crossings, disruptive to species migration, and in violation of Indigenous sacred sites. These factsâand more broadly, the connection to white supremacist and fascist movementsâshould put foundations on guard, whether they support grantees pushing for immigration reform, action on climate or both.
With the United States and other nations facing greater and greater pressures from climate changeâparticularly as it forces migration from regions like Latin America and the Middle Eastâphilanthropy would do well to be proactive now and draw a bright line in countering this ideologyâs propagation.
â»https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2021/2/24/anti-immigrant-environmentalism-is-resurgent-new-report-looks-at
#extrĂȘme_droite #anti-migrants #USA #Etats-Unis #environnementalisme #environnement #migrations #nature #dĂ©gradation_environnementale #Ă©cofascisme #Ă©co-fascisme #suprĂ©matisme_blanc #extrĂȘme_droite #Ann_Coulte #Tucker_Carlson #racisme #Earthfirst #Sierra_Club #deep_ecology #fondations #Colcom_Foundation #Weeden_Foundation #Foundation_for_the_Carolinas #Mellon_Bank #Cordelia_Scaife_May #mĂ©cĂ©nat #John_Tanton #NumbersUSA #Federation_for_American_Immigration_Reform (#FAIR) #Center_for_Immigration_Studies #Planned_Parenthood #dĂ©mographie #contrĂŽle_dĂ©mographique #nĂ©o-malthusianisme #nĂ©omalthusianisme #protection_de_l'environnement #philanthropie #Richard_Mellon_Scaife #Weeden #Don_Weeden #Californians_for_Population_Stabilization #Progressives_for_Immigration_Reform #Rewilding_Institute
En lien avec :
â»https://seenthis.net/messages/767879
âșhttps://seenthis.net/messages/767384
Rapide parcours sur la lutte contre le #suprématisme_blanc :
Ătats-Unis : â»https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch
Europe : â»https://www.counterextremism.com
]]>Je dois avouer que je suis un peu surpris par lâindĂ©cence crasse des Ă©ditorialistes venant dĂ©fendre la lĂ©gitimitĂ© de la thĂ©orie du grand remplacement au lendemain du massacre de Christchurch. Non pas le fait quâil y ait des islamophobes en roue libre dans nos mĂ©dias (ça, dirais-je, on a lâhabitude), mais le fait quâau lendemain dâun massacre aussi horrible, ils viennent se lĂącher aussi ouvertement dans leurs Ă©missions et sur leurs flux Twitter, sans mĂȘme faire semblant dâattendre ne serait-ce quâune petite pĂ©riode symbolique de respect pour les victimes. Le fait quâil ne semble y avoir aucune vague dâindignation vertueuse de lâintĂ©rieur du systĂšme aprĂšs un tel niveau de dĂ©gueulasserie fait partie, Ă©galement, de lâaspect insupportable de ces interventions (on se souvient, Ă lâinverse, des interminables commentaires indignĂ©s quand tout le monde nâĂ©tait pas au garde-Ă -vous aprĂšs le massacre de Charlie Hebdo) â lâidĂ©e quâon vienne dĂ©fendre ouvertement la thĂ©orie du « Grand remplacement » au lendemain mĂȘme dâun massacre que lâassassin justifie lui-mĂȘme par la thĂ©orie du « Grand remplacement », ça nâa pas lâair de provoquer une large indignation mĂ©diatique.
Pour le coup, je suis sidéré par cette attitude aussi ouvertement et immédiatement dégueulasse et irrespectueuse.
Je vais te dire : jây vois un marqueur de suprĂ©matisme blanc, cette façon de cracher Ă la gueule des « autres » en affichant sciemment son mĂ©pris raciste. Une signe des temps typiquement MAGA. Je veux dire que lâaffichage du mĂ©pris raciste nâest pas un Ă©lĂ©ment secondaire de leur comportement raciste, mais câest lâĂ©lĂ©ment central de leur communication. Il ne sâagit pas simplement de dire une saloperie raciste (ce qui se fait dĂ©jĂ trĂšs bien depuis longtemps dans notre culture), il sâagit dĂ©sormais de le faire ostensiblement, avec la « fiertĂ© blanche » dâun facho bas du front.
Dans le racisme ambiant usuel, on passe Ă la tĂ©lĂ© 7 jour sur 7 pour balancer les phrases codĂ©es du genre : « non mais on a bien le droit de critiquer lâislam ». Dans le suprĂ©matisme blanc en voie de banalisation, on passe spĂ©cifiquement Ă la tĂ©lĂ©vision au lendemain du massacre dâune cinquantaine de fidĂšles dans une mosquĂ©e pour commenter lâĂ©vĂšnement sous lâangle « ça ne doit pas nous interdire de critiquer lâislam et le grand remplacisme ».
]]>What is the alt right? A linguistic data analysis of 3 billion Reddit comments shows a disparate group that is quickly uniting â Quartz
âșhttps://qz.com/1056319/what-is-the-alt-right-a-linguistic-data-analysis-of-3-billion-reddit-comments-sh
Weâre witnessing the radicalization of young white men through the medium of frog memes. In order to see it, all you need to do is look at the words coming out of their mouths. The alt-right isnât yet united, but it soon will be.
]]>Richard Spencer Calls Himself âWhite Zionistâ â The Forward
â»http://forward.com/fast-forward/380235/richard-spencer-touts-himself-as-white-zionist-in-israeli-interview
In an interview on Israeli TV, Richard Spencer said that Israelis should ignore the anti-Semitism of the âalt-rightâ and instead respect and empathize with his desire to create a whites-only ethno state.
]]>Historians Question Trumpâs Comments on Confederate Monuments - The New York Times
â»https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/15/arts/design/trump-robert-e-lee-george-washington-thomas-jefferson.html
President Trump is not generally known as a student of history. But on Tuesday, during a combative exchange with reporters at Trump Tower in New York, he unwittingly waded into a complex debate about history and memory that has roiled college campuses and numerous cities over the past several years.
Asked about the white nationalist rally that ended in violence last weekend in Charlottesville, Va., Mr. Trump defended some who had gathered to protect a statue of Robert E. Lee, and criticized the âalt-leftâ counterprotesters who had confronted them.
âMany of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee,â Mr. Trump said. âSo this week, it is Robert E. Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down.â
George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, the president noted, were also slave owners. âI wonder, is it George Washington next week?â Mr. Trump said. âAnd is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?â
[âŠ]
Mr. Grossman [executive director of the American Historical Association] noted that most Confederate monuments were constructed in two periods: the 1890s, as Jim Crow was being established, and in the 1950s, during a period of mass Southern resistance to the civil rights movement.
âWe would not want to whitewash our history by pretending that Jim Crow and disenfranchisement or massive resistance to the civil rights movement never happened,â he said. âThat is the part of our history that these monuments testify to.â
How the events in Charlottesville, and Mr. Trumpâs comments, will affect the continuing debate over Confederate monuments remains to be seen. Mr. Witt [a professor of history at Yale], for one, suggested that white nationalist support might backfire.
He noted that it was the 2015 murder of nine African-American churchgoers in Charleston, S.C., by a white supremacist that led to the removal of the Confederate flag from the grounds of the statehouse.
âThe amazing thing is that the president is doing more to endanger historical monuments than most of the protesters,â he said. âThe alt-right is producing a world where there is more pressure to remove monuments, rather than less.â
]]>Hier (samedi 12 Août 2017) a Charlottesville aux E.U, les néo-nazies faisaient une manifestation.
Des personnes ont organisés aussi une contre manifestation.
Les néo-nazi en accord avec leurs valeurs on frappés des enfants racisés avec des bùtons.
â»https://twitter.com/FranceNews24/status/896626306187526145
Un terroriste nĂ©o-nazi a foncĂ© en voiture sur la foule, faisant entre autre victime une syndicaliste de lâIWW (International Worker of the World, mouvement anarcho-syndicaliste) tuĂ©e sur le coup (comme le rapporte Solidaritat Obrera â»https://twitter.com/soliobreracnt/status/896620357624496129)
Etats-Unis : lâĂ©tat dâurgence est dĂ©crĂ©tĂ© Ă #Charlottesville, oĂč se rassemblent des militants dâextrĂȘme droite
Le gouverneur dĂ©mocrate de la Virginie, Terry McAuliffe, a dĂ©clarĂ© un Ă©tat dâurgence Ă Charlottesville, oĂč de nombreux militants dâextrĂȘme droite veulent dĂ©noncer le retrait dâune statue du gĂ©nĂ©ral sudiste Lee. Un vĂ©hicule a foncĂ© dans un groupe de contre-manifestants, tuant au moins une personne.
[edit vu ailleurs : TROIS morts et 19 blessé-e-s]
â»http://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/usa/etats-unis-l-etat-d-urgence-est-decrete-a-charlottesville-ou-se-rassemb
â»http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2017/08/12/aux-etats-unis-un-rassemblement-d-extreme-droite-interdit-a-charlottesville_
La #fachosphere de twitter, trĂšs active comme Ă son habitude, a trĂšs vite lancĂ© la rumeur que le conducteur serait un « jeune dĂ©sĂ©quilibrĂ© » antifa et anti #Trump, qui se serait « trompĂ© » de manif... Le jeune en question, Joel Vangheluwe, a trĂšs vite dĂ©menti mais la rumeur Ă©tait dĂ©jĂ partie et infectait jusquâaux mainstream français pendant un temps...
â»https://www.facebook.com/joel.notavailable
Pour le contexte, je ne sais pas trop ce que vaut ce site mais il recense pas mal de sources dâautomedias sur twitter sur le dĂ©roulĂ© de la manif interdite, les affrontement entre suprĂ©macistes blancs et antifas, mais aussi les milices et les flics...
â»http://theantimedia.org/charlottesville-state-of-emergency
prenez ce couteau (Les Nazis {recrutent} les gamers. Câest un milieu...)
â»http://prenezcecouteau.tumblr.com/post/158194029468/les-nazis-recrutent-les-gamers-cest-un-milieu
Les Nazis {recrutent} les gamers. Câest un milieu qui est rempli dâhommes solitaires et isolĂ©s qui sont rĂ©ceptifs Ă leur message.
â
Avez-vous dĂ©jĂ vu le film Fight Club ? Vous voyez comment chaque personne qui rejoint le fight club est un type super triste qui cherche un sens aux choses et un sentiment dâappartenance ? Montrez cela Ă nâimporte quelle personne qui a vĂ©cu la Seconde Guerre Mondiale et elle vous dira directement “CâĂ©tait comme ça que les Nazis recrutaient les gens. Câest comme ça quâils ont transformĂ© des hommes normaux en Nazis. Ils les ont trouvĂ©s quand ils Ă©taient faibles, ils les ont fait se sentir inutiles et les ont entiĂšrement reconstruits”. Ă sa sortie, ce film a touchĂ© tous mes amis de vingt ans. Câest dur de le regarder maintenant, presque terrifiant.
â
Maintenant, pensez Ă votre groupe dâamis gamers. En grandissant, vous connaissiez combien de personnes qui tentaient dĂ©sespĂ©rĂ©ment dâappartenir Ă quelque chose ? Qui voulaient se sentir utiles ? Parce que ces 5 derniĂšres annĂ©es jâai regardĂ© tout un tas de gens dans ma communautĂ© de gamers compĂ©titifs devenir de vĂ©ritables nationalistes blancs. Un nombre inquiĂ©tant.
#male_entitlment #fascisme #masculinisme #suprématisme_blanc #fraternité #misogynie #sexisme
]]>