• UK signs contract with US startup to identify migrants in small-boat crossings

    The UK government has turned a US-based startup specialized in artificial intelligence as part of its pledge to stop small-boat crossings. Experts have already pointed out the legal and logistical challenges of the plan.

    In a new effort to address the high number of Channel crossings, the UK Home Office is working with the US defense startup #Anduril, specialized in the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

    A surveillance tower has already been installed at Dover, and other technologies might be rolled out with the onset of warmer temperatures and renewed attempts by migrants to reach the UK. Some experts already point out the risks and practical loopholes involved in using AI to identify migrants.

    “This is obviously the next step of the illegal migration bill,” said Olivier Cahn, a researcher specialized in penal law.

    “The goal is to retrieve images that were taken at sea and use AI to show they entered UK territory illegally even if people vanish into thin air upon arrival in the UK.”

    The “illegal migration bill” was passed by the UK last month barring anyone from entering the country irregularly from filing an asylum claim and imposing a “legal duty” to remove them to a third country.
    Who is behind Anduril?

    Founded in 2017 by its CEO #Palmer_Luckey, Anduril is backed by #Peter_Thiel, a Silicon Valley investor and supporter of Donald Trump. The company has supplied autonomous surveillance technology to the US Department of Defense (DOD) to detect and track migrants trying to cross the US-Mexico border.

    In 2021, the UK Ministry of Defence awarded Anduril with a £3.8-million contract to trial an advanced base defence system. Anduril eventually opened a branch in London where it states its mission: “combining the latest in artificial intelligence with commercial-of-the-shelf sensor technology (EO, IR, Radar, Lidar, UGS, sUAS) to enhance national security through automated detection, identification and tracking of objects of interest.”

    According to Cahn, the advantage of Brexit is that the UK government is no longer required to submit to the General Data Protection Regulation (RGPDP), a component of data protection that also addresses the transfer of personal data outside the EU and EEA areas.

    “Even so, the UK has data protection laws of its own which the government cannot breach. Where will the servers with the incoming data be kept? What are the rights of appeal for UK citizens whose data is being processed by the servers?”, he asked.

    ’Smugglers will provide migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros’

    Cahn also pointed out the technical difficulties of identifying migrants at sea. “The weather conditions are often not ideal, and many small-boat crossings happen at night. How will facial recognition technology operate in this context?”

    The ability of migrants and smugglers to adapt is yet another factor. “People are going to cover their faces, and anyone would think the smugglers will respond by providing migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros.”

    If the UK has solicited the services of a US startup to detect and identify migrants, the reason may lie in AI’s principle of self-learning. “A machine accumulates data and recognizes what it has already seen. The US is a country with a significantly more racially and ethnically diverse population than the UK. Its artificial intelligence might contain data from populations which are more ethnically comparable to the populations that are crossing the Channel, like Somalia for example, thus facilitating the process of facial recognition.”

    For Cahn, it is not capturing the images which will be the most difficult but the legal challenges that will arise out of their usage. “People are going to be identified and there are going to be errors. If a file exists, there needs to be the possibility for individuals to appear before justice and have access to a judge.”

    A societal uproar

    In a research paper titled “Refugee protection in the artificial intelligence Era”, Chatham House notes “the most common ethical and legal challenges associated with the use of AI in asylum and related border and immigration systems involve issues of opacity and unpredictability, the potential for bias and unlawful discrimination, and how such factors affect the ability of individuals to obtain a remedy in the event of erroneous or unfair decisions.”

    For Cahn, the UK government’s usage of AI can only be used to justify and reinforce its hardline position against migrants. “For a government that doesn’t respect the Geneva Convention [whose core principle is non-refoulement, editor’s note] and which passed an illegal migration law, it is out of the question that migrants have entered the territory legally.”

    Identifying migrants crossing the Channel is not going to be the hardest part for the UK government. Cahn imagines a societal backlash with, “the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom being solicited, refugees seeking remedies to legal decisions through lawyers and associations attacking”.

    He added there would be due process concerning the storage of the data, with judges issuing disclosure orders. “There is going to be a whole series of questions which the government will have to elucidate. The rights of refugees are often used as a laboratory. If these technologies are ’successful’, they will soon be applied to the rest of the population."

    https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/48326/uk-signs-contract-with-us-startup-to-identify-migrants-in-smallboat-cr

    #UK #Angleterre #migrations #asile #réfugiés #militarisation_des_frontières #frontières #start-up #complexe_militaro-industriel #IA #intelligence_artificielle #surveillance #technologie #channel #Manche

    –—

    ajouté à la métaliste sur la Bibby Stockholm:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1016683

    • Huge barge set to house 500 asylum seekers arrives in the UK

      The #Bibby_Stockholm is being refitted in #Falmouth to increase its capacity from 222 to 506 people.

      A barge set to house 500 asylum seekers has arrived in the UK as the government struggles with efforts to move migrants out of hotels.

      The Independent understands that people will not be transferred onto the Bibby Stockholm until July, following refurbishment to increase its capacity and safety checks.

      The barge has been towed from its former berth in Italy to the port of Falmouth, in Cornwall.

      It will remain there while works are carried out, before being moved onto its final destination in #Portland, Dorset.

      The private operators of the port struck an agreement to host the barge with the Home Office without formal public consultation, angering the local council and residents.

      Conservative MP Richard Drax previously told The Independent legal action was still being considered to stop the government’s plans for what he labelled a “quasi-prison”.

      He accused ministers and Home Office officials of being “unable to answer” practical questions on how the barge will operate, such as how asylum seekers will be able to come and go safely through the port, what activities they will be provided with and how sufficient healthcare will be ensured.

      “The question is how do we cope?” Mr Drax said. “Every organisation has its own raft of questions: ‘Where’s the money coming from? Who’s going to do what if this all happens?’ There are not sufficient answers, which is very worrying.”

      The Independent previously revealed that asylum seekers will have less living space than an average parking bay on the Bibby Stockholm, which saw at least one person die and reports of rape and abuse on board when it was used by the Dutch government to detain migrants in the 2000s.

      An official brochure released by owner Bibby Marine shows there are only 222 “single en-suite bedrooms” on board, meaning that at least two people must be crammed into every cabin for the government to achieve its aim of holding 500 people.

      Dorset Council has said it still had “serious reservations about the appropriateness of Portland Port in this scenario and remains opposed to the proposals”.

      The Conservative police and crime commissioner for Dorset is demanding extra government funding for the local force to “meet the extra policing needs that this project will entail”.

      A multi-agency forum including representatives from national, regional and local public sector agencies has been looking at plans for the provision of health services, the safety and security of both asylum seekers and local residents and charity involvement.

      Portland Port said it had been working with the Home Office and local agencies to ensure the safe arrival and operation of the Bibby Stockholm, and to minimise its impact locally.

      The barge is part of a wider government push to move migrants out of hotels, which are currently housing more than 47,000 asylum seekers at a cost of £6m a day.

      But the use of ships as accommodation was previously ruled out on cost grounds by the Treasury, when Rishi Sunak was chancellor, and the government has not confirmed how much it will be spending on the scheme.

      Ministers have also identified several former military and government sites, including two defunct airbases and an empty prison, that they want to transform into asylum accommodation.

      But a court battle with Braintree District Council over former RAF Wethersfield is ongoing, and legal action has also been threatened over similar plans for RAF Scampton in Lancashire.

      Last month, a barrister representing home secretary Suella Braverman told the High Court that 56,000 people were expected to arrive on small boats in 2023 and that some could be made homeless if hotel places are not found.

      A record backlog of asylum applications, driven by the increase in Channel crossings and a collapse in Home Office decision-making, mean the government is having to provide accommodation for longer while claims are considered.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barge-falmouth-cornwall-migrants-bibby-b2333313.html
      #barge #bateau

    • ‘Performative cruelty’ : the hostile architecture of the UK government’s migrant barge

      The arrival of the Bibby Stockholm barge at Portland Port, in Dorset, on July 18 2023, marks a new low in the UK government’s hostile immigration environment. The vessel is set to accommodate over 500 asylum seekers. This, the Home Office argues, will benefit British taxpayers and local residents.

      The barge, however, was immediately rejected by the local population and Dorset council. Several British charities and church groups have condemned the barge, and the illegal migration bill it accompanies, as “an affront to human dignity”.

      Anti-immigration groups have also protested against the barge, with some adopting offensive language, referring to the asylum seekers who will be hosted there as “bargies”. Conservative MP for South Dorset Richard Drax has claimed that hosting migrants at sea would exacerbate tenfold the issues that have arisen in hotels to date, namely sexual assaults, children disappearing and local residents protesting.

      My research shows that facilities built to house irregular migrants in Europe and beyond create a temporary infrastructure designed to be hostile. Governments thereby effectively make asylum seekers more displaceable while ignoring their everyday spatial and social needs.
      Precarious space

      The official brochure plans for the Bibby Stockholm show 222 single bedrooms over three stories, built around two small internal courtyards. It has now been retrofitted with bunk beds to host more than 500 single men – more than double the number it was designed to host.

      Journalists Lizzie Dearden and Martha McHardy have shown this means the asylum seekers housed there – for up to nine months – will have “less living space than an average parking bay”. This stands in contravention of international standards of a minimum 4.5m² of covered living space per person in cold climates, where more time is spent indoors.

      In an open letter, dated June 15 2023 and addressed to home secretary Suella Braverman, over 700 people and nearly 100 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) voiced concerns that this will only add to the trauma migrants have already experienced:

      Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to retraumatise a group of already vulnerable people.

      Locals are concerned already overstretched services in Portland, including GP practices, will not be able to cope with further pressure. West Dorset MP Chris Lode has questioned whether the barge itself is safe “to cope with double the weight that it was designed to bear”. A caller to the LBC radio station, meanwhile, has voiced concerns over the vessel’s very narrow and low fire escape routes, saying: “What they [the government] are effectively doing here is creating a potential Grenfell on water, a floating coffin.”

      Such fears are not unfounded. There have been several cases of fires destroying migrant camps in Europe, from the Grand-Synthe camp near Dunkirk in France, in 2017, to the 2020 fire at the Moria camp in Greece. The difficulty of escaping a vessel at sea could turn it into a death trap.

      Performative hostility

      Research on migrant accommodation shows that being able to inhabit a place – even temporarily – and develop feelings of attachment and belonging, is crucial to a person’s wellbeing. Even amid ever tighter border controls, migrants in Europe, who can be described as “stuck on the move”, nonetheless still attempt to inhabit their temporary spaces and form such connections.

      However, designs can hamper such efforts when they concentrate asylum seekers in inhospitable, cut-off spaces. In 2015, Berlin officials began temporarily housing refugees in the former Tempelhof airport, a noisy, alienating industrial space, lacking in privacy and disconnected from the city. Many people ended up staying there for the better part of a year.

      French authorities, meanwhile, opened the Centre Humanitaire Paris-Nord in Paris in 2016, temporary migrant housing in a disused train depot. Nicknamed la Bulle (the bubble) for its bulbous inflatable covering, this facility was noisy and claustrophobic, lacking in basic comforts.

      Like the barge in Portland Port, these facilities, placed in industrial sites, sit uncomfortably between hospitality and hostility. The barge will be fenced off, since the port is a secured zone, and access will be heavily restricted and controlled. The Home Office insists that the barge is not a floating prison, yet it is an unmistakably hostile space.

      Infrastructure for water and electricity will physically link the barge to shore. However, Dorset council has no jurisdiction at sea.

      The commercial agreement on the barge was signed between the Home Office and Portland Port, not the council. Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission.

      This makes the barge an island of sorts, where other rules apply, much like those islands in the Aegean sea and in the Pacific, on which Greece and Australia have respectively housed migrants.

      I have shown how facilities are often designed in this way not to give displaced people any agency, but, on the contrary, to objectify them. They heighten the instability migrants face, keeping them detached from local communities and constantly on the move.

      The government has presented the barge as a cheaper solution than the £6.8 million it is currently spending, daily, on housing asylum seekers in hotels. A recent report by two NGOs, Reclaim the Seas and One Life to Live, concludes, however, that it will save less than £10 a person a day. It could even prove more expensive than the hotel model.

      Sarah Teather, director of the Jesuit Refugee Service UK charity, has described the illegal migration bill as “performative cruelty”. Images of the barge which have flooded the news certainly meet that description too.

      However threatening these images might be, though, they will not stop desperate people from attempting to come to the UK to seek safety. Rather than deterring asylum seekers, the Bibby Stockholm is potentially creating another hazard to them and to their hosting communities.

      https://theconversation.com/performative-cruelty-the-hostile-architecture-of-the-uk-governments

      –---

      Point intéressant, lié à l’aménagement du territoire :

      “Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission”

      C’est un peu comme les #zones_frontalières qui ont été créées un peu partout en Europe (et pas que) pour que les Etats se débarassent des règles en vigueur (notamment le principe du non-refoulement). Voir cette métaliste, à laquelle j’ajoute aussi cet exemple :
      https://seenthis.net/messages/795053

      voir aussi :

      The circumstances at Portland Port are very different because where the barge is to be positioned is below the mean low water mark. This means that the barge is outside of our planning control and there is no requirement for planning permission from the council.

      https://news.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/2023/07/18/leaders-comments-on-the-home-office-barge

      #hostile_architecture #architecture_hostile #dignité #espace #Portland #hostilité #hostilité_performative #île #infrastructure #extraterritorialité #extra-territorialité #prix #coût

    • Sur l’#histoire (notamment liées au commerce d’ #esclaves) de la Bibby Stockholm :

      Bibby Line, shipowners

      Information
      From Guide to the Records of Merseyside Maritime Museum, volume 1: Bibby Line. In 1807 John Bibby and John Highfield, Liverpool shipbrokers, began taking shares in ships, mainly Parkgate Dublin packets. By 1821 (the end of the partnership) they had vessels sailing to the Mediterranean and South America. In 1850 they expanded their Mediterranean and Black Sea interests by buying two steamers and by 1865 their fleet had increased to twenty three. The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 severely affected their business and Frederick Leyland, their general manager, failed to persuade the family partners to diversify onto the Atlantic. Eventually, he bought them out in 1873. In 1889 the Bibby family revived its shipowning interests with a successful passenger cargo service to Burma. From 1893 it also began to carry British troops to overseas postings which remained a Bibby staple until 1962. The Burma service ended in 1971 and the company moved to new areas of shipowning including bulkers, gas tankers and accommodation barges. It still has its head office in Liverpool where most management records are held. The museum holds models of the Staffordshire (1929) and Oxfordshire (1955). For further details see the attached catalogue or contact The Archives Centre for a copy of the catalogue.

      The earliest records within the collection, the ships’ logs at B/BIBBY/1/1/1 - 1/1/3 show company vessels travelling between Europe and South America carrying cargoes that would have been produced on plantations using the labour of enslaved peoples or used within plantation and slave based economies. For example the vessel Thomas (B/BIBBY/1/1/1) carries a cargo of iron hoops for barrels to Brazil in 1812. The Mary Bibby on a voyage in 1825-1826 loads a cargo of sugar in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to carry to Rotterdam. The log (B/BIBBY/1/1/3) records the use of ’negroes’ to work with the ship’s carpenter while the vessel is in port.

      In September 1980 the latest Bibby vessel to hold the name Derbyshire was lost with all hands in the South China Sea. This collection does not include records relating to that vessel or its sinking, apart from a copy ’Motor vessel ’Derbyshire’, 1976-80: in memoriam’ at reference B/BIBBY/3/2/1 (a copy is also available in The Archives Centre library collection at 340.DER). Information about the sinking and subsequent campaigning by the victims’ family can be found on the NML website and in the Life On Board gallery. The Archives Centre holds papers of Captain David Ramwell who assisted the Derbyshire Family Association at D/RAM and other smaller collections of related documents within the DX collection.

      https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/artifact/bibby-line-shipowners

      –—
      An Open Letter to #Bibby_Marine

      Links between your parent company #Bibby_Line_Group (#BLG) and the slave trade have repeatedly been made. If true, we appeal to you to consider what actions you might take in recompense.

      Bibby Marine’s modern slavery statement says that one of the company’s values is to “do the right thing”, and that you “strongly support the eradication of slavery, as well as the eradication of servitude, forced or compulsory labour and human trafficking”. These are admirable words.

      Meanwhile, your parent company’s website says that it is “family owned with a rich history”. Please will you clarify whether this rich history includes slaving voyages where ships were owned, and cargoes transported, by BLG’s founder John Bibby, six generations ago. The BLG website says that in 1807 (which is when slavery was abolished in Britain), “John Bibby began trading as a shipowner in Liverpool with his partner John Highfield”. John Bibby is listed as co-owner of three slaving ships, of which John Highfield co-owned two:

      In 1805, the Harmonie (co-owned by #John_Bibby and three others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which carried 250 captives purchased in West Central Africa and St Helena, delivering them to Cumingsberg in 1806 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81732).
      In 1806, the Sally (co-owned by John Bibby and two others) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 250 captives purchased in Bassa and delivered them to Barbados (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 83481).
      In 1806, the Eagle (co-owned by John Bibby and four others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 237 captives purchased in Cameroon and delivered them to Kingston in 1807 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81106).

      The same and related claims were recently mentioned by Private Eye. They also appear in the story of Liverpool’s Calderstones Park [PDF] and on the website of National Museums Liverpool and in this blog post “Shenanigans in Shipping” (a detailed history of the BLG). They are also mentioned by Laurence Westgaph, a TV presenter specialising in Black British history and slavery and the author of Read The Signs: Street Names with a Connection to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and Abolition in Liverpool [PDF], published with the support of English Heritage, The City of Liverpool, Northwest Regional Development Agency, National Museums Liverpool and Liverpool Vision.

      While of course your public pledges on slavery underline that there is no possibility of there being any link between the activities of John Bibby and John Highfield in the early 1800s and your activities in 2023, we do believe that it is in the public interest to raise this connection, and to ask for a public expression of your categorical renunciation of the reported slave trade activities of Mr Bibby and Mr Highfield.

      https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/an-open-letter-to-bibby-marine

      –-

      Très peu d’info sur John Bibby sur wikipedia :

      John Bibby (19 February 1775 – 17 July 1840) was the founder of the British Bibby Line shipping company. He was born in Eccleston, near Ormskirk, Lancashire. He was murdered on 17 July 1840 on his way home from dinner at a friend’s house in Kirkdale.[1]


      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bibby_(businessman)

    • ‘Floating Prisons’: The 200-year-old family #business behind the Bibby Stockholm

      #Bibby_Line_Group_Limited is a UK company offering financial, marine and construction services to clients in at least 16 countries around the world. It recently made headlines after the government announced one of the firm’s vessels, Bibby Stockholm, would be used to accommodate asylum seekers on the Dorset coast.

      In tandem with plans to house migrants at surplus military sites, the move was heralded by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Home Secretary Suella Braverman as a way of mitigating the £6m-a-day cost of hotel accommodation amid the massive ongoing backlog of asylum claims, as well as deterring refugees from making the dangerous channel crossing to the UK. Several protests have been organised against the project already, while over ninety migrants’ rights groups and hundreds of individual campaigners have signed an open letter to the Home Secretary calling for the plans to be scrapped, describing the barge as a “floating prison.”

      Corporate Watch has researched into the Bibby Line Group’s operations and financial interests. We found that:

      - The Bibby Stockholm vessel was previously used as a floating detention centre in the Netherlands, where undercover reporting revealed violence, sexual exploitation and poor sanitation.

      – Bibby Line Group is more than 90% owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through trusts. Its pre-tax profits for 2021 stood at almost £31m, which they upped to £35.5m by claiming generous tax credits and deferring a fair amount to the following year.

      - Management aboard the vessel will be overseen by an Australian business travel services company, Corporate Travel Management, who have previously had aspersions cast over the financial health of their operations and the integrity of their business practices.

      - Another beneficiary of the initiative is Langham Industries, a maritime and engineering company whose owners, the Langham family, have longstanding ties to right wing parties.

      Key Issues

      According to the Home Office, the Bibby Stockholm barge will be operational for at least 18 months, housing approximately 500 single adult men while their claims are processed, with “24/7 security in place on board, to minimise the disruption to local communities.” These measures appear to have been to dissuade opposition from the local Conservative council, who pushed for background checks on detainees and were reportedly even weighing legal action out of concern for a perceived threat of physical attacks from those housed onboard, as well as potential attacks from the far right against migrants held there.

      Local campaigners have taken aim at the initiative, noting in the open letter:

      “For many people seeking asylum arriving in the UK, the sea represents a site of significant trauma as they have been forced to cross it on one or more occasions. Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to re-traumatise a group of already vulnerable people.”

      Technically, migrants on the barge will be able to leave the site. However, in reality they will be under significant levels of surveillance and cordoned off behind fences in the high security port area.

      If they leave, there is an expectation they will return by 11pm, and departure will be controlled by the authorities. According to the Home Office:

      “In order to ensure that migrants come and go in an orderly manner with as little impact as possible, buses will be provided to take those accommodated on the vessel from the port to local drop off points”.

      These drop off points are to be determined by the government, while being sited off the coast of Dorset means they will be isolated from centres of support and solidarity.

      Meanwhile, the government’s new Illegal Migration Bill is designed to provide a legal justification for the automatic detention of refugees crossing the Channel. If it passes, there’s a chance this might set the stage for a change in regime on the Bibby Stockholm – from that of an “accommodation centre” to a full-blown migrant prison.

      An initial release from the Home Office suggested the local voluntary sector would be engaged “to organise activities that keep occupied those being accommodated, potentially involved in local volunteering activity,” though they seemed to have changed the wording after critics said this would mean detainees could be effectively exploited for unpaid labour. It’s also been reported the vessel required modifications in order to increase capacity to the needed level, raising further concerns over cramped living conditions and a lack of privacy.

      Bibby Line Group has prior form in border profiteering. From 1994 to 1998, the Bibby Stockholm was used to house the homeless, some of whom were asylum seekers, in Hamburg, Germany. In 2005, it was used to detain asylum seekers in the Netherlands, which proved a cause of controversy at the time. Undercover reporting revealed a number of cases abuse on board, such as beatings and sexual exploitation, as well suicide attempts, routine strip searches, scabies and the death of an Algerian man who failed to receive timely medical care for a deteriorating heart condition. As the undercover security guard wrote:

      “The longer I work on the Bibby Stockholm, the more I worry about safety on the boat. Between exclusion and containment I encounter so many defects and feel so much tension among the prisoners that it no longer seems to be a question of whether things will get completely out of hand here, but when.”

      He went on:

      “I couldn’t stand the way prisoners were treated […] The staff become like that, because the whole culture there is like that. Inhuman. They do not see the residents as people with a history, but as numbers.”

      Discussions were also held in August 2017 over the possibility of using the vessel as accommodation for some 400 students in Galway, Ireland, amid the country’s housing crisis. Though the idea was eventually dropped for lack of mooring space and planning permission requirements, local students had voiced safety concerns over the “bizarre” and “unconventional” solution to a lack of rental opportunities.
      Corporate Travel Management & Langham Industries

      Although leased from Bibby Line Group, management aboard the Bibby Stockholm itself will be handled by #Corporate_Travel_Management (#CTM), a global travel company specialising in business travel services. The Australian-headquartered company also recently received a £100m contract for the provision of accommodation, travel, venue and ancillary booking services for the housing of Ukrainian refugees at local hotels and aboard cruise ships M/S Victoria and M/S Ambition. The British Red Cross warned earlier in May against continuing to house refugees on ships with “isolated” and “windowless” cabins, and said the scheme had left many “living in limbo.”

      Founded by CEO #Jamie_Pherous, CTM was targeted in 2018 by #VGI_Partners, a group of short-sellers, who identified more than 20 red flags concerning the company’s business interests. Most strikingly, the short-sellers said they’d attended CTM’s offices in Glasgow, Paris, Amsterdam, Stockholm and Switzerland. Finding no signs of business activity there, they said it was possible the firm had significantly overstated the scale of its operations. VGI Partners also claimed CTM’s cash flows didn’t seem to add up when set against the company’s reported growth, and that CTM hadn’t fully disclosed revisions they’d made to their annual revenue figures.

      Two years later, the short-sellers released a follow-up report, questioning how CTM had managed to report a drop in rewards granted for high sales numbers to travel agencies, when in fact their transaction turnover had grown during the same period. They also accused CTM of dressing up their debt balance to make their accounts look healthier.

      CTM denied VGI Partners’ allegations. In their response, they paraphrased a report by auditors EY, supposedly confirming there were no question marks over their business practices, though the report itself was never actually made public. They further claim VGI Partners, as short-sellers, had only released the reports in the hope of benefitting from uncertainty over CTM’s operations.

      Despite these troubles, CTM’s market standing improved drastically earlier this year, when it was announced the firm had secured contracts for the provision of travel services to the UK Home Office worth in excess of $3bn AUD (£1.6bn). These have been accompanied by further tenders with, among others, the National Audit Office, HS2, Cafcass, Serious Fraud Office, Office of National Statistics, HM Revenue & Customs, National Health Service, Ministry of Justice, Department of Education, Foreign Office, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

      The Home Office has not released any figures on the cost of either leasing or management services aboard Bibby Stockholm, though press reports have put the estimated price tag at more than £20,000 a day for charter and berthing alone. If accurate, this would put the overall expenditure for the 18-month period in which the vessel will operate as a detention centre at almost £11m, exclusive of actual detention centre management costs such as security, food and healthcare.

      Another beneficiary of the project are Portland Port’s owners, #Langham_Industries, a maritime and engineering company owned by the #Langham family. The family has long-running ties to right-wing parties. Langham Industries donated over £70,000 to the UK Independence Party from 2003 up until the 2016 Brexit referendum. In 2014, Langham Industries donated money to support the re-election campaign of former Clacton MP for UKIP Douglas Carswell, shortly after his defection from the Conservatives. #Catherine_Langham, a Tory parish councillor for Hilton in Dorset, has described herself as a Langham Industries director (although she is not listed on Companies House). In 2016 she was actively involved in local efforts to support the campaign to leave the European Union. The family holds a large estate in Dorset which it uses for its other line of business, winemaking.

      At present, there is no publicly available information on who will be providing security services aboard the Bibby Stockholm.

      Business Basics

      Bibby Line Group describes itself as “one of the UK’s oldest family owned businesses,” operating in “multiple countries, employing around 1,300 colleagues, and managing over £1 billion of funds.” Its head office is registered in Liverpool, with other headquarters in Scotland, Hong Kong, India, Singapore, Malaysia, France, Slovakia, Czechia, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland and Nigeria (see the appendix for more). The company’s primary sectors correspond to its three main UK subsidiaries:

      #Bibby_Financial_Services. A global provider of financial services. The firm provides loans to small- and medium-sized businesses engaged in business services, construction, manufacturing, transportation, export, recruitment and wholesale markets. This includes invoice financing, export and trade finance, and foreign exchanges. Overall, the subsidiary manages more than £6bn each year on behalf of some 9,000 clients across 300 different industry sectors, and in 2021 it brought in more than 50% of the group’s annual turnover.

      - #Bibby_Marine_Limited. Owner and operator of the Bibby WaveMaster fleet, a group of vessels specialising in the transport and accommodation of workers employed at remote locations, such as offshore oil and gas sites in the North Sea. Sometimes, as in the case of Chevron’s Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) project in Nigeria, the vessels are used as an alternative to hotels owing to a “a volatile project environment.” The fleet consists of 40 accommodation vessels similar in size to the Bibby Stockholm and a smaller number of service vessels, though the share of annual turnover pales compared to the group’s financial services operations, standing at just under 10% for 2021.

      - #Garic Ltd. Confined to construction, quarrying, airport, agriculture and transport sectors in the UK, the firm designs, manufactures and purchases plant equipment and machinery for sale or hire. Garic brought in around 14% of Bibby Line Group’s turnover in 2021.

      Prior to February 2021, Bibby Line Group also owned #Costcutter_Supermarkets_Group, before it was sold to #Bestway_Wholesale to maintain liquidity amid the Covid-19 pandemic. In their report for that year, the company’s directors also suggested grant funding from #MarRI-UK, an organisation facilitating innovation in maritime technologies and systems, had been important in preserving the firm’s position during the crisis.
      History

      The Bibby Line Group’s story begins in 1807, when Lancashire-born shipowner John Bibby began trading out of Liverpool with partner John Highfield. By the time of his death in 1840, murdered while returning home from dinner with a friend in Kirkdale, Bibby had struck out on his own and come to manage a fleet of more than 18 ships. The mysterious case of his death has never been solved, and the business was left to his sons John and James.

      Between 1891 and 1989, the company operated under the name #Bibby_Line_Limited. Its ships served as hospital and transport vessels during the First World War, as well as merchant cruisers, and the company’s entire fleet of 11 ships was requisitioned by the state in 1939.

      By 1970, the company had tripled its overseas earnings, branching into ‘factoring’, or invoice financing (converting unpaid invoices into cash for immediate use via short-term loans) in the early 1980s, before this aspect of the business was eventually spun off into Bibby Financial Services. The group acquired Garic Ltd in 2008, which currently operates four sites across the UK.

      People

      #Jonathan_Lewis has served as Bibby Line Group’s Managing and Executive Director since January 2021, prior to which he acted as the company’s Chief Financial and Strategy Officer since joining in 2019. Previously, Lewis worked as CFO for Imagination Technologies, a tech company specialising in semiconductors, and as head of supermarket Tesco’s mergers and acquisitions team. He was also a member of McKinsey’s European corporate finance practice, as well as an investment banker at Lazard. During his first year at the helm of Bibby’s operations, he was paid £748,000. Assuming his role at the head of the group’s operations, he replaced Paul Drescher, CBE, then a board member of the UK International Chamber of Commerce and a former president of the Confederation of British Industry.

      Bibby Line Group’s board also includes two immediate members of the Bibby family, Sir #Michael_James_Bibby, 3rd Bt. and his younger brother #Geoffrey_Bibby. Michael has acted as company chairman since 2020, before which he had occupied senior management roles in the company for 20 years. He also has external experience, including time at Unilever’s acquisitions, disposals and joint venture divisions, and now acts as president of the UK Chamber of Shipping, chairman of the Charities Trust, and chairman of the Institute of Family Business Research Foundation.

      Geoffrey has served as a non-executive director of the company since 2015, having previously worked as a managing director of Vast Visibility Ltd, a digital marketing and technology company. In 2021, the Bibby brothers received salaries of £125,000 and £56,000 respectively.

      The final member of the firm’s board is #David_Anderson, who has acted as non-executive director since 2012. A financier with 35 years experience in investment banking, he’s founder and CEO of EPL Advisory – which advises company boards on requirements and disclosure obligations of public markets – and chair of Creative Education Trust, a multi-academy trust comprising 17 schools. Anderson is also chairman at multinational ship broker Howe Robinson Partners, which recently auctioned off a superyacht seized from Dmitry Pumpyansky, after the sanctioned Russian businessman reneged on a €20.5m loan from JP Morgan. In 2021, Anderson’s salary stood at £55,000.

      Ownership

      Bibby Line Group’s annual report and accounts for 2021 state that more than 90% of the company is owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through family trusts. These ownership structures, effectively entities allowing people to benefit from assets without being their registered legal owners, have long attracted staunch criticism from transparency advocates given the obscurity they afford means they often feature extensively in corruption, money laundering and tax abuse schemes.

      According to Companies House, the UK corporate registry, between 50% and 75% of Bibby Line Group’s shares and voting rights are owned by #Bibby_Family_Company_Limited, which also retains the right to appoint and remove members of the board. Directors of Bibby Family Company Limited include both the Bibby brothers, as well as a third sibling, #Peter_John_Bibby, who’s formally listed as the firm’s ‘ultimate beneficial owner’ (i.e. the person who ultimately profits from the company’s assets).

      Other people with comparable shares in Bibby Family Company Limited are #Mark_Rupert_Feeny, #Philip_Charles_Okell, and Lady #Christine_Maud_Bibby. Feeny’s occupation is listed as solicitor, with other interests in real estate management and a position on the board of the University of Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited. Okell meanwhile appears as director of Okell Money Management Limited, a wealth management firm, while Lady Bibby, Michael and Geoffrey’s mother, appears as “retired playground supervisor.”

      Key Relationships

      Bibby Line Group runs an internal ‘Donate a Day’ volunteer program, enabling employees to take paid leave in order to “help causes they care about.” Specific charities colleagues have volunteered with, listed in the company’s Annual Review for 2021 to 2022, include:

      - The Hive Youth Zone. An award-winning charity for young people with disabilities, based in the Wirral.

      – The Whitechapel Centre. A leading homeless and housing charity in the Liverpool region, working with people sleeping rough, living in hostels, or struggling with their accommodation.

      - Let’s Play Project. Another charity specialising in after-school and holiday activities for young people with additional needs in the Banbury area.

      - Whitdale House. A care home for the elderly, based in Whitburn, West Lothian and run by the local council.

      – DEBRA. An Irish charity set up in 1988 for individuals living with a rare, painful skin condition called epidermolysis bullosa, as well as their families.

      – Reaching Out Homeless Outreach. A non-profit providing resources and support to the homeless in Ireland.

      Various senior executives and associated actors at Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries also have current and former ties to the following organisations:

      - UK Chamber of Shipping

      - Charities Trust

      - Institute of Family Business Research Foundation

      - Indefatigable Old Boys Association

      - Howe Robinson Partners

      - hibu Ltd

      - EPL Advisory

      - Creative Education Trust

      - Capita Health and Wellbeing Limited

      - The Ambassador Theatre Group Limited

      – Pilkington Plc

      – UK International Chamber of Commerce

      – Confederation of British Industry

      – Arkley Finance Limited (Weatherby’s Banking Group)

      – FastMarkets Ltd, Multiple Sclerosis Society

      – Early Music as Education

      – Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited

      – Okell Money Management Limited

      Finances

      For the period ending 2021, Bibby Line Group’s total turnover stood at just under £260m, with a pre-tax profit of almost £31m – fairly healthy for a company providing maritime services during a global pandemic. Their post-tax profits in fact stood at £35.5m, an increase they would appear to have secured by claiming generous tax credits (£4.6m) and deferring a fair amount (£8.4m) to the following year.

      Judging by their last available statement on the firm’s profitability, Bibby’s directors seem fairly confident the company has adequate financing and resources to continue operations for the foreseeable future. They stress their February 2021 sale of Costcutter was an important step in securing this, given it provided additional liquidity during the pandemic, as well as the funding secured for R&D on fuel consumption by Bibby Marine’s fleet.
      Scandal Sheet

      Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries have featured in a number of UK legal proceedings over the years, sometimes as defendants. One notable case is Godfrey v Bibby Line, a lawsuit brought against the company in 2019 after one of their former employees died as the result of an asbestos-related disease.

      In their claim, the executors of Alan Peter Godfrey’s estate maintained that between 1965 and 1972, he was repeatedly exposed to large amounts of asbestos while working on board various Bibby vessels. Although the link between the material and fatal lung conditions was established as early as 1930, they claimed that Bibby Line, among other things:

      “Failed to warn the deceased of the risk of contracting asbestos related disease or of the precautions to be taken in relation thereto;

      “Failed to heed or act upon the expert evidence available to them as to the best means of protecting their workers from danger from asbestos dust; [and]

      “Failed to take all reasonably practicable measures, either by securing adequate ventilation or by the provision and use of suitable respirators or otherwise, to prevent inhalation of dust.”

      The lawsuit, which claimed “unlimited damage”’ against the group, also stated that Mr Godfrey’s “condition deteriorated rapidly with worsening pain and debility,” and that he was “completely dependent upon others for his needs by the last weeks of his life.” There is no publicly available information on how the matter was concluded.

      In 2017, Bibby Line Limited also featured in a leak of more than 13.4 million financial records known as the Paradise Papers, specifically as a client of Appleby, which provided “offshore corporate services” such as legal and accountancy work. According to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a global network of investigative media outlets, leaked Appleby documents revealed, among other things, “the ties between Russia and [Trump’s] billionaire commerce secretary, the secret dealings of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s chief fundraiser and the offshore interests of the Queen of England and more than 120 politicians around the world.”

      This would not appear to be the Bibby group’s only link to the shady world of offshore finance. Michael Bibby pops up as a treasurer for two shell companies registered in Panama, Minimar Transport S.A. and Vista Equities Inc.
      Looking Forward

      Much about the Bibby Stockholm saga remains to be seen. The exact cost of the initiative and who will be providing security services on board, are open questions. What’s clear however is that activists will continue to oppose the plans, with efforts to prevent the vessel sailing from Falmouth to its final docking in Portland scheduled to take place on 30th June.

      Appendix: Company Addresses

      HQ and general inquiries: 3rd Floor Walker House, Exchange Flags, Liverpool, United Kingdom, L2 3YL

      Tel: +44 (0) 151 708 8000

      Other offices, as of 2021:

      6, Shenton Way, #18-08A Oue Downtown 068809, Singapore

      1/1, The Exchange Building, 142 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5LA, United Kingdom

      4th Floor Heather House, Heather Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland

      Unit 2302, 23/F Jubilee Centre, 18 Fenwick Street, Wanchai, Hong Kong

      Unit 508, Fifth Floor, Metropolis Mall, MG Road, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002 India

      Suite 7E, Level 7, Menara Ansar, 65 Jalan Trus, 8000 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

      160 Avenue Jean Jaures, CS 90404, 69364 Lyon Cedex, France

      Prievozská 4D, Block E, 13th Floor, Bratislava 821 09, Slovak Republic

      Hlinky 118, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic

      Laan Van Diepenvoorde 5, 5582 LA, Waalre, Netherlands

      Hansaallee 249, 40549 Düsseldorf, Germany

      Poland Eurocentrum, Al. Jerozolimskie 134, 02-305 Warsaw, Poland

      1/2 Atarbekova str, 350062, Krasnodar, Krasnodar

      1 St Peter’s Square, Manchester, M2 3AE, United Kingdom

      25 Adeyemo Alakija Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria

      10 Anson Road, #09-17 International Plaza, 079903 Singapore

      https://corporatewatch.org/floating-prisons-the-200-year-old-family-business-behind-the-bibby-s

      signalé ici aussi par @rezo:
      https://seenthis.net/messages/1010504

    • The Langham family seem quite happy to support right-wing political parties that are against immigration, while at the same time profiting handsomely from the misery of refugees who are forced to claim sanctuary here.


      https://twitter.com/PositiveActionH/status/1687817910364884992

      –---

      Family firm ’profiteering from misery’ by providing migrant barges donated £70k to #UKIP

      The Langham family, owners of Langham Industries, is now set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset

      A family firm that donated more than £70,000 to UKIP is “profiteering from misery” by hosting the Government’s controversial migrant barge. Langham Industries owns Portland Port, where the Bibby Stockholm is docked in a deal reported to be worth some £2.5million.

      The Langham family owns luxurious properties and has links to high-profile politicians, including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden. And we can reveal that their business made 19 donations to pro-Brexit party UKIP between 2003 and 2016.

      Late founder John Langham was described as an “avid supporter” of UKIP in an obituary in 2017. Now his children, John, Jill and Justin – all directors of the family firm – are set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset.

      While Portland Port refuses to reveal how much the Home Office is paying, its website cites berthing fees for a ship the size of the Bibby Stockholm at more than £4,000 a day. In 2011, Portland Port chairman John, 71, invested £3.7million in Grade II* listed country pile Steeple Manor at Wareham, Dorset. Dating to around 1600, it has a pond, tennis court and extensive gardens designed by the landscape architect Brenda Colvin.

      The arrangement to host the “prison-like” barge for housing migrants has led some locals to blast the Langhams, who have owned the port since 1997. Portland mayor Carralyn Parkes, 61, said: “I don’t know how John Langham will sleep at night in his luxurious home, with his tennis court and his fluffy bed, when asylum seekers are sleeping in tiny beds on the barge.

      “I went on the boat and measured the rooms with a tape measure. On average they are about 10ft by 12ft. The bunk bed mattresses are about 6ft long. If you’re taller than 6ft you’re stuffed. The Langham family need to have more humanity. They are only interested in making money. It’s shocking.”

      (#paywall)
      https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/family-firm-profiteering-misery-providing-30584405.amp

      #UK_Independence_Party

    • ‘This is a prison’: men tell of distressing conditions on Bibby Stockholm

      Asylum seekers share fears about Dorset barge becoming even more crowded, saying they already ‘despair and wish for death’

      Asylum seekers brought back to the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, have said they are being treated in such a way that “we despair and wish for death”.

      The Guardian spoke to two men in their first interview since their return to the barge on 19 October after the vessel lay empty for more than two months. The presence of deadly legionella bacteria was confirmed on board on 7 August, the same day the first group of asylum seekers arrived. The barge was evacuated four days later.

      The new warning comes after it emerged that one asylum seeker attempted to kill himself and is in hospital after finding out he is due to be taken to the barge on Tuesday.

      A man currently on the barge told the Guardian: “Government decisions are turning healthy and normal refugees into mental patients whom they then hand over to society. Here, many people were healthy and coping with OK spirits, but as a result of the dysfunctional strategies of the government, they have suffered – and continue to suffer – from various forms of serious mental distress. We are treated in such a way that we despair and wish for death.”

      He said that although the asylum seekers were not detained on the barge and could leave to visit the nearby town, in practice, doing so was not easy.

      He added: “In the barge, we have exactly the feeling of being in prison. It is true that they say that this is not a prison and you can go outside at any time, but you can only go to specific stops at certain times by bus, and this does not give me a good feeling.

      “Even to use the fresh air, you have to go through the inspection every time and go to the small yard with high fences and go through the X-ray machine again. And this is not good for our health.

      “In short, this is a prison whose prisoners are not criminals, they are people who have fled their country just to save their lives and have taken shelter here to live.”

      The asylum seekers raised concerns about what conditions on the barge would be like if the Home Office did fill it with about 500 asylum seekers, as officials say is the plan. Those on board said it already felt quite full with about 70 people living there.

      The second asylum seeker said: “The space inside the barge is very small. It feels crowded in the dining hall and the small entertainment room. It is absolutely clear to me that there will be chaos here soon.

      “According to my estimate, as I look at the spaces around us, the capacity of this barge is maximum 120 people, including personnel and crew. The strategy of ​​transferring refugees from hotels to barges or ships or military installations is bound to fail.

      “The situation here on the barge is getting worse. Does the government have a plan for shipwrecked residents? Everyone here is going mad with anxiety. It is not just the barge that floats on the water, but the plans of the government that are radically adrift.”

      Maddie Harris of the NGO Humans For Rights Network, which supports asylum seekers in hotels, said: “Home Office policies directly contribute to the significant deterioration of the wellbeing and mental health of so many asylum seekers in their ‘care’, with a dehumanising environment, violent anti-migrant rhetoric and isolated accommodations away from community and lacking in support.”

      A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Bibby Stockholm is part of the government’s pledge to reduce the use of expensive hotels and bring forward alternative accommodation options which provide a more cost-effective, sustainable and manageable system for the UK taxpayer and local communities.

      “The health and welfare of asylum seekers remains the utmost priority. We work continually to ensure the needs and vulnerabilities of those residing in asylum accommodation are identified and considered, including those related to mental health and trauma.”

      Nadia Whittome and Lloyd Russell-Moyle, the Labour MPs for Nottingham East and Brighton Kemptown respectively, will travel to Portland on Monday to meet asylum seekers accommodated on the Bibby Stockholm barge and local community members.

      The visit follows the home secretary, Suella Braverman, not approving a visit from the MPs to assess living conditions as they requested through parliamentary channels.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/29/this-is-a-prison-men-tell-of-distressing-conditions-on-bibby-stockholm
      #prison #conditions_de_vie

  • Loi JO 2024 : Passage de flambeau au Conseil constitutionnel
    https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/04/24/loi-jo-2024-passage-de-flambeau-au-conseil-constitutionnel

    Communiqué de l’Observatoire des libertés et du numérique (OLN), Paris, le 24 avril 2023. La loi sur les Jeux olympiques a été définitivement adoptée le 12 avril. Dans la foulée, des député·es de l’opposition ont…

    #Surveillance

  • Intelligence artificielle et administration publique numérique
    Cour de cassation
    Cycle 2022 « L’intelligence artificielle : quelle intelligence juridique ? »

    #surveillance #contrôle_social #inégalités_sociales #précarité
    Un véritable florilège de la marche forcée de la société à l’ère de l’administration numérique.

    Toute la vidéo vaut la peine d’être écoutée, voici un extrait si vous voulez des preuves pour refuser les compteurs intelligents
    #linky #gazpar et autres saloperies de surveillance

    https://youtu.be/ppeDpCBYOkk?t=5673

    compter le nombre de douches des chômeurs #belgique

    #Algorithmes #IA

    • French publisher arrested in London on terrorism charge | UK news | The Guardian
      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/18/french-publisher-arrested-london-counter-terrorism-police-ernest-moret

      Ernest Moret was stopped at rail station and taken into custody, where he was questioned about his participation in French protests

      A French publisher has been arrested on terror charges in London after being questioned by UK police about participating in anti-government protests in France.

      Ernest Moret, 28, a foreign rights manager for Éditions la Fabrique, was approached by two plainclothes officers at St Pancras station on Monday evening after arriving by train from Paris to attend the London book fair.

      He was questioned for six hours and then arrested for alleged obstruction in refusing to disclose the passcodes to his phone and computer. His treatment was condemned as an attack on the right to demonstrate, amid calls for protests outside the UK embassy in Paris and the French Institute in London.

      Moret arrived at St Pancras at 7.15pm with his colleague Stella Magliani-Belkacem, the editorial director at the Paris-based publishing house, to be confronted by the two officers.

      Magliani-Belkacem told the Guardian: “When we were on the platform, two people, a woman and a guy, told us they were counter-terrorist police. They showed a paper called section 7 of the Terrorism Act of 2000 and said they had the right to ask him about demonstrations in France.”

      She added: “I’m still shaking. We are in shock about what happened.”

      She said French publishers had drafted a joint letter calling for a protest outside the British embassy in France on Tuesday evening about Moret’s treatment.

      When the officers began questioning Moret, Magliani-Belkacem called her friend Sebastian Budgen, a senior editor at Verso Books in London, at whose home she and Moret had arranged to stay.

      Budgen arranged for a lawyer to visit Moret. The lawyer called Budgen at 1am on Tuesday to confirm that Moret had been arrested over his refusal to tell police the passcodes to his confiscated phone and laptop. He was transferred to a police station in Islington, north London, where he remained in custody on Tuesday. He was later released on bail.

      Éditions la Fabrique is known for publishing radical left authors. Moret also represents the French science fiction novelist Alain Damasio and had arranged more than 40 appointments at the London book fair.

      A joint press release from Verso Books and Éditions la Fabrique condemned Moret’s treatment as “scandalous”.

      It said: “The police officers claimed that Ernest had participated in demonstrations in France as a justification for this act – a quite remarkably inappropriate statement for a British police officer to make, and which seems to clearly indicate complicity between French and British authorities on this matter.”

      It added: “We consider these actions to be outrageous and unjustifiable infringements of basic principles of the freedom of expression and an example of the abuse of anti-terrorism laws.”

      The statement said a protest was planned at the French Institute in London and called on France’s ambassador to the UK, Hélène Duchêne, to request Moret’s immediate release.

      Budgen said: “It is causing a stink at the London book fair and there’s a big stink in France as well … there’s been an increasingly repressive approach by the French government to the demonstrations, both in terms of police violence, but also in terms of a security clampdown.”

      Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets in France last month over Emmanuel Macron’s use of constitutional executive powers to push through an unpopular increase in the pension age. The protests caused King Charles’s planned visit to France, his first overseas tour as monarch, to be postponed.

      The writers’ association Pen International said it was “deeply concerned” that Moret was detained on counter-terrorism grounds.

      Pamela Morton, senior books and magazines organiser for the National Union of Journalists, also expressed concern.

      She said it seemed “extraordinary that the British police have acted this way” in arresting a publisher on the way to the London book fair. “We will be taking this up with the police,” she added.

      A Metropolitan police spokesperson said: “At around 7.30pm on Monday 17 April, a 28-year-old man was stopped by ports officers as he arrived at St Pancras station, using powers under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

      “On Tuesday 18 April, the man was subsequently arrested on suspicion of wilfully obstructing a schedule 7 examination, contrary to section 18 of the Terrorism Act 2000.”

  • Lille : après la cyberattaque, « il faudra des mois pour retrouver une situation normale » S. B. - la voix du nord

    Quelques jours après avoir annoncé que les données personnelles de particuliers avaient été volées, Martine Aubry a fait le point, en conseil municipal, sur la cyberattaque qui bouleverse depuis un mois et demi les services de la Ville.

    Patience, patience. Un mois et demi après la cyberattaque sur la mairie, la remise en ligne des services municipaux ne fait que commencer, a prévenu ce jeudi martine aubry. « Il faudra des mois pour retrouver une situation normale. On y va pas à pas. »

    Le maire est longuement revenu, en conseil municipal, sur le déroulé et les conséquences de l’intrusion dans le réseau informatique de la Ville, survenue dans la nuit du 28 février au 1er mars : l’alerte donnée par l’Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information (ANSSI), le débranchement salutaire des serveurs de Lille, la réorganisation expresse de la Ville pour maintenir les services publics, la découverte très progressive de l’étendue du vol de données, les premiers (et pour l’instant rares) mails d’extorsion…

    « Associations prioritaires »
    « C’est un moment difficile, une situation inédite et complexe, et je voudrais dire un grand merci aux agents » , a souligné l’édile, en assurant avoir joué la transparence depuis l’origine : _ «  J’en entends dire "on ne sait pas grand-chose" , mais tout ce qu’on sait, on le dit, alors que beaucoup de villes hackées n’en parlent pas. Il y a beaucoup de choses qu’on ne sait pas, et qu’on ne saura peut-être jamais. » Et de réitérer les conseils de vigilance, à destination de tous les Lillois ayant été en contact avec la mairie.

    stéphane baly, au nom du groupe d’opposition écologiste Lille Verte, s’est quant à lui inquiété, entre autres, d’éventuelles perturbations du versement des subventions aux associations. « On a identifié quarante associations prioritaires » _ , à traiter en priorité, a rassuré la première adjointe au maire, audrey linkenheld. Pour les autres, patience, patience.

    Alors que les déclarations d’impôts vont commencer à tomber, la mairie précise que les attestations fiscales pour les frais de garde d’enfant ne pourront pas être éditées comme habituellement par la Ville. Et conseille aux contribuables d’attendre le rétablissement des services municipaux pour compléter leurs déclarations.

    Source : https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1315891/article/2023-04-13/lille-apres-la-cyberattaque-il-faudra-des-mois-pour-retrouver-une-situa

    #administration #cyberattaque #hacking #ransomware #sécurité #piratage #surveillance #internet #cybersécurité #algorithme #sécurité_informatique #dématérialisation des #services_publics #mairie #Lille #administration

    • Pas un mot, pas une remarque sur ce délire de l’informatisation administrative, qui ne peut générer que des bérézinas .
      Pour rappel, toute informatisation d’un processus humain ne traite que 98 à 99 % des cas maximum.
      Pour le reste, démerdez vous, vous n’existez pas !

    • Les gros bugs au démarrage du temple de la cybersécurité des Hauts-de-France Matthieu Slisse - mediacites.fr

      Le Campus Cyber, projet majeur porté par la région et la métropole de Lille, était inauguré en grande pompe le 5 avril. Si officiellement tout va pour le mieux, la réalité est bien moins reluisante. Retards dans la livraison des locaux, brutal changement de directeur… nos informations pointent une gestion particulièrement erratique.


      koussée vaneecke, la Présidente du Directoire d’EuraTechnologies et florence puybareau, directrice des opérations du Campus Cyber Hauts-de-France échangent à l’occasion de l’édition 2023 du Forum International de la cybersécurité de Lille. / Crédit Photo : Matthieu Slisse – Mediacités _

      S’intéresser de trop près au Campus Cyber Hauts-de-France, nous l’avons appris à nos dépens, c’est risquer de se faire claquer la porte au nez. Le 5 avril dernier, alors que le projet était inauguré en grande pompe par tout le gratin politique local - le président du conseil régional xavier bertrand en tête -, Mediacités a été sommé de rester sur le perron. Contrairement à plusieurs autres rédactions, notre média n’était pas invité.

      Mais curieux que nous sommes à propos de ce centre dédié à la cybersécurité présenté comme un axe stratégique majeur par la Région et la métropole de Lille, nous avions néanmoins fait le déplacement. L’occasion d’admirer une belle porte close et de s’entendre dire - par la directrice du campus en personne - que nos questions dérangeaient les invités [voir l’encadré En Coulisses]. La curiosité est décidément un bien vilain défaut.

      Il y a pourtant beaucoup à dire sur les débuts chaotiques de ce projet qui semble lancé sur de bien mauvais rails. Afin de pouvoir raconter l’envers du décor de cette trop belle histoire, nous avons échangé avec près d’une dizaine d’acteurs régionaux du secteur de la cybersécurité. La plupart ont accepté de nous répondre… mais uniquement sous couvert d’anonymat. Plusieurs interlocuteurs nous ont en effet dit craindre d’être marginalisés s’ils s’exprimaient sur les failles du Campus Cyber. Et s’ils ont tout de même consenti à parler, c’est irrités par la volonté manifeste des responsables de cacher la poussière sous le tapis.
      . . . . . . . .
      La suite payante : https://www.mediacites.fr/enquete/lille/2023/04/10/les-gros-bugs-au-demarrage-du-temple-de-la-cybersecurite-des-hauts-de-fra

  • Une lettre d’Ivan, enfermé à la prison de Villepinte : perquisitions et disques durs déchiffrés - Paris-luttes.info
    https://paris-luttes.info/une-lettre-d-ivan-enferme-a-la-16935

    En ce qui concerne l’enquête, ces derniers mois des nouveaux éléments ont été versés au dossier.
    Le plus significatif est que la police a réussi à avoir accès à mes ordinateurs, même s’ils étaient chiffrés.
    Celui du travail, sur lequel est installé Windows, est chiffré avec BitLocker. Un PV précédemment versé au dossier dit qu’ils avaient déjà essayé d’y accéder pendant ma garde à vue mais qu’ils n’avaient pas réussi. Mais en septembre la Brigade d’appui en téléphonie, cyber-investigation et analyse criminelle (BATCIAC) a envoyé à la SDAT une copie du disque dur. Dans le PV, ils expliquent seulement qu’ils ont démarré l’ordinateur avec une clef USB bootable et que, ensuite, ils ont utilisé le logiciel AccesData FTK imager 3.3.05 pour copier le disque dur. Mais ils ne parlent pas du déchiffrement en soi.

    Mon ordinateur personnel, qui tourne avec Ubuntu 18, est chiffré avec Luks (le mot de passe est de plus de vingt caractères : lettres, chiffres, signes de ponctuation...). Je n’ai trouvé dans le dossier aucune indication sur le moyen qu’ils ont utilisé pour le déchiffrer, mais là aussi ils ont fait une copie du disque dur. Il y a même des fichiers qui avaient été effacés et des e-mails qui avaient été téléchargés avec Thunderbird (et ensuite effacés).
    Ils n’ont trouvé rien qui puisse se rapporter aux incendies dont je suis inculpé. Mais je pense que le fait même qu’ils aient pu avoir accès à des disques durs chiffrés avec des logiciels censés être inviolables doit être connu le plus largement possible.

  • Les gains de productivité que les intelligences artificielles génératives vont générer pourraient permettre la retraite à 42 ans

    Ah non, pardon :

    « Je suis très optimiste sur la question de l’amélioration de la #productivité », a répondu le spécialiste des questions d’automatisation à une question lors d’une conférence à Glasgow, rapporte l’agence #Bloomberg. « Nous pourrions améliorer notre bien-être et nous consacrer davantage aux loisirs. Nous pourrions facilement passer à la semaine de quatre jours. »

    Comme par enchantement. Car le #capitalisme est bon — chacun le sait.

    Christopher Pissarides n’exclut cependant pas que les ChatGPT d’OpenAI, Bard de #Google, Claude d’Anthropic ou autre Ernie de #Baidu soient problématiques, en permettant par exemple une #surveillance généralisée ou une invasion de la vie privée. Mais selon lui, ils pourraient automatiser les tâches ennuyeuses, résoudre le problème de la stagnation de la productivité en Occident et « laisser aux humains les choses intéressantes ».

    « Ils pourraient » — mais c’est plutôt l’enfer qui se prépare.

    En attendant :

    Les systèmes d’intelligence artificielle générative de type #ChatGPT pourraient entraîner des « perturbations importantes » sur le marché du travail et affecter environ 300 millions d’emplois à temps plein dans le monde, vient de calculer une étude de Goldman Sachs.

    (Les Échos)

  • Vidéosurveillance biométrique : derrière l’adoption du texte, la victoire d’un lobby
    https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/04/05/videosurveillance-biometrique-derriere-ladoption-du-texte-la-victoire-

    Derrière l’adoption la semaine dernière par l’Assemblée nationale du projet de loi sur les Jeux olympiques et son article 7 sur la vidéosurveillance biométrique, il y a aussi la victoire d’un lobby. Mêlant multinationales de…

    #Surveillance

  • Hosts use the Olympics to bolster police power — harming civil liberties - The Washington Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/made-by-history/2023/04/03/olympics-police-paris

    When the French National Assembly approved the use of artificial intelligence video surveillance at the Paris 2024 Olympics on March 23, it made France the first European Union country to legalize such a wide-reaching AI-powered surveillance system and left civil-liberties advocates livid. They argued that the move not only undermines the E.U.’s AI Act regulating the technology, but also greenlights potentially massive privacy violations inside France.

    Meanwhile, Amnesty International Secretary General Agnes Callamard blasted the law’s potential to “amplify racist policing and threaten the right to protest.” Callamard’s fears are justified. In the past, the Olympic Games have opened the door for laws that infringe upon civil liberties and the right to protest.

    Local and national security officials over the past several decades have used the Olympics to generate huge sums of cash and secure special tools and laws that would be difficult to acquire during normal political times. These new laws can stay on the books and technologies remain in the hands of the state after the Games, reinforcing police power and squelching political dissent. As a result, the Olympics help normalize technologies and practices that undermine human rights, despite the Olympic Charter’s stated commitment to “promoting a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human dignity.”

  • Piratage informatique, une campagne liée à une société mercenaire de cybersurveillance - Amnesty International Belgique
    https://www.amnesty.be/infos/actualites/article/piratage-informatique-campagne-liee-societe-mercenaire

    Les nombreuses attaques révélées par Amnesty International et des partenaires de la société civile ces dernières années ont démontré que l’industrie de la cybersécurité représentait une grave menace pour les défenseur·e·s des droits humains et la société civile dans le monde. Les préjudices systémiques de la cybersurveillance croissante et non réglementée vont bien au-delà du célèbre logiciel espion Pegasus élaboré par NSO Group.

    -- Permalien

    #surveillance #droitsdelhomme #internet

  • Lille : après la cyberattaque, les coordonnées bancaires des agents et élus sur le darkweb La voix du nord

    La confirmation est tombée ce vendredi 31 mars : parmi les données volées lors de l’attaque numérique menée sur les serveurs de la ville de Lille, se trouvent les coordonnées bancaires des agents et élus municipaux.

    Un mois après la cyberattaque subie par la ville de Lille, alors que les services municipaux sont toujours fortement perturbés par cette intrusion numérique, on en sait un peu plus sur le « caractère personnel » des données soustraites.

    Alors que la Ville rappelait ce jeudi que les données volées revendiquées par les hackers pesaient moins de 2 %, il semblerait que des informations sensibles aient été récupérées. Dans une note interne que nous avons consultée, la ville informe ce vendredi son personnel et ses élus : « Les premiers résultats des analyses possibles à partir des données publiées par les hackeurs sur le darkweb viennent de confirmer que parmi ces données se trouvent les coordonnées bancaires (IBAN) de l’ensemble des agents et élus municipaux. »

    Martine Aubry : « rappeler à tout le monde de ne pas donner son code, quels que soient les messages reçus »
    En réalité, des fiches de paie et des RIB d’agents et élus font partie de la saisie numérique opérée par les pirates. « Mais avec un RIB, on ne fait rien en soi, si on n’a pas les codes et autorisations qui vont avec, précise Martine Aubry. C’est aussi pour ça qu’on a passé une note pour bien rappeler à tout le monde de ne pas donner son code, quels que soient les messages reçus. »

    La ville, par cette communication interne, conseille aux agents et aux élus de « se rapprocher de leurs établissements bancaires » , de « surveiller régulièrement leurs comptes » et, surtout, en cas de message suspect, de ne jamais répondre ou cliquer sur des liens, ni consulter les pièces jointes. La procédure en cas de suspicion d’escroquerie est également rappelée, via le service THESEE (sur le site www.masecurite.interieur.gouv.fr).

    Il faut dès lors espérer que le périmètre des données volées s’arrête là, alors que, comme le rappelle la note interne, des informations concernant les usagers des services municipaux ont elles aussi fuité. « Honnêtement pour l’heure, on n’a pas d’inquiétude particulière. Et d’ailleurs, si on en avait, on le dirait, comme on le fait depuis le début » , assure le maire de Lille.

    #administration #cyberattaque #hacking #ransomware #sécurité #piratage #surveillance #internet #cybersécurité #algorithme #sécurité_informatique #dématérialisation des #services_publics #mairie #Lille #administration

    Source : https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/1310538/article/2023-03-31/lille-apres-la-cyberattaque-les-coordonnees-bancaires-des-agents-et-elu

    • Une base de données se conçoit aussi en fonction des impératifs de sécurité.
      Ba ba du métier.

      J’espère que les informations personnelles de celles et ceux qui ont travaillé à la conception du système informatique de la mairie sont dans les informations disponibles.

  • Lausanne interdira la reconnaissance faciale dans l’espace public Marie Giovanola/lan - RTS
    https://www.rts.ch/info/regions/vaud/13902665-lausanne-interdira-la-reconnaissance-faciale-dans-lespace-public.html

    Lausanne sera la première ville romande à interdire les systèmes de reconnaissance faciale dans l’espace public. C’est ce qu’a décidé mardi soir le Conseil communal de la ville. Elle emboîte ainsi le pas à St-Gall et Zurich.

    Le débat au sein du Conseil communal a été alimenté par le récent revirement des CFF en la matière.

    L’interdiction de la reconnaissance faciale et biométrique a fait l’unanimité des groupes politiques, s’est réjoui dans le 12h30 Benoît Gaillard, conseiller communal socialiste à l’origine de la démarche.

    « Il n’y a pas eu d’opposition. Nous avons voulu agir sur l’espace public où nous pouvons édicter des règlements, que la police qui dépend de la Ville peut également suivre. Un postulat a aussi été adopté. Il demande à la Municipalité de mettre en oeuvre les mêmes lignes directrices dans les sociétés où elles exercent une influence, soit les transports publics et les infrastructures sportives ».

    La balle est maintenant dans le camp de la Municipalité de Lausanne qui va devoir proposer un changement de règlement.
    #biométrie #facial #surveillance #algorithme #reconnaissance #vidéo-surveillance #reconnaissance_faciale #discrimination #police #vie_privée #Suisse #démocratie #bonne_nouvelle

  • « Le numérique nous insère dans une trame toujours plus resserrée »
    https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/03/30/le-numerique-nous-insere-dans-une-trame-toujours-plus-resserree

    Fin 2022, deux membres de La Quadrature ont répondu aux question de Ruptures, un collectif de militant.es grenoblois.es formé à l’automne 2021. L’entretien a été publié dans leur journal La nouvelle vague n°10, paru en…

    #Surveillance

  • Les #mines, une histoire du #paternalisme

    Sous l’impulsion des compagnies privées qui se partageaient l’exploitation des gisements de #charbon en #France, une population de #mineurs s’est stabilisée à un endroit et pour plusieurs générations.

    C’est une longue histoire de l’#exploitation qui commence il y a plus de deux siècles, quand des #compagnies_minières embauchent des centaines, des milliers d’hommes, de femmes et d’enfants, tout un peuple minier, qu’on installe près des puits de mines de charbon. En possédant les logements, les écoles, les clubs sportifs ou encore les églises, ces compagnies privées organisent la vie quotidienne et le destin des mineurs, avec sa #morale, son #éducation et sa #religion.

    « Être mineur, c’était la garantie d’un salaire, d’un logement, du chauffage en hiver, de l’éducation pour les enfants et de l’accès à la coopérative minière pour les achats ». L’historienne Marion Fontaine explique d’ailleurs : “Si l’on ne prend pas en compte la dangerosité du métier, en termes de vie quotidienne, dans les années 1870-1880, il vaut mieux être un mineur qu’un ouvrier du textile. Mais cette protection a un coût. Elle a un prix énorme, car elle rend les ouvriers extrêmement dépendants de ces largesses patronales”.

    Ainsi, en contrepartie, les mineurs doivent #respect et #obéissance aux #patrons. Un véritable système de #paternalisme_patronal que nous raconte le géographe Simon Edelblutte : “L’industriel va subvenir aux besoins des ouvriers, il les paye et leur assure le logement, ainsi que certains loisirs, l’éducation des enfants, et cetera. Mais si vous aviez des problèmes au travail, si vous vous syndiquiez, et que le patron n’était pas content, non seulement vous pouviez perdre votre travail, mais vous pouviez perdre votre logement aussi, c’était donc une manière de vous contrôler.”

    Mais face à cette omniprésence des compagnies, la #solidarité minière s’organise peu à peu et résiste.

    Du porion à l’ingénieur, des gardes des mines au grand bureau, la #surveillance et le contrôle de la main d’œuvre est plus ou moins stricte selon les zones.

    C’est dans le Nord Pas de Calais que l’on fait ici notre immersion.

    https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceculture/podcasts/lsd-la-serie-documentaire/les-mines-une-histoire-du-paternalisme-5306611
    #contrôle #patronat #résistance
    #audio #podcast

  • Méga-bassines : des élus écologistes mis illégalement sous écoute | L’Humanité
    https://www.humanite.fr/politique/ecologie/mega-bassines-des-elus-ecologistes-mis-illegalement-sous-ecoute-788140

    Avant le rassemblement de samedi, les services de renseignement auraient mis sur écoute des activistes écologistes, mais aussi des élus, selon les révélations du Canard enchaîné, ce qui est interdit par la loi. Ce vendredi, la secrétaire nationale EELV Marine Tondelier a interpellé par courrier la première ministre Elisabeth Borne.

    • La criminalisation des activistes écologistes jusqu’à celle des élus. Mercredi, le Canard enchaîné a révélé les instructions données par le ministre de l’Intérieur visant à entraver, par tous les moyens, la lutte des militants anti-bassines, qui se réunissent samedi dans les Deux-Sèvres, pour un rassemblement d’une grande ampleur, pour lequel l’exécutif a mobilisé 3200 policiers. « Filatures, infiltrations, piégeage des ordinateurs, surveillance, pose des balises, géolocalisation, écoutes administratives… », le journal satirique l’usage démesuré de moyens judiciaires contre les activistes qualifiés d’ « écoterroristes » par le ministre de l’Intérieur Gérald Darmanin, lors du rassemblement de Sainte-Soline, fin octobre.

      « En branchant un militant écolo, on était amené à écouter des élus. Ce que la loi nous interdit strictement », révèle, dans l’article, un officier de renseignement. Suite à ces révélations, la secrétaire nationale EELV Marine Tondelier, se dit inquiète « d’une criminalisation de l’écologie » et s’insurge que « de tels moyens de surveillance soient déployés contre des militant·es écologistes pacifistes ».

      Dans une lettre ouverte, la responsable écologiste interpelle la Première ministre sur ces dérives, et annonce la saisie de la Commission nationale de contrôle des techniques de renseignement. « Ces écoutes s’ajoutent à l’utilisation de plus en plus fréquente par les services de l’Etat de la loi dite séparatisme pour empêcher les activités d’associations écologistes », écrit-elle, en référence à l’intensification de la répression des militants. Comme en interdisant certains rassemblements, comme ceux prévus le 24,25 et 26 mars, dans les Deux-Sèvres. Un arrêté du 17 mars considère ainsi que les organisations à l’origine de la mobilisation sont « connues pour leurs incitations à la désobéissance civile ainsi que pour leurs actions radicales et violentes. »

      À ces censures s’ajoutent également une série d’interpellations, gardes à vue, procès, menaces de dissolution et perquisitions à l’encontre des opposants aux bassines. Le 17 mars dernier, Julien Le Guet, figure de la lutte, avait été placé en garde à vue pour des faits remontant à octobre 2022. Le collectif Bassines Non Merci, dont il est le porte-parole, dénonce « une tentative grossière d’intimidation des opposants aux bassines et à l’agriculture industrielle », et un « arsenal répressif » révélateur « des angoisses préfectorales à la veille de ce qui s’annonce être une manifestation massive et historique ».

  • La France, premier pays d’Europe à légaliser la #Surveillance biométrique
    https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/03/23/la-france-premier-pays-deurope-a-legaliser-la-surveillance-biometrique

    L’article 7 de la loi sur les Jeux olympiques a été adopté ce midi par l’Assemblée, actant l’entrée formelle de la vidéosurveillance algorithmique (VSA) dans le droit français, jusqu’en décembre 2024. À l’ombre du tumulte…

  • Fiasco du Stade de France : la VSA ne masquera pas les échecs du maintien de l’ordre
    https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/03/21/fiasco-du-stade-de-france-la-vsa-ne-masquera-pas-les-echecs-du-maintie

    Alors que la loi JO est actuellement débattue à l’Assemblée, que l’article 7 va être examiné ce soir ou demain en séance, que plus de 250 élu·es appellent à s’opposer à la VSA, tout comme…

    #Surveillance

  • Le fonctionnement de l’hôpital de Brest toujours affecté par la cyberattaque

    Connexions internet coupées, pas de rendez-vous en ligne ni de paiement par carte bancaire : le fonctionnement de l’hôpital de Brest était toujours affecté lundi par la cyberattaque qui l’a visé il y a dix jours, selon un communiqué de presse. « Suite à la cyberattaque dont a été victime le CHU de Brest, les connexions internet sont coupées », souligne l’hôpital dans un communiqué diffusé lundi.


    Le CHU avait été victime « d’une intrusion dans son système d’information » le jeudi 9 mars à 20h33. Aucun détail n’a été communiqué sur le type de cyberattaque dont il s’agit. « Nous ne recevons aucun e-mail » , précise le CHU lundi, en invitant ses patients à apporter une version papier de leurs résultats et comptes rendus.

    Pas de retour à la normale avant plusieurs semaines
    Il n’est en outre pas possible de prendre rendez-vous en ligne ou par courriel ou de payer par carte bancaire. « Nos logiciels fonctionnent en interne et nos équipes peuvent vous accueillir. Nous vous prions d’accepter toutes nos excuses pour ces désagréments » , précise l’hôpital à l’intention de ses patients.

    Aucun retour à la normale n’est prévu avant plusieurs semaines, a précisé une source interne à un correspondant de l’AFP. La direction de la communication a indiqué qu’un point de situation serait fait « en milieu de semaine ». Le CHU de Brest couvre un territoire comprenant une population de 1,2 million d’habitants et emploie plus de 6500 personnes.

    Plusieurs hôpitaux français ont été la cible de cyberattaques au cours des derniers mois, comme l’hôpital de Versailles en décembre 2022 ou le Centre hospitalier Sud Francilien (CHSF) de Corbeil-Essonnes fin août. Dans le cas de l’hôpital de Versailles, les pirates informatiques avaient utilisé le rançongiciel (« ransomware ») Lockbit et réclamé une rançon pour débloquer les données cryptées. En France, les établissements publics ne paient jamais de rançons car la loi le leur interdit.

    #administration #cyberattaque #hacking #ransomware #cyberattaques #sécurité #piratage #surveillance #internet #cybersécurité #algorithme #sécurité_informatique #budget #Brest

    Source : https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-eco/le-fonctionnement-de-l-hopital-de-brest-toujours-affecte-par-la-cyberattaqu

  • Avant Paris 2024, comment la #surveillance de masse est devenue une discipline olympique
    https://www.francetvinfo.fr/les-jeux-olympiques/paris-2024/avant-paris-2024-comment-la-surveillance-de-masse-est-devenue-une-disci

    « Plus vite, plus haut, plus fort. » Aux Jeux, les sportifs ne sont pas les seuls à tenter d’appliquer la devise olympique. En matière sécuritaire, aussi, l’objectif de dépassement se vérifie au fil des olympiades. Depuis cinq décennies, les JO ne se résument plus à un gigantesque barnum, mais aussi à un bunker d’un fort beau gabarit, avec son cortège de gadgets et de lois répressives. Dernier épisode avec Paris 2024, alors que les députés se penchent sur la loi olympique, lundi 20 mars, pour autoriser entre autres une technologie inédite en France, la surveillance algorithmique, critiquée par ses opposants tels que la Quadrature du Net.

    #beauté_du_sport

    • La France, premier pays d’Europe à légaliser la surveillance biométrique
      https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/03/23/la-france-premier-pays-deurope-a-legaliser-la-surveillance-biometrique

      L’article 7 de la loi sur les Jeux olympiques a été adopté ce midi par l’Assemblée, actant l’entrée formelle de la vidéosurveillance algorithmique (VSA) dans le droit français, jusqu’en décembre 2024. À l’ombre du tumulte de la réforme des retraites, et grâce à une procédure comme d’habitude extrêmement rapide, le gouvernement a réussi à faire accepter une des technologies les plus dangereuses jamais déployées. Pour cela, il a usé de stratégies, de mensonges et de récits fictifs, pour que jamais ne soient sérieusement et concrètement discutés le fonctionnement technique de ces outils et leurs conséquences politiques et juridiques en termes de surveillance de masse. Grâce à une majorité totalement désinvestie et au soutien total de l’extrême droite, la VSA a donc pu être légalisée sur la base de mensonges sapant toujours un peu plus le jeu démocratique.

    • Projet de loi olympique : les députés adoptent un article controversé sur la vidéosurveillance

      https://www.france24.com/fr/france/20230323-projet-de-loi-olympique-les-d%C3%A9put%C3%A9s-adoptent-un-article

      L’Assemblée nationale a donné jeudi raison au gouvernement français, qui souhaite expérimenter la vidéosurveillance basée sur des algorithmes avant et pendant les JO-2024. La gauche et Amnesty international craignent des dérives sécuritaires.

      Un pas vient d’être franchi. L’Assemblée nationale a approuvé, jeudi 23 mars, le recours à de la vidéosurveillance dite « intelligente », basée sur des algorithmes. Un dispositif inédit que l’exécutif veut expérimenter avant et pendant les JO-2024, malgré les craintes de dérives sécuritaires exprimées par la gauche.

      Adopté avec 59 voix pour (majorité présidentielle - LR - RN) face à 14 contre (Nupes) , l’article 7 du projet de loi sur les Jeux olympiques prévoit la possibilité d’expérimenter, dès la promulgation de la loi, l’analyse au moyen d’algorithmes d’images de caméras et de drones lors de grands événements, afin d’alerter les autorités sur des faits et gestes potentiellement à risque.

      « Voté en l’état, ce projet de loi marquerait une première étape dangereuse pour les droits humains, dont le droit à la vie privée » avait également critiqué l’ONG Amnesty international en janvier, dénonçant un projet qui « comporte de graves dangers pour nos droits ». Le Conseil national des barreaux s’est également prononcé contre cette mesure.

      « Pas les sweats à capuche » dans les algorithmes
      Les Jeux olympiques sont en ligne de mire mais l’expérimentation, qui doit s’arrêter fin 2024, pourrait démarrer dès la promulgation de la loi, et concerner par exemple la prochaine Coupe du monde de rugby à l’automne.

      La liste des « événements » à détecter doit être fixée par décret, après avis de la Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (Cnil). Lors des débats, le ministre de l’Intérieur Gérald Darmanin a cité en exemples « un départ de feu, des goulots d’étranglement de population, un colis ou un sac abandonné ». Mais « pas les sweats à capuche », a-t-il assuré, pressé de questions par la gauche.

      >> À lire : Sécurité des JO de Paris-2024 : dernière ligne droite avant une cérémonie d’ouverture hors normes

      Les députés de la Nupes s’inquiètent du possible dévoiement de cette technologie, craignant que les Jeux ne servent que de tremplin pour généraliser par la suite ce type de surveillance à la population.

      L’exécutif insiste sur les garde-fous, l’absence de reconnaissance faciale, et sur la nécessité de sécuriser les Jeux et les millions de spectateurs attendus. « Les événements prédéterminés concernent non pas des personnes, mais des situations », a insisté Gérald Darmanin, sans les convaincre

      Un traitement des données sous-traité au privé ?
      Lors de l’examen du projet de loi à l’Assemblée, les débats ont beaucoup tourné autour du caractère « biométrique » ou non des données, dans le cas par exemple où il est nécessaire d’isoler et de suivre une personne. La majorité et le gouvernement assurent qu’elles ne revêtent pas ce caractère. « Ce seront forcément des données biométriques », a insisté Sandra Regol (écologiste).

      Les députés de l’opposition ont tenté de circonscrire davantage l’expérimentation, de la cantonner aux abandons de bagage, ou d’imposer le fait que l’État soit seul responsable de l’analyse des données, sans recourir au privé, mais sans succès.

      >> À lire : JO-2024 : Paris est-il prêt face au défi des transports ?

      Un amendement du RN Aurélien Lopez-Liguori, président du groupe d’étude sur la sécurité et la souveraineté numériques, a été adopté. Il entend prioriser le recours à des entreprises européennes. Mais le fait que des députés de la majorité, membres du groupe d’étude, ont cosigné ou sous-amendé un amendement RN, a indigné à gauche.

      Avec AFP

      voir aussi https://seenthis.net/messages/995263

      #Alliance_macroniste_RN #RNaissance
      A noter qu’il n’y avait que 73 députés à voter ce jour là …