• Le #viol de Shia LaBeouf et son traitement médiatique, symptômes d’un tabou tenace
    http://www.madmoizelle.com/shia-labeouf-viol-304217

    Condamner la femme qui aurait agressé Shia LaBeouf, c’est l’affaire de la justice, s’il porte plainte un jour. Par contre, de nombreux médias ne se sont pas gênés pour condamner… la #victime. Preuve que le viol, surtout lorsqu’il touche les hommes, est un des rares crimes qui met plus souvent la victime que le/la coupable en cible des critiques.

    J’aurais écrit même, sinon, pour le reste, ça va.

    • Dans les médias francophones, la palme revient sans aucun doute au Figaro, qui commence dès le titre pourvu de guillemets bien méprisants : Shia LaBeouf avoue s’être fait « violer par une femme ».

      Euh, c’est pas une citation plutôt ? (bon après, « avouer », hem...)

    • « Preuve que le viol, surtout lorsqu’il touche les hommes, est un des rares crimes qui met plus souvent la victime que le/la coupable en cible des critiques. »
      Toujours la faute de la victime, SURTOUT quand c’est quelqu’un qui est « sensé » être plus « fort » que son agresseur.
      Cela me fait penser à quelque chose que j’avais lu et qui m’avait marqué beaucoup : « même en étant pauvre, il faut rester digne. » En gros, même en étant victime, il faut reste digne et fermer sa gueule.
      C’est la brutalité profonde de nos cultures.

  • L’école des soignants : L’éthique biomédicale : définition, principes et exemples tirés de « Docteur House »
    http://ecoledessoignants.blogspot.ca/2014/12/lethique-biomedicale-definition.html

    Si vous n’êtes pas médecin, vous allez peut-être vous dire "Tout ça nous fait une belle jambe, les médecins « non-éthiques » se comportent comme ils veulent."

    Et je vous répondrai :
    La plus grande arme de ceux qui oppriment, c’est de laisser croire à leurs #victimes qu’elles ne peuvent rien contre eux.

    L’un des leviers (implicites) des praticiens abusifs est l’idée selon laquelle leur « autorité morale » l’emporterait sur les décisions du #patient. Or, il n’en est rien.

    Les règles éthiques sont précisément là pour dire que le #médecin n’est pas « moralement supérieur » au patient qu’il soigne. Au contraire : il est soumis à des règles beaucoup plus strictes qu’un non-professionnel de santé. Ses obligations éthiques sont également des obligations légales : ainsi, les règles édictées par le code de #déontologie médicale français figurent à l’intérieur du Code de la #Santé Publique, ce qui veut dire qu’elles ont force de #loi. Ainsi, par exemple, l’obligation d’informer n’est pas « affaire d’opinion » mais une obligation légale. Lorsqu’un médecin se comporte de manière contraire à l’#éthique, il se disqualifie en tant que professionnel de santé et face à la loi. Le patient est alors en #droit, moralement et légalement, de résister, voire d’attaquer.

    Beaucoup de praticiens indélicats le font de manière d’abord involontaire ; ils ont été formés comme ça (la « culture » des facultés de médecine déforme les futurs médecins), et ils changent d’attitude quand les patient.e.s leur indiquent clairement qu’ils/elles ne tolèreront pas que ça se produise de nouveau. Or, pour le faire, il faut être sûr.e d’être dans son bon droit – d’où cet article et ceux qui suivront. Etre convaincu.e qu’il n’est pas acceptable de se faire traiter de manière désagréable ou humiliante, c’est le début du changement.

    Si certains médecins se comportent de manière inacceptable, c’est parce qu’ils se pensent intouchables. Ils se trompent. En France, déposer une plainte au tribunal de police, c’est gratuit, et ça a beaucoup plus de poids qu’une lettre au Conseil de l’Ordre. Quand plusieurs patients d’un même médecin portent plainte, ça ne passe jamais inaperçu.

  • Massacre de Polytechnique : 25ème anniversaire ! Communiqué de presse du mercredi 3 décembre 2014 | Osez le féminisme
    http://www.osezlefeminisme.fr/article/massacre-de-polytechnique-25eme-anniversaire-communique-de-presse-du

    Ce crime de masse n’est pas l’œuvre d’un déséquilibré, il ne s’agit pas d’un coup de folie. Marc Lépine avait prémédité son acte masculiniste, et laissé une lettre-testament contenant le nom de 19 femmes féministes, que Lépine dit ne pas avoir eu le temps de tuer. Le massacre de Polytechnique est un féminicide, c’est-à-dire un assassinat commis par homme ciblant des femmes, parce qu’elles sont femmes, parce qu’elles avaient prétendu à des études prestigieuses et scientifiques.

    Les féminicides ne sont pas des actes isolés : l’ONU parle de 200 millions de femmes « manquantes » à l’échelle planétaire. 200 millions de femmes tuées par des hommes en raison de leur sexe. Les féminicides recouvrent plusieurs réalités : violences machistes conjugales, intra-familiales, viols et assassinats de femmes, néonaticides de petites filles, etc.

    #féminicide

    • Ce traumatisme a été déterminant pour la société québécoise qui a pris conscience de l’urgence de contrer le #sexisme en actes et dont la politique a évolué en se positionnant clairement du côté des féministes. Un exemple simple, l’alerte donnée pour une femme qui subit des violences fait qu’elle est rapidement protégée et prise en charge tandis que son agresseur est éloigné par une deuxième équipe.

    • http://gutsmagazine.ca/issue-one/the-politics-of-memory-feminist-strategies-of-commemoration-in-canada

      #victimes_du_patriarcat #mémorial_féministe
      et comment sont minimisées les autres victimes du patriarcat que sont les femmes indigènes.

      Feminist memorial-builders and scholars of memory have identified the “risks of symbolically conflating ‘woman’ with ‘victim’” in discussions about commemoration. Inscriptions on memorials have been painstakingly debated to avoid such re-victimization of femininity; meanwhile, the public has often reacted negatively to identifying male murderers as men. In the case of Vancouver’s ‘Marker of Change’, a monument to the École Polytechnique tragedy of December 6th, 1989, the proposed inscription included the phrase “in memory and in grief for all women murdered by men,” which prompted irate public outcry, accusations of misandry, and even bomb threats. The question of how to refer to the 1989 murders of fourteen women in Montreal is also fraught. Frequently referred to as the ‘Montreal Massacre,’ some critics have condemned the use of the term ‘massacre’ as inferring an isolated and insane tragedy, devoid of cultural context or systemic underpinnings. The event is also frequently named with reference to the school where it took place, as the École Polytechnique tragedy. While the shooting was certainly both a massacre and a tragedy, the decision to refer to it as the former (thus eschewing neutrality and justly retaining the connotations of criminal murder) or the latter (which bestows a strange passivity upon the events which could be shared with a natural disaster but maintains the sense of grief befitting what was certainly a tragic occurrence) is ultimately one of both political and personal preference. Whether to underscore murderousness or shame: it is a question of whether to speak in the language of anger or that of grief.

      The physical monuments to missing and murdered Indigenous women in Canada receive neither the funding nor the prominence of those dedicated to the fourteen women killed in Montreal. The CRAB park boulder, located a few blocks from the Marker of Change, is inscribed with the words: “The heart has its own memory: In honour of the spirit of the people murdered in the Downtown Eastside. Many were women and many were Native. Aboriginal women. Many of these cases remain unsolved. All my relations.”

  • US #drone strikes kill 28 unknown people for every intended target, new Reprieve report reveals
    http://www.reprieve.org/us-drone-strikes-kill-28-unknown-people-for-every-intended-target-new-repr

    US drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan have killed as many as 1,147 unknown people in failed attempts to kill 41 named individuals, a report by human rights charity Reprieve has found.

    #meurtre #victime_civile #Etats-Unis #impunité

  • #Israël/#Gaza : Israël a bombardé et anéanti des familles entières dans une froide #indifférence — Amnesty International Suisse
    http://www.amnesty.ch/fr/pays/moyen-orient-afrique-du-nord/israel-et-territoires-occupes/docs/2014/israel-a-bombarde-et-aneanti-des-familles-entieres-dans-une-froide-indiffere

    « Les forces israéliennes ont violé les lois de la guerre en menant une série d’attaques contre des habitations civiles, faisant preuve d’une froide indifférence face au carnage qui en résultait, a déclaré Philip Luther, directeur du programme Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord d’Amnesty International. « Notre rapport dénonce la pratique courante des attaques de maisons par les forces israéliennes, qui ont témoigné d’un #mépris choquant pour les vies des #civils palestiniens en ne les avertissant pas et en ne leur laissant aucune chance de s’enfuir. »

    Israeli forces displayed ‘callous indifference’ in deadly attacks on family homes in Gaza | Amnesty International
    http://amnesty.org/fr/node/50094

    #Israel #victimes_civiles #impunité

  • Pourquoi la France est-elle le pays qui a le plus fusillé « pour l’exemple » pendant la Grande guerre ?
    http://www.bastamag.net/Grande-Guerre-un-tour-du-monde-des

    Au moins 918 soldats français ont été exécutés entre 1914 et 1918. Ce qui fait de l’armée française celle qui a le plus fusillé, juste devant l’Italie, loin devant l’Allemagne et les pays anglo-saxons, selon la comptabilité officielle. Si plusieurs soldats condamnés à mort ont, depuis, été réhabilités, le sujet, un siècle plus tard, suscite toujours la controverse. Tour d’Europe des « fusillés pour l’exemple ». Quelques 918 militaires français ont été fusillés pour l’exemple pendant la « Grande guerre ». La (...)

    #Résister

    / A la une, #Mémoires, #Justice, #Europe, #Enquêtes

  • Premières victimes civiles des frappes américaines
    (l’autre morceau de l’article du Monde titré, à tout seigneur, tout honneur,
    La coalition frappe trois nouvelles raffineries tenues par l’Etat islamique en Syrie)
    http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2014/09/28/la-coalition-frappe-trois-nouvelles-raffineries-tenues-par-l-etat-islamique-

    Dimanche, l’organisation Human Rights Watch (HRW) a annoncé que des bombardements aériens américains sur le nord-ouest de la Syrie avaient tué au moins sept civils.

    Jeudi, l’armée américaine avait affirmé qu’elle « n’avait pas d’informations crédibles des sources opérationnelles » sur des morts de civils. Mais l’ONG de défense des droits de l’homme cite le témoignage de trois habitants de la province d’Idlib, selon lesquels au moins deux hommes, deux femmes et cinq enfants avaient été tués par des tirs de missiles mardi. Selon HRW, des images vidéo des bombardements confirment également que des civils ont été tués par des missiles de croisière américains Tomahawk.

    « Les Etats-Unis et leurs alliés en Syrie devraient prendre toutes les précautions possibles pour éviter de toucher des civils, a déclaré le vice-directeur de HRW pour le Moyen-Orient, Nadim Houry. Le gouvernement américain devrait enquêter sur de possibles frappes illégales qui auraient tué des civils, rendre publiques les conclusions et s’engager à prendre des mesures en cas de mauvaise conduite. »

  • Enterrer les victimes d’#Ebola au #Liberia

    Monrovia, 14 septembre 2014 (IRIN) - Alors que le nombre de #victimes d’Ebola ne cesse d’augmenter au Liberia, les membres des équipes d’#enterrement doivent composer avec les risques physiques et les traumatismes qui vont de pair avec l’#inhumation_sécuritaire des #morts. Ils sont par ailleurs souvent confrontés à la colère des populations locales.

    http://www.irinnews.org/fr/reportfrench.aspx?ReportID=100608

    #cadavres

  • Israël : une attaque du Hezbollah en préparation (armée) | i24news -
    http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/moyen-orient/43797-140914-israel-une-attaque-du-hezbollah-en-preparation-armee

    Des sources du commandement Nord ont révélé aux médias israéliens que la menace pourrait ressurgir

    (...) Les sources ont précisé qu’il ne s’agissait pas là d’une menace imminente, mais qu’il fallait, en cas d’attaque, « se préparer à une longue guerre au nord ».

    La frontière nord entre Israël et le Liban est une préoccupation grandissante de Tsahal, l’armée israélienne, où les membres de l’organisation, campés au sud Liban, constituent une menace directe et permanente pour les villages israéliens frontaliers.

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4570917,00.html

  • #Afghanistan : pas de justice pour les milliers de #civils tués lors d’opérations menées par l’#OTAN et les #États-Unis | Amnesty International
    http://www.amnesty.org/fr/news/afghanistan-no-justice-thousands-civilians-killed-usnato-operations-2014-08

    Les familles de milliers de civils afghans tués par les forces américaines et de l’OTAN en Afghanistan ont été privées de justice, écrit Amnesty International dans un nouveau rapport publié lundi 11 août. Le rapport Left in the Dark, qui se penche principalement sur les frappes aériennes et les raids nocturnes menés par les forces américaines, y compris les forces des #opérations_spéciales, indique que même certains agissements qui semblent être des #crimes de guerre n’ont fait l’objet d’aucune enquête et restent impunis.

    « Des milliers d’Afghans ont été tués ou blessés par les forces américaines depuis l’invasion, mais les victimes et leurs familles ont peu de chances d’obtenir réparation. Le système de #justice #militaire des États-Unis n’oblige presque jamais les soldats responsables d’#homicides illégaux et d’autres violations à répondre de leurs actes », a déclaré Richard Bennett, directeur du programme Asie-Pacifique d’Amnesty International.

    (...)

    Deux des études de cas, impliquant un raid des forces spéciales sur une maison dans la province de Paktia en 2010 et des disparitions forcées, des actes de torture et des exécutions dans les districts de Nerkh et Maidan Shahr (province de Wardak), de novembre 2012 à février 2013, rassemblent de nombreux éléments irréfutables indiquant que des crimes de guerre ont été commis. Personne n’a été poursuivi pénalement pour ces faits.

    Qandi Agha, détenu par les forces spéciales américaines en Nerkh à la fin de 2012, a parlé des séances de torture quotidiennes qu’il a subies. « Quatre personnes m’ont battu avec des câbles. Ils m’ont attaché les jambes et frappé sur la plante des pieds avec un bâton. Ils m’ont frappé au visage et m’ont donné des coups de pied. Ils m’ont cogné la tête sur le sol. » Cet homme a également déclaré qu’il a été trempé dans un baril d’eau et soumis à des décharges électriques.

    Qandi Agha a déclaré que des soldats américains et afghans ont participé aux séances de torture. Il a également expliqué que quatre des huit prisonniers détenus avec lui ont été tués alors qu’il était détenu par les forces américaines. Il a été témoin de l’homicide d’une de ces personnes, Sayed Mohammed.

    #victimes_civiles

  • #Gaza crisis: a closer look at Israeli strikes on #UNRWA schools | World | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/08/-sp-gaza-israeli-strikes-unrwa-schools?CMP=twt_gu

    Maghazi Prep School A & B
    Date: 21 July 2014

    Dead: 0 reported casualties

    Wounded: 1 child

    Sheltering: Approximately 1,000 internally displaced people prior to the first attack

    What happened: At approximately 4.55pm, the school was struck by explosive ordnance “believed to have been fired by Israeli forces.” – UNRWA statement

    Comment: “UNRWA condemns in the strongest possible terms the shelling of one of its schools in the central area of Gaza.” – UNRWA statement

    IDF comment: “We are carefully reviewing all of these incidents.”

    Maghazi Prep School A & B
    Date: 22 July 2014

    Dead: 0

    Wounded: 0

    Sheltering: Approximately 1,000 internally displaced people prior to the first attack

    What happened: At about 10.30am, as UNRWA officials at the school investigated the 21 July incident, “there was further shelling of the school, seriously endangering the lives of UN humanitarian workers and displaced civilians.” – UNRWA statement

    Comment: “This is a serious violation of United Nations’ premises that could have had far-reaching human consequences.” – Pierre Krähenbühl, commissioner-general of UNRWA

    IDF comment: “We are carefully reviewing all of these incidents.”

    Deir al-Balah Preparatory Girls School C
    Date: 23 July 2014

    Dead: 0

    Wounded: 5

    Sheltering: Approximately 1,500 internally displaced people

    What happened: the school was reportedly struck at 7.45am

    Comment: “This is the second time in three days that an UNRWA school has taken a direct hit from Israeli shelling and we again condemn this in the strongest possible terms.” – UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness

    IDF comment: “We are carefully reviewing all of these incidents.”

    Beit Hanoun Elementary Co-ed School A & D
    Date: 24 July 2014

    Dead: 15*

    Wounded: 200, mostly women and children

    Sheltering: Approximately 1,500 internally displaced people

    What happened: According to survivors, at about 2.50pm, as the playground was crowded with families waiting to be ferried to safety, one shell landed in the schoolyard, followed by several more rounds that hit the upper storeys of the building.

    Comment: “Today’s attack underscores the imperative for the killing to stop and to stop now.” – UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon

    IDF comment: The Israeli military first claimed, in a text sent to journalists, that the school could have been hit by Hamas missiles that fell short, reported the Guardian’s Peter Beaumont.

    IDF spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Peter Lerner later said in an email to the Guardian: “In the matter of the Beit Hanoun school, the IDF encountered heavy fire in vicinity of the school, including anti-tank missile. We later determined that an errant mortar did indeed land in the empty courtyard of the school, backing this up with video evidence.”

    Additional: The Guardian’s Peter Beaumont reported from the scene: “There was no visible evidence of debris from broken Palestinian rockets in the school. The injuries and the number of fatalities were consistent with a powerful explosion that sent shrapnel tearing through the air, in some cases causing traumatic amputations. The surrounding neighbourhood bore evidence of multiple Israeli attacks, including smoke from numerous artillery rounds and air strikes. One building was entirely engulfed by flames.”

    We chose to use the number from the Guardian report, as the numbers of reported dead varied between 11 and 15.

    Zaitoun Preparatory Girls School B
    Date: 29 July 2014

    Dead: 0

    Wounded: 8

    Sheltering: Approximately 2,200 internally displaced people

    What happened: the school was reportedly struck

    IDF comment: “We are carefully reviewing all of these incidents.”

    Jabaliya Elementary Girls School A & B
    Date: 30 July 2014

    Dead: 21**

    Wounded: more than 100, including women and children

    Sheltering: Approximately 3,200 internally displaced people

    What happened: School in Jabaliya refugee camp was hit by five shells during a night of relentless bombardment across Gaza.

    Comment:

    “Nothing is more shameful than attacking sleeping children. I condemn this attack in the strongest possible terms.” – UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon

    “The shelling of a UN facility, that is housing innocent civilians who are fleeing violence, is totally unacceptable and totally indefensible.” – White House spokesman Josh Earnest

    “The world stands disgraced” – Pierre Krähenbühl, commissioner-general of UNRWA

    IDF Comment: “Regarding the UNRWA facility in Jabaliya, we have determined that an exchange of fire, including mortar fire, did indeed take place in the vicinity of the school.”

    Additional:

    “All available evidence points to Israeli artillery as the cause – Ban Ki-moon

    Damage “likely to have come from heavy artillery not designed for precision use … [the IDF] provided no evidence of [militant] activity and no explanation for the strike beyond saying that Palestinian militants were firing about 200 yards away.” – New York Times investigation.

    This New York Times investigation published several days after the strike occurred found the number of dead to be greater than that previously reported. We elected to use this number.

    Rafah Boys Preparatory School A
    Date: 3 August 2014

    Dead: 11, “five were children between 3 and 15 years old”

    Wounded: 27

    Sheltering almost 3,000 internally displaced people

    What happened: A projectile struck the ground 8-10 metres from open school gates at about 10.50am. Witnesses at the scene less than an hour after the explosion claimed it had been fired from one of the many unmanned Israeli drones. UN officials in Gaza described a “shelling incident” or an air strike.

    Comment:

    “The attack is yet another gross violation of international humanitarian law, which clearly requires protection by both parties of Palestinian civilians, UN staff and UN premises, among other civilian facilities. United Nations shelters must be safe zones not combat zones. The Israel Defence Forces have been repeatedly informed of the location of these sites. This attack, along with other breaches of international law, must be swiftly investigated and those responsible held accountable. It is a moral outrage and a criminal act.” – UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon

    IDF comment: “In the Rafah School incident, the IDF targeted three Palestinian Islamic Jihad militants on a motorbike outside of the school. The targeted strike did indeed neutralise the militants on the targeted motorbike.”

    #Israël #Israel #Crimes #victimes_civiles

  • How the Israeli discourse on terrorism seeks to justify blatant war crimes | Mondoweiss
    http://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/discourse-terrorism-blatant.html

    Par #Rémi_Brulin

    In fact, in international institutions such as the United Nations, #Israel (alongside the United States) has repeatedly opposed efforts towards defining “terrorism” in a way that would differentiate between attacks against civilian and military targets, a basic historical fact that the US media has consistently failed to report.

    The Israeli discourse on “terrorism,” just like the American discourse that it has so heavily influenced, is thus a fundamentally ideological discourse.

    It is deeply incompatible with an enlightened understanding of the most basic principles of international law and, despite its claims to the contrary, profoundly weakens the protections the rule law affords to innocent, civilian life.

    #Etats-Unis #terrorisme #victimes_civiles

  • Civilians in war
    http://ottawacitizen.com/news/world/civilians-in-war

    The law of armed conflict doesn’t directly define civilians except as non-combatants.

    The official history of the civilian is that since the codification of the laws of armed conflict in the Hague and Geneva Conventions, civilians are increasingly protected by international law. Armed forces publicly declare the importance of protecting, sparing, and liberating civilians. Ideal civilians doesn’t exist. Where people live under military occupation figuring as liberation, they engage in nonviolent political action against foreign rule instead of patiently waiting for deliverance.

    Underneath the official celebratory story about international law’s protection of civilians lurks another story: The codification of the international law of armed conflict in the late 19th and early 20th century has coincided with immense atrocities, not only in the two World Wars, but also in countless colonial wars that were not even recognized as wars.

    International law has done little to curb this violence and much to hide it. For example, in 1925, in response to a Syrian revolt against the French “protectorate” under the auspices of the League of Nations, French troops bombed Damascus, a city that was not defended by anyone other than the French forces themselves, killing hundreds of residents. At the time, many international lawyers deplored the bombardment. Yet they also agreed that since this was a not an international war, but a domestic police action, the rules of international law don’t apply.

    We have come a long way since the 1920s, but we need to remember that the international law of armed conflict was, by agreement of the colonial powers, not intended to protect colonized peoples from oppression . For example, the term civilian originally applied to white European servants and non-military personnel engaged in colonial rule. The colonial powers insisted on the protection of “their” civilians but did not legally recognize civilians among the people under their rule. Before civilians are killed, their civilian status is challenged or erased, and international law has been repeatedly called upon to justify these erasures.

    We see echoes of this history in the Israeli Defence Forces’ persistent efforts to disqualify Palestinians from the status of civilian. Palestinians in Gaza live in inescapable proximity to Hamas combatants. They are exposed to the gaze of Israeli drones whose operators equate spatial proximity with association and guilt as well as to the terrifying force of Israeli bombs. They are also exposed to an international context in which many are quick to condemn the violence of non-state militaries like as Hamas and slow to condemn the violence of state armed forces like the IDF. When the footage of the boys killed on the beach emerged, we watched in horror. It is certainly wrong to kill children. Yet when we see children being shot dead, we also need to acknowledge the ways in which we have dehumanized and demonized their families and friends who are no longer children and whose deaths become less noteworthy because we are less convinced of their innocence.

    International law is often championed as a tool against violence and dehumanization, but the history of international law is entwined with histories of colonialism, oppression and racism. When we turn to international law, we need to be cognizant of this past and ask ourselves how we use this law and this history: to lessen violence, or to justify it; to analyze oppression, or to gloss over it. We must pay attention to civilian casualties, and we must also pay attention to the ways that the categories of combatant and civilian are constructed.

    #civils #droit international #victimes_civiles

  • Civils et hôpitaux victimes des violences dans l’est ukrainien - Europe - RFI

    http://www.rfi.fr/europe/20140806-civils-hopitaux-victimes-violences-est-ukrainien/?ns_campaign=nl_MONDE060814&ns_mchannel=newsletter&ns_source=emailvision&ns_link

    Donetsk, fief des séparatistes pro-russes, a été frappée dans la nuit de mardi à mercredi par une frappe aérienne ukrainienne. « Il n’y a pas de victimes parmi les civils », a précisé la mairie. Alors que l’armée ukrainienne semble préparer une offensive sur la ville séparatiste, les civils sont pris entre différents feux. Ceux qui le peuvent continuent de fuir, laissant craindre un exode massif. Dans tout l’est du pays, ravagé par les combats, les différents belligérants multiplient bavures et exactions, y compris contre les installations sanitaires.

    http://scd.rfi.fr/sites/filesrfi/imagecache/rfi_16x9_1024_578/sites/images.rfi.fr/files/aef_image/2014-08-05T155523Z_1271649077_GM1EA851UA301_RTRMADP_3_UKRAINE-CRISIS_0.JPG

    #ukraine #russie

  • Les #Etats-Unis « consternés » par le bombardement d’une #école de l’ONU à Gaza - L’Orient-Le Jour
    http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/879148/les-etats-unis-consternes-par-le-bombardement-dune-ecole-de-lonu-a-ga

    #Netanyahu avait du insulté #Obama

    « Les Etats-Unis sont consternés par le bombardement #honteux d’une école de l’#UNRWA (l’agence de l’#ONU pour l’aide aux réfugiés palestiniens, ndlr) à Rafah », a déclaré Jennifer Psaki dans un communiqué. « Nous insistons une nouvelle fois sur le fait qu’#Israël doit faire plus pour respecter ses propres standards et éviter les #victimes_civiles ».

    Et ce n’est pas tout,
    https://twitter.com/APDiploWriter/status/495995464396050435

    Le fait qu’il soit soupçonné que des militants opèrent a proximité [des locaux de l’UNRWA] ne justifie pas des frappes qui mettent en péril la vie de tant de civils #innocents.

    Et encore,
    http://www.boursorama.com/actualites/washington-condamne-l-attaque-contre-une-cole-de-l-onu--gaza-95307b3096c

    La porte-parole du Département d’État américain Jen Psaki a
    également appelé à une enquête concernant les récentes attaques
    menées contre des écoles gérées par l’UNRWA, l’agence de l’Onu
    chargée de l’aide aux réfugiés palestiniens.

    • Réaction à l’espionnage de Kerry ?
      http://seenthis.net/messages/281973

      Sinon, aujourd’hui, le New York Times a un portfolio avec des images très dures des victimes et des destructions à Gaza :
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/04/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-conflict.html
      Ce qui fait penser à ce que raconte Chomsky sur le Vietnam : selon lui, les médias ont commencé à publier des images insoutenables à partir du moment où l’establishment a décidé qu’il fallait mettre fin à l’intervention (alors que le mythe usuel est de prétendre que c’est parce que les médias ont publié des images insoutenables que l’establishment a dû céder à l’opinion publique).

    • Sinon, une possibilité est que, comme en 2006 au Liban, les États-Unis décrètent la fin des hostilités pour sortir Israël de son enlisement. Les rumeurs d’un décision unilatérale d’Israël d’arrêter son action vont bon train depuis 48 heures. Il me semble assez crédible que les États-Unis viennent donner un alibi à Netanyahu.

      (Où est l’article qui évoquait ce scénario il y a quelques temps ?)

    • Top 5 Ways the US is Israel’s Accomplice in War Crimes in Gaza | Informed Comment
      http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/israels-accomplice-crimes.html

      Despite this bold criticism, the State Department and the US government won’t actually do anything about Israel’s lawlessness in Gaza. That is because the US is a full ally of the Likud government in its war on Gaza, which is configured as a fight to destroy or attrite the capabilities of the Hamas party-militia, a Muslim fundamentalist movement that has foresworn any attack on US facilities or interests. As the head of US military intelligence recently testified, however, if Hamas were destroyed something worse would almost certainly take its place. That is because you can’t expect people to live the way Israel makes them live in Gaza without their forming a resistance movement. Since they are kept poor and on the edge of hunger, the resistance movements they throw up are lean and hungry, and as ruthless as the Israeli army.

      Here are the ways that the US is actively helping Israel in its war on Gaza:

      1. The US shares its raw signals intelligence directly with Israeli intelligence, enhancing Israeli eavesdropping and surveillance capabilities, as Glenn Greenwald shows in a new article for Firstlook. Israel somewhat ungratefully repaid the favor by collaborating with Russia to spy on John Kerry during his failed peace negotiations.

      2. The US continually replenishes Israel’s ammunition. If Washington were actually so distressed about the UNRWA school shelling, it could just stop sending the shells for a while. It did this to Egypt after the massacre at Rabi`a al-Adawiya last summer.

      3. The US State Department actively helps Israel to economically blockade the civilians of Gaza. It even pressures Egypt to uphold the blockade (which is why it is silly to say that Egypt is also responsible for the siege of Gaza; Egypt doesn’t have a choice in this policy that is made from Tel Aviv and promulgated from Washington).

      4. Amnesty International shows that “Since 2012, the USA has exported $276 million worth of basic weapons and munitions to Israel, a figure that excludes exports of military transport equipment and high technologies.”

      5. The US actively opposed the granting by the UN to Palestine of the status of nonmember observer state. It is this status that Palestine could use to go to the International Criminal Court and get a judgment against Israel for its illegal squatting on Palestinian land in the West Bank. That the US opposed Palestine having standing to apply to the ICC shows how hand in glove Washington is with Israel.

  • Nothing Unintentional « LRB blog- Nadia Abu El-Haj- 29 July 2014
    Tags: #israel | #palestine
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2014/07/29/nadia-abu-el-haj/nothing-unintentional

    ... imagine if Hamas were able to aim its rockets. Imagine it targeting the home of a high-ranking officer in the IDF, killing his wife and children, nieces and nephews, along with the family next door. Imagine these casualties being described as ‘collateral damage’ for which Hamas bore no legal or moral responsibility.

    The IDF’s bombardment of Palestinian homes, schools and hospitals, indiscriminately pummelling the people of #Gaza into the ground, deserves to be called what it is: a war #crime.

    #punition_collective #victimes_civiles #impunité #complicité

  • Hamas’s Chances
    Nathan Thrall
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n16/nathan-thrall/hamass-chances

    Après les accords de cessez-le-feu du 21 Novembre 2012 non respectés par Israël, l’éloignement de l’axe Syrie Iran Hezbollah, le renversement de Morsi, l’activisme forcené anti frères musulmans de l’Arabie Saoudite et assimilés, l’impuissance de la Turquie et du Qatar, il ne restait plus au #Hamas, non sans appréhension, que de confier les clés de Gaza à #Mahmoud_Abbas. Et de fait, les coups bas de Abbas sous pression étasunienne, et cela avant même le meurtre des 3 Israéliens, ne se sont pas fait attendre.

    Hamas paid a high price, acceding to nearly all of Fatah’s demands. The new PA government didn’t contain a single Hamas member or ally, and its senior figures remained unchanged. Hamas agreed to allow the PA to move several thousand members of its security forces back to Gaza, and to place its guards at borders and crossings, with no reciprocal positions for Hamas in the West Bank security apparatus. Most important, the government said it would comply with the three conditions for Western aid long demanded by the US and its European allies: non-violence, adherence to past agreements and recognition of Israel. Though the agreement stipulated that the PA government refrain from politics, Abbas said it would pursue his political programme. Hamas barely protested.

    (...)

    The fears of Hamas activists were confirmed after the government was formed. The terms of the agreement were not only unfavourable but unimplemented. The most basic conditions of the deal – payment of the government employees who run Gaza and an opening of the crossing with Egypt – were not fulfilled. For years Gazans had been told that the cause of their immiseration was Hamas rule. Now it was over, their conditions only got worse.

    On 12 June, ten days after the new government was formed, an unexpected event radically changed Hamas’s fortunes. Three Israeli students at yeshivas in the West Bank were kidnapped and murdered. When their bodies were found, a group of Israeli Jews abducted a 16-year-old Palestinian outside his East Jerusalem home, doused him in petrol, and burned him alive. Protests erupted among Palestinians in Jerusalem, the Negev and Galilee, while the West Bank remained relatively quiet. Israel blamed Hamas for the murders of the yeshiva students, though several Israeli security officials have said they believe that the perpetrators didn’t act on orders from above.

    In its search for the suspected murderers, Israel carried out its largest West Bank campaign against Hamas since the Second Intifada, closing its offices and arresting hundreds of members at all levels. Hamas denied responsibility for the abductions and said Israel’s accusations were a pretext to launch a new offensive against it. Among those arrested were more than fifty of the 1027 security prisoners released in 2011 by Israel in exchange for the Hamas-held Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit. Hamas saw the arrests as another violation of the Shalit agreement, which had named conditions under which the released prisoners could be re-arrested and contained unfulfilled commitments by Israel to improve conditions and visitation rights for other Palestinian prisoners.

    *The Palestinian leadership in Ramallah worked closely with Israel to catch the militants, and had rarely been so discredited among its constituents, many of whom believe abducting Israelis has proved the only effective means of gaining the release of prisoners widely regarded as national heroes. In several West Bank cities, residents protested against the PA’s security co-operation with Israel. A former minister of religious affairs who is close to Abbas went with his bodyguards to al-Aqsa Mosque; worshippers assaulted them, and they had to be hospitalised. When an Abbas emissary was dispatched to visit the murdered Palestinian boy’s grieving family, he was shouted off the premises.

    As protests spread through Israel and Jerusalem, militants in Gaza from non-Hamas factions began firing rockets and mortars in solidarity. Sensing Israel’s vulnerability and the Ramallah leadership’s weakness, Hamas leaders called for the protests to grow into a third intifada. When the rocket fire increased, they found themselves drawn into a new confrontation: they couldn’t be seen suppressing the rocket attacks while calling for a mass uprising. Israel’s retaliation culminated in the 6 July bombings that killed seven Hamas militants, the largest number of fatalities inflicted on the group in several months. The next day Hamas began taking responsibility for the rockets. Israel then announced Operation Protective Edge.

    Les #Etats-Unis et leur protégé semblent maintenant faire marche arrière, après des centaines de #morts #innocents.

    ... there are growing signs that Hamas stands a good chance of achieving some of [its goals]. Obama and Kerry have said they believe a ceasefire should be based on the November 2012 agreement. The US also changed its position on the payment of salaries, proposing in a draft framework for a ceasefire submitted to Israel on 25 July that funds be transferred to Gazan employees. Over the course of the war, Israel decided that it could solve its Gaza problem with help from the new government in Ramallah that it had formally boycotted. The Israeli defence minister said he hoped a ceasefire would place the new government’s security forces at Gaza’s border crossings. Netanyahu has begun to soften his tone towards Abbas. Near the end of the third week of fighting, Israel and the US quietly looked away as the Palestinian government made payments to all employees in Gaza for the first time. Israeli officials across the political spectrum have begun to admit privately that the previous policy towards Gaza was a mistake. All parties involved in mediating a ceasefire envision postwar arrangements that effectively strengthen the new Palestinian government and its role in Gaza – and by extension Gaza itself.

    (...)

    The obvious solution is to let the new Palestinian government return to Gaza and reconstruct it. Israel can claim it is weakening Hamas by strengthening its enemies. Hamas can claim it won the recognition of the new government and a significant lifting of the blockade. This solution would of course have been available to Israel, the US, Egypt and the PA in the weeks and months before the war began, before so many lives were shattered .

    #honte #victimes_civiles, #crimes #Israel #Israël

  • Les #enfants, premières #victimes de l’attaque d’#Israël sur #Gaza

    PROCHE-ORIENT • Au vingt-troisième jour, l’opération « #Bordure_Protectrice » aurait fait plus de mille cent morts et six mille blessés palestiniens. Plus de 75% d’entre eux sont des #civils, dont 30% des enfants. Reportage.


    http://www.lecourrier.ch/122829/les_enfants_premieres_victimes_de_l_attaque_d_israel_sur_gaza

    #enfance #Israël

  • #Gaza War, Day 22: 10 IDF Soldiers Killed Today, 1,100 Palestinians Killed Overall Tikun-Olam Tikun Olam-תיקון עולם
    http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2014/07/28/gaza-war-day-22-10-idf-soldiers-killed-today-1100-palestinians-k

    #Eran_Efrati, an activist with Anarchists Against the Wall, is in the Israel-Gaza theater. He published this astonishing post in Facebook. As you read it keep in mind that he’s talking about the killing of 7 IDF soldiers in an outdated APC who died after an anti-tank shell struck their vehicle. The deaths of so many just after the land invasion began, was a deep shock to the Israeli nation and especially their comrades. Instead of taking it out on the battlefield against Palestinian fighters, the IDF took it out on the most vulnerable, Palestinian civilians, who were most visible and available targets:

    Eran Efrati - In recent weeks I was on the border of #Gaza...
    https://www.facebook.com/eran.efrati.9/posts/10204269146351996

    In recent weeks I was on the border of Gaza and getting reports from soldiers in the Gaza Strip who leak information out to me.

    I am in the process of publication of two big stories in major U.S. newspapers, but there are some things I can share with you right now: Soldiers in two different units inside Gaza leaked information about the murdering of Palestinians by sniper fire in Shuja’iyya neighborhood as punishment for the death of soldiers in their units. (...)

    Today I can report that the official command that was handed down to the soldiers in Shujaiyya was to capture Palestinian homes as outposts. From these posts, the soldiers drew an imaginary red line, and amongst themselves decided to shoot to death anyone who crosses it. Anyone crossing the line was defined as a threat to their outposts, and was thus deemed a legitimate target. This was the official reasoning inside the units. I was told that the unofficial reason was to enable the soldiers to take out their frustrations and pain at losing their fellow soldiers (something that for years the IDF has not faced during its operations in Gaza and the West Bank), out on the Palestinian refugees in the neighborhood. Under the pretext of the so-called “security threat” soldiers were directed to carry out a pre-planned attack of revenge on Palestinian civilians.

    These stories join many other similar ones that Amira Hass and I investigated in Operation Cast Lead. The death toll that continues to rise is steadily reaching the numbers of the massacre of 2009.

    More than 1,100 have been killed in Gaza, at least 80 percent of them civilians. Today it is cleared for publication that at least 4 soldiers were killed by a rocket in a gathering area outside of Gaza, and another soldier was killed in Gaza. They join 43 soldiers that have already been killed. We know that more acts of revenge will come soon and it is important that we not stay silent. This is the time to take to the streets and to social media. Demand from your representative wherever you are to stop supporting this massacre and to immediately boycott the state of Israel until the occupation ends, the blockade is lifted and Palestinians will be free. We all want to be in the right place at the right time when history knocks on our door, and history is knocking in Gaza right now. You need to decide on which side you want to go down in history.

    #punition_collective ##price_tag #prix_à_payer #lâcheté #Israël #Israel #victimes_civiles #Palestine

  • Israel Says That Hamas Uses Civilian Shields, Reviving Debate - NYTimes.com

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/world/middleeast/israel-says-hamas-is-using-civilians-as-shields-in-gaza.html?emc=edit_th_20

    GAZA CITY — Militant rockets can be seen launching from crowded neighborhoods, near apartment buildings, schools and hotels. Hamas fighters have set traps for Israeli soldiers in civilian homes and stored weapons in mosques and schools. Tunnels have been dug beneath private property.

    With international condemnation rising over the death toll in Gaza exceeding 650 in the war’s 16th day, Israel points to its adversaries’ practice of embedding forces throughout the crowded, impoverished coastal enclave of 1.7 million people.

    #gaza #boucliers_humains

  • « Les victimes civiles sont redevenues le véritable objectif des guerres »
    http://www.bastamag.net/Les-victimes-civiles-sont

    Les bombes pleuvent sur Gaza, tuant en grande majorité des civils. Les Nations Unies viennent de condamner les violations des droits de l’Homme par l’armée israélienne, dont les tactiques militaires vont à l’encontre du droit international. Celle-ci argue de sa « retenue » ou de sa « moralité ». Mais coups de téléphone d’avertissement et tirs de « missiles préventifs » ne suffisent pas à dédouaner des morts causés par ces frappes. « Aujourd’hui près de 80% de toutes les victimes de guerre sont des civils », (...)

    #Décrypter

    / A la une, #Guerres_et_résolution_des_conflits, #Proche_et_Moyen_Orient, #Reportages

  • Can Palestinian Men be Victims ? Gendering Israel’s War on Gaza
    http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/18644/can-palestinian-men-be-victims-gendering-israels-w

    On pleure la perte des femmes et des enfants, mais les hommes palestiniens peuvent-ils aussi être des victimes ?

    Only within this logic can criticism of Israel’s war on Gaza be answered, straight faced, with statements about the “fate” of women and homosexuals “under” Hamas. Recently, a spokesman for Israel answered Noura Erakat’s condemnation of Israel’s violation of international human rights by sharing this gem of wisdom: “Hamas, they wouldn’t allow a young, liberal, secular woman to express her views like you do, ma’am. They would not allow my gay friends to express their sexuality freely.” This statement aims to mobilize the gendered discourse of the War on Terror, a discourse that plays on the affective registers of US liberalism through a pandering to feminist and LGBTQ rights. This pandering allows Islamophobia and war to be manifested as a public and international good—after all, it is “we” that are defending the helpless from the ravages of Muslim and Arab men. Laleh Khalili has called this “the use of gendered ‘telling’ to distinguish those who are to be protected from those who are to be feared or destroyed.” This discourse is so powerful that it does not need to rely on facts—it has in fact overridden them.

    The Israeli war machine, much like the US war machine in Afghanistan or Iraq, does not protect Palestinian queers and women and children. It kills them, maims them, and dispossesses them alongside their loved ones—for the simple reason that they are Palestinian, and thus able to be killed with impunity while the world watches. Today, the difference between Palestinian womenandchildren and Palestinian men is not in the production of corpses, but rather in the circulation of those corpses within dominant and mainstream discursive frames that determine who can be publicly mourned as true “victims” of Israel’s war machine. Thus the sheer number of womenandchildren dead are enough to mobilize the US president and the UN to make statements “condemning” the violence—but the killing, imprisonment, and maiming of Palestinian men and boys in times of war and ceasefire goes uncited. In Israel men, settlers, and even soldiers are framed as victims of Palestinian terrorism and aggression. All are publicly mourned. In an almost direct reversal, while Palestinian boys and men have been the primary target of Israel, as evidenced by the population of political prisoners and targeted assassinations, are not seen by western based mainstream media as victims of Israeli terrorism and aggression. Palestinians are put in the self-defeating position of having to fight to be recognized as human, to be recognized in death and in life as victims of Israeli policies and actions.

    #Proche_Orient #racisme #pinkwashing