• Sega greenlights blockchain game based on “immensely popular” series
    https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/sega-greenlights-blockchain-game-based-on-immensely-popular-franchise

    Sega has penned a licensing deal with Line Next so the company can develop a blockchain title based on an "immensely popular" franchise.

    As reported by VentureBeat, the two companies have agreed to create a web3 title for the blockchain gaming platform, Game Dosi.

    The game will reportedly support NFT production, digital payments, and marketing activities, and is part of Line Next’s plan to popularize web3 gaming.

    #jeux_vidéo #jeu_vidéo #sega #game_dosi #business #nft #web3 #annonce

  • Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee wants us to ’ignore’ Web3
    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/04/web-inventor-tim-berners-lee-wants-us-to-ignore-web3.html

    Tim Berners-Lee, the computer scientist credited with inventing the World Wide Web, said he doesn’t view blockchain as a viable solution for building the next iteration of the internet.
    “In fact, Web3 is not the web at all,” he told an audience at the Web Summit tech conference in Lisbon.
    Berners-Lee said people too often conflate Web3 with “Web 3.0,” his own proposal for reshaping the internet.

    “It’s a real shame in fact that the actual Web3 name was taken by Ethereum folks for the stuff that they’re doing with blockchain. In fact, Web3 is not the web at all.”

    Web3 is a nebulous term in the tech world used to describe a hypothetical future version of the internet that’s more decentralized than it is today and not dominated by a handful of powerful players such as Amazon, Microsoft and Google.

    It involves a few technologies, including blockchain, cryptocurrencies and nonfungible tokens.

    While breaking our personal data out of Big Tech’s clutches is an ambition shared by Berners-Lee, he’s not convinced blockchain, the distributed ledger technology that underpins cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, will be the solution.

    His new startup aims to address this through three ways:

    A global “single sign-on” feature that lets anyone log in from anywhere.
    Login IDs that allow users to share their data with others.
    A “common universal API,” or application programming interface, that lets apps pull data from any source.

    Berners-Lee’s not the only notable tech figure with doubts about Web3. The movement has been a punching bag for some leaders in Silicon Valley, like Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey and Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

    Critics say it’s prone to the same issues that come with cryptocurrencies, like fraud and security flaws.

    #Web3 #Tim_Berners-Lee

  • Blockchain game studio Immutable is making layoffs
    https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/web3-developer-immutable-games-studio-hit-with-layoffs

    Founded in 2018 by Alex Connolly and James and Robbie Ferguson, and part of the blockchain company Immutable X, the studio develops NFT games. Immutable is credited with “pioneering the world’s first blockbuster NFT trading-card game” in Gods Unchained. It has also been involved with the development of upcoming mobile action-RPG, Guild of Guardians. 

    In March, Immutable X partnered with retailer GameStop to establish a $100 million fund in Immutable tokens to assist those looking to create NFT technology and content. GameStop recently launched its own NFT marketplace, which came under fire when it had to remove an NFT referencing a man who fell to his death during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks from its marketplace.

    NFTs are trying to make a place for themselves in gaming Right now, numerous NFT and blockchain companies are trying to push into the mainstream video game market, while some developers and publishers have also flirted with the controversial technology.

    #jeu_vidéo #jeux_vidéo #business #finance #immutable #licenciements #ressources_humaines #nft #chaîne_de_blocs #blockchain #gamestop #microsoft #jeu_vidéo_minecraft #nft_worlds #jeu_vidéo_final_fantasy_vii #playstation_studios #john_garvin #michael_mumbauer #liithios #jeu_vidéo_ashfall #web3 #jeu_vidéo_stalker_2_heart_of_chernobyl #gsc_game_world #crypto #game_developers_conference #gdc #jeu_vidéo_guild_of_guardians

  • Chris Dixon thinks #web3 is the future of the internet — is it ? -
    https://www.theverge.com/23020727/decoder-chris-dixon-web3-crypto-a16z-vc-silicon-valley-investing-podcast-i
    via @baroug qui bosse sur les #NFT

    Yes, I know a lot of those people. I understand the argument. We just had Steve Aoki on the show. He is doing NFTs for exactly the reasons you described. Steve is a famous guy; he can just tweet, “I made an NFT,” and people will buy it. The unsigned musician — who is not making any money on Spotify — can go to one of your services if they hit scale, put an NFT up, and may still be in that long tail that does not make any money.

    It is early. I cannot prove a lot of these statements, but I am clearly betting on them. I think this is the chance to finally realize the “1,000 True Fans” visions. Kevin Kelly has a famous blog post from around 2002 where he mentions this great thing about the internet. For people like me, who were around for the first year of the internet, this was always the dream. You could now have someone who is into some kind of niche activity that most of the world does not love, but there are 1,000 people that really love it and are willing to patronize, buy books, and visit when there’s a talk.

    I believe that never happened in Web2. It did not happen because of the nature of the business models. They are very extractive — Facebook is well-known for this — and they will deliberately let you build a big organic reach, then change the algorithm to lower your reach and make you pay to get back there. They are incredibly sophisticated money extraction machines. This is why they are so profitable and so successful.

    (faudrait que je lise tout mais bon)

    • deux passages marrants sur les nft et leur vanité :

      Why do people value wearing fashion — like Supreme T-shirts — or cars? A lot of value in the world is about showing that you are early to something, that you are high-status, and that you have great taste.
      NFT culture is very familiar in the offline world, just applied to the online world.

      Why do you buy the wolf cloak in League of Legends? It’s high status, it’s funny, or it’s cool. You know that in those games, everything is cosmetic. To me, NFTs are very similar.

  • La fondation Wikimedia ne veut plus recevoir d’argent en cryptomonnaies
    https://www.ladn.eu/tech-a-suivre/la-fondation-wikimedia-nacceptera-plus-les-dons-en-cryptomonnaies

    La fondation à l’origine de l’encyclopédie Wikipedia acceptait les dons en cryptos depuis 2014, mais déclare que c’est terminé. Derrière ce changement, la révélation de deux visions du web qui s’affrontent.

    Fin avril, après plusieurs mois de débat, les membres de la fondation Wikimedia ont tranché : les dons en cryptomonnaies ne seront plus acceptés et ceci jusqu’à nouvel ordre. Ils étaient autorisés depuis 2014.

    Le sujet a été lancé par Molly White, une modératrice de longue date connue pour ses positions contre les cryptomonnaies en particulier et le Web3 en général. L’ingénieure en informatique tient le blog « Web3 is going just great » , qui recense les arnaques et pires dérives liées aux ventes de NFT et aux cryptomonnaies. Pour elle, les cryptos vont à l’encontre de l’engagement de la fondation contre le réchauffement climatique compte-tenu de l’impact environnemental du Bitcoin et d’Ethereum, les deux principales monnaies numériques en circulation. Par ailleurs, elle explique que « les cryptomonnaies sont des investissements extrêmement risqués qui ne font que gagner en popularité chez les investisseurs particuliers » , et qu’en acceptant les cryptos, Wikimedia démocratise l’utilisation de ces investissements « intrinsèquement prédateurs » .

    Mozilla pas fan non plus des cryptos

    Cette décision fait écho à celle de la fondation Mozilla, prise quelques mois plus tôt. Suite à de virulentes critiques de ses utilisateurs, l’éditeur du moteur de recherche Firefox a lui aussi d’abord décidé d’abandonner les dons en cryptomonnaies qu’il acceptait depuis 2014. L’un de ses fondateurs Jamie Zawinski, aujourd’hui retiré du projet, avait notamment fait part de son agacement en janvier 2022 sur Twitter. Clair et direct. « Bonjour, je suis sûr que celui qui gère ce compte n’a aucune idée de qui je suis, mais j’ai fondé Mozilla et je suis ici pour dire "allez vous faire voir" et "merde". Toutes les personnes impliquées dans le projet devraient avoir terriblement honte de cette décision de s’associer à des escrocs de Ponzi qui incinèrent la planète » , avait-il envoyé au compte officiel de Mozilla au sujet des dons en cryptos.

    Mozilla est toutefois en partie revenu sur sa décision. Depuis avril, les cryptomonnaies sont de nouveau autorisées, mais seulement celles basées sur la « preuve d’enjeu » , un protocole de validation des transactions moins énergivore que la preuve de travail (qui nécessite d’importants calculs informatiques) utilisé par Bitcoin et Ethereum.
    L’internet des communs vs le Web3 ?

    Le fait que deux acteurs historiques de l’Internet « des communs » prennent position contre les cryptomonnaies n’est pas anodin. Cela montre une rupture idéologique entre le monde du Web3 et celui de la culture libre des années 1990-2000. On aurait pu penser que ces deux cultures du web se rapprocheraient, puisque les défenseurs du Web3 militent pour un internet détaché des grandes plateformes, où les utilisateurs « reprendraient » le pouvoir. Mais le Web3 est aussi le lieu de la sur-monétisation des échanges sur le web, et d’un accès à une forme de propriété. Ce qui n’est pas vraiment la vision défendue par Wikipedia ou Mozilla, qui ont toujours plaidé pour un accès gratuit et universel à la connaissance.

    Il est intéressant de noter qu’en 2014, les décisions de Wikipedia et de Mozilla d’accepter les cryptos n’ont pas suscité tant de remous. Mais en 2022, l’usage des cryptomonnaies s’est démocratisé, les NFT et leur mauvaise réputation sont passés par là, et la critique environnementale est bien plus prégnante qu’elle ne l’était il y a dix ans.

    Marine Protais

    #Web3#Cryptomonnaies #Wikipédia #Mozilla

  • Le « Web3 » expliqué en quatre questions
    https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2022/04/20/le-web3-explique-en-quatre-questions_6122944_4408996.html

    Le « Web3 » peut sembler être à Internet ce que le sac de Mary Poppins est au rangement : un fourre-tout. Nouveau mot à la mode, à l’instar du « métavers » remis au goût du jour par Mark Zuckerberg, le terme a envahi les discours des start-up et les articles de presse. Mais de quoi s’agit-il exactement ? Et en quoi est-ce important (ou pas) ? Explications.
    1. Qu’est-ce que le Web3 ?

    En résumé, le Web3 renvoie à l’idée d’un Internet décentralisé et plus libre, indépendant des Etats comme des géants du numérique, tels que Google et Facebook. On attribue le plus souvent l’origine de l’expression à un post écrit en 2014 par Gavin Wood, le cofondateur de la blockchain Ethereum qui, cette année-là, tentait d’imaginer un Internet « post-Snowden ». Une référence au lanceur d’alerte Edward Snowden, à l’origine en 2013 de la fuite de données la plus importante de l’histoire de la National Security Agency (NSA), les services de renseignement américains.

    Le Web3, comme son nom le suggère, serait un troisième moment dans l’évolution des usages sur Internet. Si l’on se réfère à la définition de ces étapes par Chris Dixon, associé à la société de capital-risque Andreessen Horowitz et fervent défenseur du concept, la première est le Web 1.0 qui, du début des années 1990 environ, jusqu’au milieu des années 2000, renvoie aux balbutiements du réseau, avec ses pages rudimentaires permettant surtout de consulter de l’information. On trouvait en toile de fond de l’époque un mythe rappelant celui de la conquête de l’Ouest : Internet était alors vu comme une « nouvelle frontière », un espace sans grande régulation, n’appartenant à personne et où tout était possible.

    Puis est venu le Web 2.0, du milieu des années 2000 au début des années 2020 : c’est l’Internet de la circulation des contenus, des blogs, des fils RSS, des réseaux sociaux et de l’interactivité. Un réseau à l’usage démocratisé, plus accessible, et qui a vu s’imposer de grandes plates-formes centralisatrices comme le moteur de recherche de Google – plus de 90 % des requêtes effectuées sur Internet dans le monde – ou Facebook et ses près de 3 milliards d’utilisateurs actifs.

    Le Web3 succéderait ainsi à ces deux premières phases, tout en prétendant en faire une sorte de synthèse : rendre à l’internaute son indépendance et l’excitation du Web des débuts, tout en gardant les innovations et le confort d’utilisation issus du Web 2.0.
    Lire aussi Article réservé à nos abonnés « Les adeptes du Web 3 veulent rendre le pouvoir au petit peuple du numérique »
    2. Comment se manifeste-t-il concrètement ?

    Le concept est étroitement lié à la technologie de la chaîne de blocs, la « blockchain », un système de certification décentralisé. Il faut s’imaginer un grand registre, dont les pages – les « blocs » – servent à consigner toutes les transactions effectuées entre les utilisateurs. Pour chaque transaction, une nouvelle ligne s’ajoute aux précédentes, le registre comprenant donc l’historique complet de tous les échanges et formant ainsi une « chaîne ».

    Ce qui fait la validité et la solidité théoriques d’une blockchain, c’est l’absence de confiance en quiconque

    Il n’y a pas d’individu ou d’organisation unique chargé de la validation des interactions : toute modification de la blockchain doit être collectivement validée par les calculs des ordinateurs qui composent le réseau. Ce n’est donc pas la confiance accordée à un quelconque organe central qui fait la validité et la solidité théoriques d’une blockchain, mais, au contraire, l’absence totale de confiance en quiconque, tout le monde vérifiant tout.

    L’une des blockchains les plus célèbres est celle du bitcoin. Née en 2008, cette cryptomonnaie a été conçue en réaction à la crise financière qui explosait cette année-là, avec comme volonté de s’affranchir du monopole des Etats sur la monnaie et de l’emprise des places financières.

    Depuis, de nombreuses autres blockchains ont été créées, comme Solana, Hyperledger ou Tezos, sur lesquelles s’appuient le plus souvent les projets relatifs au Web3 : des collections d’images sous forme de « non-fungible tokens » (NFT, ou « jetons non fongibles » en français, comme les CryptoPunks ou le Bored Ape Yacht Club), des entreprises alliant NFT et compétitions sportives, comme Sorare ou NBATopShot, un projet de réseau social décentralisé ayant pour objectif de rémunérer chaque internaute pour tout ce qu’il fait en ligne, ou encore une start-up cherchant à permettre aux utilisateurs de parier sur l’issue de procédures judiciaires…

    L’idée centrale de toutes ces initiatives fondées sur une blockchain reste la même : ne pas faire confiance à un organe central, mais plutôt au réseau de certification, anonyme et décentralisé. En résumé, tout projet ayant trait de près ou de loin à une blockchain peut donc aujourd’hui se retrouver estampillé « Web3 ».
    La page des NFT « CryptoPunks », sur la plate-forme OpenSea.
    La page des NFT « CryptoPunks », sur la plate-forme OpenSea. FLORENCE LO / REUTERS
    3. Pourquoi en parle-t-on autant aujourd’hui ?

    Il y a d’abord la popularisation progressive de la technologie de la blockchain, qui rend aujourd’hui techniquement possible, selon les acteurs de l’industrie, un tel retour du pouvoir de décision dans les mains des internautes.

    Mais il y a aussi un changement d’état d’esprit. Surveillance de la NSA, scandale Cambridge Analytica, Facebook Files, explosion des rançongiciels… Au fil des révélations, la confiance des internautes dans les plates-formes qu’ils utilisent au quotidien s’est érodée. Même chez les principaux artisans de l’Internet tel qu’on le connaît aujourd’hui, une forme de regret se fait sentir. Le fondateur de Twitter, Jack Dorsey, s’excusait ainsi publiquement, le 2 avril, disant se considérer comme « en partie responsable » du fait d’avoir « abîmé Internet ».
    Evolution des recherches sur Google pour le terme « Web3 » en France, ces derniers mois.
    Evolution des recherches sur Google pour le terme « Web3 » en France, ces derniers mois. GOOGLE TRENDS

    Mais tout cela ne serait rien sans un ingrédient essentiel : la peur panique pour certains de passer à côté de la nouvelle révolution. Comme le raconte The Atlantic, les défenseurs du Web3 ont remis au goût du jour un face-à-face télévisuel de 1995 pour appuyer leur position : cette année-là, sur le plateau du « Late Show », le jeune Bill Gates tente d’expliquer à David Letterman en quoi consiste Internet. L’incompréhension assumée du présentateur vedette, à la limite de la condescendance, déclenche l’hilarité des spectateurs et vient, rétrospectivement, appuyer aujourd’hui l’argumentaire des défenseurs du Web3 : ne passez pas à côté, où vous serez les David Letterman des années 2020.

    Parce qu’il s’inscrit dans une époque tissée de désillusions, ce FOMO (pour Fear of Missing Out, la peur de rater quelque chose) constitue ainsi l’un des principaux moteurs du succès du Web3 dans les discours… et dans les portefeuilles. Il suffit pour cela de regarder les investissements colossaux réalisés par certaines entreprises dans le domaine, à l’image du cabinet Andreessen Horowitz, aussi connu sous le nom de a16z, qui a déjà investi 3 milliards de dollars (2,75 milliards d’euros) dans des start-up se réclamant du Web3.
    4. Pourquoi le Web3 fait-il débat ?

    Pour ceux qui s’y investissent, c’est une évidence : l’écosystème d’Internet s’apprête à être profondément bouleversé. Exit les sites intermédiaires que les internautes sont obligés d’utiliser et de payer, soit avec de l’argent, soit avec leurs données. Ici, les internautes récupéreraient le pouvoir.

    Dans une interview au média spécialisé The Verge, Chris Dixon cite par exemple des start-up comme Royal ou Sound.xyz qui, grâce aux NFT, permettraient, selon lui, aux artistes d’être mieux rémunérés pour leurs créations. Certes, créer un NFT a un coût, mais une fois en ligne, pour peu que ce dernier ait du succès, il pourrait en théorie permettre à un artiste de recevoir directement de l’argent de ses fans, sans être ponctionné par les grandes plates-formes de streaming, comme Spotify, dont le système de rémunération est régulièrement critiqué.
    Un visiteur dans une exposition mettant en scène des NFT, lors du « NFT Festiverse », à Yogyakarta, en Indonésie, le 13 avril 2022.
    Un visiteur dans une exposition mettant en scène des NFT, lors du « NFT Festiverse », à Yogyakarta, en Indonésie, le 13 avril 2022. DEVI RAHMAN / AFP

    Mais les critiques sont légion. Même le milliardaire Elon Musk – l’homme qui a pourtant envoyé une voiture électrique dans l’espace, propulsé en quelques tweets une cryptomonnaie à l’effigie d’un chien au firmament et promis des trains atteignant 1 200 km/h – estime que le Web3 relève « davantage du marketing que de la réalité ».

    Marketing, car certains observateurs font remarquer que bon nombre d’acteurs impliqués dans le Web3 sont les mêmes que ceux qui ont contribué à bâtir l’Internet actuel, pourtant décrié. A commencer par Marc Andreeseen, cofondateur d’Andreeseen Horowitz, qui a, par le passé, investi dans des entreprises comme Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest ou encore Twitter. S’impliquer autant dans le Web3 serait, pour eux, surtout une manière de résoudre une certaine crise d’identité et de continuer à se montrer innovant.

    A cela s’ajoute le fait que l’idéal décentralisé au cœur du Web3 reste, par certains aspects, en trompe-l’œil, puisque des projets estampillés comme tels appartiennent parfois aux mêmes acteurs – c’est, par exemple, la même entreprise, Yuga Labs, qui détient les trois collections de NFT les plus courues dans le même monde – et obligent, par ailleurs, les utilisateurs à recourir à des services ou à des plates-formes uniques : pour les NFT par exemple, on constate que la plate-forme OpenSea concentre déjà 97 % des parts de marché.

    Une critique régulièrement émise concernant les blockchains, les cryptomonnaies et le Web3 en général : apprendre à s’en servir n’est pas à la portée de tous

    Une forme de domination inévitable si les technologies issues du Web3, comme les NFT, entendent devenir un jour véritablement grand public, à en croire le site spécialisé Protocol. Les utilisateurs lambda auront comme exigence d’avoir des garanties de protection avant d’investir – OpenSea est, par exemple, intervenu récemment pour « geler » des NFT volés, se retrouvant confrontée à des problématiques de modération on ne peut plus classiques – ainsi que des facilités techniques d’utilisation.

    C’est d’ailleurs une critique régulièrement émise concernant les blockchains, les cryptomonnaies et le Web3 en général : comprendre leur fonctionnement et apprendre à s’en servir n’est aujourd’hui pas à la portée de tous. « Les technologies comme Ethereum ont été construites avec beaucoup des mêmes pièges implicites que le Web1, remarque ainsi Moxie Marlinspike, le fondateur de la messagerie cryptée Signal. Pour rendre ces technologies accessibles, l’espace est en train de se consolider autour… de plates-formes. »

    Cette question de l’accessibilité et de la sécurité est d’autant plus brûlante que NFT, cryptomonnaies et finance décentralisée ont donné lieu, en à peine quelques mois, à un nombre astronomique d’abus et d’arnaques. Une troisième procédure judiciaire allant à l’encontre d’OpenSea après le vol de NFT, une vulnérabilité technique détectée dans la plate-forme Rarible ou encore à un projet promu par un influenceur comme une opération de charité qui, en fin de compte, s’est révélé être une arnaque… Sur un site intitulé « Web3 Is Going Great » (« le Web3 se passe super bien »), la développeuse Molly White liste ainsi, non sans une certaine ironie, les escroqueries, spéculations et autres entreprises de margoulins qui sont, pour l’heure, légion dans le monde du Web3.

    Sans forcément parler de tentatives d’extorsion, force est de constater que la spéculation fait, pour l’heure, partie intégrante de nombreux projets de cet univers : il s’agit bien souvent d’être parmi les premiers sur le coup, afin de se tailler la part du lion, ou alors de rendre payantes des choses qui, jusqu’ici, ne l’étaient pas. Une financiarisation du Web, finalement, assez éloignée de l’idéal égalitariste de l’Internet des débuts, que le Web3 prétend pourtant ressusciter.

    Ce qui fait dire au musicien Brian Eno, qui a toujours montré son intérêt pour les arts numériques, dans un entretien à The Syllabus : « Les NFT me semblent juste être une manière pour les artistes d’avoir leur propre petit bout de capitalisme mondialisé, notre propre petite version mignonne de la financiarisation. C’est super, maintenant, les artistes peuvent aussi devenir des petits cons de capitalistes. »
    Lire le décryptage : Vendre un tweet 2,1 millions d’euros, des vidéos pour cinq millions : les NFT, nouvel eldorado numérique ?

    Olivier Clairouin

    #Web3 #NFT

  • Project “Zuck Bucks”: Meta plans virtual coin after cryptocurrency flop | Ars Technica
    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/04/project-zuck-bucks-meta-plans-virtual-coin-after-cryptocurrency-flop

    Meta has drawn up plans to introduce virtual coins, tokens, and lending services to its apps, as Facebook’s parent company pursues its finance ambitions despite the collapse of a project to launch a cryptocurrency.

    The company, led by chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, is seeking alternative revenue streams and new features that can attract and retain users, as popularity falls for its main social networking products such as Facebook and Instagram—a trend that threatens its $118 billion-a-year ad-based business model.

    Facebook’s financial arm, Meta Financial Technologies, has been exploring the creation of a virtual currency for the metaverse, which employees internally have dubbed “Zuck Bucks,” according to several people familiar with the efforts.

    This is unlikely to be a cryptocurrency based on the blockchain, some of the people said. Instead, Meta is leaning toward introducing in-app tokens that would be centrally controlled by the company, similar to those used in gaming apps such as the robux currency in the popular children’s game Roblox.

    According to company memos and people close to the plans, Meta is also looking into the creation of “social tokens” or “reputation tokens,” which could be issued as rewards for meaningful contributions in Facebook groups, for example. Another effort is to make “creator coins” that might be associated with particular influencers on its photo-sharing app Instagram.

    According to one memo shared internally last week, Meta plans to launch a pilot for posting and sharing NFTs on Facebook in mid-May. This will be “quickly followed” by testing of a feature that will allow membership of Facebook groups based on NFT ownership and another for minting—a term for creating—NFTs.

    But the push has been plagued by setbacks and regulatory scrutiny. Earlier this year, the global cryptocurrency project that it spearheaded, diem, was wound down and its assets sold to Californian bank Silvergate, after US regulators refused to give the pilot the green light over monetary stability and competition concerns.

    Amid internal frustrations, Meta’s financial division has suffered what one former employee described as a “mass exodus” of staff over the past six months. Its head David Marcus left at the end of last year, along with key engineers, compliance staff, and nearly its entire legal team.

    Those who remain are looking into how to create or support digital currencies in its metaverse—an avatar-filled virtual world that Zuckerberg hopes will eventually generate billions of dollars in commerce for digital goods and services.

    The new plans represent a far cry from diem and the dream of creating a cryptocurrency. Staffers are now trying to find the least regulated way to offer a digital currency, two people said, with a digital token that is not based on the blockchain emerging as the most attractive option.

    It would not be the first time Facebook has introduced such a currency to its ecosystem. It launched Facebook Credits in 2009, a virtual currency that enabled users to make in-app purchases, typically in games such as FarmVille. This represented 16 percent of revenues at the time of its initial public offering in 2012, according to Barclays, but was shut down in 2013 because it was too costly to maintain.

    Where some of Meta’s efforts are focused on digital payments, other efforts are part of broader plans to use blockchain technology to introduce more “decentralization” across its platforms, amid a growing buzz in Silicon Valley around the so-called Web3 movement.

    Web3 advocates typically seek to wield distributed ledger technology to allow users more control and ownership over their data and disintermediate big tech groups that typically monetize that data as part of their ad-based business models.

    But Meta appears to be embracing some Web3 ideals. It is exploring whether to store data on a blockchain, how it might give users more control over their digital identity and whether their identity or accounts can be transferred to, or used across, other platforms beyond Meta’s apps, according to one planning document.

    Meanwhile, its plans to reward users for credible content with social tokens might allow Meta to remove itself as a central content moderator and give Facebook communities more power in moderating themselves, according to the document.

    #Facebook #NFT #Meta #Monnaie_numérique #Fintech #Web3

  • How a Wikipedia volunteer editor became a very vocal Web3 critic
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90733574/how-a-wikipedia-engineer-became-one-of-the-loudest-web3-skeptics

    BY MARK SULLIVAN8 MINUTE READ
    A new blockchain-based internet that abhors huge tech platforms, embraces digital currencies, and lets individuals control their data and identity sounds like a lovely idea. But a growing chorus of skeptics are saying that Web3–the term used to sum up these concepts–is at best highly aspirational and at worst a flat-out scam.

    Some of these critics express their doubts on Substack, or in YouTube rants, or on company blogs. Others voice their skepticism with their wallets, shorting cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Eth. Molly White, a software engineer and volunteer Wikipedia editor, has a simpler approach, and it’s a good one.

    White has emerged as one of Web3’s sharpest critics by simply compiling Web3’s day-to-day mishaps and ripoffs–its non-theoretical real-world consequences–at Web3 Is Going Great, a website (and Twitter account) she created and curates. The steady stream of these news stories (many of which aren’t covered in mainstream media) strongly suggests that Web3, in fact, isn’t going as great as its legions of cheerleaders would have you believe.

    I spoke with White via email about her views on Web3 fixtures such as DAOs (distributed autonomous organizations), cryptocurrencies, and NFTs (non-fungible tokens). Our conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity. (Disclosure: I own a modest amount of Bitcoin, mainly for research purposes.)

    Why were you compelled to start the Web3 Is Going Great? What were you seeing at the time?

    Although cryptocurrencies and blockchains have been around for a long time now, last year this “web3” shift really seemed to take off: this idea that blockchains will be the “future of the web.” People pushing this were saying that before long, everyone would use crypto, many services would be built on top of some blockchain or another, and all web interactions would be financialized in some way—all things that sound like a pretty terrible “future of the web” to me. Last year also felt like the year when the scamminess of the crypto space truly exploded, and also the year where the people behind a lot of these projects really set their sights on the average layperson (rather than the computer geek or the speculative investor) as their target audience. Everyday people were being told that they should put their money into crypto in one form or another, and I was beginning to see a lot of projects that to me seemed to be targeting the particularly vulnerable: totally unregulated apps encouraging people to take out sketchy loans to get out of a financial pinch, or projects promising to help people “invest” their retirement money into crypto, for example.

    As I began learning about the topic a little more, I also began coming across just scam (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/president-sham-united-nations-affiliate-convicted-cryptocurrency-scheme) after scam (https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-tells-regulators-it-will-cease-operations-in-ontario-for-real) after scam (https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-tells-regulators-it-will-cease-operations-in-ontario-for-real), and hack (https://cointelegraph.com/news/espn-s-baseball-reporter-s-twitter-account-hacked-by-nft-scammers) after hack (https://floridapolitics.com/archives/509932-hackers-hijack-nikki-fried-campaign-twitter-account) after hack (https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/138250/hacker-steals-790000-of-nfts-and-crypto-from-owners-of-rare-bears). It seemed like every day a huge project was being hacked, or someone was launching something and making off with all the money, or people were getting their crypto wallets compromised through some technique or another. But the stories were all very fleeting—I would see them on Twitter or in a brief news headline, and then the social media/news attention span would move along and it was like it never even happened. I realized it could be really informative and meaningful to gather all of these disasters in one place, to both show how unfit this technology is for practically all use cases, and to show just how much people are getting scammed (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/05/ftc-data-shows-huge-spike-cryptocurrency-investment-scams) when they try to dip their toes in.

    Why do you think we’re seeing such shocking amounts of scams around cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and the like? What is it about these models that make it such fertile ground for scammers?

    It’s enormously unregulated, and the regulations that should apply have been slow to be enforced. People seem to have this opinion that, because a cryptocurrency is involved, they can do anything they want: operate a Ponzi scheme, or sell unregistered securities. To some extent, they have been able to do anything they want, even the blatantly illegal stuff, because the regulatory enforcement has been so slow. But I also think we’re starting to see a change in that, and there are probably more than a few people behind various crypto projects who have been seeing enforcement actions by the SEC and others on scams that were happening several years ago, and thinking “uh oh, that looks a lot like what I’ve been doing”.

    I think the amount of hype that’s being pumped into the space is contributing to the issue, too. It’s coming from everywhere—the media, big-name celebrities, advertisements on mainstream TV networks, and of course social media. There’s a reason that get-rich-quick schemes are so enticing, and because it tends to be the success stories that get the attention, I think people start to believe that it’s actually common for people to make money from these things. It’s also a bit of a perfect storm with economic uncertainty facing fairly young people (who by far seem to be the ones being pulled into these scams): They’re more likely to have the types of jobs that were impacted particularly severely by the pandemic, and many of them are facing enormous debts from things like student loans.

    Has your opinion NFTs, crypto, and other blockchain models evolved at all since you started W3IGG?

    If anything, I probably have an even stronger opinion that these technologies are enabling a lot of harm, with few promising use cases or upsides. I’ve spent the last couple of months pretty immersed in this stuff—both learning about a ton of specific Web3 projects just to be able to cover them in the site, but also researching the underlying technologies and problems they’re trying to solve, as well as speaking with a lot of other experts on the subject and hearing their opinions.

    It seems like a lot of VCs are very excited about the blockchain and crypto. Do you have any thoughts about why this might be?

    VCs are excited about blockchains and cryptocurrencies for the same reason VCs are excited about anything: It’s a moneymaking opportunity. People are putting a lot of money into crypto, and despite all the ideological talk about how crypto might democratize wealth or remove such outsized amounts of it from the hands of a few big players (including some of the same enormous venture capital firms investing in crypto), that’s not actually what’s happening. The wealth is even more centralized in crypto, in many ways, and the space is beautifully designed for that to continue.

    Crypto also promises the opportunity of quicker returns than a lot of their more traditional investments—if a VC firm’s share in a project is represented in crypto, they can cash out anytime, rather than having to wait for a company to IPO.

    What is your impression of DAOs?

    My overwhelming impression is that most of the projects calling themselves DAOs are neither distributed nor autonomous, and the ones that are trying to be have been organized by people who have done a lot of thinking about how such an organization might work in theory, but have little practical experience with those kinds of organizations.

    In some of the reporting I’ve done about DAOs, I got the impression that it’s not always practical or possible to create something that’s totally decentralized and democratic.

    If you take a look at a lot of the groups calling themselves “DAOs”, you’ll see that they are often just one person or group of people controlling the project. Some of them ostensibly have governance tokens and community votes on proposals for the project, but we’ve seen more than one instance where a community has voted for one thing and the leaders of the so-called decentralized project have just decided to do something else. In other cases, there is not even a nominal attempt at having any sort of community governance. Some of those projects say they have plans for community governance to be added later (usually after the money is raised, of course), but whether they actually follow through on those promises is anyone’s guess.

    Do you think people might eventually find a way to make DAOs functional and useful?

    There are lots of existing structures for decentralized governance that have existed in society for far, far longer than DAOs have been around. Look at co-ops, for example. You could even argue that shareholders of most public companies have rights similar to participants in DAOs. Outside of the business world there are all sorts of examples of decentralized, leaderless groups: the Wikimedia movement, for example, or also groups like Occupy Wall Street or Alcoholics Anonymous. I personally find it unlikely that anyone with significant experience in any group like this would ever argue that the goals or mechanisms of these groups could be fully, reasonably represented in code.

    DAOs are, I think, one of the best illustrations of the problem with a lot of these Web3 projects: They are trying to find technological solutions that will somehow codify very complex social structures. A lot of them also seem to operate under the assumption that everyone is acting in good faith, and that project members’ interests will generally align—a baffling assumption given the amount of bad actors in the crypto space.

    I think a lot of people are trying to understand if there are real, practical use cases for Web3 models like NFTs and DAOs that will emerge after all the initial hype and hucksterism fade away. What do you think? Is there a “there” there?

    No, there isn’t.

    NFTs and DAOs are both great examples of solutions desperately in search of a problem. People have tried to come up with ideas for how NFTs might be useful if the interest in them as a speculative investment fades, and the ideas seem incredibly uncompelling—using them for things like event tickets, which are already being bought and sold quite adequately on existing systems.

    I suspect that the hype and hucksterism will fade away when regulators step in, and make it a lot harder for influencers to pump and dump tokens without disclosing their financial interests, or for people to promise impossible returns on what are clearly Ponzi schemes, or for people to sell what are pretty obviously unregistered securities. But when that aspect is taken away, so is much of the incentive to use the technology in the first place. You’re just left with a slow, expensive datastore that doesn’t scale well, and some really complex hurdles to overcome around privacy and data ownership.

    #Web3 #NFT #Arnaque

  • These women are shaping web3 and the metaverse
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90722634/women-web3-metaverse

    By Ruth Readerlong Read

    Talk about the collection of technologies and ideas known as Web3 often focuses on making up for the transgressions of Web 2.0 companies, which have centralized control over online experiences and mined our personal data for their own profit. Whether or not you think the future of the internet involves AR, VR, NFTs, DAOs, the multiverse, or some combination thereof, there is an immense amount of money flooding into those sectors from the usual suspects. But if the same companies and people who ran Web 2.0 are at the helm of Web3, how much can really change?

    At its core, Web3 is about paying creators for their work. Music, artwork, digital fashion—any kind of intellectual property— is turned into or somehow attached to NFTs, so that the work can be certified, tracked, and transacted on a public blockchain. This infrastructure allows creators to be paid directly for their work. In this grand vision, the new internet is decentralized, with no one entity controlling it.

    How that will function is still being worked out. And right now, many of the people showing the most excitement about Web3 are the tech bro types you probably envision. But there’s also a cadre of women taking up their pickaxes and heaving them into the fertile new internet. They’re creating incentives to draw more women to Web3, so they can have a say in the next web.

    One of the splashiest efforts is BFF, a community that is designed to teach women how to get in on the crypto boom. Only one month old, it is already 14,000 members strong. BFF is led by Brit Morin, a former Googler and the founder of women’s media brand Brit + Co. She cofounded this new community for the “crypto curious” with a list of 50-plus celebrities (Tyra Banks, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Mila Kunis), technologists, and entrepreneurs.
    advertisement

    Another group, launched in 2018, is Black Women in Crypto, which aims to welcome more black women into the crypto space. There are also women-focused NFT collections such as Boss Beauties, WomenRise, and Crypto Coven. Some of these concentrate on art pieces, but Crypto Coven is selling avatars for the metaverse, the persistent VR/AR experience that could sit on top of Web3. Increasingly, there is funding for women content creators. Last week, Randi Zuckerberg—an entrepreneur who got her start in tech working for her brother Mark’s company—launched an accelerator called Big Hug that aims to elevate female creators with funding and mentorship.

    The timing of these ventures is propitious. In November, art market research firm ArtTactic noted that only 16% of NFT sales were going to female artists (the stats for non-white women were even more dismal). On NiftyGateway, an NFT marketplace owned by the Winklevoss twins, less than 4% of the artworks come from artists in Africa, less than 2.5% comes from Latin America, and less than 1% comes from artists in the Near East, the report says.

    In the metaverse, we’re all world builders—now is your time to build.”

    Cathy Hackl
    On top of that, CEOs in charge of the biggest metaverse platforms so far—Fortnite, Roblox, Sandbox, Decentraland, and Meta—are all white men, though at least two of those companies have a woman in the role of COO. Discord, widely thought to be at the leading edge of social networking, also has a white man at the wheel; however the company has a female head of engineering, Prachi Gupta. In crypto, the landscape is even worse, with only 5% of crypto companies being led by women, according to a recent estimate. Meanwhile, global venture capitalists poured $25 billion into blockchain companies last year, according to CB Insights. Pitchbook reports venture capitalists have also been investing about $2.2 billion per year since 2018 in augmented and virtual reality.

    Much of the current effort to bring women onto futuristic internet platforms is as content creators, rather than engineers of the underlying technology. Web3 is in some ways like the early 1990 iteration of the web, free and open to whoever is willing to develop in it. The goal of these various efforts to attract women to these new platforms is to ensure they have the same opportunity to capitalize as men do. It’s becoming clear that in the next version of the online world, having technical skill may be less important than being able to attract a band of devotees.

    “I’m a big proponent of saying, in the metaverse we’re all world builders—now is your time to build,” says tech futurist Cathy Hackl. While giving women a chance to build out the next big internet space is undoubtedly important, there is a question as to whether this will necessarily lead to a safer and more inclusive internet for all. Much of that will depend on who controls the technology that content is built on top of.
    [Metajuku: courtesy of Everyrealm]
    The ultimate creator economy

    While men still dominate in the nascent metaverse, female creators in Web3 are already rising to the top. Krista Kim is one of the most notable, for selling her digital Mars House for half a million dollars. Natalie Johnson, who spent much of her early career as a fashion buyer, is now building out a digital fashion house called Neuno. Everyrealm, a metaverse company with a majority female leadership team, garnered attention for its million-dollar land grab in Decentraland (the company has since invested $4.2 million into nearly 800 land parcels in The Sandbox).

    Janine Yorio, cofounder and CEO of Everyrealm, has a background in private equity and in real estate. After selling her real estate investment app Compound to investment platform Republic, she started speculating on metaverse properties for fun. This gambit quickly became the foundation of Everyrealm, her metaverse investment company. She says one of the most important things to understand about developing in the metaverse and making NFTs is that these products need communities.

    [Everyrealm executives from left to right: CEO Janine Yorio, CCO Jacqueline Schmidt, Metaverse and NFT lead Julia Schwartz, CMO Katie Witkin, courtesy of Everyrealm]
    “Crypto and the metaverse are so community-focused that you can build the coolest project ever, but if you don’t have a community and if you don’t know how to market it, then it’s worthless,” says Julia Schwartz, cofounder of Everyrealm who leads metaverse and NFT development.

    “A lot of the work that we do … involves the community and the storytelling,” adds Jacqueline Schmidt, Everyrealm’s creative director. Schmidt spent much of her previous career in design and real estate. Now she’s translating that skill into world-building.

    “It’s almost like if you were selling condos on spec: there’s an artist rendering and people are like, okay, I’ll take the penthouse. But then they put their deposit down and every month they’re like, okay, where is it? What’s happening? And so you have to show them mood boards and storyboards and bring them along for the ride— there are a lot of similarities to real world real estate development in that sense.”

    [Jonathan Simkhai Metaverse Fashion Week Show: credit Everyrealm, Blueberry, Jonathan Simkha]
    Because the metaverse and NFTs are so community-based, many women feel that they have a certain edge over men. “A woman-driven community is definitely a little more chill, a little more supportive,” says serial entrepreneur Gizem Mishi McDuff. “There are good vibes there and then there’s a lot less toxicity, because we care about that so much and that allows for the community to grow a lot faster in a better way.” The beauty of NFTs and a universally accepted blockchain, she argues, is that if a given community no longer suits you, you pick up your digital property and take it to a new one. You’re not chained to any one platform.

    McDuff owns a digital fashion company called Blueberry and says she came to virtual worlds almost by accident a decade ago. “There was this musical artist called Skye Galaxy and he did his concerts on Second Life,” she says. “So I ended up downloading Second Life and joining his shows just to see his concerts and I’ve been obsessed ever since.” Pivotally, she met a really cute guy at one of the shows. “The next time I saw him, I wanted my avatar to look cool. So I went shopping a little bit and I installed Photoshop and I made myself a cute little dress and it worked. He’s my husband now.”

    This experience was the spark for Blueberry, which designs clothes for Second Life and has 20 million digital assets. More recently, her company put on a runway show in Second Life for Jonathan Simkhai during New York Fashion Week.

    One thing McDuff worries about is how the platforms within the metaverse will be run as the ecosystem grows up. “There are a couple of things that are going on that will blow up in our face,” she says. These include how metaverse platforms compensate creators. Roblox, for example, only gives developers on its platform a quarter of every dollar spent, retaining a 75% cut on their creations.

    “When there is such a high tax on the content you create, it is not as motivating, so the quality of the content is a little less or the innovation is a little less,” she says. McDuff also believes that the fact that Roblox is profiting from the labor of kids will lead to regulation that slows down the development of the metaverse. “Kids are making this company a ton of money,” she says. (The company reported $1.9 billion in revenue in 2021.)
    The unlikelihood of a decentralized web

    The kids who are developing in Roblox also can’t take what they built with them. Which brings me back to the original question: A diversity of people, including more women, may be developing content and communities on top of Web3 and the metaverse, but does it matter if don’t they own the underlying platforms themselves?

    “A platform is only as strong as its infrastructure; if the infrastructure is designed in a biased or non-inclusive way, the ripple effects of that are profound,” says Danah Boyd, a Microsoft researcher and the founder of Data & Society, via email. She’s speaking about technology generally, though this rational could apply to Web3 or the metaverse.

    Platform owners wield immense control. Reddit allowed hate speech to flourish on its platform, because its executives prioritized a free speech policy. For years, Facebook allowed misinformation to spread freely to its users. When Twitter was first designed, its originators were not thinking about the potential for harassment and it took the company 15 years to create features to combat toxic behavior on its platform. (Safety Mode is still in beta.) Community moderators play important role in keeping communities safe, but they are ultimately limited or supported by the larger rules of the platforms.

    You don’t own “web3.”

    The VCs and their LPs do. It will never escape their incentives. It’s ultimately a centralized entity with a different label.

    Know what you’re getting into…

    — jack⚡️ (@jack) December 21, 2021

    Twitter cofounder and recently-departed CEO Jack Dorsey recently got in trouble with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen for suggesting that Web3 will not be as decentralized as promised. Dorsey tweeted that venture capitalists, who funded the companies that came to own Web 2.0, will also control Web3. He also posits that the web of the future is far more likely to be centralized than decentralized.

    Currently, many of the companies working on the next version of the web are building on top of Ethereum, a decentralized blockchain initially created by Canadian programmer Vitaly Dmitriyevich Buterin. While there is a lot of debate about whether Ethereum is truly decentralized, the bigger question is whether big tech companies will develop on a decentralized blockchain. More likely, they’ll create their own blockchain and try and incentivize developers to build on top of it.

    There’s a bit of conflict right now between kind of the complete utopian decentralization and the centralized web.”

    Randi Zuckerberg
    Meta (née Facebook) has tried to get its own blockchain going (to no avail). Gaming companies already have their own world specific economies, though players can’t take any of the stuff they build or buy off the platforms. So far, Dorsey’s other company, which rebranded from Square to Block (yes as in Blockchain), is the only outfit working on a blockchain it doesn’t own, by working on decentralized finance apps built on Bitcoin. Even if Ethereum does win out, big tech could still find a way to control it. Amazon’s AWS already runs 25% of Ethereum workloads, giving it outsized impact on the platform.

    “I agree that there’s a bit of conflict right now between kind of the complete utopian decentralization and the centralized web,” says Randi Zuckerberg. “I don’t think either of those extremes are correct, but I think we’re going to have to figure out where we net out in the middle of complete decentralization and complete centralization.” She notes that being in crypto right now doesn’t feel safe. “You’ve got to have your own back or you’re going to get scammed,” she says. While she doesn’t know exactly how centralization will come into play, she thinks it’s necessary for there to be accountability on the platform.

    Zuckerberg says it absolutely matters who is building the underlying technology in Web3 as well as the virtual reality platforms that make up the metaverse. “If you go into Discord communities, I think there is a super strong and immediate difference that you sense in a Discord community where the project has even one woman on the team versus projects that are all crypto bros,” she says. “There’s an immediate difference in what the discussion is like, what they’ll tolerate in those communities, and the mission, the goals and the ethos.”

    However the next version of the internet shapes up, it is perhaps promising that more women are deciding what companies get funded. In addition to Randi Zuckerberg, Beryl Li, cofounder of Yield Guild Games, is investing in play-to-earn game companies. At venture capital firm a16z, Arianna Simpson is leading investments in crypto and Web3 (one investment she was involved with is in a woman led company called Iron Fish, which is developing a privacy layer for blockchains). Projects like BFF create even more ways for women to play around with this burgeoning technology.

    “In this new era we’re very empowered,” says Hackl of herself and other women. In the last year she’s been invited to invest in several companies: “I’ve never seen myself as an investor, but now I do.”
    About the author

    Ruth Reader is a writer for Fast Company. She covers the intersection of health and technology.

    #Metaverse #Web3 #Blockchain #Féinisation #Genre #Infrastructure

  • Welcome to ‘Web3.’ What’s That ? - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/05/business/dealbook/what-is-web3.html

    If that sounds far-fetched, consider that venture capitalists have invested more than $27 billion in crypto and related projects this year, more than the previous 10 years combined, according to PitchBook. The biggest investors and industry players are also lobbying in Washington to influence rules that would favor their futuristic view of tokenomics, which can already be seen in some burgeoning communities where web3 is not some abstract concept but a feature of daily life.

    So far in 2021, about $27 billion worth of crypto has been spent on major NFT platforms, according to Chainalysis. That’s up from $114 million in all of last year.

    What are people getting? The NFT confers public proof of ownership and authenticity of an item, which may or may not include copyright — just as in the physical world an artist may sell a work but retain the intellectual property, said Frank Gerratana of Mintz, a law firm.

    Last month, Miramax sued the director Quentin Tarantino over his proposed auction of “Pulp Fiction” NFTs, which were linked to high-resolution scans from his original handwritten script. The company said using the film’s branding and imagery violated its rights.

    Another web3 concept that challenges conventions is decentralized social media, where users earn and trade crypto.

    On DeSo, a network for blockchain-based apps, users are paid for popularity, participation, posts and work. Its founder, Nader Al-Naji, a former Google engineer, believes that internet users will want to bypass the likes of Twitter and TikTok, which make money by serving them ads, and capture this worth directly for themselves instead.

    Toujours les mêmes arguments d’aide aux petits qui se sont toujours révélés faux !!

    Any users can be rewarded for their musings, music or mere presence via tokens or “frictionless tipping,” with a diamond button that allows others to send a bit of crypto their way in appreciation of whatever they do or say.

    “The vast majority of the benefits go to the smaller creators who people have always wanted to support,” Mr. Al-Naji said. “Here you just throw them some diamonds, you know, or buy their coin, which is an investment.”

    #Web3 #Cryptomonnaies

  • Jack Dorsey and Marc Andreessen’s Crypto Feud Puts Web3 at Risk - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/18/business/dealbook/web3-venture-capital-andreessen.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220123&ins

    “You don’t own ‘web3.’ The VCs and their LPs do.”

    Jack Dorsey tweeted this esoteric salvo in late December, not long after he stepped down as the head of Twitter to focus on advancing his Bitcoin ambitions. The post, swiping at the power held by venture capitalists and their limited partners as they try to reorganize the internet around blockchain technology, an effort known as web3, soon set off a public feud among members of the Silicon Valley ruling class. The dispute over what many herald as the next arena of technological revolution has drawn increasingly hard lines. Elon Musk is with Mr. Dorsey; Marc Andreessen is his enemy.

    The web3 revolution, backers say, promises the democratization of commerce and information by building a better internet on blockchain networks — distributed ledger systems that form the basis of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. It theoretically would cut out traditional middlemen and gatekeepers, letting users transact directly and have a greater stake in the programs they use.

    But Mr. Dorsey has a different view. “It will never escape their incentives,” continued his post about the role of venture capitalists in web3. “It’s ultimately a centralized entity with a different label.”

    Tokenisation de l’internet

    Essentially, web3 refers to an internet operating on so-called tokenomics. Tokens are digital units of cryptocurrency, and in web3, developers and users have mutual financial interests and everyone can earn crypto. Users benefit directly from their contributions — creativity, play, engagement or deposits, say. They can also help govern futuristic community-run companies, where they can vote on decisions with tokens created by the particular project.

    Yet big investors also appear attracted to the infinite frontier. Last year, venture capitalists backed about 460 blockchain projects, spending nearly $12.75 billion, up from 155 deals worth $2.75 billion in 2020, per Pitchbook data provided to The New York Times. And the venture arms of crypto exchanges like Coinbase and FTX are some of the biggest deal makers, compounding concerns about corporate concentration. That means major players increasingly control the decentralized entities said to democratize everything for little guys.

    “While cryptocurrency industry insiders promote the ‘democratized’ benefits of digital assets,” Ms. Goldstein testified, “in truth, crypto concentrations of money and power match or surpass those in traditional financial markets.”

    Proponents across the web3 ideological divide have been working to woo lawmakers. Venture capitalists are pushing policy proposals meant to influence officials to embrace web3. Believers in the revolution, like Mr. Selkis of Messari, have compiled lists of politicians to support. But the movement still appears to lack a unified front.

    The debate that Mr. Dorsey sparked last month has continued online, though it appears he has begun to direct his attention elsewhere. On Thursday, he started a Bitcoin legal defense fund for developers who face “legal headaches,” and he said Block would get involved with mining Bitcoin.

    Andreessen Horowitz’s policy team has been looking beyond Washington, publishing proposals for global leaders on how to become “web3 republics.”

    Crypto, however, is not the only issue on every tech billionaire’s mind.

    #Web3 #Tokenisation #Internet #Capital_risque #Cryptomonnaies

  • Meta and Twitter’s NFT Landgrab Could Backfire | WIRED
    https://www.wired.com/story/nft-metaverse-facebook-twitter/?bxid=61d2146d06833d7e0c58d56a&cndid=67944061&esrc=profile-page&source=EDT_WI

    Whether you view Web3—the decentralized vision of the future of the internet—as a utopian idea or a Ponzi scheme, one thing is for certain: It’s meant to look different from what’s gone before.

    This is what makes the latest moves by Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and Twitter so strange. On January 20, Twitter rolled out the ability for users of its paid premium service, Twitter Blue, to change their profile picture to a non-fungible token (NFT) they own—a key part of Web3.

    On the same day, The Financial Times reported that Meta was working on integrating NFT ownership into their profiles on Facebook and Instagram. The company is also developing a tool to allow users to mint NFTs of their own on Meta platforms, according to reports. It follows public statements in December 2021 from Instagram chief Adam Mosseri that his app was exploring the promise of NFTs.

    The co-opting of NFTs by big tech platforms is, in some way, unsurprising. Web3 and NFTs have become hot commodities—the biggest player in the space, NFT marketplace OpenSea, raised $300 million in funding earlier this month, giving it a valuation of $13.3 billion. It makes sense that the biggest names on Web 2.0 would want to capitalize on the trend and stay relevant.

    Unfortunately, Meta and Twitter’s plan to sanitize NFTs goes directly against the principle by which they were created. Both companies favor key practices that Web3 supporters want to do away with—centralized control of key digital services by a handful of multibillion-dollar corporations. Both make inordinate amounts of money from the things that Web3’s biggest boosters want to remove.

    And for the Silicon Valley titans, the backing of a market full of scammers and fraudsters is an odd move.

    “At the moment it’s the wild west—there’s nobody to police this,” says Alan Woodward, professor of cybersecurity at the University of Surrey. “The problem is these social media companies become responsible. They become policemen.” That’s particularly worrisome given the sheer volume of copyright and ownership disputes that have blighted NFT artwork in recent months. “If there’s a dispute over those NFTs, who do those people go to?” asks Woodward. “It’ll be Facebook or Twitter. Why would you want to take that liability?”

    Already buffeted by regulators who want to curb their power, Twitter and Meta are among the internet companies caught in the middle of a polarized political debate over whether they are responsible for the propagation of violent and extreme content online, so giving any ammunition to their critics seems foolhardy. And yet they’re about to share the imprimatur of their implicit support to a technology that is famous for a rug pull that stole millions of dollars from victims, racism (lots of racism), and theft, as well as questionable ties to shady Russian crime gangs who are happy to fictionalize their nationality and gender to take money from rubes. Both Twitter and Facebook did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

    “Despite the positivity around NFT use cases, there’s a lot of distrust in the community—perhaps due to the anonymity of key artists and influencers, and almost certainly due to the scammers that circle like vultures and frequent rug pulls,” says PJ Cooper, founder of Pandimensional Trading Co., which is launching its own NFT collection later this year. Despite those reservations, Cooper is largely supportive of Twitter’s entry into the NFT space, and says he will display an NFT as his profile picture when functionality rolls out to the UK.

    Cooper does, however, have worries about the fact that people can still right-click and save NFT profile pictures and mint their own version of them as NFTs.

    A company spokesperson for NFT marketplace OpenSea, Allie Mack, confirmed that NFT profile pictures that appear on Twitter are verified through the company’s site. In fact, Twitter uses API, metadata, and collection information from OpenSea to authenticate an NFT displayed on a user’s profile and turns it into a “soft hexagon” on the site. Around the same time as Twitter launched NFTs, OpenSea crashed. At the time, security researcher Jane Manchun Wong tweeted that OpenSea’s platform had taken out Twitter’s NFT feature. OpenSea says that the outage had “absolutely zero impact on the public Twitter integration” and that the issue flagged by Jane happened in a closed beta. Since the Twitter integration launch, Mack says there has been zero interruption to the Twitter service.

    Others are not convinced that relying on a third party site is the right decision. “OpenSea is pretty unreliable,” says Patrick McCorry, senior system engineer at blockchain startup Infura. This may be one thing Big Tech wants to fix before embracing NFTs full bore, he says.

    The OpenSea platform itself has not been free of controversy. Artists have pointed out that the site is rife with rip-off NFT versions of their real-life art, or versions of their sculptures and paintings that could easily be purchased by unwitting social media users. The problem got so big that DeviantArt, an art hosting website from which works were repeatedly lifted, developed its own tool to scan the blockchain for works that also appear on its site, and inform the creators. The platform does have procedures for those whose art has been stolen to appeal for work to be taken down, but the problem persists. A recent investigation found profiles selling NFTs of trademarked logos from some of the world’s biggest brands, including Microsoft, Disney, Amazon, and Adidas, without permission.

    Theft is a perennial problem for the NFT world, and one that seems unlikely to be easily fixed, but McCorry thinks that’s a non-issue for Meta and Twitter. “What matters really is custody and the ability to sell it on a secondary market,” he says. For now, it is clear that neither company would own or have custody of an NFT. “Custody is a liability for them,” he said.

    For those deep in the NFT space, the adoption of official standards by Twitter in particular is welcomed. Plenty of Twitter users have NFT art as their profile picture, but find it difficult to prove ownership, particularly when faced by trolls who like nothing more than to right-click and steal their NFTs to show them the fallibility of their investments. “Right now, anyone can just put up a CryptoPunk picture and pretend to have one,” says McCorry. Twitter’s plans to prove ownership officially are “a nice way to demonstrate digital property rights.”

    It’s easy to see why Twitter and Meta want to get involved in the NFT space—Woodward says it’s a land grab that, in the case of Meta, gives it ownership of one of the key technologies that could be involved in constructing its own version of the metaverse. For Twitter, it’s a way to build credibility around a forward-thinking tech community. “But there’s a point when the rubber hits the road, and there could be real commercial disputes about it,” says Woodward.

    The legitimacy that Big Tech lends the NFT experiment is a major benefit for boosters of the technology. But it could also be the thing that signals the beginning of the end for it in the long run. “One of the things about NFTs is that you and I can agree to exchange wherever we like,” says Woodward. “But if you get a corporate involved, isn’t it all becoming a bit Big Tech and commercial?”

    Behind this decision is an assumption that users on all three social media sites want to be involved in buying, selling, and displaying NFTs. But none have provided evidence to back up this assumption. Once the functions on these sites are rolled out, this will be the first time that the general public will be exposed and encouraged to join a digital token market that, until now, may have been perceived as obscure and niche. Zoomers on Facebook could suddenly join the once-nerdy ranks of OpenSea users and bid real money to buy digitally minted pictures of a monkey, or whatever else takes their fancy. And they may not want to at all.

    Woodward cautions overexuberant members of the NFT community from being too jubilant. “I don’t think anyone fully understands what the true potential or implications of NFTs are,” he says. “But I think there’s a bundle of bollocks being talked about it. I’m not sure people have got their thinking all aligned on this yet. I suspect it’s very much a case of the big tech companies wanting to jump on the bandwagon—because it is a fairly fast-moving bandwagon.” What might the big social media giants do when they’re in charge of the bandwagon? Woodward has one theory. “I think it’s just another way of acquiring and keeping users.”

    #NFT #Web3 #Meta #Twitter #Profile

  • How the utopian vision of Web 3.0 clashes with reality
    https://hackernoon.com/how-the-utopian-vision-of-web-3-0-clashes-with-reality-60a8dfb2fb3b?sour

    The internet as we know it is broken. Google and Facebook have created data silos in which we have lost control over our information. You’ve heard that story a dozen times. But according to the people working on Web 3.0 they are able to fix all of that.Web 3.0 was proposed as the next evolutionary stage the internet might enter. In the early 90ies the first internet browser marks the beginning of the world wide web. Back then people were only able to access static websites without any interactive content — pretty boring from today’s perspective. However, people would often self host the data they are sharing and thus have more control about what they share with whom. The downside was that this made publishing content on the internet only accessible to those who possessed the right (...)

    #blockchain #hackernoon-top-story #web-utopia #web3 #privacy

  • How To Build Your Own #blockchain using #parity #substrate
    https://hackernoon.com/build-your-blockchain-with-parity-substrate-a8ddc4872ed7?source=rss----3

    A brief getting started guide.Substrate logo — © Parity TechnologiesParity Substrate is a blockchain development framework with many cool features like upgradable blockchains, modular architecture, customizable block execution logic, and hot-swappable consensus. For an overview of the Substrate framework, watch this talk from Dr. Gavin Wood (Web3 Summit, October 2018).https://medium.com/media/4ba8c5dc61a8b51c0539df45af4a5309/hrefThis article is about how you can get started with the Substrate framework to build your own blockchain. Let’s jump right in.InstallationThe first step towards getting started with Substrate is setting up your development environment. The Substrate team has created a bash script which installs all the dependencies and compiles the relevant packages as part of (...)

    #decentralization #web3

  • The best #blockchain apps will be when the user doesn’t know it’s a blockchain app
    https://hackernoon.com/the-best-blockchain-apps-will-be-when-the-user-doesnt-know-it-s-a-blockc

    On my startup journey, there’s something I’ve been saying to those in the startup space that resonates with them:“The best blockchain apps will be when the user doesn’t even know it’s a blockchain app”.Now before getting upset, let me clarify. I’m a big believer in blockchain solutions and applications (as many of my friends that have suffered through my numerous diatribes would attest). The possibilities that blockchain and Web 3.0 can introduce are incredibly exciting and there are many people and organizations making this vision a reality (for one of my personal favorites, follow Kevin Owocki — Founder of Gitcoin).But still when people hear this line, they take solace in it. Generally, I’ve found they take solace in it for two reasons:They believe that I’m saying this to downplay the effect (...)

    #politics #social-enterprise #web3 #campaign-finance

  • Token Underground 0x2: wtf is Mithril’s ‘social mining’?
    https://hackernoon.com/token-underground-0x2-wtf-is-mithrils-social-mining-753df728804a?source=

    Token Underground 0x2: WTF is Mithril’s ‘Social Mining’?We went in depth on #Mithril Token with this one goal: to lay down some pain points of the existing token model for the Mithril team and the #blockchain community at large, and prompt further discussion and feedback.Token Underground is back with the next chapter of our ‘token bullsh*t filter’ journey.This time we review the economic model of MITH — a native token of Mithril decentralized social media platform. Our choice was affected by the recent rumor swirling around Facebook and Telegram launching crypto tokens, and more general thoughts on implications of introducing a token into social media platforms of all sorts. We’re also coming from an odd observation that Mithril has long been sitting in CMC top-100 without any comprehensive (...)

    #token-economy #web3

  • 4 Signals That Explain How Businesses Are Adopting #blockchain
    https://hackernoon.com/4-signals-that-explain-how-businesses-are-adopting-blockchain-7204ba9011

    The new State of the Enterprise Blockchain Study contains some key signals to how business is adopting blockchain technology. These signals identify its progress, but also highlight the best inroads to working with enterprises and the work the industry needs to complete to build on the progress.1. More best practices are needed.While 75% of respondents agreed that blockchain will be mainstream technology by 2025, enterprises—especially large ones—are still waiting for patterns of success before opening their wallets. 62% cite a lack of tooling and internal skills as roadblocks to adoption. 50% need further proof in the form of use cases or pre-built solutions to develop their blockchain business case.In short, blockchain is still too hard to learn for busy IT shops running at scale, and (...)

    #web3 #ethereum #enterprise-technology #bitcoin

  • #Web30 : « Trente ans d’innovations, de scandales et de mèmes : une chronologie du Web »


    Grosse émotion visuelle sur cette, très complète chronologie. On y passe en revue tous les habillages, toutes les modes qui ont fait et défait le graphisme virtuel. C’est hyper bien foutu ! Et l’#Histoire, elle donne le tourni ! Dommage de ne pas voir les noms des auteur-ice-s de ce bel hommage, mais s’il y a bien une chose que le web m’a appris, c’est de chérir autant les sources que l’anonymat
    < 3 love !

    https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/visuel/2019/03/13/trente-ans-d-innovations-de-scandales-et-de-memes-une-chronologie-du-web_543 #web #internet #informatique #graphisme

  • The Token Underground 0x1: BZRX token — a smart move or a pre-programmed fail?
    https://hackernoon.com/the-token-underground-0x1-bzrx-token-a-smart-move-or-a-pre-programmed-fa

    The Token Underground 0x1: BZRX token — a smart move or a pre-programmed fail?We are back with the next installment of the Token Underground. Bringing to the spotlight today a token model of BZRX token recently introduced by the bZx Team. This one grabbed our attention due to a number of reasons. First, it’s relatively fresh, and has some novel ideas, and — perhaps more surprisingly — was developed to integrate a token into some of a lending protocol business, while more bespoke decentralized lending projects like Dharma operate without any token whatsoever.In our pilot issue Token Underground 0x0 we outlined our approach to analyzing token design. It is based on stripping down the ecosystem to a set of elementary economic interactions. We strongly feel that a decentralized framework needs a (...)

    #bzrx-token #token-economy #blockchain #web3 #mechanism-design

  • Embracing #web 3.0: The New Internet Era Will Begin Soon
    https://hackernoon.com/embracing-web-3-0-the-new-internet-era-will-begin-soon-630ff6c2e7b6?sour

    2018: Facebook’s data breach exposes the accounts of 50,000,000 individuals [source]2017: Equifax, one of the three largest credit agencies in the U.S., suffered a breach that may affect 143 million consumers [source]2016: AdultFriendFinder network hack exposes 412 million accounts [source]2015: Insurance giant Anthem hit by massive data breach compromised the data of 112,000,000 individuals. [source]2014: eBay faces massive data breach of 145,000,000 individuals. [Source]2013: Yahoo!’s data breach compromised the data of 3 billion individuals [Source]These incidents leave us with the questions like:In spite of high-end security, aren’t giant servers capable enough to protect data?Isn’t data security should be a key factor for all the upcoming large and small enterprise?What web has (...)

    #web3 #ai #web-development #technology

  • High-definition Data
    https://hackernoon.com/high-definition-data-eeab16b055a3?source=rss----3a8144eabfe3---4

    Verifiable Claims are a new type of data resource with high-definition qualities. This represents a unique new class of information. High-definition data has very many useful applications in the digital world that could profoundly change how society operates in the physical world, as this is the basis for establishing webs of trust, between people, machines and information.Data captured in this format can be high in resolution and high in fidelity. This article explains the core concepts of these new standards and proposes how thinking about data having ‘high-definition’ qualities could produce engineering and #data-science breakthroughs.Let’s start with some easy information theoryInformation theory is a way of explaining how information gets quantified, stored and communicated. I would (...)

    #web3 #digital-identity #blockchain #cryptography