• Découvrez notre guide complet sur les procédures alternatives de résolution des litiges SYRELI et PARL Expert réalisé en collaboration avec l’OMPI https://www.afnic.fr/observatoire-ressources/actualites/guide-afnic-des-tendances-parl-2021

    Read our complete guide to alternative dispute resolution procedure SYRELI and Expert ADR in collaboration with World Intellectual Property Organization – WIPO https://www.afnic.fr/en/observatory-and-resources/news/afnic-guide-to-adr-trends-2021

    #FridayReads #ADR #Afnic #Disputes #Internet #web #domains #wipo #trademarks #Syreli #VendrediLecture #Litiges

  • Reckitt Benckiser Plc v. Eunsook Wi - quand le géant revendique un nom de domaine ...

    #WIPO Domain Name Decision : D2009-0239
    http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0239.html

    Having carefully considered all facts and material presented by the parties to the Panel in this case (including in particular the supplemental submissions of both sides as requested by the Panel), on balance of evidence, the Panel is not convinced that the domain name was registered by the Respondent on June 6, 2000 in bad faith, mainly for the following reasons:
    ...
    – The disputed domain name was registered on June 6, 2000, only months after the merger of the UK Company Reckitt & Colman plc and the Dutch group Benckiser N.V in December 1999 little time had elapsed during which the Complainant’s LSE code could have become a well-known mark.

    – At the same time, this is not a typical merger case where a complainant establishes broad media coverage that is likely to have come to the attention of the respondent (cf. Cliffe Dekker, Inc.and Hofmeyr Herbstein & Gihwala, Inc. v. Information Services, Brian Evans, WIPO Case No. D2008-1327; BINOLI GmbH v. Henrik Drehmann-Westermann, WIPO Case No. D2008-1964). The Respondent in this case is located in the Republic of Korea, while the Complainant has its headquarters in the United Kingdom. The Complainant has neither demonstrated business activities in the Republic of Korea in the year 2000, when the disputed domain name was registered, nor contended that it was well known in the Republic of Korea then (or even that is well known there now).

    ... il est parfois obligé de payer pour l’obtenir.

    http://www.rb.com
    http://www.webshotspro.com/gd/show.php/400x300/screenshots/578052801af5b4eff78724c7f1e59fe5.jpg

    capture d’écran effectué par http://www.webshotspro.com

  • Chonologie de la privatisation du savoir
    http://www.hg-graebe.de/Texte/RLKonf-2005/sietmann.pdf

    Die Wegbereiter der Ökonomisierung des Wissens, von Richard Sietmann

    intellektuell (die geistigen Wegbereiter)

    50er
    (1963) Jean Fourastié /Tertiärer Sektor / „Blaupausen-Gesellschaft“
    60er-70er
    Milton Friedman / „Chicago School“ des Neoliberalismus
    70er
    Alfred Rappaport /Shareholder Value Theory
    Ende 70er
    (dt. 1985) Daniel Bell /Post-Industrial Society

    USA

    1980
    #Bayh-Dole-Amendment Förderung des Technologietransfers:
    1983
    #CBERA (Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act)
    1984
    #IIPA (International Intellectual Property Alliance)
    1986
    IPC (Intellectual Property Committee)
    1988
    #OTCA (Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness ACT) - Section 301 -
    1998
    #DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act)
    1998 - 2003
    #CTEA (Copyright Term Extension Act) „Mickey-Mouse-Gesetz“
    seit 2003
    „DMCA-Export“ Singapur (2003), Chile (2003), Australien (2004), Guatemala (2005), u.a. nach dem Muster des Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (CBERA) von 1983, Handelsvergünstigungen gg. Übernahme der IPR-Normen

    international

    1995
    #TRIPS (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)
    das TRIPS-Abkommen ist Bestandteil der WTO-Charter
    199
    #WIPO Copyright Treaty ( #WCT )
    2006
    #GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services)

    EU

    1991
    RL/91/250/EWG Schutz von Computerprogrammen einschließlich des Quellcodes als literarische Werke
    2001
    2001/29/EC EU-Urheberrecht-Richtlinie: Umsetzung der WIPO-Verträge: Rechtsschutz für technische Schutzmaßnahmen „Richtlinie zur Harmonisierung bestimmter Aspekte des Urheberrechts und der erwandten Schutzrechte in der Informationsgesellschaft“
    2002
    COM(2002)92 Entwurf der EU-Kommission: SW-Patent-Richtlinie „Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions“
    2003
    COM(2003)46 „Proposal for a Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights“

    Deutschland

    2003
    #UrhG-Novelle (Teil I) 13.9.2003: Inkrafttreten der UrhR-Anpassung an EU-RiLi „deutscher DMCA“: wichtigste Änderung: Rechtsschutz gegen die Umgehung „technischer Schutzmaßnahmen“
    2005
    UrhG-Novelle (Teil II) offene Fragen der - Privatkopie - Pauschalvergütungs-System (2012 noch nicht umgesetzt)