Le rôle des groupes de défense des droits de l’homme, dans le renforcement du colonialisme…

Is There a Human Right to Kill ?

How governments, NGOs, and conservative think tanks turned the language of human rights on its head.

http://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Figure-1.1.jpg

The poster was part of a public campaign against President Obama’s declared intention of withdrawing US and NATO troops from #Afghanistan. Under the banner “NATO: Keep the progress going!” there was notification about a “Shadow Summit for Afghan Women” that was to take place alongside the #NATO summit. Sponsoring the event was not a Republican think tank or a defense corporation, such as Lockheed Martin, but Amnesty International, the first and one of the most renowned human-rights organizations across the globe.

The idea that the most prominent international human rights NGO was campaigning against the withdrawal of US and NATO military forces from a country halfway around the globe is something worth dwelling on. The assumption underlying Amnesty’s campaign that the deployment of violence is necessary to protect human rights suggests that violence and human rights are not necessarily antithetical. Violence protects human rights from the violence that violates human rights. Violence is not only the source of abuse but, as Amnesty’s placard clearly implies, can also be the source of women’s liberation. Yet if violence is traditionally associated with domination and human rights with emancipation, then the connection between the two seems odd. Are human rights unavoidably connected to domination, or is this campaign just an exceptional case?

#OTAN #violence

▻https://www.thenation.com/article/is-there-a-human-right-to-kill

v. aussi : ▻http://seen.li/8w7a