industryterm:creative solution

  • Stablecoins are Modernizing Age-Old #money
    https://hackernoon.com/stablecoins-are-modernizing-age-old-money-6473ba5b1bd0?source=rss----3a8

    Stablecoins are typically regulated and are pegged 1:1 to U.S. dollar (or other major fiat). Fiat reserves are audited by third party. Stablecoins provide relief from cryptos’ volatile prices. Photo credit: ShutterstockThe more things change, the more they stay the same. Innovation may bring new tech to forefront, but creative solutions can nonetheless be based on age-old practices.Cryptocurrencies designate ownership of funds via private keys: software code that are crucial in design of programmable monies. But written cyphers that grant financial control are similar to Micronesian stone money. For centuries, inhabitants of western Pacific island of Yap used disc-shape stones to record transactions and transfer ownership (of various assets) without physically moving the stone disc.Rai (...)

    #blockchain #stable-coin #tokenization #fiat-currency

  • 5 Reasons We Need Gender Conscious Responses to Climate Change

    Not all climate change victims are created equal. There are communities of society that experience climate change more intensely and destructively than the rest, and it’s not based solely on location.

    People of color, poor people, and women are most adversely affected by climate change. They are more likely to be negatively impacted by climate change than men, especially women in developing countries and the global south.

    Why? Well, in short, because of the same gender inequality that already persists in our societies. like education and employment discrimination. Climate change only worsens what is already happening.

    The burdens of climate change (like displacement, agricultural, and economic loss) disproportionately impact women from low-income communities, particularly in the Global South and Indigenous communities, more than in than in wealthy communities and the western world.

    Women from these regions often deal with lacking infrastructure and are more dependent on natural resources in everyday life. And, though studies show that women are most impacted, we are often not involved in the policy and decision making processes for climate change initiatives and solutions.

    One of the big takeaways from this year’s UN Climate Summit was the importance of promoting gender equality and women’s leadership in climate policy. One woman in attendance summed it up: “There cannot be climate justice without gender justice.”

    Women are as much a part of the solution for climate change impacts as they are the primary victims, but this fact is not being recognized enough. The reality that women are more intensely impacted also means they deserve to be leaders in the climate change movement.

    To be sure, our current responses to climate change do not just fail women; they also do not do enough to include the full spectrum of people and genders impacted by the inequalities and impacts of climate change.

    Women, more so than their male counterparts, know how dire these environmental changes are firsthand and deserve to be equal stakeholders at every level of our climate movement from grassroots to policy and politics.

    Here are 5 reasons we need gender conscious responses to climate change:
    1. First of all, not everyone identifies as a man or a woman.

    Gender is fluid and goes far beyond your sex. The same inequalities that exist in our greater society — such as those placed on non-binary folks who do not identify as man or woman — also exist in the climate change movements.

    Entire communities’ climate experiences, issues, and potential solutions are being routinely ignored.

    Relief efforts during natural disasters, which are becoming more frequent and intense due to climate change, regularly exclude or fall short of adequately assessing, informing, and aiding queer and trans communities.

    Discrimination and stigma leave LGBTQ/GNC peoples especially vulnerable to climate-related displacement and homelessness because emergency shelters are not always equipped to aid their needs. Even worse, this stigma often plays out in how our media rarely covers the experiences and stories of LGBTQ disaster victims.

    A more expansive, gender-conscious perspective of climate change would urge organizations — from grassroots to regulatory — to take into account the importance of including all identities when approaching the extent of climate changes impacts and possible resolutions.

    “The [climate policy and regulatory] spaces are historically spaces for men,” said Laura Cooper Hall, a former gender and finance Fellow at Women’s Environment & Development Organization (WEDO).

    “I think in terms of a real transformative future there really needs for all perspectives and identities need to be included explicitly.”
    2. Being the most impacted, women have firsthand experiences that can lead to creative and practical solutions.

    Globally, women make up 80% of the world’s climate refugees. They’re 45-80% of the agricultural workforce in rural areas and are responsible (along with girls) for collecting nearly two-thirds of the household water in developing countries.

    When natural disasters like hurricanes, cyclones, or droughts hit, women around the world experience the loss in a very real way. For that same reason, they, better than anyone else, will know which solutions will work best.

    Better yet, their ideas are directly connected to real-life situations and remedies.

    “The thing that really inspires me is so many of the women we work with on the frontlines, they always say we don’t want to be seen as victims,” said Osprey Orielle Lake, Founder and Executive Director of WECAN. “Because we’re also the solutions.”
    3. Right now, we don’t have consistent leadership that reflects people of all genders.

    Only recently have women increasingly become a part of the mainstream discussion about how best to tackle these climate change. But even in cases when a ciswomen/man gender balance is accomplished, it is rarely consistently maintained, and for trans and gender non-conforming peoples it’s nearly non-existent.

    Between 2013 and 2016, six ciswomen delegates were elected as chairs (or co-chairs) at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, but this year only three ciswomen filled those positions, according to a report by the on their annual conference.

    You’d be hard-pressed to find any formal LGBTQ/GNC organizations or representation at conferences like the Framework Convention or the UN Climate Talks.

    Diverse and varied perspectives and experiences must be a critical and necessary part of any and all climate talks — not just when the world (or Twitter) is watching, but always.
    4. Climate change magnifies existing inequalities — including gender inequality.

    “Reinforced gender inequality really reduces women’s physical and economic mobility, their voice, their opportunity in many places,” said Lake. “That makes them a lot more vulnerable to environmental stress.”

    All those same systems of inequality that function in greater society are at work in the climate change movement.

    No, climate cannot be racist or sexist but people can and people — whether in our federal and local government, climate organizations, or world regulatory organizations — decide our climate policy, responses, and solutions.

    “Climate change and gender justice, because of its personal effect on people and because people have personal identities, you can’t disconnect them,” said Cooper Hall.

    When we solve gender inequality and have achieved true gender justice, then we can will have more well-rounded and genuinely equitable responses to climate change — starting with diverse representation at Climate Change conferences and talks and leading to more specific bottom-up initiatives that put community first and corporations last (Think: The Tiny House Warriors in Canada or low-cost reflective paint by Mahila Housing Trust used to combat heat waves in India)
    5. Considering gender as a climate change factor benefits everything!

    Keeping gender equality in mind when planning for and implementing our climate future is valuable to everyone, so why wouldn’t we want that?

    “It’s a win-win for everyone,” said Atti Worku, founder of Seeds of Africa, a New York-based nonprofit working toward equality in education for children and communities in Ethiopia (hit particularly hard by climate change related droughts) and Africa. “It’s not only because it’s a good thing to include women or whatever, it’s also just beneficial to have women involved.”

    More diverse leadership means more diverse ideas and creative solutions. It also means more minds working together to solve our climate challenges.

    “Environmental sustainability and gender equality are interdependent,” said Worku. “If you educate girls, for example, then we’re addressing a future where women and girls will be scientists. They will be in government. They will be making decisions that are for the needs of everyone.”

    I didn’t always see my gender as being connected to the impacts of our climate. I’ve not felt any more connected to nature than the next person.

    I don’t live in a flood zone and though I am a Black woman — and, as such, more likely to be disproportionately impacted — I have been lucky enough to not have had a physical experience with a hurricane, wildfire, or other climate change-related disaster.

    I initially drew the connection quite randomly on the subway. I saw an ad with a poem about the Christian Bible’s Eve having named all the animals in nature.

    “If Eve were here now, she’d probably be a badass environmental activist or climate change policy-maker,” I thought to myself. “But she’d be terribly overqualified and definitely underpaid.”

    I immediately Googled “women in climate change” like the complete nerd that I am and found myself in a wormhole of women fighting for a seat at the table in an uncharted climate future.

    They aren’t asking for anything grand. Only that all people — of every gender and identity — be included in how we respond to climate change, how we go about making our future.

    I don’t think that’s too much to ask, do you?

    https://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/5-reasons-we-need-gender-conscious-responses-to-climate-change
    #genre #changement_climatique #climat #pauvres #pauvreté #inégalités

  • IDA Urges Decision-Makers in China Consider Cost-Effective Alternatives to “Artificial Moon”
    http://darksky.org/ida-urges-decision-makers-in-china-consider-cost-effective-alternatives-to-

    Because the illumination satellite would replace streetlights, reports estimate energy cost savings of approximately 1.2 billion yuan ($170 million) per year. [2]

    While IDA encourages creative solutions for lighting that reduce energy costs, we urge decision-makers in China and elsewhere to consider the impact of satellite illumination on wildlife, human health (specifically the interruption of circadian rhythms), and other unknown factors.

  • TripAdvisor : The New Bully on the Travel Information Block ? – Rick Steves’ Travel Blog
    https://blog.ricksteves.com/blog/tripadvisor-the-new-bully-on-the-travel-information-block


    Voici une petite collection d’articles qui montrent pourqoui tu perds quand tu construis ton modèle d’affaires sur les offres gratuites des grandes plateformes. J’ai essayé de comprendre pourquoi d’un jour à l’autre un guide berlinois n’a plus de clients. C’est Tripadvisor qui lui a supprimé les infos nécessaires pour le contacter. Je viens de découvrir que cette plateforme pratique depuis l’an 2000 les choses auquelles il faut s’attendre si on utlise les services d’Alphabet, d’Uber, d’Airbnb et d’Amazon.

    I find more and more small hotels offering a free breakfast to people who promise to write kindly about them on TripAdvisor. Conversely, several hoteliers have told me that occasionally guests threaten them with a bad review unless the hotel gives them a deep discount.

    How does Airbnb detect and hide email addresses and websites in messages ? - Quora
    https://www.quora.com/How-does-Airbnb-detect-and-hide-email-addresses-and-websites-in-messages


    Wer’e only in it for the money - ou comment transformer les expressions régulières en arme contre les PMU

    They are using regular expressions mainly.

    If you are a power user on Airbnb, you must have been approached by users who want you to contact them directly. The community has been coming with very creative solutions to circumvent that kind of problem, solutions that are very hard to catch with a RegExp.
    For example:
    john d o t smith at thebiggestsearchengineintheworld d o t c o m
    + one hello $3 hello $4 hello $7 hello (you get it)
    If have seen that type of approach times and times over.

    TripAdvisor accused of deleting reviews with rape, assault - Business Insider Deutschland
    https://www.businessinsider.de/tripadvisor-rape-assault-reviews-deleted-report-2017-11?r=US&IR=T
    Ce sont les hôtels qui paient, alors il ne faut pas nuire à leur réputation.

    What You Don’t Know About TripAdvisor – Choking on a Macaron – Medium
    https://medium.com/choking-on-a-macaron/what-you-don-t-know-about-tripadvisor-15d31d745bdc
    Cette étatsuniennen propose des visites guidées de Paris. Elle explique l’essentiel.

    What Every Travelers Needs to Know about TripAdvisor

    1. Created in 2000, TripAdvisor built its brand on the trademark “World’s most trusted travel site”. But after countless lawsuits in multiple countries, by 2013 TripAdvisor quietly removed the words “trusted” as well “honest” from all of its website marketing (now it’s just the “World’s largest travel site”).

    2. An entire industry of “reputation management” companies exists which businesses can hire to create highly believable fake reviews, “fix” their reputation if they’ve received bad reviews, or sabotage their competitors. To prove how easy this is, an Italian magazine got a fake restaurant that doesn’t even exist to #1 in the restaurant ratings.

    3. Even when reviews are posted by honest travelers, there are many good reasons why these are still completely useless to the average traveler when trying to plan a trip (and how spending hours trying to decipher them is a waste of precious time).

    4. Hotels which opt to pay for TripAdvisor’s hefty “Business Listing” package get preferential treatment, increased visibility and “access to traffic”, no matter their reviews, rankings and ratings by travelers.

    5. Hotels can’t ask for their listing to be removed, but unless they pay for the pricey Business Listing subscription TripAdvisor removes the hotel’s contact information (phone number and website) from the listing (so users have to go on Google to find their phone and website).

    6. Hotels, restaurants and other small businesses can lose a significant part of their business if they receive fake negative reviews or get red-flagged by TripAdvisor for “suspicious activity”, yet they often have no recourse except to take the website to court, and many simply don’t have the financial resources to do so.

    7. TripAdvisor prominently positions the tours and activities which can be booked through Viator, a company it bought in 2014, at the top and center of their pages. These companies listed on Viator pay 20–30% commissions. So TripAdvisor is blatantly promoting their own companies’ business listings above companies which are independent, even if the latter have better reviews and ratings by the anonymous users.

    8. TripAdvisor encourages travelers to book directly through its own website booking system, but takes zero responsibility for any issues with the service booked when travelers experience problems (ie overcharged on their credit card, show up with a booking confirmation but the hotel has no record, etc). This is compounded when booking through TripAdvisor for tours, because they then go through Viator’s system instead of directly to the actual tour company.

    Le musellement des clients fait peur. Je ne réserverai jamais quoi que ce soit par une de ces plateformes.

    Hotelbewertung auf Tripadvisor : Gammelhotel verlangt Strafgebühr von Gästen | STERN.de
    https://www.stern.de/reise/europa/hotelbewertung-auf-tripadvisor--gammelhotel-verlangt-strafgebuehr-von-gaesten-

    Ein britisches Ehepaar bezeichnete ein Hotel als „heruntergekommene und stinkende Bruchbude“. Der Hotelier reagierte prompt: Er belastete ihre Kreditkarte mit dem Dreifachen des Zimmerpreises.

    Voici quelques billets d’utilisateurs désespérés.

    Were website links/phones numbers removed from listings ? - TripAdvisor Support Message Board
    https://www.tripadvisor.co.za/ShowTopic-g1-i12105-k11392052-Were_website_links_phones_numbers_remov

    CPD212, 24 Mar 2018, 13:00

    Guys hi,
    Yesterday i’ve noticed that website link and phone # are missing from our listing.
    I’ve checked other things to do listings and none have website link and phone # listed.
    Did TA removed them?
    Not sure if it’s IP specific, but we are in USA, NYC.

    My email, website and contact details are missing from my TA - TripAdvisor Support Message Board
    https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowTopic-g1-i12105-k11413010-My_email_website_and_contact_details_ar

    Adrian R, 30 Mar 2018, 18:21

    I have been a member of TA for over 5 years and have taken a lot of time to gather reviews from satisfied clients for my London taxi tours. I am now very frustrated that my contact details have been deleted from my page. When I phoned TA, I was told they were updating their algorithms and the information would be put back afterwards. It is now over a week and still the information is missing. If clients click on ’improve this listing’ details are there, but not all people would know that. I have lost a considerable number of bookings because clients do not know how to contact me. I notice it is not just my details missing but other tours in London also. Also, TA have changed the listings and how they rate them. Although my listing has gone up, there are some that have far less reviews and are literally a couple of slots back from mine? I am not sure what TA are doing but can someone throw any more light on the situation and perhaps if TA read this they can reassure owners that this is a temporary ’blip’.

    Why has TripAdvisor removed all our website links ? - TripAdvisor Support Forum
    https://www.tripadvisor.co.nz/ShowTopic-g1-i12105-k11418402-Why_has_TripAdvisor_removed_all_our_web

    Luke C, 2 Apr 2018, 4:32 AM

    TripAdvisor has recently removed all the website links and contact info from all of my listings of which we have 7 different attractions. Does anyone have any ideas about why they might have suddenly done this? They haven’t emailed in regards to the removal. Thanks!

    Il y en a qui disent byebye à Tripadvisor parce qu’ils peuvent se le permettre.

    Und Tschüss TripAdvisor… › Bundeskater und Bundeskatze stromern herum
    http://blog.gierth.name/blog/2014/09/24/und-tschuess-tripadvisor

    Habe ich mich doch endlich mal aufgerafft eine positive Bewertung auf TripAdvisor zu schreiben. Es ging dabei um Dolphin Pacific Diving aus Vava’u, mit denen wir bei den Walen waren.

    Der Beitrag ist nie veröffentlicht worden und war plötzlich aus meinem Profil verschwunden. Verwundert hab ich dann an Tripadvisor geschrieben und folgende Antwort erhalten:

    “Hallo,

    vielen Dank, dass Sie sich mit TripAdvisor in Verbindung gesetzt haben.

    Ihre Bewertung wurde aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach von unseren automatischen Filtern abgefangen. Diese Filter fangen Beiträge ab, die verdächtig erscheinen. Leider können wir keine Einzelheiten zu den Gründen für die Entfernung angeben und können Ihren Beitrag nicht veröffentlichen.

    Wir legen jedoch großen Wert darauf, dass andere Reisende Ihre Meinung erfahren. Aus diesem Grund möchten wir Sie darum bitten, Ihren Beitrag erneut zur Veröffentlichung auf unserer Seite einzusenden. Wir möchten Sie an dieser Stelle auch auf unsere Richtlinien für Reisebewertungen hinweisen: http://www.tripadvisor.de/pages/userrev_rules.html

    Wir entschuldigen uns für den Umstand und hoffen, dass Sie unser Bemühen, ausschließlich objektive und unvoreingenommene Informationen zu veröffentlichen, zu schätzen wissen.

    Mit freundlichem Gruß,

    Name entfernt”

    Ich liebe es, wenn im Hintergrund Algorithmen werkeln und Meinungen zensieren aber das Unternehmen nicht damit rausrücken will, warum der Bericht abgelehnt wurde. Ich für mich habe damit beschlossen, dass TripAdvisor für mich gestorben ist. Wer sich hinter ungenannten Algorithmen versteckt, dem trau ich nicht. Denn ich weiß nicht, wie viele wirklich relevante Bewertungen so von irgendwelcher Software einfach einbehalten wurden – und die Schreiber nichts davon wissen.

    Außerdem ist mir meine Zeit zu kostbar um gegen ein Script anzuschreiben was meine Art der Meinungsäußerung nicht mag. Ich möchte authentische Meinungen lesen und keine weichgespülte Langeweile, die sich hinter sogenannter Objektivität versteckt.

    Tschüss TripAdvisor…

    Conclusion - si tu veux jouer avec les grands, tu vas prendre des coups tant que tu n’a pas encore leur taille.

    Social Media ads are a bad deal for small businesses and individuals / Boing Boing
    https://boingboing.net/2018/04/30/social-media-ads-are-a-bad-dea.html

    #platform-capitalisme #tourisme #Berlin #Paris #visites_guidées

  • Avoid Design by Committee : Generate Apart, Evaluate Together
    https://dev.to/lpasqualis/avoid-design-by-committee-generate-apart-evaluate-together-2l00

    This post was first published in its entirety on CoderHood as Avoid Design by Committee: Generate Apart, Evaluate Together. CoderHood is a blog dedicated to the human dimension of software engineering.

    The tech industry thrives on innovation. Building innovative software products requires constant design and architecture of creative solutions. In that context, I am not a fan of design by committee; in fact, I believe that it is more of a disease than a strategy. It afflicts teams with no leadership or unclear leadership; the process is painful, and the results are abysmal.

    Usability issues plague software products designed by committee. Such products look like collections of features stuck together without a unifying vision or a unique feeling; they are like onions, built as a series (...)

  • Design rollercoaster. 5 epic fails vs. 5 trendy must-haves
    https://hackernoon.com/design-rollercoaster-5-epic-fails-vs-5-trendy-must-haves-91c2e052080d?so

    Sometimes creating a web design is like walking across the minefield. You never know which creative solution will endear the users and which will make them leave the brand forever. And while research and analytics tools provide insights into the user’s preferences, some design errors are persistent. Today we want to take you on a rollercoaster ride of the five worst mistakes a web designer can make and the five trendy ways to correct them.Design originality that hinders usabilityDesigners get caught up in the creative flow and forget that they create interfaces for users, not themselves. And when people can’t find content, they turn from interested into annoyed and then just leave never to return. Unhelpful category names, an excess of links and menus, illogical structure and unexpected (...)

    #frontend #design-must-haves #design-fail #web-development #web-design

  • Definitions, Cake, and Zombies | 3 Lessons Learnt from #hacking at TX McCombs 3-P Hackathon
    https://hackernoon.com/definitions-cake-and-zombies-3-lessons-from-hacking-at-tx-mccombs-3-p-ha

    Last weekend, I had the pleasure of hacking at the McCombs School of #business 3-P Hackathon which was focused on tackling 3 challenges: People, Profit (Sustainability), and Planet. We worked over the course of Friday and Saturday to come up with some creative solutions to these mammoth-sized problems.With every hackathon, there is always something new to learn and I wanted to share 3 lessons that I took away from this experience:1. Define everything2. Problems = Layered cake3. Zombies are welcomeOur keynote speaker on Saturday afternoon was Kristjan Jespersen, Ph.D. who is an Assistant Professor at the Copenhagen Business School. I loved his quote about how every business developed these days should be sustainable, but beyond that, he started his speech by showing a painting “Landscape (...)

    #hackathons #sustainability #diversity

  • atelier cartographique

    A collaborative network of professionals involved in data visualization.

    Using cartographic culture as a source of inspiration, we propose technical and creative solutions for digital and printed cartography.

    We come up with unique ideas and proposals that can help our clients and collaborators to push forward their initial requirements, and open-up relevant and exciting ways to work with mapping and cartography.

    https://www.atelier-cartographique.be pour @fil et @reka

  • Stuxnet’s Secret Twin - By Ralph Langner | Foreign Policy
    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/11/19/stuxnets_secret_twin_iran_nukes_cyber_attack
    http://www.nettavisen.no/imagecache/parameter/?upsizable=true&action=resize&width=980&height=-1&url=http://pub.nettavisen.no/multimedia/na/archive/00755/Natanz__Natanz___75588116x9.jpg

    What I’ve found is that the full picture, which includes the first and lesser-known Stuxnet variant, invites a re-evaluation of the attack. It turns out that it was far more dangerous than the cyberweapon that is now lodged in the public’s imagination.

    ...

    Once multiple centrifuges are shut off within the same stage, operating pressure — the most sensitive parameter in uranium enrichment using centrifuges — will increase, which can and will lead to all kinds of problems.

    The Iranians found a creative solution for this problem.

    ...

    The system might have keep Natanz’s centrifuges spinning, but it also opened them up to a cyberattack that is so far-out, it leads one to wonder whether its creators might have been on drugs.

    ...

    One of the first things this Stuxnet variant does is take steps to hide its tracks, using a trick straight out of Hollywood. Stuxnet records the cascade protection system’s sensor values for a period of 21 seconds. Then it replays those 21 seconds in a constant loop during the execution of the attack. In the control room, all appears to be normal, both to human operators and any software-implemented alarm routines.

    Then Stuxnet begins its malicious work.

    ...

    Nevertheless, the attackers faced the risk that the attack would not work at all because the attack code is so overengineered that even the slightest oversight or any configuration change would have resulted in zero impact or, worse, in a program crash that would have been detected by Iranian engineers quickly.

    The results of the overpressure attack are unknown. Whatever they were, the attackers decided to try something different in 2009.

    ...

    The new version self-replicated, spreading within trusted networks and via USB drive to all sorts of computers, not just to those that had the Siemens configuration software for controllers installed.

    ...

    If Stuxnet is American-built — and, according to published reports, it most certainly is — then there is only one logical location for this center of gravity: Fort Meade, Maryland, the home of the National Security Agency.

    ...

    Stuxnet is a low-yield weapon with the overall intention of reducing the lifetime of Iran’s centrifuges and making the Iranians’ fancy control systems appear beyond their understanding.

    Reasons for such tactics are not difficult to identify. When Stuxnet was first deployed, Iran had already mastered the production of IR-1 centrifuges at industrial scale. During the summer of 2010, when the Stuxnet attack was in full swing, Iran operated about 4,000 centrifuges, but kept another 5,000 in stock, ready to be commissioned. A one-time destruction of the Iranians’ operational equipment would not have jeopardized that strategy, just like the catastrophic destruction of 4,000 centrifuges by an earthquake back in 1981 did not stop Pakistan on its way to getting the bomb. By my estimates, Stuxnet set back the Iranian nuclear program by two years; a simultaneous catastrophic destruction of all operating centrifuges wouldn’t have caused nearly as big a delay.

    ...

    Pakistan basically managed to go from zero to successful low-enriched uranium production within just two years during shaky economic times, without the latest in digital control technology. The same effort took Iran over 10 years, despite the jump-start from Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan network and abundant money from sales of crude oil. If Iran’s engineers didn’t look incompetent before, they certainly did during the time when Stuxnet was infiltrating their systems.

    ...

    Legend has it that in the summer of 2010, while inflicting its damage on Natanz, Stuxnet “escaped” from the nuclear facility due to a software bug that came with a version update. While that is a good story, it cannot be true. Stuxnet propagated only between computers that were attached to the same local network or that exchanged files though USB drives.

    ...

    Given that Stuxnet reported Internet protocol addresses and hostnames of infected systems back to its command-and-control servers, it appears that the attackers were clearly anticipating (and accepting) a spread to noncombatant systems and were quite eager to monitor that spread closely. This monitoring would eventually deliver information on contractors working at Natanz, their other clients, and maybe even clandestine nuclear facilities in Iran.

    ...

    Stuxnet-inspired attackers will not necessarily place the same emphasis on disguise; they may want victims to know that they are under cyberattack and perhaps even want to publicly claim credit for it.

    And unlike the Stuxnet attackers, these adversaries are also much more likely to go after civilian critical infrastructure.

    ...

    In fact, all modern plants operate with standard industrial control system architectures and products from just a handful of vendors per industry, using similar or even identical configurations. In other words, if you get control of one industrial control system, you can infiltrate dozens or even hundreds of the same breed more.

    ...

    Along the road, one result became clear: Digital weapons work. And different from their analog counterparts, they don’t put military forces in harm’s way, they produce less collateral damage, they can be deployed stealthily, and they are dirt cheap. The contents of this Pandora’s box have implications much beyond Iran; they have made analog warfare look low-tech, brutal, and so 20th century.