industryterm:oil wealth

  • House of Saud’s power struggle could turn bloody | Middle East Eye
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/house-sauds-power-struggle-may-turn-bloody-737583439

    Par Madawi Al-Rasheed

    What we are witnessing today in Saudi Arabia among royalty is the beginning of the process by which the vertical succession may need bloodshed to be established as fait accompli, thus slimming down a cult that has gone too big at times of dwindling oil wealth.

    If in the past money was thrown at disgruntled princes, today bin Salman wants to strip them of their cash to replenish his own coffers that are under the pressure of both population growth and decreasing oil prices.

    He’s got to find money somewhere if he wants to mitigate against an imminent rebellion by both disgruntled princes and impoverished Saudis, who will have to resort to traditional methods of cooling their beds by sleeping under wet sheets in the absence of affordable electricity to power their modern air-conditioning units.

    Should Mohammed bin Salman continue to deploy the sword against his rivals and more importantly the disenfranchised Saudis, he is unlikely to secure his place as the visionary saviour, the new imam of moderate Islam, the economic engine of affluence in the post-oil age, and the youngest head of the Al-Saud cult.

  • Report
    64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/20/64-years-later-cia-finally-releases-details-of-iranian-coup-iran-tehr
    New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate spy.
    https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/gettyimages-160316677.jpg?w=960&h=460&crop=1
    “Declassified documents released last week shed light on the Central Intelligence Agency’s central role in the 1953 coup that brought down Iranian Prime Minister Muhammad Mossadegh, fueling a surge of nationalism which culminated in the 1979 Iranian Revolution and poisoning U.S.-Iran relations into the 21st century.

    The approximately 1,000 pages of documents also reveal for the first time the details of how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate spy on the ground.

    Known as Operation Ajax, the CIA plot was ultimately about oil. Western firms had for decades controlled the region’s oil wealth, whether Arabian-American Oil Company in Saudi Arabia, or the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in Iran. When the U.S. firm in Saudi Arabia bowed to pressure in late 1950 and agreed to share oil revenues evenly with Riyadh, the British concession in Iran came under intense pressure to follow suit. But London adamantly refused.

    So in early 1951, amid great popular acclaim, Mossadegh nationalized Iran’s oil industry. A fuming United Kingdom began conspiring with U.S. intelligence services to overthrow Mossadegh and restore the monarchy under the shah. (Though some in the U.S. State Department, the newly released cables show, blamed British intransigence for the tensions and sought to work with Mossadegh.)

    The coup attempt began on August 15 but was swiftly thwarted. Mossadegh made dozens of arrests. Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi, a top conspirator, went into hiding, and the shah fled the country.

    The CIA, believing the coup to have failed, called it off.”

  • Vijay Prashad’s Book Explores Why ’You Cannot Build Democracy With a Gun’
    http://thewire.in/72317/vijay-prashad-death-of-a-nation-and-the-future-of-the-arab-revolution-review

    Prashad asserts that however real the Sunni-Shia divide is, it does not drive the political turmoil in the region. That narrative is authored by the geo-political rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia, spurred by the machinations of the West and Israel. There was no inherent antipathy between the sultans of Arabia and the king of Iran. It was the Iranian Revolution of 1979 that posed issues which the Saudi monarchy saw as an existential challenge to itself and as an insidious influence on its neighbourhood. The fact that a Muslim king had been replaced by an Islamic form of republicanism, with the introduction of an elected parliament and the establishment of modern institutions which even allowed women to participate. Early on, the US had decided that its own preservation lay in protecting the Arab monarchs and their oil wealth. For its own interests, the US government deepened the sectarian divide by fanning Saudi fears about Iran.

    “Anti-Iran morphed rapidly into anti-Shia rhetoric and practice,” notes Prashad. “It is how Saudi proxies have operated in Syria and in Iraq and why Saudi Arabia began its endless war in Yemen.”

    Wahabism would have been unthinkable in the diverse and secular Iraq that existed before the US invasion in 2003. The occupation forces dug into fissures between the Shia and Sunni sects to smother any chance of reconstruction of Iraqi nationalism. The US occupation provided oxygen to al-Qaeda and its ilk, who the locals began to refer to as “the Saudis of Iraq”. Nothing in the soil of Iraq, says Prashad, suggested incipient sectarian brutality; under US sponsorship it developed and bloomed fully. The global war on terror declared by the US and its allies “did not erase the terrorists; it manufactured them”. ISIS dates its origin to the anti-US insurgency in Iraq. The danger of sectarian wars, he points out “is that they have no endgame. They will not end with a utopian outcome. They can end only where life becomes evil.”

    Prashad adds that in similar fashion “the West – and Israel – have been content to see Syria bleed and weaken. No outcome is desirable to them.” Since the Syrian government was incapable of fulfilling people’s aspirations, Arab money intervened – backed by the adventurism of Western powers – to play out their own respective agendas. From a political dispute, the Syrian stand-off plunged into a confounding war among a number of proxy armies from neighbouring countries, the al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Kurds and Assad’s forces, with overt and covert gimmicks of Russia, France and the US further poisoning the quagmire.

    The Death of the Nation maintains that the lessons from Iraq were not learned: they were repeated in Libya and again, calamitously, in Syria and Yemen. Was there an alternative to regime-change that might have saved these countries from devastation and chaos? If the West and its allies had not chased total victory, could a negotiated settlement have been fashioned to forestall the resultant catastrophe? Bear in mind that bodies like the African Union had offered to mediate; and Saddam Hussein, on his capture, begged to negotiate; while [Muammar] Gaddafi, before he was lynched, pleaded that he be allowed to surrender.

    The Arab Revolutions were the outcome of the inter-play of three forces, contends Prashad. First, ‘political Islam’ which had originated as an Islamic component of the anti-colonial struggle. Exemplified in the Muslim Brotherhood, this was also a modernising influence and therefore, distinct from Wahabism. While it remained largely in the shadows, political Islam incubated in mosques everywhere, touching the lives of large numbers and developing a mass base and strong cadre. Second, the “youth bulge” in the Arab demographic presented a phalanx of under-employed, educated young people frustrated at the lack of economic and social opportunity and at the stultifying political atmosphere. The third strand – and in Prashad’s view the most significant – comprised of the organised working class and migrant residents of urban slums, who came together on everyday issues to demonstrate and strike, and to provide the spark for insurrection.

    These forces combined to spur large sections of the population to rise against dispensations representing the security state on the one hand and neo-liberal policies on the other, triggering a revolution against economic deprivation and political suffocation. Prashad views the Arab Revolution as a “civilisational” uprising, but he does not offer anything more than anecdotal basis to support his wishful assertion that the memory of the popular upsurge “makes an irreversible slip backward impossible”.

    On his extensive travels, Prashad comes upon a cross-section of individuals dreaming of revitalised Arab nationalism “as a cord that binds people across the widened sectarian divides”: Iraqi women’s activist Yanar Mohammed challenges the Americans: “You cannot build democracy with a gun”; journalist and theatre person Hadi al-Mahdi laments: “I am sick of seeing our mothers beg in the streets”; a young al-Nusra militant in Lebanon confides: “If I had a job, I would not do jihad”; Omar Abdulaziz Hallaj, “a wise and distinguished architect from Aleppo” works quietly with others like him to build trust to bridge the sectarian divide and buttress Syrian diversity.

    #prashad #catastrophe_arabe

  • .:Middle East Online:: :.
    http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=76959

    ADNOC is cutting thousands of jobs as it vies to cut costs to cope with sharp drop in oil revenues, industry sources say. (...) ADNOC has “asked its affiliates to cut costs,” said the source, pointing out that job cuts are the obvious outcome “as more than half of the operating cost is that of the staff”. (...)

    In a statement issued by ADNOC on Sunday, the group said its decisions are always taken to “serve the ultimate goal of maximising shareholder value”, without mentioning job cuts.

    "We have taken significant steps to ensure ADNOC enhances its commerciality by becoming more efficient and doing more with less, in line with best business practice. (...) Abu Dhabi controls the bulk of the oil wealth of the United Arab Emirates which ranks sixth largest among the reserves of OPEC members.

    #émirats

  • Saudi currency devaluation would carry major political risk
    http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2016/Feb-05/335754-saudi-currency-devaluation-would-carry-major-political-risk.ash

    Currency traders have been betting against the Saudi peg, and those of other regional oil producers, in the wake of oil’s price collapse. Societe Generale said Thursday it saw at least a 25 percent chance of a near-term devaluation or 40 percent if oil prices stay at current levels throughout 2016.

    But in Saudi Arabia’s largely dollar-denominated economy breaking the peg would immediately raise the price of goods, hitting living standards.

    Combined with other pending painful economic reforms, this could lead to unrest in a country where the unwritten social contract swaps citizens’ obedience and allegiance to the king for good government services and a share in oil wealth.

    “Devaluation of the currency or depegging would self-inflict destructive economic pain. It would be catastrophic,” said John Sfakianakis, a Riyadh-based economist.

  • The Saudis Are Stumbling. They May Take the Middle East with Them.
    http://fpif.org/the-saudis-are-stumbling-they-may-take-the-middle-east-with-them

    For the past eight decades Saudi Arabia has been careful.

    Using its vast oil wealth, it’s quietly spread its ultra-conservative brand of Islam throughout the Muslim world, secretly undermined secular regimes in its region, and prudently kept to the shadows while others did the fighting and dying. It was Saudi money that fueled the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan, underwrote Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iran, and bankrolled Islamic movements and terrorist groups from the Caucasus to the Hindu Kush.

    It wasn’t a modest foreign policy, but it was a discreet one.

    #arabie_saoudite

  • Et pendant ce temps-là, en #Azerbaïdjan,…

    Azerbaijan : Aliyev Family, Friends Cruise Aboard SOCAR Super Yachts
    https://www.occrp.org/en/investigations/4342-azerbaijan-aliyev-family-friends-cruise-aboard-socar-super-yachts


    Le Prima

    Friends and family of President Ilham Aliyev make free use of two luxury yachts worth US$ 59 million that are owned by the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan (SOCAR), the organization charged with managing the country’s oil wealth for its citizens.
    That means the yachts deprive Azerbaijani citizens of about US$ 12 million per year in oil profits—the amount experts say such yachts typically cost to run. That’s in addition to the US$ 2,000 worth of fuel per hour that the yachts consume.
    It’s not the first time SOCAR has been so accommodating to the Aliyevs. The First Family previously used SOCAR to register their US$ 25 million London mansion.

    avec visite du Prima et du Sedation A, les 2 yachts en question.
    https://www.occrp.org/investigations/4342-azerbaijan-aliyev-family-friends-cruise-aboard-socar-super-yachts

    Yet another ex-crew member shed light on why the Aliyevs were seldom seen aboard Prima: on one occasion when Aliyev and his wife, Mehriban, were on board, the First Lady is said to have felt seasick and the presidential staff complained that the yacht was too small.

    During a short trip the wife felt sick and said that the boat was too small. So then her staff started to talk about buying a bigger boat, of 70 or 100 meters,” the crew member said.

    #Corleones_of_the_Caspian

  • The Algerian Exception -
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/30/opinion
    By KAMEL DAOUD

    ORAN, Algeria — Algeria is indeed a country of the Arab world: a de facto dictatorship with Islamists, oil, a vast desert, a few camels and soldiers, and women who suffer. But it also stands apart : It is the only Arab republic untouched by the Arab Spring of 2010-2011. Amid the disasters routinely visited upon the region, Algeria is an exception. Immobile and invisible, it doesn’t change and keeps a low profile.

    This is largely because Algeria already had its Arab Spring in 1988, and it has yet to recover. The experience left Algerians with a deep fear of instability, which the regime of President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in power since 1999, has exploited, along with the country’s oil wealth, to control its people — all the while deploying impressive ruses to hide Algeria from the world’s view.

    October 1988: Thousands of young Algerians hit the streets to protest the National Liberation Front (F.L.N.), the dominant party born of the war for independence; the absence of presidential term limits; a mismanaged socialist economy; and a tyrannical secret service. The uprising is suppressed with bloodshed and torture. The single-party system nonetheless has to take a step back: Pluralism is introduced; reforms are announced.

    The Islamists came out ahead in the first free elections in 1990, and again in the 1991 legislative elections — only to be foiled by the military in January 1992. Long before Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Egypt, Algeria had invented the concept of therapeutic coup d’état, of coup as cure for Islamism. At the time, the military’s intervention did not go over well, at least not with the West: This was before 9/11, and the world did not yet understand the Islamist threat. In Algeria, however, Islamism was already perceived as an unprecedented danger. After the coup followed a decade of civil war, which left as many as 200,000 people dead and a million displaced, not to mention all those who disappeared.

    When in 2010-2011 the Arab Spring came to Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, Algerians hoped for change, too. But their fear that war or the Islamists would return was greater still. “We have already paid,” the vox populi said, and the government joined in, intent on checking any revolutionary urge.

    At the time I wrote: “Yes, we have already paid, but the goods have not been delivered.” The regime had slowly been gnawing away at the democratic gains made in October 1988: freedom of speech, a true multiparty system, free elections. Dictatorship had returned in the form of controlled democracy. And the government, though in the hands of a sickly and invisible president, was brilliant at playing on people’s fears. “Vote against change” was the gist of the prime minister’s campaign for the 2012 legislative elections.

    The government also exploited the trauma left by France’s 132-year presence, casting the Arab Spring as a form of neocolonialism. To this day, the specter of colonialism remains the regime’s ideological foundation and the basis of its propaganda, and it allows the country’s so-called liberators — now well into their 70s — to still present themselves as its only possible leaders. France’s direct intervention to oust Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya only played into their hands; it looked like the sinister workings of their phantasmagorical triptych of enemies: France, the C.I.A. and Israel. Enough to quiet any populist ardor and charge the opposition’s leaders with being traitors and collaborators.

    And so it was that as soon as January 2011 the early stirrings of protest were promptly quashed. The massive police apparatus played a part, as did state television, with stations taking turns reminding the people of a few chilling equations: democracy = chaos and stability = immobility.

    Money also helped. Oil dollars may make the world go round, but they have kept Algeria still. In the contemporary mythology of the Arab Spring, Bouazizi the Tunisian is the unemployed man who topples a dictator by setting himself on fire in public. This hero could not have been Algerian: In this country, Mohamed Bouazizi would have been bought off, corrupted.

    The Algerian regime is rich in oil and natural gas. And at the outset of the Arab revolts, it reached into its pockets, and gave out free housing, low-interest loans and huge bribes. Oil money was distributed not to revive the economy or create real jobs, but to quell anger and turn citizens into clients. Wilier than others, the government of Algeria did not kill people; it killed time.

    While distributing handouts thwarted a revolution, it did trigger thousands of small local riots — 10,000 to 12,000 a year, by some estimates. But these protesters were not demanding democracy, just housing and roads, water and electricity. In 2011 a man set himself on fire in a town west of Algiers. Reporters flocked to him, thinking they had found a revolutionary. “I am no Bouazizi,” said the Algerian, from the hospital bed in which he would not die. “I just want decent housing.”

    Meanwhile Mr. Bouteflika, ailing and absent, managed to get himself re-elected in 2014 without ever appearing in public, campaigning mostly by way of a Photoshopped portrait plastered across the country. The best dictatorship knows to stay invisible. Local journalists are under strict surveillance; the foreign media’s access is restricted; tourism is limited; few images of Algeria are broadcast internationally.

    The only spectacle to come out of Algeria these last few years was of some Islamists taking hostages in the Tiguentourine gas field in January 2013. But the government, by responding firmly, was able to project the image of a regime that, though no ideological ally of the West, could nonetheless be counted on as a dependable partner in the global war against terrorism. To a Morsi, an Assad or a Sisi, Western governments prefer a Bouteflika, even aging and ailing and barely able to speak. Between antiterrorism and immobility, Algeria has succeeded in selling itself as a model even without being a democracy. No small feat.

    But the situation is untenable. Politically, the Algerian regime has become the Pakistan of North Africa, with both money and power in the hands of a caste that the West thinks of as a difficult partner. Algeria is too vast a country to be run by a centralist government, and no new leaders have emerged who could ensure a guided transition. The Islamists are on the rise. Oil prices are dropping. The Algerian exception cannot last much longer.

    Kamel Daoud, a journalist and columnist for Quotidien d’Oran, is the author of “The Meursault Investigation.” This essay was translated by Edward Gauvin from the French.

    NEXT IN OPINION

  • Fragmentation will hinder peace efforts in Libya
    https://www.oxan.com/analysis/dailybrief/samples/LibyaRebelGroups.aspx?DCS.dcsref=http%3a%2f%2ft.co%2fZfHVqYmszV&WT.mc_id=TWT

    Libya’s militia groups have coalesced into two broad camps — the Dignity and Dawn blocs — but even within these camps, they are far from unified. Towns are competing against other towns, tribes against each other, ideological groupings against everyone — and all vying for influence and access to the state’s oil wealth.

    This will hinder efforts to stabilise the country: no group has the capability to force consensus but can effectively veto any stabilisation efforts by acting as a spoiler.

    #Libye

  • A ’#ghost town’ created in the U.S., with a little help from Canadian oil wealth
    http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/ghost+town+created+with+little+help+from+Canadian+wealth/9734306/story.html

    the whole relocation program might have cost the Marathon Oil Corp. less than one per cent of the overall price tag for its $2.2-billion plant renovation.

    http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/cms/binary/9734321.jpg

    ça cause de Fort McMurray @davduf tu as vu ?
    #pétrole #logement #pollution

  • Libyan gunmen occupying #Oil ports begin exports
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/libyan-gunmen-occupying-oil-ports-begin-exports

    Gunmen who have been seizing oil ports in eastern #Libya said on Saturday they had started exporting oil, bypassing the Tripoli government, with their first shipment going to a North Korean-flagged tanker. Officials at state-run National Oil Corp (NOC) confirmed earlier on Saturday that the tanker was docked at the Es-Sider port, which is under the control of a group demanding autonomy and a greater share of Libya’s oil wealth. “We started exporting oil. This is our first shipment,” a spokesman for the group, which has seized Es-Sider and two other ports, said. read more

    #North_Korthea #oil_port #Top_News

  • Saudi salaries campaign gains momentum on social media

    A Saudi-based social media campaign aimed at increasing salaries has gained a massive following among citizens of the kingdom, many of whom are facing an increasing struggle to meet their daily living costs. Supporters of the campaign, which uses the Arabic hashtag #Our_salary_does_not_meet_our_needs, have been most active on the micro-blogging site Twitter, and their hashtag is becoming the campaign’s defining symbol, generating 17 million tweets in its first two weeks and becoming the 16th most popular hashtag in any language. However the campaign has also attracted criticism, with some Saudis seeing it as misguided and others unhappy with the public way in which the country’s problems are being aired.

    Kingdom in flux
    Although the campaign’s objective, to appeal to King Abdallah “to issue a royal decree to increase the salaries of all employees”, appears clear cut, the campaign has come to embody a number of factors that reveal a society in flux: poverty and the distribution of the country’s vast oil wealth, a population that has grown from around 7 million in the 1970s to almost 30 million in 2012, a growing number of young, educated citizens, and a disconnect between the expectations of many Saudis and their government’s policies.

    Misplaced government spending?
    Supporters of the campaign have voiced criticism of what they see as the Saudi government’s misplaced spending of the country’s funds. A widely circulated cartoon on Twitter depicts a palm tree labelled “the Saudi government” on one side of a wall, with a Saudi citizen sitting beneath it while the tree leans over the wall dropping its fruit on the other side, which is captioned “95 per cent: the rest of the world”. This criticism came to a head when the government pledged 5 billion dollars in aid to Egypt in the wake of the ousting of President Muhammad Morsi in July, prompting many to express their resentment at the decision. A picture circulated on Twitter underlined the point: it showed a Saudi couple with a baby and living in squalor in a caravan, with the caption: “Saudi Arabia gives Egypt 5 billion dollars. Don’t they deserve it more?”

    Royal excesses
    Many Saudis have used the campaign to vent their frustrations with the perceived excesses of some members of the royal family. Recent reports of a prince paying half a million dollars to spend 15 minutes with the American actress Kristen Stewart were met with tweets such as: “A prince meets an actress for 500 thousand and the people are chanting ’Our salary does not meet our needs’, suffering from a housing crisis and asking ’How can a Saudi own a house?’. The country is lost.”

    “Saudization”
    Attempts at “Saudization” by the government in recent years are yet to make significant inroads into resolving employment issues in the kingdom. A number of measures aimed at reducing the country’s heavy reliance on foreign workers in favour of Saudi employees, has so far had a limited impact on the situation. With 50 per cent of its population below the age of 25, how Saudi Arabia tackles this issue will become increasingly important in future. According to a July 2013 IMF report on Saudi Arabia, one of the challenges faced by the country is in providing suitable employment for the increasing number of young Saudis expected to enter the workplace over the next decade. It also notes a complaint voiced by many of the campaign’s supporters, which is the lack of affordable housing, reporting “a sharp increase in rents during 2007-11”.

    Nation “drowning in debt”
    Preparations ahead of Saudi National Day on 23 September have led many Twitter users to express conflicted feelings over their sense of patriotism in light of the campaign. A tweet posted by many users reads: “Before you shake your behind on the street happily wearing green on National Day, remember that you were tweeting with the hashtag ’Our salary does not meet our needs’.” Another Twitter user complained: “What National Day, when my nation is drowning in debt, all the princes are in Switzerland and we’re paying bills. It’s the fault of those who allow them to play with our money and our petrol”.

    Twitter hashtag “is a front for sedition”
    Such public airing of social grievances is frowned upon in a society which prefers to keep its flaws out of the spotlight, with some believing that the campaign and the publicity it has received tarnishes the image of the country. The secretary-general of the Cabinet, Abd-al-Rahman al-Sadhan, condemned the campaign in the Saudi newspaper Al-Watan, saying that the hashtag was “a front for sedition led by people angry that the kingdom is living in peace and stability amid the struggles that some countries are facing”. He added that it was set up by “unknown, envious people who don’t like the fact that Saudi Arabia is blessed with security and peace of mind”.

    Campaign misses deeper issues
    Abd-al-Rahman Al Farhan wrote in the Saudi daily Al-Bilad that the campaign’s demand of a higher salary fails to take into account underlying issues that make it difficult for many Saudis to meet their living costs. The writer suggested that topics addressed by the campaign would be better dealt with by the introduction of measures such as ensuring accommodation by expediting housing allowance payments, and providing health insurance for all citizens to enable them to receive the best health care. According to Al Farhan, if these measures were implemented, then “all calls for increases in salaries would dissolve into a vast sea of satisfaction and contentment”.

    Source: BBC Monitoring research in English 12 Sep 13

    © Copyright British Broadcasting Corporation 2013

  • AP: Chavez Wasted His Money on Healthcare When He Could Have Built Gigantic Skyscrapers
    http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/03/06/ap-chavez-wasted-his-money-on-healthcare-when-he-could-have-built-gigantic-sky

    One of the more bizarre takes on Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s death comes from Associated Press business reporter Pamela Sampson (3/5/13):

    Chavez invested Venezuela’s oil wealth into social programs including state-run food markets, cash benefits for poor families, free health clinics and education programs. But those gains were meager compared with the spectacular construction projects that oil riches spurred in glittering Middle Eastern cities, including the world’s tallest building in Dubai and plans for branches of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums in Abu Dhabi.

    Je vous le traduis, parce que c’est assez incroyable…

    Chavez a investi les bénéfices du pétrole du Vénézuela dans des programmes sociaux incluant des magasins d’alimentation gérés par l’État, des prestations en cash pour les familles pauvres, des cliniques de santé gratuites et des programmes éducatifs. Mais ces gains sont maigres comparées aux projets de construction spectaculaires que les richesses du pétrole ont investi dans les scintillantes villes du Moyen-Orient, notamment le plus haut building du monde à Dubai et des projets de branches des musées du Louvre et Guggenheim à Abu Dhabi.

  • Why Are Dubai and Abu Dhabi’s Roads Some of the World’s Most Dangerous? - Max Fisher - International - The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/10/why-are-dubai-and-abu-dhabis-roads-some-of-the-worlds-most-dangerous/246816

    It turns out that the profusion of oil wealth (not to mention some cultural factors) might actually make the roads more dangerous. Individuals, who often live off lavish subsidies, are accustomed to seeing the government as something that gives out money, not as a regulatory and policing body. The governments, which draw their legitimacy and power from oil rather than from people, have less incentive to implement harsher driving rules, which might prove unpopular. I asked on Twitter why UAE traffic is so bad and got some interesting responses from residents, natives, and expats who’ve lived in the area.

  • Six Official Lies And Misconceptions Of Euro-US War On Libya – James Petras
    http://www.eurasiareview.com/six-official-lies-and-misconceptions-of-euro-us-war-on-libya-oped-300

    The key point is that while Libya allows the biggest US-European multi-nationals to plunder its oil wealth, it did not become a strategic geo-political-military asset of the empire. As we have written in many previous essays the driving force of US empire-building is military – and not economic. This is why billions of dollars of Western economic interests and contracts had been sacrificed in the setting up of sanctions against Iraq and Iran – with the costly result that the invasion and occupation of Iraq shut down most oil exploitation for over a decade.

    The Washington-led assault on Libya, with the majority of air sorties and missiles strikes being carried out by the Obama regime, is part of a more general counter-attack in response to the most recent Arab popular pro-democracy movements. The West is backing the suppression of these pro-democracy movements throughout the Gulf; it finances the pro-imperial, pro-Israel junta in Egypt and it is intervening in Tunisia to ensure that any new regime is “correctly aligned”. It supports a despotic regime in Algeria as well as Israel’s daily assaults on Gaza. In line with this policy, the West backs the uprising of ex-Gaddafites and right-wing monarchists, confident that the ‘liberated’ Libya will once again provide military bases for the US-European military empire-builders.

    In contrast, the emerging market-driven global and regional powers have refused to support this conflict, which jeopardizes their access to oil and threatens the current large-scale oil exploration contracts signed with Gaddafi. The growing economies of Germany, China, Russia, Turkey, India and Brazil rely on exploiting new markets and natural resources all over Africa and the Middle East, while the US, Britain and France spend billions pursuing wars that de-stabilize these markets, destroy infrastructure and foment long-term wars of resistance.

    Je n’ai pas vraiment d’opinion définitive sur la question, pas de religion quant à James Petras, mais je pense que c’est un texte intéressant pour alimenter la réflexion.