#islamophobia

#Islamophobia: Anatomy of an American Panic
DateThursday, June 14, 2012

_The Nation has a special issue entitled “Islamophobia: Anatomy of an American Panic” with articles examining different aspects of Islamophobia in the US.

These include Moustafa Bayoumi, “Fear and Loathing of Islam”, Jack Shaheen, “How the Media Created the Muslim Monster Myth” (subscription only), Petra Bartosiewicz, “Deploying Informants, the FBI Stings Muslims”, Laila Lalami, “Islamophobia and Its Discontents”, Abed Awad, “The True Story of Sharia in American Courts”, Ramzi Kassem, “The Long Roots of the NYPD Spying Program”, Max Blumenthal, “The Sugar Mama of Anti-Muslim Hate”, and Laila Al-Arian, “When Your Father Is Accused of Terrorism”._

http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2012/6/14/islamophobia-anatomy-of-an-american-panic.html

In Breivik, troubling echoes of #West's view of #Islam
By Timothy Stanley, Special to CNN, April 17, 2012

Editor’s note: Timothy Stanley is a historian at Oxford University and blogs for Britain’s Daily Telegraph. He is the author of the new book “The Crusader: The Life and Times of Pat Buchanan.”

(CNN) — The trial of mass murderer Anders Breivik has confirmed one thing so far: He seems quite mad. Looking plump and dumb, with a slightly receding hairline, the Norwegian gave a right-wing salute as he entered the courtroom and smirked his way through CCTV footage of his handiwork.

Breivik claims that he killed 77 people as an act of self-defense against the #Islamification of Norway, that he is a member of the Knights Templar and part of an “anticommunist” resistance to multiculturalism. Reading his insane manifesto, it is tempting to dismiss him as a nut with a gun.

Nevertheless, there’s no denying the political context to what Breivik did. Since 9/11, fringe and mainstream politicians in Europe and America have spoken of Islam as incompatible with Western values. Breivik quoted many of them in his manifesto. This is not to say that he took direct inspiration from those public figures, or that they bear personal responsibility for his crimes. But Breivik’s paranoia does conform to a popular — wholly negative — view of the twin problems of Islam and multiculturalism. Tragically, it is a view that few mainstream politicians have been willing to challenge.

Breivik makes two false claims. The first is that Islam is ethically inferior to Christianity and cannot exist peacefully within the secular democracies of the post-Enlightenment West. That is the open view of the Dutch Party for Freedom, the French National Front, the English Defense League and the Finnish True Finns. It was implicit in Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain’s aversion to the building of mosques. We might also infer it from much of the testimony presented at Rep. Peter King’s congressional hearings into the radicalization of American Muslim youth. King has opined that there are “too many mosques” in the United States and that roughly 80% of American Muslims are radical.

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/17/opinion/stanley-islam-breivik/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

#islamophobia

Argument: Liberalism and Multiculturalism

Paul Berman and Tim Stanley - April 28, 2011

The following is a response by Paul Berman to Tim Stanley’s “Muscle-Flexing at Muslims.” Read Stanley’s reply below.

IN A recent contribution to Dissent, Tim Stanley of the University of London has reminded us of a terrible danger just now, which is the rise of nativist bigotries against Muslim populations in Europe and the United States. And Stanley has reminded us that, in a peculiar twist, old-style nativism has, at times, lately adopted a language of enlightened progressivism, such that, in the name of tolerance and advanced views, we are called upon to adopt the most dismissive and retrograde of attitudes toward entire immigrant populations—a rhetorical oddity of our present age.

#islamophobia, #multiculturalism

►http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online.php?id=475

Argument: Liberalism and Multiculturalism

Paul Berman and Tim Stanley - April 28, 2011

The following is a response by Paul Berman to Tim Stanley’s “Muscle-Flexing at Muslims.” Read Stanley’s reply below.

IN A recent contribution to Dissent, Tim Stanley of the University of London has reminded us of a terrible danger just now, which is the rise of nativist bigotries against Muslim populations in Europe and the United States. And Stanley has reminded us that, in a peculiar twist, old-style nativism has, at times, lately adopted a language of enlightened progressivism, such that, in the name of tolerance and advanced views, we are called upon to adopt the most dismissive and retrograde of attitudes toward entire immigrant populations—a rhetorical oddity of our present age.

#islamophobia, #multiculturalism

►http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online.php?id=475