company:wintershall

Gazoduc Nord Stream 2 : les Etats-Unis s’en prennent directement aux entreprises européennes
▻https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-finance/industrie/energie-environnement/gazoduc-nord-stream-2-les-etats-unis-s-en-prennent-directement-aux-entrepr

Washington maintient la pression contre le projet de #gazoduc germano-russe, #Nord_Stream_2, en menaçant de sanctions les entreprises allemandes impliquées.

Le porte-parole de l’ambassade américaine à Berlin a indiqué dimanche à l’AFP que « La lettre rappelle à toutes les entreprises impliquées dans le secteur des gazoducs d’exportation de l’énergie russe qu’elles s’exposent à des sanctions américaines », une information révélée par le quotidien allemand Bild paru dimanche.

Ce risque de sanctions est prévu par la Loi sur les « sanctions pour lutter contre les adversaires de l’Amérique » (CAATSA), adoptée en 2017 et qui vise l’Iran, la Corée du Nord et la Russie.

Le porte-parole a précisé que cette missive n’avait pas « pour but d’être comprise comme une menace mais comme un message clair de la politique américaine ». Il a également souligné que le seul « chantage » possible dans ce dossier serait de voir à l’avenir le Kremlin contrôler les livraisons gazières à l’Europe.

Le gazoduc qui attire ainsi les foudres de Washington est le projet Nord Stream 2 qui doit permettre de livrer directement du gaz russe à l’Allemagne et au reste de l’Europe en passant par la mer Baltique. Cela en contournant l’Ukraine, aujourd’hui principal point de passage.

Afin de multiplier par deux la capacité de gaz transportée, Nord Stream 2 a pour objectif de doubler Nord Stream 1, dont le parcours traverse les eaux territoriales de cinq pays, Russie, Finlande, Suède, Danemark et Allemagne.

Le projet regroupe le géant russe Gazprom et plusieurs groupes énergétiques européens dont les allemands Wintershall et Uniper, le néerlando-britannique Shell, le français Engie et l’autrichien OMV.

Ce n’est pas la première fois que les Etats-Unis critiquent ce projet mais en menaçant directement de sanctions les entreprises concernées, ils franchissent in pas de plus dans leur opposition.

#NordStream (1 et 2)

Hundreds of Norway oil workers go on strike, Shell shuts Knarr field | Reuters
▻https://www.reuters.com/article/us-norway-oil-wages/wage-talks-with-norway-oil-drilling-workers-go-into-overtime-strike-threat-

Hundreds of workers on Norwegian offshore oil and gas rigs went on strike on Tuesday after rejecting a proposed wage deal, leading to the shutdown of one Shell-operated field and helping send Brent crude prices higher.

One union said hundreds more workers would join the strike on Sunday if an agreement over union demands for a wage increase and pension rights was not reached.

Royal Dutch Shell said that due to the strike it was temporarily closing production at its Knarr field, which has a daily output of 23,900 barrels of mostly oil, but also natural gas liquids and natural gas.

Shutting the field, whose owners are Idemitsu, Wintershall and DEA, could take up to 36 hours, it said.

Norway is Western Europe’s biggest oil producer. The disruption added to a rise in global oil supply outages and helped push Brent crude up 1.2 percent to $79.03 per barrel.

Forget Ukraine. It’s Business As Usual Between Europe and Russia
▻http://www.newsweek.com/forget-ukraine-its-business-usual-between-europe-and-russia-369730

It was just like the old days before the European Union imposed sanctions on Russia in 2014. At the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok Gazprom clinched three major deals with some of Europe’s biggest energy companies.

One of the most important was the revival of a lucrative asset swap between the Russian energy giant and Wintershall, the energy division of BASF, a German chemical company. BASF had abandoned that swap arrangement in December 2014 because of the geopolitical consequences of Russia’s invasion of eastern Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea.

The asset swap and other deals signed in Vladivostok show how German as well as Austrian energy companies are loath to quit Russia. They also show how Gazprom wants to tie Europe’s lucrative gas market more closely to Russia. In 2013, Russia supplied the EU’s 28 countries with 30 percent of their gas needs.

But more importantly, the deals confirm how Russia is determined to end Ukraine’s role as the major transit route for Russian gas to Europe. Half of the Russian gas imported by Europe crosses Ukraine.

Under the terms of the deal between BASF and Gazprom, BASF’s subsidiary Wintershall will obtain a stake of 25 percent plus one share in the Urengoy natural gas fields in Siberia. Both firms will develop the fields.

In return, Wintershall will transfer to Gazprom its jointly owned gas storage and trading business in Germany as well as a stake in its business in Austria. Through the asset swap, Gazprom will also receive a 50 percent stake in Wintershall’s exploration and production of oil and gas in the North Sea. These activities amounted to sales of over $13.4 billion in 2014, according to BASF.

The second deal agreed to in Vladivostok involves Gazprom and a European consortium building a second Nord Stream pipeline under the Baltic Sea. This will enable Russia to send more of its gas directly to Germany, bypassing Ukraine.

The consortium consists of BASF, German energy company E.ON, French electricity company Engie, Austrian oil and gas firm OMV and Royal Dutch Shell. Gazprom will own a 51 percent share of a new company called New European Pipeline AG, which will develop the project. The other partners will have a 10 percent stake, except for Engie, which will own 9 percent.

“The fact that the global energy majors participate in the project bespeaks its significance for securing reliable gas supply to European consumers,” stated Alexey Miller, chairman of the Gazprom Management Committee.

Tell that to Poland and the Baltic states—and Ukraine. They had criticized the first Nord Stream pipeline, which was agreed to under the then German chancellor Gerhard Schröder in 2005. At the time, Warsaw argued that the deal increased Europe’s dependence on Russian energy.

Since then, however, Europe has been diversifying its energy supplies, spurred by the 2009 Ukraine gas crisis, which disrupted supplies to Europe because of a dispute between Russia and Ukraine over energy prices.

Also, through its Third Energy Package, the European Commission is introducing more competition in the energy sector by breaking the hold any one company can have over the production, distribution and trading of gas. That is one of the main reasons why in December 2014 Russia pulled out of the South Stream project, which was to transport gas across the Black Sea to Southeastern Europe. Under the terms of the commission package, Russia would have had to open up the gas pipeline to competition.

The third deal reached in Vladivostok involves OMV’s participation in the Urengoy oil and gas fields. When the deal is concluded, OMV will acquire a 24.8 percent stake in the project in exchange for Gazprom obtaining some of the assets of OMV.