• With Regard to Netanyahu’s speech, Nancy Pelosi said it all
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/03/1368277/-With-Regard-to-Netanyahu-s-speech-Nancy-Pelosi-said-it-all

    After reiterating the U.S.’s bond with Israel, Leader Pelosi said the following:

    That is why, as one who values the U.S. – Israel relationship, and loves Israel, I was near tears throughout the Prime Minister’s speech – saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States as part of the P5 +1 nations, and saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation.

    Netanyahu was almost flip when he sought to assuage fears that collapse of these negotiations would inevitably mean war, arguing that all we have to do to get a better deal is impose a few more sanctions and the Iranians will cave and come running back to the table to surrender completely their enrichment capacity. Netanyahu would have us believe that the regime in Iran that allegedly cannot be deterred, that is completely irrational, and would gladly suffer nuclear annihilation just for the opportunity to attack Israel, will surrender everything in these negotiations in the face of sanctions that could shave another few percent off their GDP. According to Netanyahu, the mullahs don’t fear nuclear annihilation, but they panic at the prospect of an economic recession.

    Insulting, indeed. Condescension, indeed.

    Bibi Netanyahu either thinks we are idiots or he is the most dangerously deluded leader on the world stage today. It’s one or the other.

    • To call that position “absurd” is too kind. You don’t have to be some kind of foreign policy whiz to grasp that there’s something weird about arguing that 1) Iran is a nation run by genocidal maniacs; 2) they want nuclear weapons so they can annihilate Israel; and 3) the best way to stop this is to abandon negotiations to limit their nuclear program and just wait to see what they do. But that’s the position Netanyahu and his supporters in the Republican Party are now committed to.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/03/03/why-netanyahus-speech-didnt-do-his-american-allies-any-favors

    • Netanyahu ne propose "aucune alternative viable", pour Obama

      http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/fr/1736/Iran/article/detail/2238803/2015/03/03/Netanyahu-ne-propose-aucune-alternative-viable-pour-Obama.dhtml

      Le président américain Barack Obama a estimé mardi que le Premier ministre israélien Benjamin Netanyahu « n’avait présenté aucune alternative viable » devant le Congrès américain au projet d’accord sur le nucléaire iranien.

      Le discours du dirigeant israélien n’apporte « rien de nouveau », a encore déclaré le dirigeant américain dans le Bureau ovale.

      « Le fait est que nous n’avons pas encore d’accord » sur le nucléaire iranien. « Mais si nous réussissons, ce sera le meilleur accord possible avec l’Iran pour empêcher qu’il se dote d’une arme nucléaire », a-t-il ajouté.

      « C’est important que nous restions concentrés sur ce problème. La question centrale est : comment pouvons nous les empêcher d’obtenir l’arme nucléaire ? », a-t-il souligné. « Je ne suis pas focalisé sur la politique, (...) sur le théâtre », a-t-il affirmé.

      “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
      Nucléaire : l’Iran accuse Netanyahu de mentir

      http://www.romandie.com/news/Nucleaire-lIran-accuse-Netanyahu-de-mentir/571495.rom

      Téhéran - L’Iran a accusé mardi le Premier ministre israélien Benjamin Netanyahu d’avoir recours à des mensonges continus après son discours devant le Congrès américain affirmant qu’un accord sur le nucléaire iranien serait une menace pour le monde entier.

      Dans un communiqué publié par l’agence officielle Irna, la porte-parole de la diplomatie Marzieh Afkham a dénoncé les mensonges continus de Netanyahu, devenus répétitifs et ennuyeux, sur les objectifs et les intentions du programme nucléaire pacifique de l’Iran.

      Le discours de M. Netanyahu est un signe de faiblesse et de l’isolement extrême des radicaux, même au sein de ceux qui soutiennent Israël, a-t-elle estimé.

      Elle a affirmé que les adversaires de Téhéran sont confrontés à de sérieux problèmes avec la poursuite des négociations et la détermination de l’Iran à surmonter la crise.

  • Fears mount that Dems will undermine White House on Iran
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/12/06/fears-mount-that-dems-will-undermine-white-house-on-iran

    Multiple Democrats on Capitol Hill are worried that House Democratic leaders are close to joining with House GOP leaders to support a bipartisan measure that could undermine the White House’s efforts to reach a long term deal curbing Iran’s nuclear program, I’m told by sources involved in discussions.
    The worry is that Dem Rep. Steny Hoyer, the number two House Dem, may join with GOP Rep. Eric Cantor on a resolution or bill that will either criticize the current temporary deal with Iran, or call for a new round of sanctions, or set as U.S. policy some strict parameters on a final deal with Iran, such as opposition to any continued uranium enrichment, House Democratic aides say. House Dems and outside foreign policy observers have communicated such worries to Hoyer’s office, sources add.

    Will Steny Hoyer Kill Deal? Will Mandela Help Sustain It? « LobeLog.com
    http://www.lobelog.com/will-steny-hoyer-kill-deal-will-mandela-help-sustain-it

    It’s worth noting that Hoyer and Cantor have led delegations consisting of freshmen members of Congress to Israel virtually every summer for some years now. The trips are sponsored by the American Israel Education Foundation, the “educational” affiliate of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), to ensure that the new lawmakers are thoroughly briefed on the Israeli government’s perspectives on a range of issues. (You may remember the one last year when one Kansas freshman under Cantor’s charge was inspired to go skinny-dipping in Lake Kinneret/Sea of Galilee. This is not the kind of publicity AIPAC normally seeks.)

    It’s also worth noting that both Hoyer’s and Cantor’s campaign chests have benefited handsomely from AIPAC-associated political action committees over the years, according to the Center for Responsive Politics’ invaluable opensecrets.org website. For the last decade, they have both ranked among the top ten House recipients of “pro-Israel” largess — Cantor ordinarily within the top three or four, Hoyer a little further down (and he only ranked 12 in the 2003-04 cycle.) One Capitol Hill Middle East policy veteran who asked not to be named called Hoyer “the (Israel) lobby’s quarterback for the Democrats in the House,” a status presumably confirmed by his leadership of the annual AIPAC codels.