• British Virgin Islands at a crossroads as outgoing governor decries corruption | British Virgin Islands | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/25/british-virgin-islands-at-a-crossroads-as-outgoing-governor-decries-cor

    Je signale pour la photo surtout, qui dit absolument tout ! Mais l’article est aussi intéressant.

    The shuffling of diplomats around the UK’s Caribbean territories rarely makes much of a splash. But Gus Jaspert ensured his last days as governor of the British Virgin Islands would be remembered.

    In an emotional Facebook video post to the BVI’s 30,000 inhabitants, he accused the country’s government of overseeing a “plague” of corruption, interfering in the criminal justice system and attempting to silence anyone who raised concerns about the misuse of funds, including £30m given by the UK to help the islands’ fight against the coronavirus pandemic.

    • Ce qui est complètement fou sur cette photo c’est que les yachts alignés sont tous rigoureusement identiques (enfin, il y en a deux séries : le modèle à voile et le modèle à moteur). Ça veut dire quoi ? Que pour être résident des îles Vierges et faire son business là bas il faut un yacht amaré sur place, et que donc ils fournissent le modèle standard ?

  • WHO’s Covid mission to Wuhan: ’It’s not about finding China guilty’ | Coronavirus | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/12/who-experts-covid-mission-not-about-finger-pointing-at-china
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/6acdc29443a8e9282d279d3fd0df409f2c8c0c19/0_50_5802_3481/master/5802.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    When the scientists on the World Health Organization’s mission to research the origins of Covid-19 touch down in China as expected on Thursday at the beginning of their investigation they are clear what they will – and what they will not – be doing.They intend to visit Wuhan, the site of the first major outbreak of Covid-19, and talk to Chinese scientists who have been studying the same issue. They will want to see if there are unexamined samples from unexplained respiratory illnesses, and they will want to examine ways in which the virus might have jumped the species barrier to humans. What the mission will not be, several of the scientists insist, is an exercise in “finger pointing at China” – something long demanded by the Trump administration and some of its allies.
    While some of the scientists will travel to China, others will be part of a wider effort that has drawn in global experts in diseases.
    The importance of being on the ground in China, of seeing sites associated with the Wuhan outbreak, was underlined by Fabian Leendertz, professor in the epidemiology of highly pathogenic microorganisms at Germany’s public health body, the Robert Koch Institute, and part of the team.Involved in tracking down the source of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in west Africa to a bat colony in a tree, he has also worked on identifying when measles may have first jumped to humans. While some have built up considerable expectations around the first visit, Leendertz cautions that his experience suggests it can take time to get to the initial bottom of outbreaks, if at all.
    “We will see how long it takes. There’s small possibility we will only come up with scenarios, that we wont be able to come up with a scientific proof. For example my group published a paper last summer in Science where we found it was probably 25,000 years since measles spread from cattle to humans. Hopefully it won’t take that long,” he joked.
    Leendertz, like other colleagues involved in the mission, is clear, however, about one thing. “This is not about finding China guilty or saying ‘it started here, give or take three metres.’ This is about reducing the risk. And the media can help by avoiding Trump style finger-pointing. Our job is not political.“There will never be no risk, which is why it’s not the time to say it is farming animals or people going into bat caves for guano. It has be a data-based investigation and at the moment there is very limited data around the origin.“We know the closest relative viruses in bat species. But we still need to find the original reservoir, if there were intermediate hosts and even intermediate human hosts.”And while China has suggested other places outside of the country where the virus could have originated Leendertz believes that Wuhan remains the best starting point.“I think the WHO philosophy is a good one. Start at the point which has the most solid description of human cases even if we do not know that the Wuhan wet market was the point where it first spilled over into humans or was simply the first mega spreading event.
    “From Wuhan we can go back in time to follow the evidence. [The origin] may stay in the region. It may go to another part of China. It may even go to another country.”While there was a conversation in the team about whether the research could be done remotely, when it looked for a moment last week the visit might be blocked by China, he is not convinced that would have been a useful strategy.“You can’t do an investigation of any outbreak remotely,” he told the Guardian. “It’s just not really possible. I don’t want to give the impression we’ll be taking swabs or finding bats, but it is really important to see the locations and the settings, the wet market in Wuhan, the virology institute, to see the wildlife farms, the potential interface between the virus and humans.“We have already had a few productive online meetings with our Chinese counterparts but it is better to be sitting down and brainstorming to develop hypotheses.”Leendertz’s remarks on finger pointing were echoed by fellow team member Marion Koopmans in an interview with the Chinese television channel CGTN.“The WHO warned about the risk of emerging diseases, and I don’t think any country is immune to that. So I don’t believe this is about blaming. It’s about understanding and learning that for the future of our global preparedness. So, I don’t think we should be pointing fingers here. But it is important to start in Wuhan, where a big outbreak occurred. We need to have an open mind to all sorts on the hypothesis. And that’s what we’ve been asked to do. But we need to start in Wuhan where we first learned about the situation.”
    Professor John Watson, a UK member of the team and a former deputy chief medical officer, echoed many of the same sentiments. “I’ve worked on outbreaks mainly in the UK,” he told the Guardian. “And although in theory you could do it remotely being on the spot makes a big difference. Understanding how a place works and having direct contact with the individuals involved.“I am going into this with an entirely open mind and the colleagues on the team I have managed to speak to are the same. This is a chance to go and find out the facts: what is available to know now and what lines of investigation might be fruitful in the future. I’m not sure a single trip will find all the answers, it may never be wholly sorted, but it is a start.”
    Leendertz is clear about one thing, however. While the international scientists on the team do the investigation, the complex and sensitive diplomacy around access will be handled by the WHO amid concerns in some circles that China might try and obstruct the work.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#chine#oms#sante#pandemie#circulation#coronavirus#propagation#expert#ebola

  • Golden ticket: the lucky tourists sitting out coronavirus in New Zealand | Coronavirus | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/01/a-golden-ticket-the-tourists-who-sat-out-coronavirus-in-new-zealand
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/20140e40046f96889be19f1f56a003b124e187b9/125_0_3750_2250/master/3750.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Visitors from UK and North America tell of finding themselves with a pass to one of the best-rated pandemic responses in the world.For Christmas 2019 Efrain Vega de Varona gave his partner plane tickets to New Zealand – her dream holiday destination. It has proved a gift that keeps on giving.
    A year later they are still in New Zealand, having decided to stay put at the end of their two-week holiday in mid-March rather than return to Los Angeles. “We’ve been living out of two suitcases for 10 months,” says Vega de Varona from their latest Airbnb rental (number 50-something this year) in Island Bay, Wellington.The couple were among an estimated 250,000 overseas visitors in New Zealand just before the national lockdown and border restrictions in mid-March. Most returned home as restrictions lifted in subsequent months, but when the government extended temporary visas some decided they were better off where they were. By mid-May there were an estimated 120,000 temporary visa holders in New Zealand, among them tourists from the UK and North America who found themselves unexpectedly far from home – but with a pass to one of the best-rated pandemic responses in the world.After their flight to LA was cancelled and New Zealand went into lockdown, Vega de Varona and his partner, Ingrid Rivera, settled in the South Island coastal town of Kaikōura, where they helped to deliver groceries to local elderly people. Vega de Varona admits he had to be persuaded to stay on after the six-week lockdown. “Ingrid was the smarter one who said ‘This is the place to be – we’re not going back.’”
    The couple sold their home and cars in LA and spent 2020 travelling New Zealand while working on their motorhome rental business remotely. Rivera now plans to enrol to study, extending their visas; and they are exploring ways to put down roots by starting a business.“It’s just starting to feel like home to us,” says Vega de Varona.
    But as fortunate as they feel to have chanced upon a “golden ticket” through the pandemic, says Rivera, it has been tempered by fears for their loved ones in the US and Puerto Rico: “It’s obviously a completely different story for them.” Dr Tom Frieden, a US infectious disease expert and public physician, highlighted the stakes this week, tweeting that an American in New Zealand had a 200-times reduced risk of dying from Covid. Indeed, inquiries in emigrating to New Zealand from America climbed by 65% during May alone – representing interest from 80,000 individuals.For Eric Denman and Michelle Paulson, on holiday in New Zealand in March, the threat of going back to San Francisco was prohibitive. Paulson has lupus, putting her at elevated risk of coronavirus, so they decided to stay in Christchurch for lockdown. “We had a lot more faith in the New Zealand government in their ability to handle a pandemic – which turned out to be well founded,” she says.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#nouvellezelande#etatsunis#sante#tourisme#confinement#retour#emigration#morbidite