company:trans-pacific partnership

  • Trump est un “tourbillon crisique”
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article/trump-est-un-tourbillon-crisique

    Trump est un “tourbillon crisique”

    24 janvier 2017 – J’aurais pu, arguant de mon grand âge, reprendre dans ce Journal la gâterie californienne du jour, si intéressante. Je le fais par un biais, en l’associant contradictoirement au triomphe de Trump qui vient de liquider le TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) avec le soutien enthousiaste (si, si) de Sanders et des syndicats US, AFL-CIO en tête. Là, évidemment, nous entrons dans un nœud gordien de contradictions que j’annexe aussitôt à notre concept commun, à dde.org et moi, de “tourbillon crisique”, où il est bien difficile de suivre la rectitude d’une idéologie implacable et vertueuse, et en plus fermement plantée dans le sable poisseux du déterminisme-narrativiste.

    ... Car Sanders, c’est bien connu, et les susdits syndicats, c’est très classique, sont tous (...)

  • Trump Revamps U.S. Trade Focus by Pulling Out of Pacific Deal - Bloomberg
    https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-01-23/trump-said-to-sign-executive-order-on-trans-pacific-pact-monday

    With the stroke of a pen, President Donald Trump abruptly ended the decades-old U.S. tilt toward free trade by acting to withdraw from an Asia-Pacific accord that had been promoted by companies including Nike Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. as well as family farmers and ranchers.

    Great thing for the American worker, what we just did,” Trump said on Monday after signing a memorandum directing the U.S. Trade Representative to withdraw the U.S. as a signatory to the Trans-Pacific Partnership accord with 11 other nations. He left the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada untouched for now, but an aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said action on that accord is still in the works.

    #TPP #NAFTA

  • Gabbard avec Trump contre les neocons ?
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article/gabbard-avec-trump-contre-les-neocons

    Gabbard avec Trump contre les neocons ?

    Si elle décroche une fonction dans l’administration Trump, on peut être sûr que ce n’est ni parce qu’elle est une femme, ni parce qu’elle est d’une minorité, mais simplement du fait de l’expérience exemplaire de sa carrière et de son activisme antiguerre en matière de sécurité nationale. On parle de Tulsi Gabbard, 35 ans, députée de Hawaii, de confession hindouiste, vétéran de plusieurs campagnes en Irak et au Moyen-Orient et adversaire déclarée de l’interventionnisme et du bellicisme de la politique-Système, démocrate et démissionnaire de la vice-présidence du DNC en mars dernier pour rejoindre Sanders contre Clinton. Beau raccourci pour nous conduire à la rencontre Gabbard-Trump d’hier matin.

    Gabbard est en piste pour un poste au département de la défense ou au (...)

    • Nov 21 - Trump meets with extremely rare Democratic S3xpot Tulsi Gabbard
      https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2423090

      Gabbard met with Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence on Monday morning, but Trump spokesman Jason Miller said it was “premature” to discuss Gabbard’s potential role in the Trump administration.

      She is a noted opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, and was part of a rally on Capitol Hill on Saturday to protest the deal that is supported by Barack Obama.

      Trump also opposes the TPP.

      Stephen Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist, reportedly likes Gabbard because of her stance on guns, refugees and Islamic extremism along with her ability to invoke strong anti-establishment populist sentiment on the left.

  • Les #MSM étasuniens n’ont aucun problème à ce que les #multinationales poursuivent en justice leur propre pays (ou plutôt le contribuable étasunien) mais sont très inquiets quant aux poursuites judiciaires que pourraient subir les #Etats-Unis (ou plutôt les différents agents de la « #sécurité_nationale ») du fait de leurs #crimes de guerre,

    Big Papers Want Foreign Companies, Not War Crime Victims, to Sue US
    http://fair.org/home/big-papers-want-foreign-companies-not-war-crime-victims-to-sue-us

    The irony is that none of these publications were overly concerned with exposing the US to foreign lawsuits when they offered support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a corporate trade deal that includes a provision for Investor-State Dispute Settlement—meaning it permits corporations to sue governments, including the US, in the event that a regulation undermines corporate profits. So increased exposure to liability to the US government when it gives more power to corporations is permissible, even desirable, but when it might provide recourse for victims of US war crimes? Not so much.

  • Bernie Sanders’ Democratic National Convention speech / Boing Boing
    http://boingboing.net/2016/07/25/bernie-sanders-democratic-na.html


    La journée commence avec un type qui a du culot.

    Thank you. Good evening.

    It is an honor to be with you tonight and to be following in the footsteps of Elizabeth Warren, and to be here tonight to thank Michelle Obama for her incredible service to our country. She has made all of us proud.

    Let me begin by thanking the hundreds of thousands of Americans who actively participated in our campaign as volunteers. Thank you.

    Let me thank the 2 1/2 million Americans who helped fund our campaign with an unprecedented 8 million individual campaign contributions . Anyone know what that average contribution was? That’s right, $27. And let me thank the 13 million Americans who voted for the political revolution, giving us the 1,846 pledged delegates here tonight – 46 percent of the total.

    And delegates: Thank you for being here, and for all the work you’ve done. I look forward to your votes during the roll call on Tuesday night.

    And let me offer a special thanks to the people of my own state of Vermont who have sustained me and supported me as a mayor, congressman, senator and presidential candidate.

    And to my family – my wife Jane, four kids and seven grandchildren –thank you very much for your love and hard work on this campaign.

    I understand that many people here in this convention hall and around the country are disappointed about the final results of the nominating process. I think it’s fair to say that no one is more disappointed than I am. But to all of our supporters – here and around the country – I hope you take enormous pride in the historical accomplishments we have achieved.

    Together, my friends, we have begun a political revolution to transform America and that revolution – our revolution – continues. Election days come and go. But the struggle of the people to create a government which represents all of us and not just the 1 percent – a government based on the principles of economic, social, racial and environmental justice – that struggle continues. And I look forward to being part of that struggle with you.

    Let me be as clear as I can be. This election is not about, and has never been about, Hillary Clinton, or Donald Trump, or Bernie Sanders or any of the other candidates who sought the presidency. This election is not about political gossip. It’s not about polls. It’s not about campaign strategy. It’s not about fundraising. It’s not about all the things that the media spends so much time discussing.

    This election is about – and must be about – the needs of the American people and the kind of future we create for our children and grandchildren.

    This election is about ending the 40-year decline of our middle class the reality that 47 million men, women and children live in poverty. It is about understanding that if we do not transform our economy, our younger generation will likely have a lower standard of living then their parents.

    This election is about ending the grotesque level of income and wealth inequality that we currently experience, the worst it has been since 1928. It is not moral, not acceptable and not sustainable that the top one-tenth of one percent now own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, or that the top 1 percent in recent years has earned 85 percent of all new income. That is unacceptable. That must change.

    This election is about remembering where we were 7 1/2 years ago when President Obama came into office after eight years of Republican trickle-down economics.

    The Republicans want us to forget that as a result of the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior on Wall Street, our economy was in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Some 800,000 people a month were losing their jobs. We were running up a record-breaking deficit of $1.4 trillion and the world’s financial system was on the verge of collapse.

    We have come a long way in the last 7 1/2 years, and I thank President Obama and Vice President Biden for their leadership in pulling us out of that terrible recession.

    Yes, we have made progress, but I think we can all agree that much, much more needs to be done.

    This election is about which candidate understands the real problems facing this country and has offered real solutions – not just bombast, not just fear-mongering, not just name-calling and divisiveness.

    We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor. We need leadership which brings our people together and makes us stronger – not leadership which insults Latinos, Muslims, women, African-Americans and veterans – and divides us up.

    By these measures, any objective observer will conclude that – based on her ideas and her leadership – Hillary Clinton must become the next president of the United States. The choice is not even close.

    This election is about a single mom I saw in Nevada who, with tears in her eyes, told me that she was scared to death about the future because she and her young daughter were not making it on the $10.45 an hour she was earning. This election is about that woman and the millions of other workers in this country who are struggling to survive on totally inadequate wages.

    Hillary Clinton understands that if someone in this country works 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty. She understands that we must raise the minimum wage to a living wage. And she is determined to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure – our roads, bridges, water systems and wastewater plants.

    But her opponent – Donald Trump – well, he has a very different point of view. He does not support raising the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour – a starvation wage. While Donald Trump believes in huge tax breaks for billionaires, he believes that states should actually have the right to lower the minimum wage below $7.25.

    Brothers and sisters, this election is about overturning Citizens United, one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in the history of our country. That decision allows the wealthiest people in America, like the billionaire Koch brothers, to spend hundreds of millions of dollars buying elections and, in the process, undermine American democracy.

    Hillary Clinton will nominate justices to the Supreme Court who are prepared to overturn Citizens United and end the movement toward oligarchy in this country. Her Supreme Court appointments will also defend a woman’s right to choose, workers’ rights, the rights of the LGBT community, the needs of minorities and immigrants and the government’s ability to protect our environment.

    If you don’t believe that this election is important, if you think you can sit it out, take a moment to think about the Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump would nominate and what that would mean to civil liberties, equal rights and the future of our country.

    This election is about the thousands of young people I have met all over this country who have left college deeply in debt, and tragically the many others who cannot afford to go to college. During the primary campaign, Secretary Clinton and I both focused on this issue but with somewhat different approaches. Recently, however, we have come together on a proposal that will revolutionize higher education in America. It will guarantee that the children of any family this country with an annual income of $125,000 a year or less – 83 percent of our population – will be able to go to a public college or university tuition free. That proposal also substantially reduces student debt.

    This election is about climate change, the greatest environmental crisis facing our planet, and the need to leave this world in a way that is healthy and habitable for our kids and future generations. Hillary Clinton is listening to the scientists who tell us that – unless we act boldly and transform our energy system in the very near future – there will be more drought, more floods, more acidification of the oceans, more rising sea levels. She understands that when we do that we can create hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.

    Donald Trump? Well, like most Republicans, he chooses to reject science. He believes that climate change is a “hoax,” no need to address it. Hillary Clinton understands that a president’s job is to worry about future generations, not the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry.

    This campaign is about moving the United States toward universal health care and reducing the number of people who are uninsured or under-insured. Hillary Clinton wants to see that all Americans have the right to choose a public option in their health care exchange. She believes that anyone 55 years or older should be able to opt in to Medicare and she wants to see millions more Americans gain access to primary health care, dental care, mental health counseling and low-cost prescription drugs through a major expansion of community health centers.

    And What is Donald Trump’s position on health care? Well, no surprise there. Same old, same old Republican contempt for working families. He wants to abolish the Affordable Care Act, throw 20 million people off of the health insurance they currently have and cut Medicaid for lower-income Americans.

    Hillary Clinton also understands that millions of seniors, disabled vets and others are struggling with the outrageously high cost of prescription drugs and the fact that Americans pay the highest prices in the world for the medicine we use. She knows that Medicare must negotiate drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry and that drug companies should not be making billions in profits while one in five Americans are unable to afford the medicine they need. The greed of the drug companies must end.

    This election is about the leadership we need to pass comprehensive immigration reform and repair a broken criminal justice system. It’s about making sure that young people in this country are in good schools and at good jobs, not rotting in jail cells. Hillary Clinton understands that we have to invest in education and jobs for our young people, not more jails or incarceration.

    In these stressful times for our country, this election must be about bringing our people together, not dividing us up. While Donald Trump is busy insulting one group after another, Hillary Clinton understands that our diversity is one of our greatest strengths. Yes. We become stronger when black and white, Latino, Asian-American, Native American – when all of us – stand together. Yes. We become stronger when men and women, young and old, gay and straight, native born and immigrant fight together to create the kind of country we all know we can become.

    It is no secret that Hillary Clinton and I disagree on a number of issues. That’s what this campaign has been about. That’s what democracy is about. But I am happy to tell you that at the Democratic Platform Committee there was a significant coming together between the two campaigns and we produced, by far, the most progressive platform in the history of the Democratic Party. Among many, many other strong provisions, the Democratic Party now calls for breaking up the major financial institutions on Wall Street and the passage of a 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act. It also calls for strong opposition to job-killing free trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
    We have got to make sure that the #TPP doesn’t get passed by Cogress during a lame-duck session.

    Our job now is to see that platform implemented by a Democratic Senate, a Democratic House and a Hillary Clinton presidency – and I am going to do everything I can to make that happen.

    I have known Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I remember her as a great first lady who broke precedent in terms of the role that a first lady was supposed to play as she helped lead the fight for universal health care. I served with her in the United States Senate and know her as a fierce advocate for the rights of children, for the women, and for the disabled.

    Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding president and I am proud to stand with her tonight.

    Thank you all very much.

    #USA #politique

  • Donald Trump Doesn’t Seem to Understand What Rape Is

    Donald Trump likened backers of international trade agreements to rapists on Tuesday. “The Trans-Pacific Partnership is another disaster done and pushed by special interests who want to rape our country, just a continuing rape of our country,” he said. “That’s what it is, too. It’s a harsh word: It’s a rape of our country.”

    It wasn’t the first time he’d used the word that way. He accused China of rape last month: “We can’t continue to allow China to rape our country,” he said. “And that’s what they’re doing. It’s the greatest theft in the history of the world.”

    https://theintercept.com/2016/06/30/donald-trump-doesnt-seem-to-understand-what-rape-is
    #terminologie #viol #mots #Trump #Donald_Trump #vocabulaire

  • The Washington Post Says Doctors Without Borders Is Silly to Worry About the Impact of the TPP on Drug Prices | Beat the Press | Blogs | Publications | The Center for Economic and Policy Research
    http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/the-washington-post-says-doctors-without-borders-is-silly-to-worry-about-the-i

    The humanitarian group, Doctors Without Borders, along with many other NGOs involved in providing health care to people in the developing world, have come out in opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) over concerns that the deal will make it more difficult to provide drugs to people in the developing world. Their argument is that it will raise drug prices by making patent protection stronger and longer and by making it more difficult for countries to scale back protections that they may come to view as excessive and wasteful.

    But the Washington Post editorial board tells us not to fear, that the TPP is actually “a healthy agreement.” The gist of its argument is an analysis by Council on Foreign Relations Fellow Thomas Bollyky, which finds that there were few incidents of large increases in drug prices for countries following the signing of previous trade deals. 

    As I noted in a previous post, this analysis almost seemed designed not to find substantial rises in prices. Bollyky looked at changes in drugs prices immediately after a trade deal took effect. The problem with this approach is:

    "In most cases, the rules in these agreements will only apply to new drugs, and even then to a subset of new drugs, for example patent protection for a drug that is a combination of already approved drugs. They may also allow for the extension of patent terms beyond the date where they would have expired under pre-trade deal rules, but here again the impact will only be felt gradually over time.

    “Furthermore, the date of a trade deal with the United States may not be the key factor in pushing up drug prices. The United States signed a deal with South Korea in 2012 that required stronger patent and related protections, but most of these conditions were already law as of 2009 due to a trade agreement Korea signed with the European Union.”

    In other words, this before and after approach is a bit like weighing people the day after they gave up drinking sugary soda to determine whether this decision will affect obesity. It’s not serious stuff.

    There is evidence that prior trade agreements have affected drug prices. As I noted in that earlier post:

    "An analysis of the impact of the rules in the 2001 trade agreement between the United States and Jordan found that it had increased annual spending on drugs by $18 million by 2004. This is slightly less than 0.16 percent of Jordan’s GDP in that year, the equivalent of $28 billion annually in the U.S. economy today.

    “There is a similar story of sharply higher drug spending in Morocco, which signed a pact with the United States in 2006. In Morocco, spending on drugs went from $662 million in 2009 (0.7 percent of GDP) to $1.4 billion (1.4 percent of GDP) in 2015.”

    To be clear, Bollyky does have a limited point in his piece, any specific trade deal should not be viewed in isolation. It a process of creating ever stronger and longer patent protections, which mean ever larger gaps between the protected price of drugs and their free market price. (For some reason, none of the modelers ever factor in the negative impact of higher drug prices into their analysis of the economic impact of these trade deals.)

    In this sense, the TPP should be understood as working alongside other steps, like the Obama administration’s pressures on the Indian government to give up flexibilities granted under TRIPS, to ensure that U.S. drug companies can get ever higher prices from their drugs as protections are extended more broadly around the world. For people who are concerned about public health and would prefer a less corrupt and more efficient mechanism for supporting drug research, this sounds like a really bad deal.

    #arnaque #manipulation #libre_échange #pharma #Etats-Unis

  • The dotted line: trade in the Pacific 2016-02-05 | Espresso

    https://espresso.economist.com/78573597059a0617129964af6caa5168?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/thedottedlinetradeinthepacific20160204espresso

    he dotted line: trade in the Pacific

    In Auckland this morning, representatives of a dozen countries spanning four continents signed the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an ambitious free-trade agreement long in the negotiation. The 12 include America and Japan, the world’s biggest and third-biggest economies in nominal terms, and together account for about 40% of the global economy. For Barack Obama’s administration, TPP has become an important part of its “rebalance” towards Asia and the Pacific—a symbol of how America, not China, can still set the rules. Celebrations, however, will be tempered by the difficulties ahead. The deal is opposed by both anti-globalisation campaigners and powerful lobbies. Signature is a prelude in several countries to arduous domestic ratification processes, notably in America. This week the White House urged Congress not to delay. But it already seems too late for passage before November’s presidential and congressional elections. So TPP’s fate may hinge on American voters.

    #pacifique #commerce #transport #transport_maritime #containers

  • How the TPP Will Affect You and Your Digital Rights
    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/how-tpp-will-affect-you-and-your-digital-rights

    The Internet is a diverse ecosystem of private and public stakeholders. By excluding a large sector of communities—like security researchers, artists, libraries, and user rights groups—trade negotiators skewed the priorities of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) towards major tech companies and copyright industries that have a strong interest in maintaining and expanding their monopolies of digital services and content. Negotiated in secret for several years with overwhelming influence from (...) #DRM #TPP #EFF #DMCA #copyright

  • Promesses

    Le gouvernement japonais a signé l’accord de partenariat transpacifique (Trans-Pacific Partnership, #TPP) malgré l’opposition des paysans. Il essaie d’en minimiser l’impact social et politique pour ne pas voir fuir les électeurs.

    La libération du marché agricole représente l’un des principaux défis de l’administration [du premier ministre] Abe après la signature du TPP. Le Japon a accepté d’abolir ses droits de douane sur 81~% des 2~328 produits agricoles importés. Le ministère de l’agriculture, de la forêt et de la pêche assure que seuls 60~% des produits seront touchés. (...) Pour le riz, le gouvernement a pris des mesures de stockage afin de stabiliser les prix. Sur les 2,5~millions de familles vivant de l’agriculture, 1,15~million produisent du riz... et constituent une énorme réserve électorale. [#st]

    http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/11/19/what-does-the-tpp-mean-for-japans-agricultural-sector

    http://zinc.mondediplo.net/messages/12815 via Le Monde diplomatique

  • Access to affordable generic medicines for world’s poorest countries under threat | msfaccess.org
    https://www.msfaccess.org/about-us/media-room/press-releases/access-affordable-generic-medicines-world%E2%80%99s-poorest-countries

    Starting Thursday, 15 October, the Member States of the World Trade Organization will be considering a request by the world’s poorest countries to be exempted from implementing medicine patents for as long as they are classified as least-developed countries (LDCs). If this request is not granted, access to affordable medicines for millions of people in these countries could be negatively impacted.
    While the European Union has come out supporting the LDCs’ request, other wealthy countries, including the United States, Australia, and Canada, are looking to weaken any exemption and are placing pressure on LDCs to accept a deal where they’d be worse off. Information has emerged that US Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Michael Punke, met with representatives of 15 LDCs last Friday in Geneva, where he noted that the US could not agree to an indefinite exemption due to pressure from some US stakeholders who are upset with the US government’s intellectual property concessions on the recently-completed Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement.

    #big_pharma #médicament #générique #santé

  • Poster woman for the war against the U.S.-led TPP | The Japan Times
    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2015/09/01/arts/poster-woman-war-u-s-led-tpp
    L’artiste japonaise #Yoko_Inoue a créé une affiche "papier de riz"où elle dénonce le partenariat trans-pacifique #TPP

    The Japanese-born, New York-based multimedia and performance artist takes aim at society’s assumptions about commerce and culture using works rooted in intensive research. This time, her target is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

    Inoue has been at work since February of this year on a project she calls “Rice Paper” (“Kome Kami”), a wall-mounted bilingual newspaper addressing the trade agreement currently being negotiated by 12 Pacific Rim nations, including Japan and the United States. The deal would reduce tariffs on goods such as rice, cars and beef, and alter other policies to encourage international trade. Despite lagging negotiations and stiff opposition from Japanese farmers and other stakeholders, it remains a priority for both U.S. President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

    Inoue, however, is convinced the TPP would harm Japanese society.

    “Who benefits?” the 51-year-old artist asks on a recent afternoon in her neatly organized New York studio. “It’s the 1 percent who control all the policies and trade. Maybe we (in the general public) don’t realize it — but the corporations who want to benefit from the agreement are very tenaciously and meticulously planning everything possible to dismantle socio-economic structures. When we start paying attention, we say ‘Oh my God.’ ”

    Dommage, on ne voit pas très bien son œuvre

  • Final day: Malaysia, Vietnam just saying no to parts of TPP- Nikkei Asian Review
    http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Malaysia-Vietnam-just-saying-no-to-parts-of-TPP

    LAHAINA, Hawaii — Malaysia and Vietnam, the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s two emerging economies, have offered compromises regarding service sector liberalization but remain steadfast in other “sensitive” areas.

  • TiSA: The Scariest Trade Deal Nobody’s Talking About Just Suffered a Big Leak
    http://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/tisa-the-scariest-trade-deal-nobodys-talking-about-just-suffered-a-b

    By David Dayen @ddayen

    The Obama administration’s desire for “fast track” trade authority is not limited to passing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In fact, that may be the least...

  • FOCUS | 5 Leading Legal Scholars on TPP: We Write Out of Grave Concern
    http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/30076-focus-5-leading-legal-scholars-on-tpp-we-write-out-of-gra

    We write out of grave concern about a document we have not been able to see. Although it has not been made available publicly, we understand that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement currently being negotiated includes Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions. ISDS allows foreign investors—and only foreign investors—to avoid the courts and instead to argue to a special, private tribunal that they believe certain government actions diminish the value of their investments.

  • Ralph Nader on Bernie Sanders, the TPP “Corporate Coup d’État” & Writing to the White House | Democracy Now!
    Friday, May 1, 2015
    http://www.democracynow.org/2015/5/1/ralph_nader_on_bernie_sanders_the

    AMY GOODMAN: Senator Sanders’ announcement came one day before May Day, celebrated around the world as International Workers’ holiday. Many events are planned across the country today, many mass protests that will also show solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement, the immigrants’ rights movement, as well.

    Well, today we’re joined by a former presidential candidate, Ralph Nader. His new book is called Return to Sender: Unanswered Letters to the President, 2001-2015, the book dedicated in part to the workers of the U.S. Postal Service.

    Ralph Nader, welcome back to Democracy Now! First, let’s get your response to the announced candidacy of Bernie Sanders. It might bring back memories for you, the number of times that you ran for president.

    RALPH NADER: Well, that’s a good—good news. We don’t want a coronation of Hillary Clinton. We want a vibrant debate in the televised primaries next year, and Bernie Sanders will provide an alternative view of where the country should be going. I hope he’ll be stronger on pulling back on empire. I’ve always thought his foreign policy and military policy were not up to his great domestic reforms and corporate accountability from Wall Street to Houston.

    AMY GOODMAN: The issue of TPP, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, that doesn’t get a heck of a lot of attention in the mainstream media—when it does, presenting largely one point of view—is a mainstay, one of the things that Senator Sanders has been speaking against. It’s also an issue that you have been taking on, dealing with 40 percent of the global economy.

    RALPH NADER: Well, the people have got to demand that their members of Congress block the fast track that is now beginning to circulate in Congress, which will allow an up-or-down vote, no amendments whatsoever to the subsequent Trans-Pacific Partnership, so-called. This is a corporate coup d’état. This is worse than NAFTA. It’s worse than the World Trade Organization. It’s bad for consumers, for labor, for the environment. All these necessities are subordinated to the supremacy of international commercial trade, and a tremendous invasion on local, state and national sovereignty. And all the disputes that may affect American workers and dealing with poverty and investment in poor areas in this country, all the disputes are going to be before secret tribunals. They cannot go to our courts. This is blatantly unconstitutional. But any citizen that tries to take these trade agreements to the federal courts are dismissed because of no standing to sue. So, we’ve got a real fight coming up. Go to GlobalTradeWatch.org, and you’ll get the details. I’m telling you, people, if this one passes, with about a dozen other countries on the Pacific Rim, it’s going to affect the pace of exporting jobs and industry, and subordinating the ability of the United States to be first, and environmental, labor and consumer standards.

    2ème partie de l’entretien :
    http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2015/5/1/pt_2_ralph_nader_on_bernie

    • Un socialiste à la Maison-Blanche ?
      par Richard Hétu - Jeudi 30 avril 2015
      http://blogues.lapresse.ca/hetu/2015/04/30/un-socialiste-a-la-maison-blanche


      Bon, disons que je ne vous conseille pas de parier sur l’élection de Bernie Sanders à la Maison-Blanche en 2016. Mais le sénateur du Vermont ne pourrait accuser Fox News et autres médias conservateurs de fabuler en le qualifiant de « socialiste ». Utilisant lui-même cette étiquette pour se décrire, il a donné aujourd’hui un aperçu de sa vision politique marquée à gauche en annonçant son intention de défier Hillary Clinton à l’occasion de la course à l’investiture démocrate pour l’élection présidentielle de 2016. Je cite quelques-unes de ses déclarations recueillies par l’AFP :

      « 99 % de tous les revenus générés dans ce pays vont aux 1 % les plus riches. »

      « Comment est-il possible que les 1 % les plus riches détiennent presque autant de richesses que les 90 % les moins riches ? »

      « Ce type d’économie est non seulement immoral, non seulement mauvais, il est insoutenable. »

      « Nous ne pouvons continuer à avoir un pays qui a à la fois le plus haut taux de pauvreté chez les enfants parmi tous les grands pays de la Terre, et une prolifération de millionnaires et milliardaires. »

      Pour le moment, le sénateur Sanders est le seul adversaire de l’ancienne secrétaire d’État aux primaires démocrates. L’ancien gouverneur du Maryland (et maire de Baltimore) Martin O’Malley pourrait bientôt se joindre à eux.

  • #Warren To #Obama: Stop making ’untrue’ trade claims
    http://thehill.com/policy/finance/240068-warren-to-obama-stop-making-untrue-trade-claims

    #menteur

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) told President Obama on Saturday he was making “untrue” claims about his opponents — including herself.

    The feud between Obama and the left continued Saturday, when Warren and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) called on the president to immediately declassify the negotiating terms of a pending trade deal with a host of nations known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    In an effort to push through trade legislation that would help finalize the deal, Obama has blasted critics on the left, saying they are “wrong” and “don’t know what they’re talking about.”

    Liberal critics of the trade deal have griped that the terms have not been made public, arguing it amounts to a secret deal hammered out by other nations with influence from huge corporations.

    Obama equated that argument to the “death panels” floated during the ObamaCare debate, as a claim so far-fetched as not to be taken seriously, adding that members of Congress have been frequently briefed on the talks.

    “Someone coming up with a slogan like ‘death panels’ doesn’t mean it’s true,” he said Thursday. “The same thing is true on this. Look at the facts, don’t just throw a bunch of stuff out there.”

    In response to those claims, Warren and Brown told Obama to release the text of the negotiations to the public. While members of Congress can review documents, it is illegal to release them to the public or discuss specifics.

    And if, as Obama says, the trade deal is his best effort to carve out good terms for the working class, they argued there is no reason not to let the public review it before it is finalized.

    “The American people should be allowed to see for themselves whether it’s a good deal for them,” they wrote.

    “Characterizing the assessments of labor unions, journalists, members of Congress and others who disagree with your approach to transparency on trade issues as ‘dishonest’ is both untrue and unlikely to serve the best interests of the American people,” they added.

    The two went on to argue the administration has handed an outsized amount of influence to corporations in hammering out the deal. They said the 28 trade advisory committees on the TPP have 566 members, and 480 of them are “senior corporate executives or industry lobbyists.”

    “Fast-track” legislation that would limit Congress’s ability to amend trade deals is currently pending before both chambers of Congress, with healthy backing from congressional Republicans. But Warren and Brown also criticized the legislation for going beyond the current trade deal, handing expanded power to future administrations by limiting congressional input as far forward as 2021.

    “No one knows who will be using this authority once you leave office,” they said.

  • Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (#TPP) - Investment Chapter
    https://wikileaks.org/tpp-investment

    The TPP Investment Chapter, published today, is dated 20 January 2015. The document is classified and supposed to be kept secret for four years after the entry into force of the TPP agreement or, if no agreement is reached, for four years from the close of the negotiations.

    Le New York Times en a parlé
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/business/trans-pacific-partnership-seen-as-door-for-foreign-suits-against-us.html

    The chapter in the draft of the trade deal, dated Jan. 20, 2015, and obtained by The New York Times in collaboration with the group WikiLeaks, is certain to kindle opposition from both the political left and the right. The sensitivity of the issue is reflected in the fact that the cover mandates that the chapter not be declassified until four years after the Trans-Pacific Partnership comes into force or trade negotiations end, should the agreement fail.

  • Latest TPP Leak Shows US Still Pushing Terrible DRM and Copyright Term Proposals—and New Threats Arise
    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/latest-tpp-leak-shows-us-still-pushing-terrible-drm-and-copyright-term-proposal @mb

    Today Wikileaks published a new draft of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (#TPP)’s intellectual property chapter. This draft text, from May 2014, gives us another look into the current state of negotiations over this plurilateral trade agreement’s copyright provisions since another draft was leaked last year. And what we’re seeing isn’t pretty. The TPP still contains text on #DRM, ISP liability, copyright term lengths, and criminal enforcement measures, and introduces new provisions on trade secrets that have us worried.

  • Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) - Environment Consolidated Text
    http://wikileaks.org/tpp-enviro

    Today, 15 January 2014, WikiLeaks released the secret draft text for the entire TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Environment Chapter and the corresponding Chairs’ Report. The TPP transnational legal regime would cover 12 countries initially and encompass 40 per cent of global GDP and one-third of world trade. The Environment Chapter has long been sought by journalists and environmental groups. The released text dates from the Chief Negotiators’ summit in Salt Lake City, Utah, on 19-24 November 2013.

    The Environment Chapter covers what the Parties propose to be their positions on: environmental issues, including climate change, biodiversity and fishing stocks; and trade and investment in ’environmental’ goods and services. It also outlines how to resolve enviromental disputes arising out of the treaty’s subsequent implementation. The draft Consolidated Text was prepared by the Chairs of the Environment Working Group, at the request of TPP Ministers at the Brunei round of the negotiations.

    Leaked: environmental chapter of the secret Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty
    http://boingboing.net/2014/01/15/leaked-environmental-chapter.html

    Most of our coverage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership has focused on its Internet-regulating provisions. But the treaty — which has been negotiated in unprecedented secrecy, with heavy-handed shoves from the US Trade Representative — also has disturbing implications for the environment. Today, Wikileaks published a leaked consolidated draft of TPP’s environment chapter, which sets out the ways in which corporations will be able to prevent countries from passing environmental laws that interfere with profit making.

    #Partenariat_Trans-Pacifique #environnement #profit

  • #Wikileaks lance son alerte sur la réunion secrète du TPP
    http://www.argotheme.com/organecyberpresse/spip.php?article1976

    La mondialisation en marche, même intéressante et permettant à des peuples de s’émanciper et à des nations d’émerger, recherche l’uniformité. Elle effacerait donc, sinon elle réduirait l’importance, des identités et particularités locales et régionales. Est-elle cependant transparente pour les peuples appréhendent les accords qui engagent les Etats sans l’accord des citoyens ? La réunion secrète, attendue du 19 au 24 Novembre pour le « Trans-Pacific Partnership », est dénoncée par Wikileaks. Elle a pour (...)

    #TECHNOLOGIE,_INTERNET,_PERFORMANCES_INCLASSABLES #technologie,_drone,_citoyen,_USA,_google,_High_Tech #économie,_politique,_arts,_corruption,_opposition,_démocratie
    http://www.argotheme.com/organecyberpresse/IMG/pdf/Wikileaks-secret-TPP-treaty-IP-chapter.pdf

  • Publication de l’Accord secret de Partenariat Trans-Pacifique - Chapitre portant sur la Propriété Intellectuelle (Wikileaks) — Wikileaks
    http://www.legrandsoir.info/publication-de-l-accord-secret-de-partenariat-trans-pacifique-chapitre

    Aujourd’hui , le 13 Novembre 2013, WikiLeaks a publié le projet de texte secret négocié pour l’ensemble du chapitre du TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership ) portant sur la Propriété intellectuelle. Le TPP est le traité économique le plus important jamais négocié et englobe les nations représentant plus de 40 pour cent du PIB mondial. La publication de ce document par WikiLeaks s’inscrit dans la perspective du sommet décisif des négociateurs en chef du TPP à Salt Lake City, Utah, le 19-24 Novembre 2013.

    Le chapitre publié par WikiLeaks est peut-être le chapitre le plus controversé du TPP en raison de ses multiples effets sur les médicaments, les éditeurs, les services Internet, les libertés civiles et les brevets biologiques. De manière significative, le texte publié comprend les positions de négociation et de désaccords entre les 12 états membres potentiels.

    Le TPP est le précurseur du pacte également secret entre les États-Unis et l’Union Européenne (Transatlantic Trade et Investment Partnership ), pour lequel le président Obama a entamé des négociations américano-européennes en Janvier 2013. Ensemble, le TPP et le TTIP couvriront plus de 60 pour cent du PIB mondial. Les deux pactes excluent la Chine.....

    #Publication de l’ #Accord secret de #Partenariat #Trans-Pacifique - Chapitre portant sur la #Propriété-Intellectuelle (Wikileaks)