person:arthur c. clarke

  • The most expensive hyphen in history
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90365077/the-most-expensive-hyphen-in-history

    Bugs, bugs bugs

    By Charles Fishman4 minute Read

    This is the 18th in an exclusive series of 50 articles, one published each day until July 20, exploring the 50th anniversary of the first-ever Moon landing. You can check out 50 Days to the Moon here every day.

    In the dark on Sunday morning, July 22, 1962, NASA launched the first-ever U.S. interplanetary space probe: Mariner 1, headed for Venus, Earth’s neighbor closer to the Sun.

    Mariner 1 was launched atop a 103-foot-tall Atlas-Agena rocket at 5:21 a.m. EDT. For 3 minutes and 32 seconds, it rose perfectly, accelerating to the edge of space, nearly 100 miles up.

    But at that moment, Mariner 1 started to veer in odd, unplanned ways, first aiming northwest, then pointing nose down. The rocket was out of control and headed for the shipping lanes of the North Atlantic. Four minutes and 50 seconds into flight, a range safety officer at Cape Canaveral—in an effort to prevent the rocket from hitting people or land—flipped two switches, and explosives in the Atlas blew the rocket apart in a spectacular cascade of fireworks visible back in Florida.

    The Mariner 1 probe itself was blown free of the debris, and its radio transponder continued to ping flight control for another 67 seconds, until it hit the Atlantic Ocean.

    This was the third failed probe in 1962 alone; NASA had also launched two failed probes to the Moon. But the disappointment was softened by the fact that a second, identical Mariner spacecraft (along with an identical Atlas-Agena rocket) were already in hangers at the Cape, standing by. Mariner 2 was launched successfully a month later and reached Venus on December 14, 1962, where it discovered that the temperature was 797º F and that the planet rotated in the opposite direction of Earth and Mars. The Sun on Venus rises in the West.

    It was possible to launch Mariner 1’s twin just 36 days after the disaster because it took scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory only five days to figure out what had gone wrong. In handwritten computer coding instructions, in dozens and dozens of lines of flight guidance equations, a single letter had been written incorrectly, probably forgetfully.

    In a critical spot, the equations contained an “R” symbol (for “radius”). The “R” was supposed to have a bar over it, indicating a “smoothing” function; the line told the guidance computer to average the data it was receiving and to ignore what was likely to be spurious data. But as written and then coded onto punch cards and into the guidance computer, the “R” didn’t have a bar over it. The “R-bar” became simply “R.”

    As it happened, on launch, Mariner 1 briefly lost guidance-lock with the ground, which was not uncommon. The rocket was supposed to follow its course until guidance-lock was re-achieved, unless it received instructions from the ground computer. But without the R-bar, the ground computer got confused about Mariner 1’s performance, thought it was off course, and started sending signals to the rocket to “correct” its course, instructions that weren’t necessary—and weren’t correct.

    Therefore “phantom erratic behavior” became “actual erratic behavior,” as one analyst wrote. In the minute or so that controllers waited, the rocket and the guidance computer on the ground were never able to get themselves sorted out, because the “averaging” function that would have kept the rocket on course wasn’t programmed into the computer. And so the range safety officer did his job.

    A single handwritten line, the length of a hyphen, doomed the most elaborate spaceship the U.S. had until then designed, along with its launch rocket. Or rather, the absence of that bar doomed it. The error cost $18.5 million ($156 million today).

    In the popular press, for simplicity, the missing bar became a hyphen. The New York Times front-page headline was “For Want of a Hyphen Venus Rocket Is Lost.” The Los Angeles Times headline: “‘Hyphen’ Blows Up Rocket.” The science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, in his 1968 book The Promise of Space, called it “the most expensive hyphen in history.”

    For NASA’s computer programmers, it was a lesson in care, caution, and testing that ended up steeped into their bones. During 11 Apollo missions, more than 100 days total of spaceflight, the Apollo flight computers performed without a single fault.

    But what happened to Mariner 1 was, in fact, an arresting vulnerability of the new Space Age. A single missing bolt in a B-52 nuclear bomber wasn’t going to bring down the plane, but a single inattentive moment in computer programming—of the sort anyone can imagine having—could have a cascade of consequences.

    George Mueller was NASA’s associate administrator for manned spaceflight from 1963 to 1969, the most critical period for Apollo’s development. Just before that, Mueller had been an executive at Space Technology Laboratories, which had responsibility for writing the guidance equations for Mariner 1, including the equation with the missing bar.

    During his years at NASA, Mueller kept a reminder of the importance of even the smallest elements of spaceflight on the wall behind his desk: a framed image of a hyphen.

    #Histoire_numerique #Nasa #Mariner

  • 55% of Americans approve the use of facial recognition for public safety, but the technology raises privacy concerns
    https://bonus.usbeketrica.com/article/facial-recognition-regulatory-framework-science-china

    Facial recognition could make us safer and prove useful in fields such as science and history. However, to avoid a dystopian scenario, there is a growing demand for a regulatory framework. There are a few technologies that instantly bring up fears, echoing the gloomy, nightmarish and dystopian worlds invented by science fiction authors such as Philip K. Dick, Arthur C. Clarke or Kurt Vonnegut. Facial recognition, with its potential for mass surveillance and invasion of private life, is (...)

    #Google #Microsoft #Amazon #CCTV #biométrie #facial #surveillance #vidéo-surveillance

  • JEFF NOON « NYQUIST MYSTERY »
    https://laspirale.org/texte-565-jeff-noon-nyquist-mystery.html

    Auteur culte navigant dans la zone entre littérature de genre et avant-garde, l’inclassable #Jeff_Noon a publié une oeuvre merveilleusement bizarre sur les vingt-cinq dernières années. Découvert en 93 avec une série de quatre romans célèbres : d’abord Vurt (qui remporte le Prix Arthur C. Clarke), suivi en 95 de Pollen, puis Alice Automatique en 96 et NymphoRmation en 97, il accouche d’autres pépites étranges au tournant du millénaire, comme les 50 nouvelles hallucinatoires rassemblées dans le recueil Pixel Juice en 98, le dub addictif de Intrabasses qui dissout la narration en 2000 ; en 2001, il sample le langage en l’expédiant dans les filtres de poésie virale de Cobralingus ; en 2002, il fouille les marges de notre civilisation de l’information en déliquescence avec Descendre en marche (tous ces livres sauf Cobralingus sont traduits à ​La Volte​).

    #laspirale
    http://jeffnoon.fr
    https://lavolte.net/auteurs/jeff-noon

  • I saw the future | ARTE360 VR
    https://sites.arte.tv/360/en/i-saw-future-360

    I saw the Future” invites the viewer to plunge into a three-dimensional space reflecting the futuristic predictions of Arthur C. Clarke.

    In 1964, Arthur C. Clarke revealed his vision of the future to the cameras of the BBC. The British author, famous for having collaborated with Stanley Kubrick on the screenplay for “2001 A Space Odyssey”, looked forward with extraordinary precision to the changes brought about today by the advent of the digital era. The futuristic visions of Arthur C. Clarke and the texture of the archive are seamlessly integrated into this 360 video, which offers an amazing journey through time:

    We will never outguess it.

  • L’écrivain Arthur C. Clarke à propos de 2001 : l’Odyssée de l’espace - Vidéo Ina.fr
    http://www.ina.fr/video/MAN4500309356

    A l’occasion de la sortie du film « 2001 : l’Odyssée de l’espace » de Stanley Kubrick, l’auteur du roman éponyme Arthur C. Clarke revient sur les thèmes métaphysiques et philosophiques abordés dans son livre et dans l’adaptation cinématographique à laquelle il a participé avec Kubrick.

    #Cinéma #Arthur_Clarke #Stanley_Kubrick #2001

  • Révolution d’Octobre
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9volution_d%27Octobre


    2017 est l’année de tous les centenaires. Après Arthur C. Clarke (qui est né au mois de décembre) c’est le tour de la plus grande révolution du siècle. Attention, il ne faut pas confondre la révolution d’octobre qui s’est passée au mois de novembre avec la révolution de novembre.
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novemberrevolution_(Begriffskl%C3%A4rung)

    L’insurrection est lancée dans la nuit du 6 au 7 novembre 1917 (24 au 25 octobre du calendrier julien). Les événements se déroulent presque sans effusion de sang. Les gardes rouges conduits par les bolcheviks prennent sans résistance le contrôle des ponts, des gares, de la banque centrale, des centrales postale et téléphonique, avant de lancer un assaut final sur le palais d’Hiver. Les films officiels tournés plus tard montrèrent ces évènements sous un angle héroïque, bien que dans la réalité les insurgés n’eurent à faire face qu’à une faible résistance. En effet, parmi les troupes cantonnées dans la capitale, seuls quelques bataillons d’élèves officiers (junkers) soutiennent le gouvernement provisoire, l’immense majorité des régiments se prononçant pour le soulèvement ou se déclarant neutres. On ne dénombre que cinq morts et quelques blessés6. Pendant l’insurrection, les tramways continuent à circuler, les théâtres à jouer, les magasins à ouvrir. Un des événements décisifs du XXe siècle a lieu sans que grand monde s’en rende compte.


    La révolution de novembre (1918) à Berlin

    #centenaire #1917

  • Technology : He wrote the future : Nature : Nature Research
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v541/n7637/full/541286a.html


    Arthur C. Clarke, 16 décembre 1917 - 19 mars 2008

    In 1945, Clarke inadvertently launched a career as a futurologist with his outline for a geostationary communications satellite. In a letter (’V2 for ionosphere research?’) published in February’s issue of Wireless World and inspired by the German V2 rockets then landing on London, he made a revolutionary proposal:

    An ’artificial satellite’ at the correct distance from the earth would make one revolution every 24 hours; i.e., it would remain stationary above the same spot and would be within optical range of nearly half the earth’s surface. Three repeater stations, 120 degrees apart in the correct orbit, could give television and microwave coverage to the entire planet.

    Clarke realistically concluded: “I’m afraid this isn’t going to be of the slightest use to our postwar planners, but I think it is the ultimate solution to the problem.” He followed up with a more detailed piece in Wireless World that October, envisioning “space-stations” that relied on thermionic valves serviced by an onboard crew supplied by atomic-powered rockets.
    Space Godfather

    The first commercial communications satellite, Telstar I, was built by Bell Telephone Laboratories and launched in 1962. The first to be geostationary, the Hughes Aircraft Company’s Intelsat I (’Early Bird’), went up in 1965. Both launched on conventional rockets, and operated with transistors and without human maintenance. The two US engineers chiefly responsible — John Pierce for Telstar and Harold Rosen for Intelsat — saw Clarke as the father of satellite communications. Richard Colino, director-general of Intelsat (the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization) agreed in his foreword to a collection of Clarke’s technical writings, Ascent to Orbit (1984). Clarke preferred “godfather”, noting with uncharacteristic modesty in the book that he had received “rather more of the credit, I suspect, than I really deserve”. In old age, however, he told me that his comsat article was “the most important thing I ever wrote”.

    Conclusion : publiez vos idées afin qu’elles fassent des enfants.

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke

    #technologie #science-fiction #littérature #2001 #centenaire #1917

  • Is Physical Law an Alien Intelligence? - Issue 42: Fakes
    http://nautil.us/issue/42/fakes/is-physical-law-an-alien-intelligence

    Perhaps Arthur C. Clarke was being uncharacteristically unambitious. He once pointed out that any sufficiently advanced technology is going to be indistinguishable from magic. If you dropped in on a bunch of Paleolithic farmers with your iPhone and a pair of sneakers, you’d undoubtedly seem pretty magical. But the contrast is only middling: The farmers would still recognize you as basically like them, and before long they’d be taking selfies. But what if life has moved so far on that it doesn’t just appear magical, but appears like physics? After all, if the cosmos holds other life, and if some of that life has evolved beyond our own waypoints of complexity and technology, we should be considering some very extreme possibilities. Today’s futurists and believers in a machine “singularity” (...)

  • La technologie est-elle magique ou hantée ?
    http://www.internetactu.net/2016/03/09/la-technologie-est-elle-magique-ou-hantee

    Pour Nicolas Nova (@nicolasnova), initiateur et organisateur de cette ultime session de l’édition 2016 des conférences #lift, l’un des mantras du #design d’interaction consiste à rendre la technologie invisible… et donc parfaitement magique. Cette intuition repose s’une l’une des 3 lois de l’écrivain de Science-fiction, Arthur C. Clarke : “toute technologie suffisamment avancée est indiscernable de la magie”. Cela signifie…

    #complexité #confiance #genre #identité #innovation_sociale #internet_des_objets #lift16 #psychologie