#glan

#glanage #sculpteur_d’opportunité

Si ça pouvait se généraliser, ce serait bien.

a cohabité avec diverses femmes (il a y compris été persécuté pour avoir débauché une paysanne de 14 ans), a fait des enfants illégitimes et a fui dans d’autres villes après avoir promis de se marier

#gland_homme

#trucage #retouches #photoshop

Sylvester staline

https://64.media.tumblr.com/6e904445d47bf3c74f13aed04d24a504/tumblr_pv1txqmGwX1rtkhn9o1_540.jpg

ping @deka

Complaint to the European Court of Auditors Concerning the Mismanagement of EU Funds by the EUTrust Fund for Africa’s ‘Support to Integrated Border and Migration Management in Libya’ (IBM) Programme Submitted by Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), Association for Juridical Studies on Immigration (ASGI), and Italian Recreational and Cultural Association (ARCI)

▻https://c5e65ece-003b-4d73-aa76-854664da4e33.filesusr.com/ugd/14ee1a_ae6a20e6b5ea4b00b0aa0e77ece91241.pdf

EU: Time to review and remedy cooperation policies facilitating abuse of refugees and migrants in Libya

One year after the resumption of the armed conflict in Tripoli, and at a time when the humanitarian situation in Libya continues to deteriorate due to further military escalation and the spreading of the Covid-19 virus, Amnesty International, the Italian Recreational and Cultural Association (ARCI), Association for Juridical Studies on Immigration (ASGI), Avocats Sans Frontières (ASF), Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EuroMed Rights), the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), Human Rights Watch (HRW), International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Lawyers for Justice in Libya (LFJL), Oxfam International, Migreurop, and Saferworld are calling on EU institutions to stop any actions trapping people in a country where they are in constant, grave danger.

EU institutions should review and reform the bloc’s policies of cooperation with Libya on migration and border management and control. During the past three years, these have facilitated the containment of tens of thousands of women, men and children in a country where they have been exposed to appalling abuse.

The call coincides with the submission by GLAN, ASGI and ARCI of a complaint before the European Court of Auditors (ECA). In their complaint, the three organisations are requesting the body to launch an audit into EU’s cooperation with Libya. Such an audit would seek to determine whether the EU has breached its financial regulations, as well as its human rights obligations, in its support for Libyan border management.

▻https://euromedrights.org/publication/eu-time-to-review-and-remedy-cooperation-policies-facilitating-abuse-

Stop cooperation with and funding to the Libyan coastguard, MEPs ask

The EU should stop channeling funds to Libya to manage migration and to train its coastguard, as the violation of human rights of migrants and asylum-seekers continues.

In a debate in the Civil Liberties Committee with representatives of the Commission, Frontex, UNHCR, the Council of Europe and NGOs, a majority of MEPs insisted that Libya is not a “safe country” for disembarkation of people rescued at sea and demanded that the cooperation with the Libyan coastguard stops.

Most of the speakers acknowledged the challenges faced by front line countries receiving most of the migrants and asylum-seekers fleeing Libya, namely Italy and Malta, and underlined that the European common asylum system needs to be reshuffled, with a focus on solidarity among member states and respect of international legislation. Others made clear that member states are entitled to protect their borders, especially in the middle of a health crisis such as the current one. Some instead criticised the closure of ports due to the COVID-19 pandemic and stressed that letting people drown cannot be a solution.

Background

According to UNHCR, the human rights situation inside Libya is extremely complicated, in the context of intensifying combat, the coronavirus crisis and the high number of economic migrants, refugees and internally displaced people needing material and humanitarian assistance. Around 1,500 people remain in detention centers in appalling conditions, arbitrary detentions continue to take place and resettlement schemes of the most vulnerable people to neighbouring countries have been suspended.

Since the beginning of the year, 3,277 persons have arrived in Italy by sea and 1,135 in Malta. On 1 April, the EU naval Operation Irini succeeded Operation Sophia, with a focus on enforcing the arms embargo to Libya, in an attempt to contribute to the pacification of the country.

You can watch the debate again: ▻https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/es/libe-committee-meeting_20200427-1600-COMMITTEE-LIBE_vd

▻https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200427IPR77915/stop-cooperation-with-and-funding-to-the-libyan-coastguard-meps-ask

EU : Time to review and remedy cooperation policies facilitating abuse of refugees and migrants in Libya

One year after the resumption of the armed conflict in Tripoli, and at a time when the humanitarian situation in Libya continues to deteriorate due to further military escalation and the spreading of the Covid-19 virus, Amnesty International, the Italian Recreational and Cultural Association (ARCI), Association for Juridical Studies on Immigration (ASGI), Avocats Sans Frontières (ASF), Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EuroMed Rights), the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), Human Rights Watch (HRW), International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Lawyers for Justice in Libya (LFJL), Oxfam International, Migreurop, and Saferworld are calling on EU institutions to stop any actions trapping people in a country where they are in constant, grave danger.
EU institutions should review and reform the bloc’s policies of cooperation with Libya on migration and border management and control. During the past three years, these have facilitated the containment of tens of thousands of women, men and children in a country where they have been exposed to appalling abuse.
The call coincides with the submission by GLAN, ASGI and ARCI of a complaint before the European Court of Auditors (ECA)*. In their complaint, the three organisations are requesting the body to launch an audit into EU’s cooperation with Libya. Such an audit would seek to determine whether the EU has breached its financial regulations, as well as its human rights obligations, in its support for Libyan border management.

The EU cooperation with Libya on border control and its consequences

EU Member States and Institutions have long responded to the arrival of refugees and migrants, crossing the central Mediterranean on unseaworthy and overcrowded boats, by cooperating with Libyan authorities to stop departures and ensure that people rescued or intercepted at sea would be disembarked in Libya. In recent years, this policy has been pursued through new and numerous means, including the provision of training, speedboats, equipment and various forms of assistance to Libyan authorities such as the Libyan Coast Guard and Port Security (LCGPS, under the Ministry of Defence) and the General Administration for Coastal Security (GACS, under the Ministry of Interior), both under Libya’s Government of National Accord (GNA).

EU institutions have played a key role in the definition and execution of this strategy. While significant resources have been invested in projects aimed at alleviating the suffering of refugees and migrants stranded in Libya and remain central to EU public communications on the topic, EU actions have nonetheless facilitated and perpetuated this policy of containment. The contained people have become victims of human rights violations and abuse, including indefinite, arbitrary detention and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, which such cosmetic measures have not remedied.

Indeed, the overall policy of cooperation with the Libyan authorities on border control and management has been designed and consistently implemented at the EU level. It started with the launch of the EU Border Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM) in 2013, with the goal to support the Libyan authorities in improving and developing the security of the country’s borders. [1] It continued with the modification of the mandate of naval operation EunavforMed Sophia, tasked since June 2016 [2] to train members of the Libyan Coast Guard. It expanded with the Joint Communication by the European Commission and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs, dated 25 January 2017, indicating action to step up the capacity of the Libyan Coast Guard as a key priority. [3]] The strategy was completed through the Malta Declaration [4], of 3 February 2017, which explicitly indicated “training, equipment and support to the Libyan national coast guard and other relevant agencies” as its first priority. Crucially, this declaration also affirmed the intention to strengthen the mainstreaming of migration within the EU’s official development assistance for Africa, including through the mobilization of resources under the EU Emergency trust fund for stability and addressing root causes of irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa (EUTFA).

The EU has then concretely implemented this strategy through the funding of specific projects, in particular the project “Support to Integrated border and migration management in Libya” (IBM project), launched in July 2017 and funded by the EUTFA with a total of €91.3m. [5] The project has focused almost entirely on enhancing the operational capacity of Libyan authorities in maritime surveillance : assisting with the supply and maintenance of speedboats ; setting up basic facilities to coordinate operations and planning the establishment of fully-fledged operational rooms ; and supporting the definition of a Libyan Search and Rescue Region, declared by Libya in December 2017. This, notwithstanding the fact that the country cannot be considered a place of safety for the disembarkation of people rescued at sea, a fact that even the Libyan authorities admitted earlier this month. It should also be noted that, despite the assistance provided, Libya has been unable to attend to this rescue area and has benefited from extensive and decisive support from Italy to coordinate maritime operations, including many triggered following sightings by EU assets. [6]

While this strategy has achieved its objective of drastically reducing the number of people reaching Europe via the central Mediterranean – as well as the absolute number of deaths at sea, given the plummeting departures – it has also led to dramatic human consequences. Following disembarkation in Libya, since 2016 tens of thousands of women, men and children have been transferred to detention centres nominally under the control of the Libyan Ministry of Interior, where people have been detained arbitrarily for an indeterminate period of time, and where inhumane conditions and overcrowding are accompanied by the prevalence of torture and other ill-treatment. Cases of beatings, sexual violence, exploitation, forced labour, unlawful killings, and deaths in custody due to inadequate medical treatment or lack of adequate food, have been widely documented. Even outside of detention centres, refugees and migrants are constantly exposed to the risk of kidnappings, robberies, trafficking and exploitation. [7]

The already dire humanitarian situation has been compounded, in recent weeks, by newly escalating violence in Tripoli as well as by the spreading of Covid-19 disease. All parties to the conflict, including the GNA and the Libyan National Army (LNA), have committed serious violations of international humanitarian law. Indiscriminate attacks have resulted in deaths among civilians, including dozens of refugees and migrants killed in the bombing of the detention centre of Tajoura, near Tripoli, in July 2019. [8] The risk of an escalation of violence in Libya due to the fragile political situation should have been foreseen by EU decision-makers.

Many risks were well-known by EU Member States’ and institutions’ officials when designing the cooperation with Libya. In particular, the systematic human rights violations in detention centres – the very centres where Libyan authorities detain people who, with EU support, they intercept at sea – have been documented widely for a number of years, including by UN agencies who have also attempted to respond to such risks through human rights due diligence steps and the adoption of restrictive measures on their programmes. [9]

While fully conscious of the horrific violations and abuses experienced by refugees and migrants taken to Libya, EU institutions have undertaken to implement the above-mentioned strategy for the past four years.

The EU has thus contributed to the disembarkation in Libya and transfer to detention centres of tens of thousands of women, men and children. What is more, taking into account the 2012 European Court of Human Rights decision in the case Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, ruling that maritime pushbacks towards Libya breach the European Convention on Human Rights – this strategy has been designed to circumvent responsibility under international and EU laws, in multiple ways. [10] First, the focus on the capacity-building of the LCGPS is meant to ensure that people are intercepted at sea and subsequently disembarked in Libya by non-European actors – since both international and EU law prohibit the transfer of anyone to a country where their rights and freedoms are at serious risk. Second, EU institutions have tried to minimise the EU’s direct involvement and deflect attention from their responsibility for the serious abuses they have contributed to by focusing on funding projects implemented primarily by Member States. Finally, by transferring European
development and other aid resources into the EUTFA, a fund that can be used with reduced transparency and limited supervision, and then using those funds to realize projects such as IBM, they have reduced avenues for holding decision-makers to account for the harmful contributions made by such actions.

The complaint before the European Court of Auditors

On 27 April 2020, GLAN, ASGI, and ARCI submitted a complaint before the European Court of Auditors, the EU body responsible for auditing the use and management of the EU budget.

The complaint was drafted based on an expert opinion by academic experts on EU budget and development laws, Prof Dr Phillip Dann and Dr Michael Riegner of Humboldt University and Ms Lena Zagst of Hamburg University, published alongside the complaint. Following close to a year’s efforts to obtain information from various EU institutions about the use of EU funds, the complaint argues that EU funds used to implement the EU’s migration policy have been mismanaged, in breach of EU laws governing the EU budget, and with consequences for the EU and its Member States under international law. The complaint claims that the European Commission has failed to uphold its obligations under EU law to ensure that it is not acquiescing or contributing to serious human rights violations. In particular, it argues that provision of financial means to implement projects resulting in return to and containment in Libya of people at risk of human rights abuse, with knowledge of these consequences and in the absence of any legally required measures to mitigate such risks, engages the responsibility of the EU institutions. The complaint is unique insofar as it specifically addresses the responsibilities of EU institutions relevant to the use of EU funds in such projects, linking their financial disbursements and human rights obligations. Crucially, it is filed in the context of several previous and ongoing litigation efforts before domestic and regional courts and international bodies, including the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Committee.

The complaint calls on the ECA to launch an audit into the IBM programme for the misuse of EU funds and for its harmful impacts on human rights. The complaint argues, based on EU financial legislation, the illegality of the IBM programme due to inconsistency with the permissible funding objectives for development and other underlying funds disbursed by the EUTFA. Specifically, the use of EU funds in the IBM programme contravenes the obligation to follow legal requirements for the use of such funds, to ensure that use ‘does no harm’, and is compliant with EU law regarding sound financial management principles of effectiveness, efficiency and transparency. The arguments are based on the appended legal opinion and supported by information specific to the IBM programme researched and analysed by the groups.

The human rights impact of the funding is particularly severe due to the fact that the IBM programme, now in its second phase, which is set to last until late 2021, is being implemented without any conditionality or restriction on the use of funding or review of funded activities, and without a human rights review or monitoring of the human rights impact. EU and international law, the complaint argues, requires that the EU and its Member States make the implementation of the programme conditional on the closure of detention centres and the enactment of asylum laws by Libyan authorities, amongst other concrete and verifiable steps.
The programme should also provide for robust and effective review mechanisms that could result in its suspension if conditions are not respected.

There is no doubt that EU institutions have been long aware of the risks involved in cooperating with Libyan authorities on border control and management. A recent investigation by The Guardian revealed how in early 2019 the Director of Frontex, Fabrice Leggeri, wrote to Paraskevi Michou, the Director-General of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs in the European Commission, outlining issues arising from sharing information about the position of boats in distress with Libyan authorities, highlighting how “the Commission and in general institutions may face questions of a political nature as a consequence of the SAR related operational exchanges of information.” [11] Indeed, questions about the lawfulness of the cooperation have previously been asked, not only by members of civil society. As early as March 2017, a review by the UK Independent Commission for Aid Impact noted that the UK and EU work efforts to build the capacity of the LCGPS aimed at increasing the likelihood that refugees and other irregular migrants were intercepted by the LCGPS, and that those intercepted were placed in detention. The body, which reports its findings to the British Parliament, expressed concern that “the programme delivers migrants back to a system that leads to indiscriminate and indefinite detention and denies refugees their right to asylum”, and concluded that the risk of UK aid causing unintended harm to vulnerable migrants, or preventing refugees from reaching a place of safety, had been inadequately assessed. [12] Subsequently, both the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe expressed deep concern about the consequences of European cooperation with Libya on border control. [13]

In 2018, the ECA opened a first, general audit on the EUTFA, leading to the Special Report “European Union Emergency Trust Fund for Africa : Flexible but lacking focus”. [14] In its conclusions, the ECA found that the fund’s more general established objectives were too broad to efficiently steer action and measure impact ; that the Commission did not comprehensively analyse needs nor the means at its disposal to address them ; that the selection of projects had been fast but not fully consistent and clear ; and that, while projects have started to deliver outputs, their monitoring was deficient. Among other weaknesses, the report highlighted the lack of a specific risk assessment framework, or – in the case of projects for the North of Africa – of any documented criteria for selecting project proposals. The funding of the IBM programme reveals that these concerns have now materialised.

The “action fiche” for the first phase of the IBM programme – i.e. the document summarizing its objectives and relevant plans and activities – acknowledges that “Under the existing Libyan legislation, once rescued, irregular migrants generally end up in detention centres which generate international concerns.” [15] The action fiche for the second phase of the programme expands on this : “The treatment of migrants in Libyan detention centres is of great concern : there is a lack of food, hygiene is abhorrent and there is a situation of total despair. Equally important is the absence of a clear and verifiable system of the rule of law, which meets the international and human rights standards. Migrants in detention centres have often no access to legal process and cannot address any misuse of power. This situation has led to criticism on the current programs financed by the EU in Libya and influenced the design of this action.” [16]

Despite such references to human rights and international law, the programme has not provided for any measure adequate to address the role of such funding in contributing to the dire situation of refugees and migrants trapped in Libya. Other measures supposedly adopted to mitigate the human rights impact of the programme, such as trainings and political demarches, either depend on the good will of Libyan authorities, or are tokenistic. While EU officials express concern that the continuation of abuse against refugees and migrants in Libya may “further damage the narrative and reputation of the EU”, the risk of actively facilitating this abuse is not considered in the brief risk analysis provided in the action fiche for the second phase . Notably, most of the project’s impact monitoring is outsourced to the Italian Ministry of Interior, which is also in charge of implementing many of the planned actions and has repeatedly refused to disclose information or even discuss related concerns.

As the IBM project is set to last until end 2021, it is high time to reassess this project, as well as the implications of the wider strategy adopted by the EU and its Member States to stop irregular crossings in the central Mediterranean. Human rights violations should be stopped and remedied, not encouraged and enabled. At a time when refugees and migrants stuck in Libya, as a result of EU decisions and projects, are exposed not only to serious abuse but also to the risks emerging from intensifying conflict and spreading disease, Europe should ensure the accountability of its own institutions and that any migration cooperation programmes are devised in line with its international obligations, not least in terms of their financial dimension.

▻http://www.migreurop.org/article2987

#glanage
ping @albertocampiphoto

Falling_fruit

https://i.imgur.com/SDt4YRW.png

#pauvreté #salaires #bas_salaires #pauvreté_de_masse #glanage #travail #marché_du_travail #salaire_minimum #aide_sociale #précarité

#Gaspard_Glanz #Glanz #GJ #gilets_jaunes #médias

Gaspard Glanz, le journaliste « à tuer direct »
Mardi, 28 Mars, 2017
Emilien Urbach
►https://www.humanite.fr/gaspard-glanz-le-journaliste-tuer-direct-633960

Suite à une vidéo dévoilant des agents de police grimés en reporters lors d’une manifestation, le journaliste de Taranis News est la cible de menaces sur les réseaux sociaux.

« À tuer direct. Nous sommes en France ou pas ? Les anciens auraient pris le fusil depuis longtemps » ; « C’est sa gueule de con qu’il faut diffuser, avec à la clé une prime à celui qui lui explosera » ; « Y a pas une balle perdue pour ce fils de pute ? » Ces menaces et ces insultes, qui, tour à tour, peuvent prendre un caractère homophobe ou xénophobe, sont actuellement proférées en quantité sur la page Facebook dénommée « Soutien aux forces de l’ordre ». Elles visent toutes Gaspard Glanz, 29 ans, journaliste et gérant depuis 2012 de la société de production Taranis News.

Attention, sur facebook des gens disent que Gaspard Glanz a accepté une comparution immédiate. Nop. il est convoqué comme tous les autres à une audience ultérieure ce qui est logique puisqu’il ne peut y avoir de comparution immédiate aujourd’hui, jour férié de Pacques.
La même source a publié une 2° fausse info. NON il n’y aurait pas de convocation pour Gaspard Glanz demain matin :

Sans donner plus d’informations pour l’instant, le parquet dément une convocation de Gaspard Glanz pour demain matin pour une comparution immédiate.
▻https://twitter.com/l_peillon/status/1120312728936120320
Echange exact : « Certains parlent de demain matin pour une comparution immédiate ». Réponse : « non ».
▻https://twitter.com/l_peillon/status/1120313717315526659

… Il n’en va pas forcément de même pour les autres interpellé-e-s, cf la #LegalTeam sur @paris luttes : ▻https://paris-luttes.info/attention-lundi-22-ferie-pas-de-ci-12040

Les personnes placées en Garde-à-Vue ce samedi 20 avril, si elles ne sont pas libérées directement des commissariats pendant le week-end, NE seront PAS déférées en Comparution Immédiate ce lundi. Elles seront déférées devant un juge des libertés et de la détention (JLD) pour savoir si elles sont libres, sous contrôle judiciaire ou en détention provisoire en attendant leur audience. Par contre, il y aura bien des Comparutions Immédiates mardi 23.

Selami de Strasbourg, Thomas d’Orléans, Heidi de Lille, Alain de l’Ariège /.../
243 interpellé-e-s lors de l’#acte23 des #GiletsJaunes à #Paris
219 en garde à vue
22 femmes, 6 mineurs et 13 de nationalités étrangères L’un est âgé de 65 ans... #SOLIDARITÉ :
▻http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/acte-23-des-gilets-jaunes-qui-sont-les-interpelles-21-04-2019-8057829.php

▻https://twitter.com/ERIC_GLANZ/status/1120341485973659648

Si cette information est confirmée, c’est la fin de @TaranisNews. Un assassinat économique pur et simple. Ou comment se débarrasser d’un journaliste gênant. Déjà à Calais, il avait été fiché S pour permettre son interdiction de séjour pendant l’évacuation de la jungle...

> Luc Peillon
> Selon un proche du dossier, le procureur envisagerait de requérir une interdiction de séjour à Paris contre le journaliste Gaspard Glanz, jusqu’à l’audience. Info non confirmée (mais non infirmée non plus) par le parquet. Convocation devant le tribunal toujours pas notifiée.

ça rappelle l’expulsion de Cohn-Bendit en mai 1968 !
▻http://www.brocante66.com/photos/194G.JPG

L’information est confirmée : interdiction de « paraitre » à Paris les samedi et le 1er mai…

▻https://taranis.news
#liberté_d'informer

Gilets jaunes acte 23 : le suicide collectif du vieux monde en bête blessée
▻https://yetiblog.org/archives/16846

Gaspard Glanz : « Je couvrirai les manifestations malgré les interdictions, parce que je suis journaliste »
par #Nnoman

Je pense que les journalistes devraient se relever un petit peu, faire leur travail. Pas ce qu’on leur demande de faire, mais leur travail de journaliste : montrer ce qui se passe, raconter ce qui se passe. C’est exactement ce que j’ai fait.

►https://reporterre.net/Gaspard-Glanz-Je-couvrirai-les-manifestations-malgre-les-interdictions-p

via @davduf :

allo @Place_Beauvau - c’est pour un bilan (provisoire) - édition spéciale MEDIAS 76 journalistes, photographes, vidéastes entravés dans leur travail depuis l’#ActeI Depuis les violences subies #ActeXXIII les journalistes dépassent les 10% des victimes.

▻https://twitter.com/davduf/status/1120049736072015872
article hélas toujours en #paywall : ►https://www.mediapart.fr/studio/panoramique/allo-place-beauvau-cest-pour-un-bilan

#Instock

Wereldwijd is dat 1,3 miljard ton per jaar! Eten weggooien gebeurt in de gehele voedselketen. Bij Instock willen wij hier verandering in brengen door voedselverspilling letterlijk én figuurlijk op de kaart te zetten.

▻https://www.instock.nl
#restaurant

Gaspillage : un #supermarché allemand ne vend que des produits ‘à jeter’

La société moderne gaspille énormément : électroménager qui n’est pas réparé, mobilier et même, bien évidemment, de la nourriture. Beaucoup de nourriture. Un problème majeur que les politiques et des personnes engagées tentent de résoudre. Contre le gaspillage alimentaire, un nouveau supermarché allemand prend les devants et décide de ne vendre que des produits destinés à la poubelle.

▻https://www.consoglobe.com/gaspillage-un-supermarche-allemand-ne-vend-que-des-produits-jeter-cg
#épicerie

Le site internet:

THE GOOD FOOD ist ein Laden, indem du mit einem Einkauf Lebensmittel retten kannst. Wir sorgen dafür, dass aussortierte aber noch köstliche Lebensmittel auf dem Teller anstatt in der Tonne landen.

https://www.the-good-food.de/wp-content/uploads/The-Good-Food_Logo_350.png

Ça fait mal de voir que tout est commercialisable même ce qui part à la poubelle, des fois c’est vraiment pourri ce qui est vendu et ceux qui faisaient la poubelle gratos n’y ont plus accès.

Bien cool sinon de découvrir à Marseille des magasins de ce type pour les boissons, un système de débrouille +/- solidaire qui semble implanté depuis longtemps.
#systèmeD

– Glaner dans les champs (si on est à la campagne). Chez moi la récolte des patates va commencer.
– Planter des arbres et des arbustes (groseilliers par exemple) dans les terrains vagues le long des voix de chemin de fer (attention aux désherbants répandus par les services d’entretiens.
Pour information, les griottes qui servent à la fabrication de la kriek viennent des cerisiers sauvages poussant le long des voies de chemin de fer sur Bruxelles.
Il y a aussi les bandes de terrain le long des autoroutes qui sont parfois utilisables.

Ah, oui, dans le « participatif » de l’action-partitipative on pourrait imaginer une action de plantage d’arbres et arbustes qui produisent des fruits et légumes en « libre service », dans les #friches_urbaines notamment, comme le suggère @bce_106_6.
–-> du coup j’ajoute à la liste « incroyables comestibles »

–#jardins_partagés
–#accès à une #alimentation_saine et suffisante
Pour rebondir sur la proposition de @bce_106_6 , certaines municipalités choisissent de planter des arbres fruitiers sur les terres communales
– #apprentissage : dans les quartiers ou les écoles des initiatives pour apprendre aux enfants à créer et entretenir ensemble
un #potager

Sur le #glanage il y a un film documentaire d’Agnès Varda
Les Glaneurs et la Glaneuse
▻https://www.telerama.fr/cinema/films/les-glaneurs-et-la-glaneuse,51079.php

« Pour les familles les plus pauvres, l’alimentation est devenue une variable d’ajustement »
▻http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2018/09/11/01016-20180911ARTFIG00007-pour-les-familles-les-plus-pauvres-l-alimentation

Numéro spécial de la revue Justice spatiale sur ce thème :
Justice Alimentaire et Agriculture
▻https://www.jssj.org/issue/janvier-2016-editorial

– moments festifs autour d’un denrée alimentaire : fête du cochon, de la châtaigne, de la bière, du miel...

"The Diggers are hip to property. Everything is free, do your own thing. Human beings are the means of exchange. Food, machines, clothing, materials, shelter and props are simply there. Stuff. A perfect dispenser would be an open Automat on the street. Locks are time-consuming. Combinations are clocks.

https://p0.storage.canalblog.com/04/77/529468/45621809_p.jpg

De 1966 à 1969, les #Diggers constituent un réseau de militants et d’autres personnes qui utilisent le théâtre de rue de guérilla, l’action directe et le sens de l’humour pour explorer des alternatives sociales. Leur devise était « Tout est gratuit, faites votre propre chose ! »
▻https://www.lesinrocks.com/2014/10/06/livres/1966-1968-printemps-californien-diggers-11528176
▻https://journals.openedition.org/lectures/15986
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/633019

Food Justice Now! Deepening the Roots of Social Struggle

A rallying cry to link the food justice movement to broader social justice debates

Food Justice Now! charts a path from food activism to social justice activism that integrates the two. In an engrossing, historically grounded, and ethnographically rich narrative, Joshua Sbicca argues that food justice is more than a myopic focus on food, allowing scholars and activists alike to investigate the causes behind inequities and evaluate and implement political strategies to overcome them.

https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/food-justice-now/image_mini#.jpg

Mallette pédagogique « #Droit_à_l’alimentation »

Le CNCD-11.11.11 et ses membres vous présentent leur nouvelle mallette pédagogique. Animations, jeux, films, etc. Découvrez nos outils de sensibilisation...

▻https://www.cncd.be/Mallette-pedagogique-Droit-a-l

Le paradoxe de la faim dans le monde

En 2012, on évalue à un milliard le nombre de personnes souffrant de la faim sur notre planète. Cela représente 1 personne sur 7. Pourtant, la Terre produit assez pour nourrir l’ensemble de la population : la #faim ne devrait donc pas exister...

▻https://vimeo.com/51045141

Quand la #grande_distribution s’empare du bio...

▻https://seenthis.net/messages/384596
#supermarchés #bio_industriel

Relaxé pour avoir récupéré de la nourriture dans une poubelle - ladepeche.fr
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/628462

#gaspillage_alimentaire #glanage

La loi n° 2016-138 du 11 février 2016 contre le gaspillage alimentaire votée à l’initiative d’élus, dont le conseiller municipal de Courbevoie Arash Derambarsh, contient plusieurs dispositions destinées à empêcher les grandes surfaces de jeter de la nourriture et de rendre leurs invendus impropres à la consommation, notamment en les inondant d’eau de javel (lire notre article Lutte contre le gaspillage alimentaire : la loi du 11 février 2016)

La loi de 2016 prévoit donc :

– inscription dans le code de l’environnement d’une hiérarchie de la lutte contre le gaspillage alimentaire, allant de la prévention à la #méthanisation ;
– obligation de recourir à une convention pour les dons réalisés entre un distributeur de denrées alimentaires et une association caritative ;
– obligation pour les surfaces de plus de 400 m² de proposer, dans un délai d’un an à compter de la promulgation de la loi, une convention de don à une ou plusieurs associations pour la reprise de leurs invendus alimentaires encore consommables ;
– interdiction de la javellisation des invendus ;
– information et éducation à la lutte contre le gaspillage alimentaire dans les écoles ;
– intégration de la lutte contre le gaspillage alimentaire dans le reporting social et environnemental des entreprises.

C’est ainsi qu’un distributeur du secteur alimentaire qui rendrait délibérément impropres à la consommation les invendus alimentaires encore consommables, sans préjudice des dispositions réglementaires relatives à la sécurité sanitaire, est désormais puni d’une amende de 3 750 €. Il encourt également la peine complémentaire d’affichage ou de diffusion de la décision prononcée, dans les conditions prévues à l’article 131-35 du code pénal.

Mouaif ça fait pas envie

J’ai un ami qui est un « homme des bois ».
En vrai, il est administrateur réseaux, mais il a été élevé à la campagne et a passé son enfance dans les buissons, à farfouiller les plantes. Dès qu’il a du temps libre, il s’intéresse aux plantes et quand on se balade dans la nature, il peut me montrer des tas de plantes comestibles dont certaines, me dit-il, sont nettement plus goûteuses que les variétés domestiquées.

Après, dans mon coin de cambrousse, il y a encore beaucoup de #glaneurs qui agrémentent leur régime avec ce qu’ils cueillent dans la nature : champignons, baies, herbes, légumes, fruits, etc.

Il existe des goûts que nous ne connaissons tout simplement pas dans les sauvages comestibles.
Quand à la valeur médicinale et nutritionnelle de ces plantes, on voit la la générosité de la nature.
ex : l’ortie, 5 fois plus de Vit C qu’un citron, 25 à 45% de protéines, vit A, B2,B5,B9 et K. Coté médicinal, dépuratif, reminéralisant, liste non exhaustive....., ...... la suite ▻http://vegecru.com/ortie

Quand je serai grande, je jetterai mon ordinateur aux orties pour devenir ethnobotaniste.
▻http://www.couplan.com/fr/formations/formations.php

lien avec ►http://www.terraeco.net/Pourquoi-une-pomme-d-aujourd-hui,58246.html
plus ça va plus on devra avoir recours aux plantes sauvages si on veut pas être carencés

« A la fin du Moyen-Âge, les nobles ont voulu se distinguer des pauvres, qui pratiquaient beaucoup la cueillette, en se nourrissant de légumes et de fruits cultivés », explique Jean Peyre. Peu à peu, par effet de mode, tout le monde a abandonné les plantes sauvages pour des repas à base de viande et de variétés potagères.

« Lois et normes, comme la réforme potagère de Louis XIV, ont ensuite confirmé la relégation de nos amies des bois ». Un phénomène renforcé aujourd’hui par l’influence des industries des semences et de la sélection végétale. (Voir ce que dit la loi actuelle sur la protection de la flore sauvage. ▻http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/La-protection-de-la-faune-sauvage.html )

#mimétisme #enclosures #wilderness

Des mêmes, le très drôle & corrosif

SÉCURITÉ GÉNÉRALE
LA LIQUIDATION DE L’ALCOOL
Lettre ouverte aux annonceurs de la
campagne de publicité « À ta santé ! » (2011)

▻http://i2d.toile-libre.org/PDF/2011/i2d_securite_generale.pdf