industryterm:sur son site

  • Who’s Afraid of George Soros? – Foreign Policy (10/10/2017) http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/10/10/whos-afraid-of-george-soros

    BUCHAREST, Romania — Last winter, in the middle of anti-corruption demonstrations, a television broadcaster accused George Soros — the Hungarian-born, Jewish-American billionaire philanthropist — of paying dogs to protest.

    The protests in Bucharest, sparked by dead-of-night legislation aimed at decriminalizing corruption, were the largest the country had seen since the fall of communism in 1989. Romania TV — a channel associated with, if not officially owned by, the government — alleged the protesters were paid.

    “Adults were paid 100 lei [$24], children earned 50 lei [$12.30], and dogs were paid 30 lei [$7.20],” one broadcaster said. 

    Some protesters responded by fitting their dogs with placards; others tucked money into their pets’ coats. One dog stood next to a sign reading, “Can anyone change 30 lei into euro?” Another dog wore one that read: “#George_Soros paid me to be here.”

    “The pro-government television, they lie all the time. In three sentences, they have five lies,” investigative journalist Andrei Astefanesei told Foreign Policy outside a gyro shop in Bucharest. “I told you about that lie, that Soros paid for dogs. ‘If you bring more dogs in the street, you get more money.’” He laughed.

    Romania TV was fined for its false claims about Soros. But the idea — that roughly half a million Romanians, and their dogs, came to the streets because Soros made them do it — struck a responsive chord. It’s similar to the idea that Soros is personally responsible for teaching students about LGBTQ rights in Romanian high schools; that Soros manipulated the teenagers who led this year’s anti-corruption protests in Slovakia; and that civil organizations and what’s left of the independent media in Hungary wouldn’t exist without Soros and his Open Society Foundations.

    The idea that the 87-year-old Soros is single-handedly stirring up discontent isn’t confined to the European side of the Atlantic; Soros conspiracies are a global phenomenon. In March, six U.S. senators signed a letter asking Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s staff to look into U.S. government funding going to Soros-backed organizations.

    “Our skepticism about Soros-funded groups undermining American priorities goes far beyond Eastern Europe,” said a spokesperson for Utah Sen. Mike Lee, who led the initiative, when asked if there was some specific piece of evidence of Soros-funded activity in Eastern Europe that prompted the letter or if concerns were more general.

    Soros has even been linked to former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who knelt during the national anthem to protest police brutality. “Congrats to Colin Kaepernick for popularizing the hatred of America. Good work, bro,” Tomi Lahren, a conservative commentator, tweeted during the controversy. “Your buddy George Soros is so proud. #istand.”

    On Twitter, Soros has also been held responsible for the recent Catalan independence referendum and the mass shooting in Las Vegas.

    But one of the places in which suspicion of Soros is most obvious is Central and Eastern Europe. There, Soros is not unlike the Mirror of Erised in Harry Potter, except that while the fictional mirror shows what the viewer most desires, Soros reflects back onto a country what it most hates.

    In Romania, where the head of the ruling party said Soros wants to do evil, the billionaire is not to be trusted because he’s Hungarian. In Hungary, where Prime Minister Viktor Orban has reportedly declared that Soros will be a main campaign theme in next year’s general election, he’s a traitor. And everywhere, he is Jewish, his very name a nod to the anti-Semitism that runs deep throughout the region.

    Now, Soros’s effectiveness as a bogeyman for conservative governments will be put to the test, literally. This week, Hungary is holding a “national consultation,” essentially a referendum designed to condemn Soros and his views on immigration. The government-funded questionnaire will be open to the country’s adult citizens and is meant to solicit their views on the Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor.

    “George Soros has bought people and organizations, and Brussels is under his influence,” Orban said in a radio interview Friday in the run-up to the consultation. “They want to demolish the fence, allow millions of immigrants into Europe, then distribute them using a mandatory mechanism — and they want to punish those who do not comply.”

    Soros declined an interview for this article, but a spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations, the main conduit for Soros’s philanthropic efforts, chalked up the backlash to his outspokenness. “He’s a man who stands up for his beliefs,” Laura Silber, a spokeswoman for the foundation, told FP. “That’s threatening when you’re speaking out against autocrats and corruption.”

    Blame and hatred of Soros are, to borrow from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, a specter haunting Central and Eastern Europe. But how did an 87-year-old billionaire thousands of miles away become the region’s most famous ghost?

    #conspirationnisme

    • George Soros lègue 18 milliards de dollars à sa fondation
      http://www.latribune.fr/economie/international/george-soros-legue-18-milliards-de-dollars-a-sa-fondation-754607.html

      Open Society Foundations (OSF) a reçu 18 milliards de dollars (15,2 milliards d’euros) de ce grand donateur du parti démocrate américain, a indiqué à l’AFP une porte-parole. « Cette somme reflète un processus en cours de transfert des actifs » de M. Soros, « qui prévoit de laisser la vaste majorité de sa fortune à Open Society Foundations », a-t-elle souligné.

      Cette donation fait d’Open Society Foundations la deuxième plus riche ONG aux Etats-Unis après la Fondation Bill et Melinda Gates, qui dispose de 40 milliards de dollars pour promouvoir les problématiques de santé publique et de développement à travers le monde, d’après la National Philanthropic Trust.

      L’OSF est un réseau de 39 entités aux opérations interconnectées à travers le globe et fait la promotion de ses valeurs dans plus de 120 pays. La première a ouvert ses portes en 1984 en Hongrie, pays d’origine de M. Soros. La dernière a vu le jour en 2016 en Birmanie. George Soros en est le président et ses fils Alexander et Jonathan sont membres du conseil d’administration. D’autres de ses enfants sont également impliqués.

      Le milliardaire américain d’origine hongroise, connu pour ses paris financiers risqués, avait donné jusqu’à ce jour 12 milliards de dollars (10,2 milliards d’euros) de sa fortune à des oeuvres caritatives. Depuis des décennies, il donne environ entre 800 et 900 millions de dollars à des associations chaque année d’après des chiffres mentionnés par le New-York Times. C’est en 1979 que le financier avait fait son premier don en attribuant des bourses d’études à des élèves noirs sud-africains en plein Apartheid, rappelle OSF sur son site internet. Selon le président de la Ford Foundation, Darren Walker interrogé par le quotidien américain :

      "il n’y a aucune organisation caritative dans le monde, y compris la Ford Foundation, qui a plus d’impact que l’Open Society Foundations durant ces deux dernières décennies. [...] Parce qu’il n’y a aucun endroit dans le monde où ils ne sont pas présents. Leur empreinte est plus importante et plus conséquente que n’importe qu’elle organisation de justice sociale dans le monde".

      v/ @hadji

    • Soros turns antisocial: Billionaire says Facebook & Google manipulate users like gambling companies
      https://www.rt.com/news/417065-soros-social-media-blame

      Soros, whose investment fund owned over 300,000 shares in #Facebook until last November, said social media platforms are deliberately engineering “addiction to the services they provide.” Facebook and Google deceive their users by “manipulating their #attention and directing it towards their own commercial purposes,” he said.

      In this respect, online platforms have become similar to gambling companies, Soros asserted. “#Casinos have developed techniques to hook gamblers to the point where they gamble away all their money, even money they don’t have.

      “Something very harmful and maybe irreversible is happening to human attention in our digital age,” he said. Social media companies “are inducing people to give up their autonomy,” while the power to shape the public’s attention “is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few companies.”

      The billionaire financier, whom the Hungarian government has labeled a “political puppet master,” then struck an even gloomier tone by offering a full-on dystopian conspiracy theory.

      In future, there could be “an alliance between authoritarian states and these large, data-rich IT monopolies,” in which tech giants’ corporate surveillance would merge with “an already developed system of state-sponsored surveillance,” he said.

      That “may well result in a web of totalitarian control the likes of which not even Aldous Huxley or George Orwell could have imagined,” he said, referring to the British authors of two famous dystopian novels.

      Last year, some tech corporations fell out of favor with Soros when his investment fund sold 367,262 shares in Facebook, although he chose to keep 109,451 of the network’s shares. Soros’ fund also offloaded 1,700 shares in Apple and 1.55 million in the owners of Snapchat. It also reduced its stake in Twitter by 5,700 shares, while still holding 18,400 shares in the social media service.

      Soros was not the only Davos speaker to launch a verbal attack on Big Tech. American entrepreneur and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said on Tuesday that Facebook should be regulated just like a tobacco company.

      “I think you’d do it exactly the same way you regulate the cigarette industry. Here’s a product, cigarettes, they are addictive, they are not good for you,” Benioff said. “Maybe there is all kinds of different forces trying to get you to do certain things. There are a lot of parallels.”

  • Premier accident mortel pour le pilote automatique de Tesla | Silicon 2.0
    http://siliconvalley.blog.lemonde.fr/2016/07/01/premier-accident-mortel-pour-le-pilote-automatique-de-tes

    Première tragique pour la fonction de pilotage automatique de Tesla. Au début de mai, un automobilisme américain a trouvé la mort au volant d’une Model S, la berline de luxe du fabricant californien de voitures électriques. Rendu public jeudi 30 juin, cet accident a provoqué l’ouverture d’une enquête de la National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), l’organisme responsable de la sécurité routière. Celle-ci pourrait déboucher sur un rappel des quelque 25 000 véhicules vendus par Tesla aux Etats-Unis.

    Cet accident mortel a eu lieu sur une voie rapide en Floride alors que le pilote automatique était activé. A une intersection, la voiture a percuté un poids lourd qui lui avait coupé la route afin de tourner à gauche. En raison d’un « ciel lumineux », « ni le pilote automatique, ni le conducteur n’ont détecté le flanc blanc de la remorque, détaille l’entreprise fondée par Elon Musk, dans un message publié sur son site Internet. Les freins n’ont donc pas été enclenchés ». Le conducteur est décédé sur le coup.

    • Iron Man fait parler les morts maintenant… le fait que le « conducteur » n’a pas freiné ne signifie pas forcément qu’il n’a pas pu voir le camion (ce qui semble dédouaner le robot dans la manière dont c’est rapporté). Peut-être qu’il l’a vu et n’a pas eu le réflexe de freiner (puisqu’il avait délégué le contrôle du véhicule), ou peut-être qu’il l’a pas vu parce qu’il faisait un scrabble sur son iphone ! Enquête à suivre…

    • L’avis d’ouverture de l’enquête par le #NHTSA (aucun détail, si ce n’est que l’incident semble avoir été signalé par Tesla)
      (ODI : Office of Defects Investigation)
      http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM530776/INOA-PE16007-7080.PDF

      Action: A Preliminary Evaluation has been opened.
      Summary:
      ODI has identified, from information provided by Tesla and from other sources, a report of a fatal highway crash involving a 2015 Tesla Model S operating with automated driving systems (“Autopilot”) activated. This preliminary evaluation is being opened to examine the design and performance of any automated driving systems in use at the time of the crash.

    • Une petite revue des questions soulevées par le principe même du pilote automatique, réactivées par l’accident de la Tesla.

      Is Tesla Responsible for the Deadly Crash on Auto-Pilot ? Maybe. - Forbes
      http://www.forbes.com/sites/patricklin/2016/07/01/is-tesla-responsible-for-the-deadly-crash-on-auto-pilot-maybe/#75eb35f35bbc

      Tesla’s Autopilot had its first fatality, the company announced yesterday. Statistically, this was bound to happen. The self-driving car had broadsided a truck that its sensors didn’t detect, and the driver didn’t see it either.

      Does Tesla have any responsibility for the accident, even if the driver was supposed to be watching the road at all times?

      The argument for why the driver, not Tesla, was responsible is that the driver had agreed to always monitor the road, in case of emergency situations exactly like this that the car cannot handle. This is part of the company’s standard agreement before it allows customers to use the #Autopilot feature, which is still in beta-testing mode since its introduction last October. (Beta-testing is working out the last bugs in a product before its official release to the public.)

      Et d’abord, est-il raisonnable de réaliser le #beta-test du logiciel en conditions réelles ?

      Puis les considérations éthiques déjà abordées ici.

      Enfin, une session prévue sur le sujet à la fin du mois

      Later this month in San Francisco, we’re already planning to address this exact issue in a half-day ethics session at the Automated Vehicles Symposium, sponsored by the Transportation Research Board and AUVSI. Tesla’s unfortunate accident reminds us that these conversations aren’t just academic but are all too real.

      L’auteur parle à 10h15, le 19 juillet
      http://www.automatedvehiclessymposium.org/program/agenda

  • Mossad contradicted Netanyahu on Iran nuclear programme
    http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/02/leaks-netanyahu-misled-iran-nuclear-programme-guardian-iran-nuclear-speec

    Less than a month after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s 2012 warning to the UN General Assembly that Iran was 70 per cent of the way to completing its “plans to build a nuclear weapon”, Israel’s intelligence service believed that Iran was “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons”.

    Al-Jazeera compte divulguer des télégrammes du Mossad
    Les documents incluraient l’évaluation des renseignements israéliens sur le programme nucléaire de l’Iran
    http://fr.timesofisrael.com/al-jazeera-compte-divulguer-des-telegrammes-du-mossad

    Certains de ces dossiers seront publiés par al-Jazeera en collaboration avec le journal britannique The Guardian.

    Ils « offrent un aperçu sur les relations opérationnelles dans le royaume sombre et hautement politisé de l’espionnage mondial », explique al-Jazeera sur son site web.

    La chaîne d’informations indique que seule une partie des documents serait publiée, et « gardera [le reste] dans le cadre de futures publications – pour ceux qui ont besoin d’être contextualisés », et « des centaines ne seront pas révélés ».

    Parmi les documents publiés, la chaîne d’informations a indiqué qu’elle publierait les échanges entre le Mossad et leurs collègues sud-africains qui révèlent la « véritable évaluation [du Mossad] au sujet du programme nucléaire iranien ».

    Ces dossiers prouveraient, que contrairement aux déclarations des politiciens israéliens qui affirment que l’Iran pourra développer la bombe atomique d’ici un an, le Mossad ne croit pas que Téhéran travaille à l’obtention de l’arme nucléaire.

    Al-Jazeera n’a pas donné plus de précision sur les documents au sujet du Mossad, notamment sur leur date. Le site a, plus tard, retiré la mention sur l’évaluation du Mossad.

    Le rapport du Mossad semblerait concorder avec un article du New York Times de 2012 qui citait un ancien responsable des renseignements américains qui affirmait que les renseignements israéliens étaient d’accord avec l’évaluation américaine selon laquelle le programme sur les armes nucléaires iraniens « n’avait pas repris ».

    • Le NCRI alias #MEK (très promptement relayé par les MSM) appelé à la rescousse,
      http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/25/1366697/-BREAKING-Amateur-hour-at-the-Pro-war-media-Latest-allegations-against-Ira

      In the wake of the embarrassing new revelations that the top Israeli intelligence agency is contradicting Bibi Netanyahu on his alarmist Iran intelligence, the well known liars, the “dissident” group NCRI (aka MEK), has jumped into damage control action and has released a suspiciously timed report that claims Iran has a new secret site. Countless media outlets including of course #Faux_News, have jumped on this as well.

      Here’s a Fox video segment about it.

      But it’s a total #fabrication. The image included in the NCRI report is actually a product shot from the Iranian safe company.

    • Long March of the Yellow Jackets: How a One-Time Terrorist Group Prevailed on Capitol Hill - The Intercept
      https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/02/26/long-march-yellow

      AT A SENATE Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Iran’s nuclear program in October 2013, more than a dozen men and women in yellow rain jackets sat in the gallery seats of the wood-paneled room, a bright presence amid the standard-issue dark suits of Washington. It wasn’t raining.

      They were supporters of the Iranian exile opposition group the Mojahedin-e Khalq, often referred to as the #MEK, but known to most Iranians as the Mojahedin. Activists distribute all manner of yellow paraphernalia at the group’s demonstrations: hats, banners, flags, inflatable rubber clapper sticks, and, most of all, the jackets. The yellow jackets — often emblazoned with portraits of the group’s two co-leaders, Massoud and Maryam Rajavi — have become its calling card.

      During the hearing, the powerful then-Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey, spoke out for the Mojahedin. About an hour and a half into the proceedings, Menendez issued an explicit threat to Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman over attacks against the group’s members in Iraq.

  • La NSA a commis"des milliers" d’infractions aux lois sur la vie privée - ÉTATS-UNIS - FRANCE 24
    http://www.france24.com/fr/20130816-nsa-enfreint-milliers-fois-lois-vie-privee-snwoden-washington-pos

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-broke-privacy-rules-thousands-of-times-per-year-audit-finds/2013/08/15/3310e554-05ca-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

    Le Washington Post a révélé jeudi, que des « milliers » d’infractions avaient été commises par l’Agence nationale de la sécurité (#NSA) américaine, en s’appuyant des documents secrets livrés au journal par Edward #Snowden.

    Des « milliers » d’infractions aux lois sur le respect de la #vie_privée ont été commises par l’Agence nationale de la sécurité (NSA), a rapporté jeudi 16 août le Washington Post sur son site internet. Des violations observés depuis que l’agence américaine du renseignement a été dotée de nouveaux pouvoirs, il y a cinq ans.

    Ces infractions ont été révélées par une analyse d’un audit interne et d’autres documents secrets, qui ont été livrés au journal par l’ancien consultant américain du renseignement Edward Snowden.

    L’un des documents cité par le Washington Post montre que la NSA avait ordonné à ses équipes de falsifier des rapports adressés au département de la Justice et au Bureau du directeur du Renseignement national, en remplaçant certains détails, selon l’article.

    Selon le journal, la NSA a également caché la surveillance non intentionnelle de plusieurs Américains. Ainsi, en 2008, un « grand nombre » d’appels téléphoniques en provenance de Washington ont été surveillés après une erreur de programmation qui a interverti le préfixe de la zone de la capitale américaine (202) avec celui de l’Égypte (20). L’erreur n’avait pas été révélée à l’équipe de surveillance de la NSA, indique l’article du Post.

    Selon la même source, l’audit sur la NSA, daté de mai 2012, a dénombré 2 776 incidents au cours des 12 mois précédents, concernant des « collectes, stockages, accès et communication de données protégées légalement, sans autorisation ».

    La plupart de ces incidents n’étaient pas intentionnels, mais nombre d’entre eux sont dus à des défaillances, ou à la violation des procédures normales.

    « Nous sommes une agence conduite par des humains et agissant dans un environnement complexe avec un grand nombre de régimes de régulation différents, c’est pourquoi nous nous retrouvons parfois du mauvais côté de la barrière », a déclaré un haut responsable de la NSA s’exprimant sous couvert de l’anonymat, en réponse aux questions du journal.

    Latest Leak: NSA Abused Rules To Spy On Americans ’Thousands Of Times Each Year’ - http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130815/18185824196/latest-leak-nsa-abused-rules-to-spy-americans-thousands-times-each-year.sh

    Even worse, this report only covers the NSA’s activities in the DC area. Other NSA locations are not covered.

    Three government officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified matters, said the number would be substantially higher if it included other NSA operating units and regional collection centers.

    White House Tried To Interfere With Washington Post’s Report, And To Change Quotes From NSA | Techdirt
    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130816/01314924200/white-house-tried-to-interfere-with-washington-posts-report-to-change-quot

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-statements-to-the-post/2013/08/15/f40dd2c4-05d6-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

    Among the many, many incredible revelations from the Washington Post report on the abuses by the NSA is a tidbit about an interview that the Post was able to do with the NSA’s director of compliance, John DeLong, followed by the White House’s attempt to completely whitewash the interview and block his quotes from being used, despite being told otherwise initially:

    The Obama administration referred all questions for this article to John DeLong, the NSA’s director of compliance, who answered questions freely in a 90-minute interview. DeLong and members of the NSA communications staff said he could be quoted “by name and title” on some of his answers after an unspecified internal review. The Post said it would not permit the editing of quotes. Two days later, White House and NSA spokesmen said that none of DeLong’s comments could be quoted on the record and sent instead a prepared statement in his name. The Post declines to accept the substitute language as quotations from DeLong.

    Read that again. This is the same White House that has been saying that they want to be as transparent as possible and to rebuild trust. And yet, here they are trying to block the Post from using an interview — an interview they suggested in the first place — and then to replace it with a bland and bogus “statement.”

    #surveillance #mensonges

    • NSA’s Defense Of All Those Abuses: ’Well, Compared To All The Spying We Do, We Don’t Abuse It That Often’ | Techdirt
      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130816/02134124202/nsas-defense-all-those-abuses-well-compared-to-all-spying-we-do-we-dont-ab

      In our initial report about the Washington Post’s astounding revelations about NSA abuses of surveillance, we posted part of the NSA’s “defense” to these abuses, but we left out the truly crazy part, which came right after the part we initially quoted:

      You can look at it as a percentage of our total activity that occurs each day,” he said. “You look at a number in absolute terms that looks big, and when you look at it in relative terms, it looks a little different.

      This was a senior NSA official, almost certainly the NSA’s “compliance director” arguing, in effect, “we do so much spying, that a few thousand mistakes per year is really no big deal.” Except, remember, throughout all of this, all of the NSA’s defenders, from President Obama to James Clapper to Keith Alexander to Mike Rogers, keep insisting that abuse is next to impossible.

      Yet, now even the NSA is admitting that “in absolute terms” there’s a lot of abuse, but we shouldn’t worry our pretty little heads about it, because in relative terms, it’s not that much. This is the point at which anyone who understands the difference between absolute and relative numbers, and when each is the appropriate measure to use, starts coughing up a lung. The relative amount is meaningless here. The absolute number means everything, because it shows that abuse is widespread and happens daily — something that the program’s defenders have been trying to deny for months.

    • NSA revelations of privacy breaches ’the tip of the iceberg’ – Senate duo | World news | theguardian.com
      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/16/nsa-revelations-privacy-breaches-udall-wyden

      Two US senators on the intelligence committee said on Friday that thousands of annual violations by the National Security Agency on its own restrictions were “the tip of the iceberg.”

      “The executive branch has now confirmed that the rules, regulations and court-imposed standards for protecting the privacy of Americans’ have been violated thousands of times each year,” said senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall, two leading critics of bulk surveillance, who responded Friday to a Washington Post story based on documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

      “We have previously said that the violations of these laws and rules were more serious than had been acknowledged, and we believe Americans should know that this confirmation is just the tip of a larger iceberg.”

      On July 31, Wyden, backed by Udall, vaguely warned other senators in a floor speech that the NSA and the director of national intelligence were substantively misleading legislators by describing improperly collected data as a matter of innocent and anodyne human or technical errors.

      In keeping with their typically cautious pattern when discussing classified information, Wyden and Udall did not provide details about their claimed “iceberg” of surveillance malfeasance. But they hinted that the public still lacks an adequate understanding of the NSA’s powers to collect data on Americans under its controversial interpretation of the Patriot Act.

    • Argh, Free article limit . On peut récupérer le code source et lire, mais c’est moins confortable…

      He said at one point that a lot of things aren’t clearly legal, but that doesn’t make them illegal” says a former military
      intelligence officer who served under Alexander at INSCOM.

  • Et voilà que le New York Times publie, sur son site Web, un article du philosophe Joseph Levine contestant, longuement, le droit d’Israël à exister en tant qu’État juif : On Questioning the Jewish State.
    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/09/on-questioning-the-jewish-state

    I conclude, then, that the very idea of a Jewish state is undemocratic, a violation of the self-determination rights of its non-Jewish citizens, and therefore morally problematic. But the harm doesn’t stop with the inherently undemocratic character of the state. For if an ethnic national state is established in a territory that contains a significant number of non-members of that ethnic group, it will inevitably face resistance from the land’s other inhabitants. This will force the ethnic nation controlling the state to resort to further undemocratic means to maintain their hegemony. Three strategies to deal with resistance are common: expulsion, occupation and institutional marginalization. Interestingly, all three strategies have been employed by the Zionist movement: expulsion in 1948 (and, to a lesser extent, in 1967), occupation of the territories conquered in 1967 and institution of a complex web of laws that prevent Israel’s Palestinian citizens from mounting an internal challenge to the Jewish character of the state.

    Le New York Times ? Oui, le New York Times. Prévoir un scandale à base d’imputation d’antisémitisme dans le courant de la semaine prochaine, et idéalement quelqu’un va se faire virer.

  • Suite aux révélations de Wikileaks (#cablegate), le directeur général d’Al Jazeera, Wadah Khanfar, vient à l’instant d’annoncer sa démission.

    Les USA font censurer le site web d’Al Jazeera
    http://www.numerama.com/magazine/19772-les-usa-font-censurer-le-site-web-d-al-jazeera.html

    Depuis, la situation s’est un peu détendue, mais visiblement aussi grâce à la bonne volonté d’Al Jazeera de censurer ses reportages dans un sens qui plaise davantage aux Etats-Unis. En tout cas sur son site Web. C’est en effet ce que démontre un câble diplomatique révélé par Wikileaks, daté de novembre 2010, qui révèle que le directeur général d’Al Jazeera, Wadah Khanfar, avait eu rendez-vous avec des officiels américains (PAO) et qu’il avait accepté de modifier un reportage photo sur la bataille sanglante de Tal Afar, en Iraq :

    Le câble incriminé :
    http://wikileaks.org/cable/2005/10/05DOHA1765.html

    Khanfar said the most recent website piece of concern to the USG has been toned down and that he would have it removed over the subsequent two or three days.

    • Angry Arab: resignation of Waddah Khanfar
      http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/09/resignation-of-waddah-khanfar.html?spref=tw

      The director-general of Aljazeera, Waddah Khanfar, has resigned. He has shaped the direction of the network since 2003 although I know for a fact that the Emir of Qatar has a hands-on role in directing the network. As for the resignation: it came only days after Al-Akhbar in Lebanon (and other newspapers and news sites in the region) published translations of Wikileaks in which Khanfar was admitting to US officials that he was toning down criticisms of US in Aljazeera media outlets. I don’t predict a shift in the network’s coverage. I met Khanfar only once a year ago: he is very smart and dynamic but is associated with the Islamists trend and is accused (especially by female anchors) of bringing in very conservative influences and officials.

    • Démission/éviction du directeur général d’Al-Jazeera, la “chaîne islamiste”… | Culture et politique arabes
      http://cpa.hypotheses.org/2961

      Quand on regarde Al-Jazeera (en langue arabe) aujourd’hui, on est surtout frappé par le fait que la chaîne est certes très engagée sur les révolutions arabes, mais de manière extrêmement partisane. Sa couverture des événements, guère éloignée d’un simple discours de propagande dans certains cas, fait qu’elle apparaît de moins en moins comme la meilleure chaîne d’information de la région, et de plus en plus comme le bras armé médiatique de la politique extérieure du Qatar. Ce que pourrait bien conformer la nomination du nouveau directeur général, cheikh Ahmed Jassem Ben Mohamed Al Thani, un homme venu des milieux de l’industrie pétrolière, sans la moindre expérience des médias, mais fort proche du régime…