organization:angry arab news service

  • Israel’s obsession with hummus is about more than stealing Palestine’s food | The National

    http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comment/israels-obsession-with-hummus-is-about-more-than-stealing-palestines-foo

    Pep Montserrat for The National

    son travail ici http://pepmontserrat.com/artwork

    When Israel expelled hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their villages and homes in 1948, many left with little more than the clothes on their back. Food was left on the stove. Crops were left unharvested. But the land emptied of its inhabitants was soon occupied by new residents.

    From 1948 to 1953, almost all new Jewish settlements were established on refugees’ property. The myth of making the desert bloom is belied by the facts: in mid-1949, two-thirds of all land sowed with grain in Israel was Palestinian land. In 1951, “abandoned” land accounted for nearly 95 per cent of all Israel’s olive groves and almost 10,000 acres of vineyards.

    During these early years, many Palestinian refugees attempted to return to their lands. By 1956, as many as 5,000 so-called “infiltrators” had been killed by Israeli armed forces, the vast majority of them looking to return home, recover possessions, or search for loved ones. Palestinian women and children who crossed the frontier to gather crops were murdered.

    The Nakba in 1948 was the settler colonial conquest of land and the displacement of its owners, a dual act of erasure and appropriation. Citing “reasons of state”, Israel’s first premier David Ben-Gurion appointed a Negev Names Committee to remove Arabic names from the map. By 1951, the Jewish National Fund’s “Naming Committee” had “assigned 200 new names”.

    http://www.geog.bgu.ac.il/members/yiftachel/books/Hagar-Bedouins-%20articles.pdf
    reference page 6 (State Archives; Prewar Archive, C/2613, cited in Benvenisti, 1997:8–9).

    But it did not stop with dynamite and new maps. The Zionist colonisation of Palestine has also included culture, notably cuisine. This is the context for the so-called “hummus wars”: it is not about petty claims and counterclaims, rather, the story is one of colonial, cultural appropriation and resistance to those attempts.

    In the decades since the establishment of the State of Israel on the ruins and ethnically cleansed lands of Palestine, various elements of the indigenous cuisine have been targeted for appropriation: falafel, knafeh, sahlab and, of course, hummus.

    Though these dishes are common to a number of communities across the Mediterranean and Middle East, Israel claims them as its own: falafel is the “national snack”, while hummus, according to Israeli food writer Janna Gur, is “a religion”.

    In a 2002 article on recipes, the Israeli embassy in Washington acknowledged that “Israel lacks a long-standing culinary heritage”, adding that “only a few years ago, Israelis even doubted the existence of their own authentic cuisine”.

    Introduction to Israeli Foods | Jewish Virtual Library
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/foodintro.html

    Such an admission is hard to find these days, as appropriation has become propaganda.

    In 2011, Jerusalem-based chef Michael Katz visited Australia and told a local newspaper how the Israeli government had “decided, through culture, to start improving Israel’s image”.

    “They started sending artists, singers, painters, filmmakers and then the idea came of sending chefs.”

    Israel’s cuisine not always kosher but travelling well
    http://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/restaurants-and-bars/israels-cuisine-not-always-kosher-but-travelling-well-20110521-1ey1s.html

    In 2010, the Israeli government decided to distribute pamphlets at Tel Aviv airport, to equip Israelis who go abroad with, in the words of then-public diplomacy minister Yuli Edelstein, the “tools and tips to help them deal with the attacks on Israel in their conversations with people”. Included in the literature was the claim that “Israel developed the famous cherry tomato.”

    http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Israel-to-use-ordinary-people-for-PR

    Now, as the Jewish Telegraphic Agency put it earlier this year, “Israel has been on the culinary ascent of late, with dozens of food blogs, new high-end restaurants, cooking shows and celebrity chefs, and a fascination with everything foodie”.

    http://www.jta.org/2015/01/28/arts-entertainment/exploring-israels-ethnic-cuisine

    It is not just food that is enlisted in Israel’s global PR initiatives. A few year ago, pro-Israel students at Brandeis University, in Massachusetts, held a “hookah night” with the help of campus-based “hasbara fellows”, professional Israel advocates who noted without any irony that “hookah is not specifically an Israeli cultural facet”.

    In addition to smoking and snacks, the “cultural” evening also included belly dancers. Explaining the rationale for the event, a member of the Brandeis Zionist Alliance said they had found that “students are more receptive to Israel-related education when we use a cultural lens”.

    http://www.hasbarafellowships.org/cgblog/255/Brandeis-Embraces-Israeli-Culture-with-Hookah-Night

    Now we have “International Hummus Day”, launched by an Israeli, Ben Lang, who is explicit about the propaganda value of his project: “The idea was to connect people around hummus and get more people talking about it and hopefully get people to see the good things that are happening in Israel.”

    “I just wanted to make sure that people saw that the initiative started in Israel.”

    http://www.ibtimes.com/international-hummus-day-israeli-entrepreneurs-middle-eastern-food-celebrat

    As everything from food to the keffiyeh is used to “rebrand” the state that colonised Palestine in the first place, Palestinians and their supporters have fought back.

    When an Israeli choreographer included the dabke traditional dance in his company’s repertoire in 2013,

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/arts/dance/dance-listings-for-aug-2-8.html?_r=0

    a New York-based dabke troupe responded with a thoughtful critique that noted how, by “appropriating dabke, and labelling it Israeli”, the “power imbalance” is only furthered.

    They added: “This makes us feel taken advantage of. Exploited. Commodified.”

    NYC Dabke Dancers respond to ZviDance “Israeli Dabke” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM9-2Vmq524

    In December 2014, after a campaign by Palestinian students and their allies, the student assembly at Wesleyan University in Connecticut agreed to remove Sabra hummus from campus dining facilities. The product symbolises Israeli appropriation and ongoing brutality; its parent company, the Strauss Group, donates to the Israeli military.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/10/wesleyan-hummus-boycott_n_6289238.html

    Accusations of cultural appropriation can produce some misleading responses. It’s not about who is “allowed” to eat what, or even about an objection to the natural cross-pollination that occurs in culture through language, cuisine and more.

    That is not the point. It is about the claim of ownership in a context of historic and ongoing violent erasure and displacement.

    It is about efforts to create an artificial history that justifies the establishment and continued existence of a settler colonial state.

    Even a mainstream Israeli food writer like Gil Hovav has pointed to this reality. “Food is about memory and identity,” he told the Israeli media last year. “Claiming ownership over a food is a way to assert a nation’s narrative. Israeli Jews have made hummus their own.”

    http://www.haaretz.com/misc/iphone-article/.premium-1.571496

    Cuisine is where efforts to both deny the existence of Palestine and appropriate its land and heritage meet. It is both an act of theft itself, and a way of justifying that theft.

    Ben White is a journalist and the author of Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide

    On Twitter: @benabyad

    #Palestine #Israel #Appropriation_Culturelle #Cuisine #Houmouss #Propagande #Héritage

    • Ici au Canada, ils ont aussi inventé le « israeli couscous », c’est très énervant ! C’est juste une céréale, une autre céréale, du moyen orient, qui existait bien avant 1948 (on me dit que c’est du Maftoul), mais c’est un outil de propagande très efficace, les gens ne pensant pas faire de la politique en utilisant ce terme...

    • @sinehebdo de plus le terme couscous n’a rien à voir avec la région

      Le couscous est un plat berbère originaire du Maghreb . Il est à base de semoule de blé dur. Les légumes qui composent le couscous varient d’une recette à l’autre.
      ...
      Le mot seksu (devenu kuskus, kuskusūn en arabe d’Afrique du Nord, puis couscous en français[1]), existe dans tous les parlers berbères de l’Afrique du Nord et désigne le blé bien modelé et bien roulé [2],[3]. Suivant les régions, le mot a plusieurs prononciations comme kseksu et seksu[4] . Un autre terme qui dérive de la même racine que seksu est le verbe berkukkes, de kukkes « rouler la semoule » et de ber qui signifie « redoubler le travail dans le but d’agrandir les grains »[3]. Le mot taseksut (prononcé en français thasseksouth) est la passoire dans laquelle on fait cuire le couscous.

      Un verbe seksek est utilisé par les Touaregs dans le sens de « passer au crible », rappelant l’usage du tamis dans la préparation[4].

      https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couscous

      #couscous

    • La Chakchouka, nouveau plat tendance
      http://www.huffpostmaghreb.com/2014/04/15/chakchouka-plat-tendance_n_5153680.html

      Une origine qui fait débat

      Aux Etats-Unis, la plupart des restaurants israéliens servent de la Chakchouka, et c’est notamment le chef israélien Yotam Ottolenghi qui a fait la réputation de ce plat au Royaume-Uni, d’où un amalgame quant à son origine.

      Ce dernier précise toutefois dans son livre de recettes « Jerusalem » que _ "la Chakchouka est à l’origine un plat tunisien, mais est devenu extrêmement populaire à Jerusalem". _

      Sa provenance exacte fait néanmoins toujours débat, cette spécialité étant également un incontournable des cuisines algérienne, marocaine, égyptienne et libyenne.

      Dans un autre article du site Buzzfeed, la Chakchouka est citée en tant qu’une des « 13 spécialités gastronomiques qui ne sont pas israéliennes », dénonçant une « colonisation » culinaire et soulignant que « l’appropriation culturelle est pour le moins inappropriée ».

      Essayez (à vos risques et périls) de dire à un Tunisien que la Chakchouka est un plat israélien ou américain !

      #Chakchouka #Tunisie

    • Après lecture je ne comprend toujours pas ce qu’est Le #Shawarma israélien. On peut résumer l’article ainsi : Le Shawarma fait son retour, des restaurants turcs et grecs le font très bien, des restaurants « israéliens » aussi => Le Shawarma Israélien est donc celui fait par des Israéliens descendants des colons Juifs ? (en admétant que les turcs et grecs des restaurants de telaviv sont aussi des citoyens israéliens)

      ici l’article

      The end-of-year summaries are over, and in any case this column doesn’t usually make them – we’d rather eat instead – but if there was one pleasing mini-trend that is worth noting, it’s the ostensible return of shawarma. If in the middle of the last decade, Tel Aviv was full of dozens of shawarma joints, most of which closed pretty quickly, fans of this popular delicacy, frequently called the “queen of the street food,” have lately encountered some new eateries that are making successful attempts to return the dish to its glory days. These include the Mutfak and Babacim Turkish restaurants, and the quasi-Greek Pitos.

      This is all good. In fact it’s very good – but it’s not enough. If it’s to be a true revival we need to talk about what is called “Israeli” shawarma. True shawarma connoisseurs tend to wrinkle their noses when confronted with a skewer of turkey meat, but even they will have to admit that during a time of distress or mere craving, this is the (relatively) lightest, most available and popular solution. Two new places have given us the opportunity to examine the possibility of a shawarma comeback.

      Welcome minimalism

      Mifgash Habracha (65 Hakishon St., Tel Aviv) is the type of place that rarely opens in the city anymore, mainly because it looks and acts as if it has been here for at least 20 or 30 years. Who calls themselves by such a name anymore, unless it’s trying to hint at pseudo authenticity? Who makes do with a simple sign, with no “brand,” no website and no Facebook page?

      This welcome minimalism continues inside, with (turkey) shawarma and schnitzel. The shawarma ranges from 34 to 45 shekels ($9.20 to $12.15); the schnitzel sells for 25 to 35 shekels, depending on whether it’s served in a pita, lafa or baguette, or on a plate. And that’s it.

      Shawarma isn’t at all cheap, for its vendors or its consumers, but I’m happy to say that the portions sold at Mifgash go for somewhat less than the average in Tel Aviv. Take an uncharacteristically generous portion of sliced meat (I ordered it in pita, for 34 shekels), and add to it a counter full of pickles, fried eggplant and grilled hot peppers to be sampled freely, plus classic, fresh, oil-drenched (and addictive) french fries – and you get why this place quickly became a hit among the residents and workers in the Florentine neighborhood (including several employees of Haaretz, whose offices are nearby).

      Condiments and salads for shawarmas at Nurman. Eran Laor

      The retro continues with the turkey meat on the rotating spit, which is huge and coarse in texture, with thick pieces sliced off in a manner that is uncharacteristic of our times – not with some cutting robot, not even with an electric slicer, but with a regular knife by the guy at the counter. The result is uneven meat chunks that are far different from the thin shavings we get elsewhere. The use of the wrong spices (whether too weak or too aggressive) or dry spots on the meat can easily ruin such shawarma, but fortunately that doesn’t happen here. This one doesn’t taste much different from any other turkey shawarma, but one does recognize the cautious use of cumin and turmeric, which makes this shawarma no less tempting, but much less yellowish and phosphorescent.

      Branded design

      A small jump to the center-of-the-center of Tel Aviv and the price for shawarma in pita jumps 10 percent: 38 shekels at Nurman (96 Hahashmonaim St.), whose location under the Gindi Towers left it no alternative but to put on a more sophisticated, modern face. Once – okay, 10 years ago – a place like this would have been called a “high-tech shawarma joint,” but today it is now the standard and it’s places like Mifgash Habracha that are considered a sensation.

      There are two shawarma rotisseries here, with veal/lamb or turkey meat (you can mix them if you like), and a spanking-clean glass case in front of them containing a more than ample selection of toppings: two types of hot pepper (red and green), pickled lemons, pepper spread and the other usual suspects in this genre.

      The turkey shawarma was reasonable. Very thin pieces that were a little less juicy than one might expect (the requisite dome of fat on top was already shrunken when we arrived; while it’s correct to give customers a piece of it if they ask, one must remember that it has a role to play here). The seasoning was the type you find in other places. No complaints, but no special praise here, either.

      The second spit was more successful. The shawarma was dark, soft and juicier – and naturally and understandably less seasoned. I know plenty of people who love meat but still avoid lamb because of its dominant taste that remains long after it’s eaten. That doesn’t happen here, because the lamb mostly takes the form of fat, while the meat itself is decent veal. Forgetting the hummus-tahini option and taking advantage of an unexpected addition of pickled (and sharp) lemon created a portion of shawarma that was relatively original and refreshing.

      In both cases there was nothing sensational. But you know what? We weren’t looking for that. We’d be happy with a few other options like these. If Mifgash Habracha and Nurman survive 2019, we could officially declare that shawarma is back. We hope it won’t ever abandon us again.

    • Avec Cyril Lignac, Israël fait découvrir son patrimoine et sa gastronomie – Le Quotidien du Tourisme
      http://www.quotidiendutourisme.com/destination/avec-cyril-lignac-israel-fait-decouvrir-son-patrimoine-et-sa-gastronomie/160786

      Ici tout y passe : du humous à la chawarma en passant par les aubergines grillées avec la peau et ce petit goût fumé (baba ghanouch) on notera cette phrase qui me file des urticaire

      Il livre aussi une appétissante recette de houmous avec Caleb, « une recette transmise de génération en génération »…

      et sinon,

      Une année record pour le tourisme en Israël
      A l’occasion des vœux de l’Office national israélien du tourisme (Onit) en France, Lina Haddad, sa directrice, a annoncé les bons chiffres de 2017. Une « année record », avec tous les marchés touristiques en hausse qui ont permis de passer la barre des 3 millions de touristes. En 2017, le pays a accueilli « 3.611.800 touristes, soit 700.000 de plus que l’année précédente ». L’Onit explique cette croissance par trois axes : une nouvelle stratégie marketing, des incentives aux compagnies aériennes et des partenariats avec des OTAs (Expedia et Lastminute). La communication sur des destinations (Jérusalem/Tel-Aviv, Eilat et la mer Rouge, le Néguev) comme sous-marques de la destination principale a porté ses fruits. « Ces campagnes ont déclenché l’envie de partir » explique-t-on à l’Onit. Quant aux subventions aux compagnies aériennes, elles ont facilité l’ouverture de routes (low cost notamment) et l’augmentation des rotations. Le premier marché touristique pour Israël reste les Etats-Unis (778.000 arrivées, +20%). La France se classe troisième (308.600, +7%) derrière la Russie (331.500, +25%). Les recettes touristiques ont dépassé l’an dernier les 20 milliards de shekels (environ 4,79 milliards d’euros). Le tourisme a créé 25.000 nouveaux emplois.

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: I have not seen such a revolutionary meeting of the minds since the last GCC summit
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2016/05/i-have-not-seen-such-revolutionary.html

    From Left: Revolutionary George Sabra. Revolutionary Walid Jumblat. Revolutionary Burhan Ghalyun. Revolutionary Michel Kilu. And the revolutionary spirit of Muhammad bin Salman hover over them.

    #esprit #révolutionnaires

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: Terrorism in Europe: how US and Western governments nourished and encouraged Al-Qa`idah terrorists in Syria
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2016/03/terrorism-in-europe-how-us-and-western.html

    You can really trace the current problem of terrorism hitting Europe to the beginning of the Syrian war in 2012 and the insistence of Western governments—against all available evidence—on creating the myth of “moderate Syrian rebels”. Western propaganda glamorized a non-existing Syrian “revolution” and romanticized those Muslims in the West who took the trip to fight with the various Jihadi group. The myth of the moderate Free Syrian Army was in full swing at the time, and any opinion which warned of the dangers of rise of terrorist groups in Syria was immediately dismissed as pure Syrian regime propaganda. The dangerous propaganda ploy of Western media continues. Look at this map from this article in Bloomberg. Look how the areas designated as “Syrian rebels” is so widely expanded. In fact, if you look at the areas around Idlib, the dominant force there is Nusrah Front even if it works with other militant Jihadi groups under the banner of Jaysh Al-Fath. So basically, whenever Nusrah Front (the descenents of the terrorists of Sep. 11) align themselves with other rebel groups, Western propaganda and media outlet regard the rebels in that area as “moderate Syrian rebels” because they are not fighting under the banner of Nusrah although the banner exists. This is one of many example but it gives you an idea. And Zionists have been most active in this regard and in spinning this propaganda but they are not alone: some liberal and leftists have also been spinning this fable.

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Former British ambassador to Syria : We never saw a secular Arab regime that we didn’t want to overthrow
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2016/02/former-british-ambassador-to-syria-we.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMZVKdWFJPk

    Remarquable intervention de l’ex ambass de Sa Majesté à Damas (entre 2003 et 2006). En plus, c’est de l’anglais facile à comprendre !

    #syrie

  • Devant les avancées du régime au nord la Turquie a fourni (avant les accords de cessation des hostilités à Munich) aux groupes qu’elle soutient des missiles Sol-sol d’une portée de 20 kms. Certes ce n’est pas encore la livraison de missiles sol-air portatifs (option afghane Stinger) mais c’est une nouvelle étape dans l’escalade militaire internationale en Syrie :
    http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-rebels-missiles-confront-offensive-191050845.html

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s foreign enemies have sent rebels new supplies of ground-to-ground missiles to confront a Russian-backed offensive by the government near Aleppo, stepping up support in response to the attack, two rebel commanders said.

    The commanders told Reuters the missiles with a range of 20 km (12 miles) had been provided in “excellent quantities” in response to the attack that has cut rebel supply lines from the Turkish border to opposition-held parts of the city of Aleppo.
    Facing one of the biggest defeats of the five-year-long war, rebels have been complaining that foreign states such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey have let them down by not providing them with more powerful weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles.
    “It is excellent additional fire power for us,” said one of the commanders, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. The second rebel commander said the missiles were being used to hit army positions beyond the front line. “They give the factions longer reach,” he said.

    • Aleppo under siege
      http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_aleppo_under_siege5092

      For the United States, increased weapons flows are a more palatable alternative than direct intervention. These new weapons will be aimed not so much at securing decisive victories, but at keeping the opposition alive as a viable fighting force, preventing the fall of Aleppo and making Russia pay a higher price for their ongoing support. Of course, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are also very focused on the fact that 2017 will usher in a new US president and hope that the new office holder will be willing to up US intervention in the conflict, something that is distinctly possible given US political dynamics and the expected desire of a new president to project assertiveness as a mark of contrast with Obama’s perceived timidity. Keeping the rebels ready for this moment is likely to have already emerged as a critical strategy of the opposition and its backers.

    • @kassem : intéressant de lire cette analyse dans ce think tank atlantiste. Le passage que vous citez rend plausible l’accusation d’Angry arab - de toute manière les TOW américains, selon les contrats d’armement américains me semble-t-il, ne sauraient être vendus ou céder sans en référer aux USA et obtenir leur accord. A minima cette intensification de l’armement de Jaysh al-Fatah suppose la non-opposition de Washington.
      Le reste de l’article plaide, étonnamment, pour prendre un peu plus en compte, dans la définition des politiques occidentales en Syrie, les besoins immédiats des civils syriens plutôt que les intérêts de tel camp ou les questions dites « morales ». Un ton un peu plus raisonnable que celui auquel on est habitué...

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: You know more who is more idiotic than that Israeli rightwing nut who opined on the letter “P” in Arabic? Isabel Kershner of the New York Times
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2016/02/you-know-more-is-more-idiotic-than-that.html

    You know more who is more idiotic than that Israeli rightwing nut who opined on the letter “P” in Arabic? Isabel Kershner of the New York Times
    “But it is rare to meet an Arab who can pronounce the letter P; Pepsi is known as “Bebsi” across the Middle East.” This is a correspondent in a land that is majority Arab (historically before the nakbah) and it still retains Arabs as at least half of the population of the holy land, and you would expect her living there to know something about them, and yet this is how ignorant she is. But this is the worst part: “Palestinians pronounce the name of their would-be state as “Falastin” (fah-leh-STEEN)”. Their would-be state? No, Ms. Kershner. Palestinians pronounce their historic state over centuries as Filastin.

    A ce point de bêtise, s’en est presque beau. Comment dit-on #gorafi_encore_piégé en anglais ?

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: Whenever it is convenient, Western media can find that there are indeed underlying causes for political violence—provided it is not directed at Western clients
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2016/01/whenever-it-is-convenient-western-media.html

    “Experts outside China, however, say much of the bloodshed here is fueled by local grievances, among them job discrimination against Uighurs, endemic poverty and a widespread belief that the flood of Han migrants to the region is part of a government plan to dilute Uighur identity.” [...]

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Today in Lebanon : Al-Qa`idah has been incorporated as the 19th sect
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/12/today-in-lebanon-al-qaidah-has-been.html

    Brillante synthèse, comme souvent, d’Angry Arab sur les circonstances de l’échange entre des otages d’Al-Qaïda et des prisonniers de l’armée libanaise, bruyamment salué par les médias locaux (même si on est content pour les malheureux soldats libérés). Il en reste, mais ils sont entre les griffes de daesh ceux-là...

    Today, it has been proven in Lebanon:
    1) that Qatar is the official sponsor of the Al-Qa`idah (Nusrah Front to be exact).
    2) that Aljazeera Arabic is the official voice of Nusrah Front.
    3) that Lebanon is yet again proven as the capital of self-humiliation and self-contempt.
    4) that Lebanese media often play cheerleaders for the Lebanese security services.
    5) that Lebanon, in return for the hostages, pledged to basically equip and feed Nusrah front in its terrorist wars.
    6) Nusrah Front has been welcomed as an additional sect in Lebanon: image from Aljazeera from Irsal inside Lebanon. Ben Laden would have been proud of the Lebanese state.

    (Légende de l’image, tirée d’Al-Jazeera : « Urgent : début de la mise en oeuvre de l’accord d’échanges de prisonniers, réalisé sous le patronnage du Qatar entre le gouvernement libanais et le Front Al-Nosra. »)

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: Some observations about the carnage in Paris
    http://angryarab.blogspot.de/2015/11/some-observations-about-carnage-in-paris.html

    Some observations about the carnage in Paris
    1) ISIS has gone on the offensive: in ten days, they downed a Russian civilian airliner, massacred Hazara Shi`ites in Afghanistan, bombed the southern suburbs of Beirut and now Paris.
    2) Western governments: US and France in particular along with their Saudi,Qatari, and Turkish allies are directly responsible for the rise and expansion of ISIS through their policies in Syria which cuddled and nurtured ISIS and its sister terrorist organizations.
    3) there is no way on earth to stem the menace of ISIS and Al-Qa`idah like organizations without going to the source, in Saudi Arabia which is the official headquarters of the Ibn Taymiyyah’s terrorist interpretation of Islam.
    4) Ibn Taymiyyah is the one thinker/theologian who has inspired and guided the deeds and thoughts of terrorists striking in the name of Islam.
    5) Western governments AND media have been rather cynically silent about victims of ISIS terrorism if the civilian victims happen to be categorized as “enemies”. Western governments AND media (look at the dispatches from Times and Post over the last 4 years about Syria) have consistently ignored and even cheered sectarian massacres of Syrian and Lebanese civilians if seems as being perpetrated by foes of the Syrian regime.
    6) Just as ISIS and Al-Qaidah brought terrorism to the heart of the West, Western governments have also been exporting death and destruction to the Middle East and North Africa: from Mali to Libya to Egypt to Sudan to Somalia to Syria to Iraq to Pakistan to Afghanistan.  Terrorism has been inflicted on people in those countries by the terrorism of ISIS and Al-Qaidah and by the bombs and rockets and drones of Western governments.

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Take One : how Human Rights Watch justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages as human shields
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/11/take-one-how-human-rights-watch.html

    Et cet autre commentaire n’est pas mal non plus, qui décortique le minable communiqué de HRW. Faut-il préciser qour ceux qui ne le lisent pas régulièrement, que l’auteur dénonce régulièrement les horreurs du gouvernement syrien ?

    Take One: how Human Rights Watch justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages as human shields
    1) notice that the headline does not talk about human shields but provides justifications for the war crime: “Armed Groups Use Caged Hostages to Deter Attacks”.
    2) Another justification for the war crime: “even if the purpose is to stop indiscriminate government attacks,” said Nadim Houry”.
    3) Yet another justification of the practice: “Syrian government forces have repeatedly attacked residential areas and popular markets in Eastern Ghouta”. I defy you to find this: in all the many statements by Human Rights Watch about war crimes of the regime do they ever insert a sentence or a passage to the effect that Syrian rebels also target civilians? The sentence here is merely inserted to justify the war crimes and to engender sympathy for the rebels.
    4) The statement then cites a to provide a further justification: “The Shaam video includes interviews with local residents who justify the use of the cages by arguing that this may deter further attacks.”. Imagine if a story by HRW about barrel bombs over Ghuta, from which Syrian rebels shell Damascus indiscriminately includes a statement by a pro-government source in which he/she says that the bombs may “deter further attacks”?
    5) they then issue a list of attacks by the government on civilians, of course always based on their pro-rebel sources. Has HRW resorted to this methodology in all of its statements on war crimes by regime? Never.
    6) They then provide this statement which has no pictorial evidence whatsoever except a claim on Facebook: imagine if the HRW accepts to rely on a Facebook page to document war crimes by the Syrian rebels: "On September 13, a Facebook page used to spread local news from Fua and Kefraya, two Shia towns in Idlib besieged by Jaysh al-Fateh, a coalition of opposition armed groups including Ahrar al-Sham and Jabhat al-Nusra, posted images of a cage that they claimed contained detained Jaysh al-Fateh combatants that had been placed on top of a building in the besieged communities by fighters defending the towns."  Notice that the HRW statement does not even bother to mention that the two towns of Fua and Kafrayyah are both held hostage by Syrian rebels for no reason except the sectarian affiliation of the residents.

    This is one of the few times in which Western human rights organizations have helped and abetted and justified war crimes by rebels—in the case of Syria.

    #clichés_arabes (hélas)

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Take Two : How New York Times justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages to be used as human shields
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/11/take-two-how-new-york-times-justified.html

    Take Two: How New York Times justified the placement of Alawite civilians in cages to be used as human shields
    1) Typical of the New York Times: Alawite sect is always referred to as “Bashshar Al-Asad’s sect”, as if he is its prophet or as if he owns it. This is bigotry in the extreme and has provided justification and jubilation for war crimes by Syrian rebels. It would be disgusting anti-Semitism if one were to refer to Judaism as “the religion of Ariel Sharon” or to refer to Islam as “the religion of ISIS”.
    2) Like the HRW statement (see below) the article immediately gives readers justification of the cage war crime: “Two days after Syrian government forces shelled a rebel-held suburb of the capital, Damascus, killing at least 40 people in a market”. That is it: the reader is immediately persuaded to sympathize with the war crimes of the rebel by telling them that the Syrian regime started this. Notice that New York Times has been doing this constantly and it is a propaganda service that the New York Times has never rendered except to Israeli occupation forces. You will look in vain to find any reference to a war crime by the regime in which a sentence is inserted to remind readers of a war crime by Syrian rebels.
    3) Instead of condemning the act, the article in fact makes an effort to blatantly justifiies it and does not even refer to its practice as human shields: “apparently to shield the area from further bombardment”.
    4) Wait: how were they able to capture “army officers” with their families? The officers were on the battle fields with their families? “the prisoners were captured army officers from President Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite sect and their families.” Another desperate attempt to provide justifications.
    5) Joshua Landis is wrong: it is not uncommon for Syrian rebels to impose Sunni-style veiling on Alawite women: “Joshua Landis, a Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma, suggested that some of the women appeared to be Sunni Muslims.”
    6) The NYT even tries to present the leader of the group which committed those war crimes in a positive light: “The Army of Islam, a group with financial backing from Saudi Arabia, is led by Zahran Alloush, a Sunni commander who seemed to back away from sectarian anti-Alawite statements in an interview with an American journalist, Roy Gutman, in May.” That is all what it takes for NYT to be convinced that he is no more anti-Alawite? I am sure that Times would have been impressed with Ribbentrop statements in Nuremberg as well.
    7) Obama’s administration is in contact with this war criminal: “Mr. Alloush, who said his faction had been in direct contact with Daniel Rubinstein, the Obama administration’s special envoy for Syria”.
    8) Another attempt by Alewives to justify indiscriminate war crimes against all Alawites: “Alawites from the Assad family have ruled Syria for decades, even though most Syrians are Sunnis.” Imagine how the NYT would be outraged if an Arab were to insert a statement about the murder of Jews by Palestinians to the effect that: “Jews have ruled Palestine since 1948”: such a reference would be categorized as anti-Semitism in a sentence about violence.
    9) Another justification in the same article for the cage war crime: “The rebel stronghold of Eastern Ghouta has been under intense bombardment since the insurgents managed to block the main northern entrance to Damascus”.
    10) They managed to even Skyped with someone to give them another justification: ““It’s to protect the civilians,” Bilal Abu Salah, a media activist from Douma, said in a Skype interview on Sunday.” And by referring to this supporter of war crimes as “media activists” they only lend his voice credibility.
    11) Then a medication justification for the cage war crime: “A paramedic from Douma who asked to be identified only by his first name, Ahmad, said the casualties of the recent strikes there “were women and kids mostly.””
    12) Another justification: “said the Sunni Islamist group had copied the strategy of using “kidnapped people — including whole families — as human shields,” seen earlier in Alawite-majority towns seeking to deter shelling by insurgents.” Where did the Times correspondent see that in Alawite-majority towns? Why not name them and provide readers with pictures?

    Excellente analyse de texte, en en l’occurrence un article du NYT, par Angry Arab. Pas suffisant malheureusement pour convaincre ceux qui s’obstinent encore à applaudir à la révolution syrienne.

    #syrie

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب: Who says that American and its Gulf allies are not bringing democracy and enlightenment to the Middle East? this is the fruits of their work in Syria
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/10/who-says-that-american-and-its-gulf.html

    Leçon de droit musulman à Idlib. Il y en a une qui n’a pas ses gants, au fond. Mauvais esprit sans doute. Pauvres gamines.

    #clichés_arabes #syrie

  • The Angry Arab News Service - Flash: what is happening in Yarmuk Camp near Damascus?
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/06/flash-what-is-happening-in-yarmuk-camp.html

    I have been receiving live updates from friends and comrades about the developments in Yarmuk Camp. The latest is that the Syrian Army is surrounding the camp. Some say that it all started when people protested outside the office of the PFLP-GC in the camp: some parents of murdered children and men (murdered by the fire of the terrorist Zionist regime in occupied Palestine) were protesting against the role of the PFLP-GC in the protests in Majdal Shams. But an eyewitness at the protests told me that the Palestinian organizations were not present in the protests: that the Syrian regime did not want the Palestinian organizations to mobilize for fear of a big massive protests, although Syrian TV was present. But some were not happy about the role of the PFLP-GC, and some indicated that some fighters at the office in Yarmuk fired at the protesters. Apparently, that resulted in an armed clash and that gun fire can still be heard at this hour. The Syrian Army is surrounding the camp but others are saying that the Army was called in for help by the PFLP-GC but that Army is not intervening to support the organization for some suspicious reasons. All seems murky at this hour. The Syrian Army is busing killing Syrian people but may have time to kill some Palestinians too.

    PS No matter what, the responsibility for yesterday’s terrorist crimes against civilian protesters should be squarely blamed on the terrorist Israeli army. No question about that.

    PSS Eyewitnesses in Syria complained to me about the role of the Syrian army and security forces. How they stood idly by while the Israeli terrorist soldiers were committing their crimes. The Syrian Army is very much like the cowardly Lebanese Army in that regard. These are armies that are only heroic against civilians (in fairness to the Lebanese Army, it is also afraid of civilians).

  • Le nouveau Patriarche maronite - Angry Arab News Service (traduction)
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/03/new-maronite-patriarch.html

    Aujourd’hui, la Patriache Sfayr a fait élire l’évêque Bisharah Ar-Ra‘i [Bechara Raï] pour lui succéder. C’était son choix. Le nouveau Patriache est un religieux parmi les plus conservateurs et les plus réactionnaires. Il appartient à cette catégorie d’obscurantistes tels que ceux qui servaient en France avant la Révolution.

    Il a déclaré qu’éliminer le confessionnalisme au Liban serait mauvais, parce que cela aboutirait à un État islamique. C’est lui qui a pondu cette idée l’année dernière : il a souhaité qu’une « Grande excommunication » soit prononcée contre quiconque oserait critiquer le Patriarche maronite au Liban. Je ne plaisante pas.

    Il a écrit des articles dans le torchon publié par Elias Murr (Al-Jumhuriyyah). Ses derniers articles commentaient la catastrophe au Japon : il écrivait que « Dieu » s’exprime au travers des désastres, avalanches, déluges et tsunamis ; que ces langages de Dieu sont destinés à appeler les gens à se repentir de leurs pêchés. Je ne plaisante pas.

    Ah, et il se teint toujours les cheveux à 71 ans, mais a expliqué qu’il le faisait uniquement parce qu’il pensait que Husni Mubarak avait l’air bien avec les cheveux noirs.

    C’est un type qui, à toutes fins utiles, appartient à la milice des Forces libanaises.

    Mais en tant que réactionnaire, il devrait bien servir la politique étrangère américaine : avez-vous remarqué que tous les alliés des États-Unis dans la région sont des réactionnaires ? Pouvez-vous citer un seul progressiste qui soit aligné sur la politique étrangère américaine ?

    #Liban

  • Intervention militaire en Libye : pour un rejet catégorique d’une intervention OTAN/Arabie séoudite (traduction)
    As’ad AbuKhalil, Angry Arab News Service, 12 mars 2011
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/03/military-intervention-in-libya-for.html

    Les appels pour une intervention militaire en #Libye sont maintenant de plus en plus alarmants et suspects. Je deviens plus suspicieux quand je lis les éditorialistes libéraux (lire : toujours sionistes) réclamer à cor et à cri une intervention militaire directe, alors que les mêmes n’ont jamais montré le moindre intérêt pour les victimes arabes auparavant, notamment pendant les virées israéliennes et leurs crimes de guerre. Quelqu’un m’a expédié un message Twitter par nul autre que Nicholas Kristof (auteur de commentaires scandaleux et racistes concernant les Arabes l’année dernière, et connu pour sa lâcheté absolue face à tous les crimes israéliens contre les Arabes), dans lequel il se prévaut de la légitimité de « la Ligue arabe » pour appeler à une intervention militaire.

    En d’autres termes, Kristof, les libéraux et la droite sont en train de revendiquer l’autorité morale de l’autocratie séoudienne pour appeler au soutien du mouvement pour la démocratie en Libye. Que reste-t-il de la Ligue arabe, sinon l’Arabie séoudite et sa marionnette, Amr Moussa ?

    George Will, un éditorialiste sioniste et de droite (qui a au moins pour lui de savoir écrire correctement et de défendre un argument), a écrit un article convaincant dans lequel il réfute de nombreux arguments qui circulent concernant la Libye (Will, bien sûr, est aussi coupable que Kristof dans son soutien et son silence face aux crimes de guerre israéliens).
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/08/AR2011030803149.html

    La priorité pour le mouvement d’opposition en Libye est de se débarasser de ce Moustafa Abdeldjelil, la tête du Conseil de transition, qui comprend plusieurs fidèles de Kadhafi, comme lui. Ils mènent une branche islamiste de l’opposition qui s’oppose à une tendance plus laïque et radicale représentée par exemple par l’association professionnelle des avocats, laquelle — contrairement à Abdeldjelil — refuse les échanges de messages secrets avec la junte de Kadhafi.

    Je pense que la meilleure solution serait que les démocraties tunisienne et égyptienne fournissent les bases pour un soutien à l’opposition libyenne et à l’établissement de bases de volontaires venus des peuples arabes (surtout ceux qui ont un entrainement militaire) qui souhaitent aider la rébellion contre la tyrannie de Kadhafi. Je ne fais pas confiance aux militaires tunisiens et égyptiens, parce qu’ils ne sont pas le produit de la volonté populaire, et sont dirigés par des individus nommés par les dictateurs, mais ils peuvent aider s’ils le souhaitent.

    Moustafa Abdeldjelil est potentiellement un messager de la tyrannie wahhabite qui peut compromettre la démocratisation de la Libye. Il est devenu célèbre pour ses talents de double langage et de malhonnêteté. Heureusement, le conseil est très diversifié, mais il est également infiltré par les sbires de Kadhafi.

    Nicolas Kristof et John Kerry devraient savoir que les Arabes sont capables d’écrire leur propre histoire, et qu’aucun des deux n’est légitime, une seule seconde, pour faire la leçon ou donner un prêche sur ce qui est bon pour les Arabes, alors que les deux sont connus pour leur passif d’approbation et/ou de silence des crimes de guerre israéliens.

    http://www.leparisien.fr/images/2011/03/13/1356073_bhl-libye-46_640x280.jpg
    Photo : Bernard-Henri Lévy et Mustapha Abdel Jalil, le président du Conseil national de transition. | MARC ROUSSEL
    http://www.leparisien.fr/crise-egypte/bernard-henri-levy-c-est-le-debut-de-la-fin-pour-kadhafi-13-03-2011-13558