Obama’s drone war kills ‘others,’ not just al Qaida leaders

/129176

  • Air strike kills 15 civilians in Yemen by mistake : officials
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/12/us-yemen-strike-idUSBRE9BB10O20131212

    (Reuters) - Fifteen people on their way to a wedding in #Yemen were killed in an air strike after their party was mistaken for an al Qaeda convoy, local security officials said on Thursday.

    The officials did not identify the plane in the strike in central al-Bayda province, but tribal and local media sources said that it was a #drone.

    Yémen : un drone tire sur une cérémonie de mariage
    http://french.ruvr.ru/news/2013_12_12/Yemen-un-drone-tire-sur-une-ceremonie-de-mariage-6335

    #victimes_civiles

    • US/Yemen: Investigate Civilian Deaths from Airstrikes
      http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/12/17/usyemen-investigate-civilian-deaths-airstrikes

      The United States and Yemen should investigate airstrikes in Yemen causing civilian deaths and ensure accountability and appropriate redress for unlawful attacks, Human Rights Watch said today. A December 12, 2013 drone strike may have killed up to 12 civilians just days before the fourth anniversary of a December 17, 2009 US cruise missile attack that killed 41 villagers that the US has never publicly acknowledged or investigated.

      The December 2009 US cruise missile strike on al-Majalah, a hamlet in southern Abyan province, killed 14 alleged armed militants but also 41 Bedouin civilians sleeping in tents nearby. Diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks confirmed that the US carried out the attack, but the Obama administration never publicly acknowledged its role. Relatives of the civilians killed have rejected the Yemeni government’s offers of compensation as insufficient, and said they will refuse any sum until the Yemeni government fulfills a promise to prosecute those responsible for the strike.

      “Four years later, relatives are still waiting for the US to acknowledge the killing of 41 civilians in al-Majalah, or even to account for what happened in that airstrike,” said Letta Tayler, senior terrorism and counterterrorism researcher at Human Rights Watch. “Military operations that do little to address civilian casualties are short-sighted as well as unlawful.”

      The attacks on al-Majalah and Rad`a are among at least 83 targeted killings that research groups say the US has carried out since 2009 in Yemen, many with remotely piloted drones, against Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the armed group the US is targeting in Yemen. Research groups estimate the strikes have killed 500 or more people. President Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi has consented to the strikes but, on December 15, the Yemeni Parliament passed a non-binding motion demanding a halt to drone operations.

      An October Human Rights Watch report, “Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda,” http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/10/22/between-drone-and-al-qaeda-0 describes how US cruise missiles released hundreds of cluster submunitions, indiscriminate weapons by their very nature, on al-Majalah. Two-thirds of the civilians killed were women and children. The strike area remains littered with cluster munitions, which can explode on impact. (...)

      Five days before the fourth anniversary of the al-Majalah attack, a reported US drone strike on a wedding procession killed 12 men and wounded 15 others near the central Yemeni city of Rad`a. Witnesses and government officials have provided contradictory accounts about whether the strike killed members of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. A brief statement from the Yemeni government said the December 12 strike killed “many ranking terrorists.” But local and international media reports quoted unnamed Yemeni government officials as saying those killed were civilians. A council member from the area and a witness to the strike who knew the victims, as well as a local journalist who investigated the attack, told Human Rights Watch they believed that none of those killed were armed militants.

    • The Wedding That Became a Funeral: U.S. Still Silent One Year on From Deadly Yemen Drone Strike
      http://www.newsweek.com/wedding-became-funeral-us-still-silent-one-year-deadly-yemen-drone-strike-

      A year on from a U.S. drone strike in Yemen that hit a wedding convoy, killing 12, the United States government have refused to formally recognise the attack, or publicly acknowledge that unarmed civilians died as a result of the strike. However, recent investigations have found that they have secretly paid a record sum of over $1 million in compensation to the families of the victims.

      (...)

      Our government and America ignored us. They never asked about the effects of the strike on our lives. I want to ask President Obama. Have you got children? Do you love them? Of course you do. And we love our children as much as you love yours. But your government killed them. So why won’t you recognise our pain?”

      “We want an apology and to see those responsible to be held accountable. Doesn’t the US tell the world that it is a just and law-abiding country? We want to hear more than slogans. We won’t rest until we see #justice.”

      #Etats-Unis

  • Secret US documents show Brennan’s ‘no civilian drone deaths’ claim was false: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
    http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2013/04/11/secret-us-documents-show-brennans-no-civilian-drone-deaths-cl

    US intelligence officials were aware that at least one civilian had died in drone strikes in Pakistan during 2011, despite claims to the contrary made by the man now running the Central Intelligence Agency.

    In June 2011, John Brennan, at the time President Obama’s chief counter terrorism adviser, stated publicly that for ‘almost a year’ no civilian had died in US drone strikes in Pakistan.

    But leaked US intelligence documents obtained by news agency McClatchy show this was not true.

    • An Inconvenient Truth
      Finally, proof that the United States has lied in the drone wars. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/04/10/an_inconvenient_truth_drones

      Jonathan Landay, national security reporter at McClatchy Newspapers, has provided the first analysis of drone-strike victims that is based upon internal, top-secret U.S intelligence reports http://seenthis.net/messages/129176.

      It is the most important reporting on U.S. drone strikes to date because Landay, using U.S. government assessments, plainly demonstrates that the claim repeatedly made by President Obama and his senior aides — that targeted killings are limited only to officials, members, and affiliates of al Qaeda who pose an imminent threat of attack on the U.S. homeland — is false.

      ...

      It is important to note that the claim of a single civilian casualty is based on the CIA’s interpretation that any military-age males who are behaving suspiciously can be lawfully targeted . No U.S. government official has ever openly acknowledged the practice of such “signature strikes” because it is so clearly at odds with the bedrock principle of distinction required for using force within the laws of armed conflict. According to the documents reviewed by Landay, even the U.S. intelligence community does not necessarily know who it has killed; it is forced to use fuzzy categories like “other militants” and “foreign fighters.”

      Some of the drone strikes that Landay describes, such as a May 22, 2007 attack requested by Pakistan’s intelligence service to support Pakistani troops in combat, do not appear in the databases maintained by the New America Foundation, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, or Long Wars Journal . This should strengthen the concerns of many analysts about the accuracy of reporting from Pakistan’s tribal areas. It also suggests that there may be a few additional targeted killing efforts of which we know nothing.

      ...

      ...based on the Obama administration’s patterns of behavior, the Department of Justice will assuredly target Landay and his sources for leaking classified information. While the DOJ has refrained from plugging the many selective leaks by anonymous administration officials that praise the precision and efficacy of drone strikes, it has sought more criminal prosecutions of leaks in Obama’s first term than during all previous presidential administrations combined. (...) Absolutely nothing in Landay’s reporting reveals the CIA’s sources and methods for determining who had been killed.

      Three key lessons from the Obama administration’s drone lies - http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/11/three-lessons-obama-drone-lies

      (1) The Obama administration often has no idea who they are killing.

      ....

      (2) Whisteblowers are vital for transparency and accountability, which is precisely why the Obama administration is waging a war on them.

      ...

      (3) Secrecy ensures both government lies and abuses of power.

      ...

    • Sequestering the War on Terror : The New Yorker
      http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/04/sequestering-the-war-on-terror.html

      Questions capitales:

      The logic is deeply troubling. Are drone strikes a diplomatic chit? Do we call someone dangerous because he gets in the way of what we’ve persuaded ourselves we need to do somewhere? If it was necessary to get a foreign leader to help us with a war, could we, by the same reasoning, kill someone who was merely a political threat—or a political figure who, say, by rallying domestic opposition to drone strikes in a foreign country, we’d decided was helping Al Qaeda?

    • Rights Groups Question Legality of Targeted Killing - NYTimes.com
      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/13/us/politics/rights-groups-question-legality-of-targeted-killing.html

      .... efforts on Thursday by Representative Jan Schakowsky, Democrat of Illinois, to get John O. Brennan, formerly the president’s counterterrorism adviser and now the C.I.A. director, to discuss strike policies during a hearing of the House Intelligence Committee went nowhere.

      (...)

      Ms. Schakowsky was prompted to question Mr. Brennan in part by an article this week by McClatchy News Service reporting that it had obtained classified government documents showing that the drone strikes had killed hundreds of low-level suspected militants whose identities were not known. The article suggested that the documents undercut assertions by Mr. Obama and his aides.

      “There are a lot of things that are printed in the press that are inaccurate, in my mind, and misrepresent the facts,” Mr. Brennan said. When Ms. Schakowsky pressed the point, he said, “I’m not going to engage in any type of discussion on that here today, congresswoman.”